World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

House of Plantagenet


House of Plantagenet

House of Plantagenet
Illustration of the Plantagenet coat of arms, three gold lions on a red background
Armorial of Plantagenet
Country Kingdom of England, Kingdom of France, Lordship of Ireland, Principality of Wales
Parent house Angevins
Founded 1126 (1126)
Founder Geoffrey V of Anjou
Final ruler Richard III of England
Dissolution 1499 (male)
1541 (female)
Deposition 1485
Ethnicity French, English
Cadet branches

The House of Plantagenet ( )[nb 1] was a royal house which originated from the lands of Anjou in France. The name Plantagenet is used by modern historians to identify four distinct royal houses – the Angevins who were also Counts of Anjou, the main body of the Plantagenets following the loss of Anjou, and the houses of Lancaster and York, the Plantagenets' two cadet branches. The family held the English throne from 1154, with the accession of Henry II, until 1485, when Richard III died.

Under the Plantagenets, England was transformed, although this was only partly intentional. The Plantagenet kings were often forced to negotiate compromises such as Magna Carta. These constrained royal power in return for financial and military support. The king was no longer just the most powerful man in the nation, holding the prerogative of judgement, feudal tribute and warfare. He now had defined duties to the realm, underpinned by a sophisticated justice system. A distinct national identity was shaped by conflict with the French, Scots, Welsh and Irish, and the establishment of English as the primary language.

In the 15th century, the Plantagenets and England were beset with social, political and economic problems. Popular revolts were commonplace, triggered by the denial of numerous freedoms. Crime was rampant, and was often perpetrated by destitute soldiers returning from France after the Plantagenets were defeated in the Hundred Years' War. English nobles raised private armies, engaged in private feuds and openly defied Henry VI. The rivalry between the House of Plantagenet's two cadet branches of York and Lancaster brought about the Wars of the Roses, a decades-long fight for the English succession, culminating in the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485, when the reign of the Plantagenets and the English Middle Ages both met their end with the death of King Richard III. Henry VII, a Lancastrian, became king of England; two years later, he married Elizabeth of York, thus ending the Wars of the Roses, and giving rise to the Tudor dynasty. The Tudors worked to centralise English royal power, which allowed them to avoid a number of the problems that had plagued the last Plantagenet rulers. The resulting stability allowed for the English Renaissance, and the advent of early modern Britain.


  • Terminology 1
    • Plantagenet 1.1
    • Angevins 1.2
  • Origin 2
  • Angevin kings 3
    • Arrival in England 3.1
    • Angevin zenith 3.2
    • Decline and the loss of Anjou 3.3
  • Main line 4
    • Baronial conflict and the establishment of Parliament 4.1
    • Constitutional change and the reform of feudalism 4.2
    • Expansion in Britain 4.3
    • Conflict with the House of Valois 4.4
    • Descendants of Edward III 4.5
    • Demise of the main line 4.6
  • House of Lancaster 5
  • House of York 6
  • House of Tudor and other Plantagenet descendants 7
    • Tudor 7.1
    • De La Pole 7.2
    • Pole 7.3
    • Stafford 7.4
    • Tudor succession 7.5
  • Further information 8
  • Notes 9
    • References 9.1
    • Bibliography 9.2



Ancient depiction of the first Plantagenet King Henry the 2nd of England
Henry II is considered by some to be the first Plantagenet king of England.

Richard of York, 3rd Duke of York, adopted Plantagenet as his family name in the 15th century. "Plantegenest" (or "Plante Genest") had been a 12th-century nickname for Geoffrey V. It is unclear from what this derived and numerous theories have been suggested. A popular one was his emblem may have been the common broom, named planta genista in medieval Latin.[1] It is uncertain why Richard chose this specific name, although during the Wars of the Roses it emphasised Richard's status as Geoffrey's patrilineal descendant. The retrospective usage of the name for all of Geoffrey's male descendants was popular during the subsequent Tudor dynasty, perhaps encouraged by the further legitimacy it gave to Richard's great-grandson, Henry VIII.[2] It was only in the late 17th century that it passed into common usage among historians.[3]


The three Angevin kings (French for "from Anjou") are Henry II, Richard I and John; "Angevin" can also refer the period of history in which they reigned. Many historians identify the Angevins as a distinct English royal house. In addition, "Angevin" is used in reference to any sovereign or government derived from Anjou. As a noun, it refers to any native of Anjou or an Angevin ruler, and specifically to: other counts and dukes of Anjou, including the ancestors of the three kings that formed the English royal house; their cousins, who held the crown of Jerusalem; and to unrelated members of the French royal family who were later granted the titles and formed different dynasties, such as the Capetian House of Anjou and the Valois House of Anjou.[4] Consequently, there is disagreement between those who consider Henry III to be the first Plantagenet monarch and those who do not distinguish between Angevins and Plantagenets and therefore consider the first Plantagenet to be Henry II.[5][6][7][8]

The term "Angevin Empire" was coined by Angevin Empire", but that the term "espace Plantagenet", Plantagenet span in English, was acceptable.[9] Nonetheless, historians have continued to use "Angevin Empire".[nb 2]


An illuminated diagram showing the Angevins; coloured lines connect the two to show the lineal descent
13th century depiction of Henry II and his legitimate children: William, Henry, Richard, Matilda, Geoffrey, Eleanor, Joan and John

The later counts of Anjou, including the Plantagenets, descended from Geoffrey II, Count of Gâtinais, and his wife Ermengarde of Anjou. In 1060 the couple inherited the title via cognatic kinship from an Angevin family that was descended from a noble named Ingelger, whose recorded history dates from 870.[10][11]

During the 10th and 11th centuries, power struggles occurred between rulers in northern and western France including those of Anjou, Normandy, Brittany, Poitou, Blois, Maine, and the kings of France. In the early 12th century, the marriage of Geoffrey V of Anjou to Empress Matilda, King Henry I's only surviving legitimate child and heir to the English throne. As a result of this marriage, Geoffrey's son Henry II inherited the English, Norman and Angevin thrones, thus marking the beginning of the Angevin and Plantagenet dynasties.[12]

The marriage was the third attempt of Geoffrey's father, Fulk V, Count of Anjou, to build a political alliance with Normandy. He first espoused his daughter, Alice, to William Adelin, Henry I's heir. After William drowned in the wreck of the White Ship Fulk married another of his daughters, Sibylla, to William Clito, son of Henry I's older brother, Robert Curthose. Henry I had the marriage annulled to avoid strengthening William's rival claim to Normandy. Finally Fulk achieved his goal through the marriage of Geoffrey and Matilda, passed his titles to Geoffrey and departed to become king of Jerusalem.[13]

Angevin kings

Arrival in England

Map of King Henry the second's II's continental holdings in 1154, forming part of the
Henry's continental holdings in 1154

Map of King Henry the second's II's continental holdings in 1154, forming part of the "Angevin Empire"

When Henry II was born in 1133, his grandfather, Henry I, was reportedly delighted, saying that the boy was "the heir to the kingdom".[14] The birth reduced the risk that the king's realm would pass to his son-in-law's family, which might have occurred if the marriage of Matilda and Count Geoffrey had proved childless. The birth of a second son, also named Geoffrey, increased the likelihood that, in accordance with French custom, Henry would receive the English maternal inheritance and Geoffrey the Angevin paternal inheritance. This would separate the realms of England and Anjou.[14] In order to secure an orderly succession, Geoffrey and Matilda sought more power from Henry I, but the king refused in case they used this power against him and the two sides quarrelled. When he died in November 1135, the couple were in Anjou, allowing Matilda's cousin Stephen to seize the crown of England. Stephen's contested accession initiated the widespread civil unrest later called the Anarchy.[15]

Count Geoffrey had little interest in England. Instead he commenced a ten-year war for the duchy of Normandy, but in 1139 Matilda invaded England.[16] From the age of nine, Henry was repeatedly sent to England to be the male figurehead of the campaigns, since it became apparent that he would become king if England was conquered. In 1141 Stephen was captured at the Battle of Lincoln and later exchanged for the release of Matilda's half-brother, Robert. Geoffrey continued the conquest of Normandy and in 1150 transferred the duchy to Henry while retaining the primary role in the duchy's government.[17]

Three events allowed the Angevins' successful termination of the conflict:

  • Count Geoffrey died in 1151 before finalizing the division of his realm between Henry and Henry's younger brother Geoffrey, who would have inherited Anjou. According to William of Newburgh, who wrote in the 1190s, Count Geoffrey decided that Henry would receive England and Anjou for as long as he needed the resources for the conflict against Stephen. Count Geoffrey instructed that his body should not be buried until Henry swore an oath that the young Geoffrey would receive Anjou when England and Normandy were secured.[18] W. L. Warren cast doubt on this account on the grounds that it was written later based on a single contemporary source, it would be questionable that either Geoffrey or Henry would consider such an oath binding and it would break the inheritance practice of the time.[19] The young Geoffrey died in 1158, before receiving Anjou, but he had become count of Nantes when the citizens of Nantes rebelled against their ruler. Henry had supported the rebellion.[20]
  • Louis VII of France was granted an annulment of his marriage to Eleanor of Aquitaine on 18 March 1152, and she married Henry (who would become Henry II) on 18 May 1152. Henry consequently acquired the Duchy of Aquitaine.[21]
  • Stephen's wife and elder son, Eustace, died in 1153 leading to the Treaty of Wallingford. The treaty agreed the peace offer that Matilda had rejected in 1142, recognised Henry as Stephen's heir, guaranteed Stephen's second son William his father's estates and allowed Stephen to be king for life. Stephen died soon afterwards, and Henry acceded to the throne in late 1154.[22]

Angevin zenith

Of Henry's siblings, William and Geoffrey died unmarried and childless, but the tempestuous marriage of Henry and Eleanor, who already had two daughters (Marie and Alix) through her first marriage to King Louis, produced eight children in thirteen years:[23]

Miniature from an English psalter presenting a representation of the murder of Archbishop Becket
Miniature from an English psalter presenting a spirited account of the murder of Archbishop Becket, c. 1250, Walters Art Museum

Henry also had illegitimate children with several mistresses, possibly as many as twelve. These children included Geoffrey, William, Peter and four children who died young by Alice, the daughter of Louis VII, while she was betrothed to his son Richard.[25] William had a long career at the highest political levels demonstrating the important role played by royal bastards as well as his competence in administration, diplomacy, and war typical of leading figures amongst the Angevin elite. [26]

Henry reasserted and extended previous suzerainties to secure possession of his inherited realm.[27] In 1162 he attempted to re-establish his authority (as he saw it) over the English Church by appointing his friend Thomas Becket as Archbishop of Canterbury upon the death of the incumbent archbishop, Theobald. Becket's defiance as Archbishop alienated the king and his counsellors. Henry and Becket had repeated disputes over issues such as church tenures, the marriage of Henry's brother, and taxation. Henry reacted by getting Becket and other English bishops to recognise sixteen ancient customs in writing for the first time in the Constitutions of Clarendon, governing relations between the king, his courts and the church. When Becket tried to leave the country without permission, Henry tried to ruin him by filing legal cases relating to Becket's previous tenure as chancellor. Becket fled and remained in exile for five years. Relations later improved, and Becket returned, but they declined again when Henry's son was crowned as coregent by the Archbishop of York, which Becket perceived as a challenge to his authority. Becket later excommunicated those who had offended him. When he received this news, Henry said: "What miserable drones and traitors have I nurtured and promoted in my household who let their lord be treated with such shameful contempt by a low-born clerk." Four of Henry's knights killed Becket in Canterbury Cathedral after Becket resisted a failed arrest attempt. Henry was widely considered complicit in Becket's death throughout Christian Europe. This made Henry a pariah; in penance, he walked barefoot into Canterbury Cathedral where he was scourged by monks.[28]

It is alleged that Pope Adrian IV issued a papal bull in 1155, allowing Henry to reform the Irish church by assuming control of Ireland.[29] It originally allowed Henry's brother William some territory. Henry did not personally act on this until 1171 by which time William was already dead. He invaded Ireland to assert his authority over knights who had accrued autonomous power after they recruited soldiers in England and Wales and colonised Ireland with his permission. Henry later gave Ireland to his youngest son, John.[30] In 1172 Henry gave John the castles of Chinon, Loudun and Mirebeau as a wedding gift. This angered Henry's eighteen-year-old son, Henry the Young King, who believed these were his. A rebellion by Henry II's wife and three eldest sons ensued. Louis VII of France supported the rebellion. William the Lion, king of the Scots, and others joined the revolt. After eighteen months, Henry subdued the rebels.[31]

Photograph of the 1195 seal of Richard I of England. Exhibited in History Museum of Vendee
1195 seal of Richard I of England. Exhibited in History Museum of Vendee

In Le Mans in 1182, Henry II gathered his children to plan a partible inheritance: his eldest surviving son, Henry, would inherit England, Normandy and Anjou; Richard (his mother's favourite) would inherit the Duchy of Aquitaine; Geoffrey would inherit Brittany; and John would inherit Ireland. This resulted in further conflict. The younger Henry rebelled, but died of dysentery. Geoffrey died in 1186 after an accident in a tournament. In 1189, Richard and Philip II of France exploited the aging Henry's failing health and forced him to accept humiliating peace terms, including naming Richard his sole heir. Henry II died two days later, defeated and miserable. French and English contemporary moralists viewed this fate as retribution for the murder of Becket; [32]even his favourite legitimate son, John, had rebelled although the constantly loyal illegitimate son Geoffrey remained with Henry until the end.[33]

Following Richard's coronation he quickly put the kingdom's affairs in order and departed on a Crusade for the Middle East. Opinion of Richard has fluctuated. Although he was respected for his military leadership and courtly manners, he had rejected and humiliated the sister of the king of France, deposed the king of Cyprus and later sold the island, refused to give spoils from the Third Crusade to nobles such as Leopold V, Duke of Austria, and was rumoured to have arranged the assassination of Conrad of Montferrat. His ruthlessness was demonstrated by his massacre of 2,600 prisoners in Acre.[34] He obtained victories during the Third Crusade, but failed to capture Jerusalem. According to Steven Runciman Richard was "a bad son, a bad husband and a bad king".[35] Jonathan Riley-Smith described him as "vain ... devious and self-centred".[36] In an alternate view John Gillingham points out that for centuries Richard was considered a model king.[37]

Returning from the crusade with a small band of followers, Richard was captured by Leopold and was passed to

Royal house
House of Plantagenet
Cadet branch of the Angevins
Deposition: 1485
Preceded by
House of Blois
Ruling House of England
Angevins (until 1214)
House of Lancaster (1399–1461)
House of York (1461–1485)

Succeeded by
House of Tudor
Preceded by
House of Penthièvre
Ruling House of Brittany
Succeeded by
House of Thouars
Preceded by
House of Ingelger
Ruling House of Anjou
until 1214
Succeeded by
House of Anjou
  • Abulafia, D. S. H (2004). "Isabella (1214–1241)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Anon (2004). "Monarchs of England (924x7–1707)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Barber, Richard (2004). "Edward , prince of Wales and of Aquitaine (1330–1376)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Barratt, Nick (2003). "The Revenues of King John and Philip Augustus Revisited". In Church, S. D. King John: New Interpretations. Boydell & Brewer Ltd.  
  • Bent, Samuel Arthur (1887). Familiar Short Sayings of Great Men, with Historical and Explanatory Notes by Samuel Arthur Bent. Boston: Ticknor and Co. 
  • Blockmans, Wim; Hoppenbrouwers, Mark (2014). Introduction to Medieval Europe, 300–1500 (2nd ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.  
  • Carpenter, D. A. (1990). The Minority of Henry III. University of California Press.  
  • Carpenter, Christine (2004b). "Edward, styled earl of Warwick (1475–1499)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Carpenter, David (2007). King Henry III and Saint Edward the Confessor: The Origins of the Cult"". English Historical Review. CXXII (498). 
  • Carpenter, David (2004). The Struggle for Mastery: The Penguin History of Britain 1066–1284. Penguin.  
  • Norgate, Kate (2004). "Joan (d. 1237))". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Carter, A.T. (1986). A History of English Legal Institutions. Fred B Rothman & Co.  
  • Cooper, J. P. D. (2004). "Henry Courtenay (1498/9–1538)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Crofton, Ian (2007). The Kings and Queens of England. Quercus.  
  • Cunningham, Sean (2004a). "Pole, Richard de la (d. 1525)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Cunningham, Sean (2004b). "Pole, Edmund de la, eighth earl of Suffolk (1472?–1513)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Danziger, Danny; Gillingham, John (2003). 1215: The Year of Magna Carta. Hodder & Stoughton.  
  • Davies, C. S. L. (1977). Peace, Print & Protestantism 1450–1558. Hart-Davis, McGiven.  
  • Davies, C. S. L. (2004). "Edward Stafford (1478–1521)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Davies, Norman (1997). Europe – A History. Pimlico.  
  • Davies, Norman (1999). The Isles – A History. MacMillan.  
  • Duggan, Anne (2005). "Laudabiliter: a new interpretation by Professor Anne Duggan". Early Modern History (1500–1700) 13. 
  • Gardiner, Juliet (2000). The History Today Who's who in British History. Collins & Brown.  
  • Gillingham, John (1985). "The art of Kingship: Richard I 1189–99". History Today 35. 
  • Gillingham, John (2001). The Angevin Empire. Arnold.  
  • Gillingham, John (2007a). "Doing Homage to the King of France". In Harper-Bill, Christopher; Vincent, Nicholas. Henry II: New Interpretations. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell Press.  
  • Gillingham, John (2004b). "Richard I (1157–1199)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Gillingham, John (2004). "John (1167–1216)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Goodman, Anthony (1981). The Wars of the Roses: Military Activity and English Society, 1452–97. Taylor & Francis.  
  • Goodman, Anthony (2004). "Katherine(1372–1418)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Grant, Alexander (1995). Uniting the Kingdom?: The Making of British History. Routledge.  
  • Grant, Lindy (2005). Architecture and Society in Normandy, 1120–1270. Yale University Press.  
  • Griffiths, R. A. (2004). "Henry VI (1421–1471)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Gunn, S. J. (2004). "Henry VII (1457–1509)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Hallam, Elizabeth (2004). "Eleanor, countess of Pembroke and Leicester (1215?–1275)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Harriss, G.L. (2004). "Humphrey , duke of Gloucester (1390–1447)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Harriss, G.L. (2004b). "Richard, earl of Cambridge (1385–1415)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Hatcher, John (2002). "The Great Slump of the Mid-Fifteenth Century". In Britnell, Richard; Hatcher, John. Progress and Problems in Medieval England: Essays in Honour of Edward Miller. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  
  • Hebditch, Felicity (2003). Tudors. Evans Brothers.  
  • Hicks, Michael (2012). The Wars of the Roses. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.  
  • Hilton, Rodney Howard (1984). The English Rising of 1381. Cambridge University Press.  
  • Horrox, Rosemary (2004). "Richard III (1452–1485)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Horrox, Rosemary (1989). Richard III: A Study of Service. Cambridge University Press.  
  • Keefe, Thomas K (2004). "Henry II (1133–1189)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Kelsey, Sean (2004). "Wilson, Thomas)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Lovatt, Marie (2004). "Geoffrey (1151?–1212)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Lawless, Emily (1893). The Story of Ireland. G. P. Puttnam's Sons.  
  • MacDougall, N (2001). An Antidote to the English: the Auld Alliance, 1295–1560. Tuckwell Press.  
  • Maddicott, J.R. (2004). "Thomas of Lancaster, second earl of Lancaster, second earl of Leicester, and earl of Lincoln (c.1278–1322)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Mortimer, Ian (2003). The Greatest Traitor: The Life of Sir Roger Mortimer, Ruler of England: 1327—1330. Thomas Dunne Books.  
  • Mortimer, Ian (2008). The Fears of Henry IV: The Life of England's Self-made King. Random House.  
  • Ormrod (2004). "Edward III (1312–1377)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Phillips, J. R. S. (2004). "Edward II (1284–1327)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Pierce, Hazel (2004). "Pole, Margaret, suo jure countess of Salisbury (1473–1541))". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Plant, John S (2007). "The Tardy Adoption of the Plantagenet Surname". Nomina 30.  
  • Pollock, Sir Frederick; Maitland, Frederic William (1975). The History of the English Law, Second Edition Volume 2. Cambridge University Press. 
  • Power, Daniel (2007). "Henry, Duke of the Normans (1149/50–1189)". In Harper-Bill, Christopher; Vincent, Nicholas. Henry II: New Interpretations. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell Press.  
  • Prestwich, Michael (2004). "Edward I (1239–1307)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Public Records Office (1870). Calendar of State Papers, Domestic Series, of the Reigns of Edward VI, Mary, Elizabeth, 1547–1580: Elizabeth 1601–1603; with addenda, 1547–1565. Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans, & Roberts. Retrieved 2015-02-20. 
  • Ridgeway, H. W. (2010). "Henry III (1207–1272)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Riley-Smith, Jonathan (1987). The Crusades: A Short History. Yale University Press.  
  • Rothwell, H. (ed.) (1975). English Historical Documents III, 1189–1327. Eyre & Spottiswoode.  
  • Runciman, Steven (1987). A History of the Crusades, Volume 3. CUP Archive.  
  • Schama, Simon (2000). A History of Britain – At the Edge of the world. BBC.  
  • Sherborne, J. W; Tuck, Anthony (1994). War, Politics, and Culture in Fourteenth-century England. Continuum International Publishing Group.  
  • Strickland, Matthew (2004). "Longespée , William (I), third earl of Salisbury (b. in or before 1167, d. 1226)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Stringer, Keith (2004). "Joan (1210–1238)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Sumption, Jonathan (2009). Divided Houses: The Hundred Years War, Vol. 3: Trial by Battle v. 1. Faber and Faber.  
  • Swanson, R.N. (1995). Religion and Devotion in Europe, c. 1215–c. 1515. Cambridge University Press.  
  • Tuck, Anthony (2004). "Richard II (1367–1400)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Turner, Ralph V (1994). King John (The Medieval World). Longman Medieval World Series.  
  • Turner, Ralph V; Heiser, Richard (2014). The Reign of Richard Lionheart: Ruler of The Angevin Empire, 1189–1199. Routledge.  
  • Vauchez, Andre (2000). Encyclopedia of the Middle Ages. Routledge.  
  • Vincent, Nicholas (2004). "Richard, first earl of Cornwall and king of Germany (1209–1272)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Wagner, John (2001). Encyclopedia of the Wars of the Roses. ABC-CLIO.  
  • Wagner, John A (2006). Encyclopedia of the Hundred Years War. Westport CT: Greenwood Press.  
  • Walker, Simon (2004). "John , duke of Aquitaine and duke of Lancaster, styled king of Castile and León (1340–1399)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Warren, W. L. (1973). Henry II. University of California Press.  
  • Warren, W. L. (1991). King John. London: Methuen.  
  • Watts, John (2004). "Richard of York, third duke of York (1411–1460)". (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)  
  • Waugh, Scott L (1991). England in the Reign of Edward III. Cambridge University Press.  
  • Weir, Alison (2008). Britain's Royal Families. Vintage.  


  1. ^ Plant 2007
  2. ^ Wagner 2001, p. 206
  3. ^ Keefe 2004
  4. ^ "Angevin".   (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  5. ^ BlockmansHoppenbrouwers 2014, p. 173
  6. ^ Gillingham 2007a, pp. 15–23
  7. ^ Power 2007, pp. 85–86
  8. ^ Warren 1991, pp. 228–229
  9. ^ Gillingham 2001, pp. 2–5
  10. ^ Davies 1997, p. 190
  11. ^ Vauchez 2000, p. 65
  12. ^ Gillingham 2001, p. 7
  13. ^ Davies 1999, p. 309.
  14. ^ a b Gillingham 2001, pp. 11–12
  15. ^ Schama 2000, p. 117
  16. ^ Grant 2005, p. 7
  17. ^ Gillingham 2001, pp. 15–18
  18. ^ Gillingham 2001, p. 18
  19. ^ Warren 1973, pp. 45–46
  20. ^ Gillingham 2001, p. 21
  21. ^ Weir 2008, pp. 60–61
  22. ^ Gillingham 2001, pp. 19–20
  23. ^ Weir 2008, pp. 59–74
  24. ^ Weir 2008, p. 66
  25. ^ Weir 2008, p. 65
  26. ^ a b Strickland 2004
  27. ^ Gillingham 2001, p. 23
  28. ^ Schama 2000, p. 142
  29. ^ Duggan 2005
  30. ^ Gillingham 2001, pp. 28–29
  31. ^ Gillingham 2001, pp. 34–36
  32. ^ Gillingham 2001, p. 40
  33. ^ Lovatt 2004
  34. ^ Runciman 1987, p. 53
  35. ^ Runciman 1987, p. 75
  36. ^ Riley-Smith 1987, p. 113
  37. ^ Gillingham 1985, pp. 17–23
  38. ^ Gillingham 2004b
  39. ^ a b c d Gillingham 2004
  40. ^ Turner 1994, p. 100
  41. ^ a b c Ridgeway 2010
  42. ^ Barratt 2003, pp. 75–100
  43. ^ TurnerHeiser 2014, p. 48
  44. ^ Gillingham 2001, p. 103
  45. ^ Weir 2008, p. 74
  46. ^ "The official website of the British Monarchy". The Angevins. The Royal Household. Retrieved 20 February 2015. 
  47. ^ Vincent 2004
  48. ^ Stringer 2004
  49. ^ Abulafia 2004
  50. ^ Hallam 2004
  51. ^ Weir 2008, p. 73
  52. ^ Norgate 2004
  53. ^ DanzigerGillingham 2003, p. 271
  54. ^ Carpenter 2007
  55. ^ Schama 2000, p. 172
  56. ^ Carpenter 1990, pp. 376, 378
  57. ^ Carpenter 1990, p. 379
  58. ^ Carpenter 2004, p. 307
  59. ^ Carpenter 1990, p. 383
  60. ^ Carpenter 2004, p. 307
  61. ^ Weir 2008, pp. 74–81
  62. ^ Weir 2008, p. 203
  63. ^ Weir 2008, p. 75
  64. ^ Mortimer 2008, p. 183
  65. ^ Maddicott 2004
  66. ^ Rothwell 1975, pp. 527–539
  67. ^ Schama 2000, p. 181
  68. ^ Prestwich 2004
  69. ^
  70. ^ Weir 2008, pp. 82–86
  71. ^ Weir 2008, pp. 86–90
  72. ^ Pollock & Maitland 1975, pp. 332–335; 337; 354–356; 608–610
  73. ^ a b Carter 1986, p. 71
  74. ^ a b
  75. ^ Grant 1995, p. 89
  76. ^ Grant 1995, p. 90
  77. ^ MacDougall 2001, p. 9
  78. ^ Gardiner 2000, p. 275
  79. ^ McKisack 1959, pp. 4–6
  80. ^ Maddicott 1970, pp. 67, 71
  81. ^ McKisack 1959, pp. 6–7
  82. ^ Maddicott 1970, p. 103
  83. ^ McKisack 1959, p. 10
  84. ^ McKisack 1959, pp. 25, 27
  85. ^ Maddicott 1970, p. 190
  86. ^ McKisack 1959, p. 54
  87. ^ Maddicott 1970, p. 311
  88. ^ a b Phillips 2004, pp. 411–413
  89. ^ Mortimer 2003, pp. 154, 160–162
  90. ^ Schama 2000, p. 220
  91. ^ Weir 2008, p. 92
  92. ^ a b c d e Ormrod 2004
  93. ^ Horrox 1989, p. 246
  94. ^ a b Barber 2004
  95. ^ Walker 2004
  96. ^ Goodman 2004
  97. ^ Wagner 2006, p. 122
  98. ^ Weir 2008, p. 93
  99. ^ Sumption 2009, pp. 325–327
  100. ^ Sumption 2009, pp. 187–202
  101. ^ SherborneTuck 1994, p. 44
  102. ^ Weir 2008, pp. 92–117
  103. ^ Waugh 1991, p. 19
  104. ^ Hilton 1984, p. 132
  105. ^ a b Tuck 2004
  106. ^ a b Saul 1997, p. 203
  107. ^ Weir 2008, pp. 79–80
  108. ^ Weir 2008, pp. 124–130
  109. ^ Schama 2000, p. 264
  110. ^ Mortimer 2008, p. 185
  111. ^ a b Mortimer 2003, p. 353
  112. ^ Swanson 1995, p. 298
  113. ^ Schama 2000, p. 265
  114. ^ Harriss 2004
  115. ^ Davies 1977, p. 19
  116. ^ Hicks 2012, p. 50
  117. ^ Hatcher 2002, p. 246
  118. ^ Hicks 2012, p. 51
  119. ^ Davies 1977, p. 68
  120. ^ Weir 2008, pp. 93–114
  121. ^ Harriss 2004b
  122. ^ Crofton 2007, p. 112
  123. ^ Weir 2008, pp. 134–139
  124. ^ "Family tree".  
  125. ^ Crofton 2007, p. 111
  126. ^ Goodman 1981, p. 25
  127. ^ Goodman 1981, p. 31.
  128. ^ Goodman 1981, p. 38.
  129. ^ Watts 2004
  130. ^ Goodman 1981, p. 57
  131. ^ Goodman 1981
  132. ^ Goodman 1981, p. 147
  133. ^ Griffiths 2004
  134. ^ Weir 2008, pp. 139–145
  135. ^ Horrox 2004
  136. ^ Weir 2008, p. 145
  137. ^ Gunn 2004
  138. ^ Anon 2004
  139. ^ Weir 2008, p. 148
  140. ^ Starkey 2009, p. 305
  141. ^ Hebditch 2003, p. 6
  142. ^ Lawless 1893, pp. 136, 138
  143. ^ Carpenter 2004b
  144. ^ Cunningham 2004b
  145. ^ Cunningham 2004a
  146. ^ a b Pierce 2004
  147. ^ Cooper 2004
  148. ^ Davies 2004
  149. ^ Kelsey 2004
  150. ^ Public Records Office 1870
  151. ^ Bent 1887, p. 166
  152. ^ Weir 2008, pp. 96–97


  1. ^ The Plantagenet name is spelt in English sources in a number of ways, such as Plantaganet, Plantagenett, Plantagenette, Plantaginet, Plantagynett, etc.
  2. ^ For instance, David Crouch in William Marshal: Court, Career, and Chivalry in the Angevin Empire, 1147–1219 (Longman, 1990); Ralph V. Turner and Richard Heiser in The Reign of Richard Lionheart: Ruler of The Angevin Empire, 1189–1199 (Routledge, 2000)
  3. ^ The Mowbray family was Anglo-Norman and from Geoffrey de Montbray who accompanied Duke William of Normandy at the conquest of England in 1066. Mowbray and Plantagenet descent merged through intermarriage—John de Mowbray, 3rd Baron Mowbray married Joan of Lancaster who was the granddaughter of Edmund Crouchback and John de Mowbray, 4th Baron Mowbray married Elizabeth Segrave who was the daughter of Margaret, Duchess of Norfolk, granddaughter of Edward I. It is through this they became royal dukes of Norfolk.


Further information

I have labored to make a covenant with myself, that affection may not press upon judgment; for I suppose there is no man that hath any apprehension of gentry or nobleness, but his affection stands to the continuance of a house so illustrious, and would take hold of a twig or twine-thread to support it. And yet time hath his revolutions; there must be a period and an end to all temporal things—finis rerum—an end of names and dignities, and whatsoever is terrene; and why not of de Vere? For where is Bohun? Where is Mowbray[nb 3]? Where is Mortimer? Nay, which is more, and most of all, where is Plantagenet? They are entombed in the urns and sepulchres of mortality! yet let the name of de Vere stand so long as it pleaseth God.[151]

Ranulph Crewe, Chief Justice of the King's Bench, argued that by 1626 that the House of Plantagenet could not be considered to remain in existence in a speech during the Oxford Peerage case, which was to rule on who should inherit the earldom of Oxford. It was referred by Charles I of England to the House of Lords, who called for judicial assistance. Crewe said:

As late as 1600, with the Tudor succession in doubt, older Plantagenet lines remained as possible claimants to a disputed throne, and religious and dynastic factors gave rise to complications. Thomas Wilson wrote in his report The State of England, Anno Domini 1600 that there were 12 "competitors" for the succession. At the time of writing (about 1601), Wilson had been working on intelligence matters for Lord Buckhurst and Sir Robert Cecil.[149] The alleged competitors included five descendants of Henry VII and Elizabeth, including the eventual successor James I of England, but also seven from older Plantagenet lines:[150]

Tudor succession

Edward Stafford, Duke of Buckingham, combined multiple lines of Plantagenet descent: from Edward III by his son Thomas of Woodstock, from Edward III via two of his Beaufort children, and from Edward I from Joan of Kent and the Holland family. His father failed in his rebellion against Richard III in 1483 but was restored to his inheritance on the reversal of his father's attainder late in 1485. His mother married Henry VII's uncle Jasper Tudor, and his wardship was entrusted to the king's mother, Lady Margaret Beaufort. In 1502, during Henry VII's illness, there was debate as to whether Buckingham or Edmund de la Pole should act as regent for Henry VIII. There is no evidence of continuous hostility between Buckingham and Henry VIII, but there is little doubt of the duke's dislike of Thomas Wolsey, whom he believed to be plotting to ruin the old nobility. Therefore, Henry VIII instructed Wolsey to watch Buckingham, his brother Henry Stafford, 1st Earl of Wiltshire, and three other peers. Neither Henry VIII nor his father planned to destroy Buckingham because of his lineage and Henry VIII even allowed Buckingham's son and heir, Henry Stafford, 1st Baron Stafford, to marry Ursula Pole, giving the Staffords a further line of royal blood descent. Buckingham himself was arrested in April 1521; he was found guilty on 16 May and executed the next day. Evidence was provided that the duke had been listening to prophecies that he would be king and that the Tudor family lay under God's curse for the execution of Warwick. This was said to explain Henry VIII's failure to produce a male heir. Much of this evidence consisted of ill-judged comments, speculation and bad temper, but it underlined the threat presented by Buckingham's descent.[148]


Margaret was attainted. The possibility of an invasion involving Reginald via her south coast estates and her embittered relationship with Henry VIII precluded any chance of pardon. However, the decision to execute her seems a spontaneous, rather than a premeditated, act. According to the Calendar of State Papers her execution was botched at the hands of "a wretched and blundering youth ... who literally hacked her head and shoulders to pieces in the most pitiful manner". In 1886 she was beatified by Pope Leo XIII on the grounds she had laid down her life for the Holy See "and for the truth of the orthodox Faith".[146]

Her daughter Ursula married the son of Edward Stafford, 3rd Duke of Buckingham. Buckingham's fall after arguments with the king over property, and Margaret's open support for Catherine of Aragon and Princess Mary began the Poles' estrangement from the king. Hope of reconciliation was dashed by De unitate, the letter that Margaret's son Reginald Pole wrote to Henry VIII, in which Reginald declared his opposition to the royal supremacy. In 1538 evidence came to light that Pole family members in England had been in communication with Reginald. Margaret's sons Geoffrey and Henry were arrested for treason along with several friends and associates, including Henry's wife and brother-in-law—Edward Neville. Among those arrested was the king's cousin Henry Courtenay, 1st Marquess of Exeter, his wife and 11-year-old son. Courteney's wife was released two years later, but their son spent 15 years in the Tower until Queen Mary released him. Except for the surviving Geoffrey Pole, all the others implicated were beheaded.[147]

Warwick's sister, and therefore Edward IV's niece, Margaret Pole, Countess of Salisbury, was executed by Henry VIII in 1541. By then, the cause was more religious and political rather than dynastic. Clarence's attainder was a legal bar to any claims to the throne by his children and that her marriage arranged by Henry VII to Sir Richard Pole was not auspicious. Nevertheless, it did allow the couple to be closely involved in court affairs. Margaret's fortunes improved under Henry VIII and in February 1512 she was restored to the earldom of Salisbury and all the Warwicks' lands. This made her the first and, apart from Anne Boleyn, the only woman in 16th century England to hold a peerage title in her own right.[146]

Ancient oil painting of Cardinal Pole
Cardinal Reginald Pole


John de la Pole's attainder meant that his brother Edmund inherited their father's titles, but much of the wealth of the duchy of Suffolk was forfeit. Edmund did not possess sufficient finances to maintain his status as a duke, so as a compromise he accepted the title of earl of Suffolk. Financial difficulties led to frequent legal conflicts and Edmund's indictment for murder in 1501. He fled with his brother Richard, while their remaining brother, William, was imprisoned in the Tower—where he would remain until his death 37 years later—as part of a general suppression of Edmund's associates Philip the Fair had be holding Edmund and in 1506 he returned him to Henry. Edmund was imprisoned in the Tower. In 1513, he was executed after Richard de la Pole, whom Louis XII of France had recognised as king of England the previous year, claimed the kingship in his own right.[144] Richard, known as the White Rose, plotted an invasion of England for years but was killed in 1525 at the battle of Pavia while fighting as the captain of the French landsknechts during François I of France's invasion of Italy.[145]

De La Pole

This did not deter Lambert Simnel pretending to be Edward. John de la Pole, 1st Earl of Lincoln, joined the revolt, probably anticipating that it would further his own ambitions to the throne, but he was killed in the suppression of the uprising at the Battle of Stoke Field in 1487.[142] Warwick was implicated by two further failed invasions supported by Margaret using Perkin Warbeck pretending to be Edward IV's son Richard of Shrewsbury, and Warbeck's later planned escape for them both; Warwick was executed in 1499. Edward's execution may simply have been a precondition for the marriage of Arthur, Prince of Wales to Katherine of Aragon in 1501.[143]

When Henry Tudor seized the throne there were eighteen Plantagenet descendants who might today be thought to have a stronger hereditary claim, and by 1510 this number had been increased further by the birth of sixteen Yorkist children.[139] Henry mitigated this situation with his marriage to Elizabeth of York. She was the eldest daughter of Edward IV, and all their children were his cognatic heirs. Indeed, Polydore Vergil noted Henry VIII's pronounced resemblance to his grandfather Edward: "For just as Edward was the most warmly thought of by the English people amongst all English kings, so this successor of his, Henry, was very like him in general appearance, in greatness of mind and generosity and for that reason was the most acclaimed and approved of all."[140]


House of Tudor and other Plantagenet descendants

Dynastic infighting and misfortune quickly brought about the demise of the House of York. Lady Eleanor Talbot, leaving Edward's marriage invalid.[135] Richard seized the throne, and the Princes in the Tower were never seen again. Richard's son predeceased him and Richard was killed in 1485[136] after an invasion of foreign mercenaries led by Henry Tudor, who claimed the throne through his mother Margaret Beaufort. [137] Tudor assumed the throne as Henry VII, founding the Tudor dynasty and bringing the Plantagenet line of kings to an end.[138]

By the mid-1470s, the victorious House of York looked safely established, with seven living male princes; Edward IV and his two sons, his brother George and George’s son, his brother Richard and Richard’s son. Edward and Elizabeth Woodville themselves had ten children, seven of whom survived him:[134]

Edward's preferment of the former Lancastrian-supporting Woodville family, following his marriage to Elizabeth Woodville, led Warwick and Clarence to help Margaret depose Edward and return Henry to the throne. Edward and Richard, Duke of Gloucester, fled, but on their return, Clarence switched sides at the Battle of Barnet, leading to the death of the Neville brothers. The subsequent Battle of Tewkesbury brought the demise of the last of the male line of the Beauforts. The battlefield execution of Edward of Westminster, Prince of Wales, and the later probable murder of Henry VI extinguished the House of Lancaster.[133]

The Scottish queen Mary of Guelders provided Margaret with support and a Scottish army came pillaging into southern England.[130] London resisted for fear of being plundered, then enthusiastically welcomed York's son Edward, Earl of March. Parliament confirmed that Edward should be made king,[131] and he was crowned after consolidating his position with victory at the Battle of Towton.[132]

When Henry VI had a mental breakdown, Richard was named regent, but the birth of a male heir resolved the question of succession.[125] When Henry's sanity returned, the court party reasserted its authority, but Richard of York and the Nevilles defeated them at a skirmish called the First Battle of St Albans. The ruling class was deeply shocked and reconciliation was attempted.[126][127] York and the Nevilles fled abroad, but the Nevilles returned to win the Battle of Northampton, where they captured Henry.[128] When Richard of York joined them he surprised Parliament by claiming the throne and forcing through the Act of Accord, which stated that Henry would remain as king for his lifetime, but would be succeeded by York. Margaret found this disregard for her son's claims unacceptable, and so the conflict continued. York was killed at the Battle of Wakefield and his head set on display at Micklegate Bar along with those of Edmund, Earl of Rutland, and Richard Neville, Earl of Salisbury, who had been captured and beheaded.[129]

The Battle of Tewkesbury, as illustrated in the Ghent manuscript
The Battle of Tewkesbury, as illustrated in the Ghent manuscript

Edmund's son Richard was married to Anne Mortimer, the daughter of Roger Mortimer, 4th Earl of March and Eleanor Holland and great-granddaughter of Edward III's second surviving son Lionel. Anne died giving birth to their only son in September 1411.[121] Richard's execution four years later left two orphans: Isabel, who married into the Bourchier family, and a son who was also called Richard. Although his earldom was forfeited, Richard (the father) was not attainted, and the four-year-old orphan Richard was his heir. Within months of his father's death, Richard's childless uncle, Edward Duke of York, was killed at Agincourt. Richard was allowed to inherit the title of Duke of York in 1426. In 1432 he acquired the earldoms of March and Ulster on the death of his maternal uncle Edmund Mortimer, Earl of March, who had died campaigning with Henry V in France, and the earldom of Cambridge which had belonged to his father. Being descended from Edward III in both the maternal and the paternal line gave Richard a significant claim to the throne if the Lancastrian line should fail, and by cognatic primogeniture arguably a superior claim.[122] He emphasised the point by being the first to assume the Plantagenet surname in 1448. Having inherited the March and Ulster titles, he became the wealthiest and most powerful noble in England, second only to the king himself. Richard married Cecily Neville, a granddaughter of John of Gaunt, and had thirteen or possibly fifteen children:[123]

Edward III made his fourth son Edmund the first duke of York in 1385. Edmund was married to Isabella, a daughter of King Peter of Castile and María de Padilla and the sister of Constance of Castile, who was the second wife of Edmund's brother John of Gaunt. Both of Edmund's sons were killed in 1415. Richard became involved in the Southampton Plot, a conspiracy to depose Henry V in favour of Richard's brother-in-law Edmund Mortimer. When Mortimer revealed the plot to the king, Richard was executed for treason. Richard's childless older brother Edward was killed at the battle of Agincourt later the same year. Constance of York was Edmund's only daughter and was an ancestor of Queen Anne Neville. The increasingly interwoven Plantagenet relationships were demonstrated by Edmund's second marriage to Joan Holland. Her sister Alianore Holland was mother to Richard's wife, Anne Mortimer. Margaret Holland, another of Joan's sisters, married John of Gaunt's son. She later married Thomas of Lancaster, John of Gaunt's grandson by King Henry IV. A third sister, Eleanor Holland, was mother-in-law to Richard Neville, 5th Earl of Salisbury—John's grandson by his daughter Joan Beaufort, Countess of Westmorland. These sisters were all granddaughters of Joan of Kent, the mother of Richard II, and therefore Plantagenet descendants of Edward I.[120]

House of York

Depopulation stemming from the Black Death led to increased wages, static food costs and a resulting improvement in the standard of living for the peasantry. However, under Henry misgovernment and harvest failures depressed the English economy to a pitiful state known as the Great Slump . The economy was in ruins by 1450, a consequence of the loss of France, piracy in the channel and poor trading relations with the Hanseatic League.[115] The economic slowdown began in the 1430s in the north of the country, spreading south in the 1440s, with the economy not recovering until the 1480s.[116] It was also driven by multiple harvest failures in the 1430s and disease amongst livestock, which drove up the price of food and damaged the wider economy.[117] Certain groups were particularly badly affected: cloth exports fell by 35 per cent in just four years at the end of the 1440s, collapsing by up to 90 per cent in some parts of the South-West.[118] The Crown's debts reached £372,000, Henry's deficit was £20,000 per annum, and tax revenues were half those of his father.[119]

Henry IV died in 1413. His son and successor, Henry V of England, aware that Charles VI of France's mental illness had caused instability in France, invaded to assert the Plantagenet claims and won a near total victory over the French at the Battle of Agincourt.[113] In subsequent years Henry recaptured much of Normandy and secured marriage to Catherine of Valois. The resulting Treaty of Troyes stated that Henry's heirs would inherit the throne of France, but conflict continued with the Dauphin. When Henry died in 1422, his nine-month-old son succeeded him as Henry VI of England. During the minority of Henry VI the war caused political division among his Plantagenet uncles, Bedford, Humphrey of Lancaster, 1st Duke of Gloucester, and Cardinal Beaufort. Humphrey's wife was accused of treasonable necromancy after two astrologers in her employ unwisely, if honestly, predicted a serious illness would endanger Henry VI's life, and Humphrey was later arrested and died in prison.[114]

Henry went to convoluted legal means to justify his succession. Many Lancastrians asserted that his mother had had legitimate rights through her descent from Edmund Crouchback, who it was claimed was the elder son of Henry III of England, set aside due to deformity.[109] As the grandson of Lionel of Antwerp, 1st Duke of Clarence, Edmund Mortimer, Earl of March, was the heir presumptive to Richard II and Henry had to ignore the legal precedent of numerous kings, back to Henry III, entailing their inheritance away from the male line in order to discount Mortimer's descent in the female line.[110] In fact Mortimer never showed interest in the throne. The later marriage of his granddaughter Anne to Richard's son consolidated his descendants' claim to the throne with that of the more junior House of York. Henry planned to resume war with France, but was plagued with financial problems, declining health and frequent rebellions.[111] He defeated a Scottish invasion, a serious rebellion by Henry Percy, 1st Earl of Northumberland in the North and Owain Glyndŵr's rebellion in Wales.[111] Many saw it as a punishment from God when Henry was later struck down with unknown but chronic illnesses.[112]

  • Henry (1421–1471)—also had one son:

Henry married his Plantagenet cousin Mary de Bohun, who was paternally descended from Edward I and maternally from Edmund Crouchback.[107] They had seven children:[108]

House of Lancaster

When John of Gaunt died in 1399, Richard disinherited John's son, Henry, who invaded England in response with a small force that quickly grew in numbers. Meeting little resistance, Henry deposed Richard to have himself crowned Henry IV of England. Richard died in captivity early the next year, probably murdered, bringing an end to the main Plantagenet line. None of Henry's heirs were free from challenge on the grounds of not being the true heir of Richard II and that the Lancastrian dynasty had gained the throne by an act of usurpation[105]

Richard was reduced to a figurehead with little power. As a result of the Merciless Parliament, de Vere and Michael de la Pole, 1st Earl of Suffolk, who had fled abroad, were sentenced to death in their absence. Alexander Neville, Archbishop of York, had all his possessions confiscated. A number of Richard's council were executed. On John of Gaunt's return from Spain, Richard was able to re-establish his power, having Gloucester murdered in captivity in Calais. Warwick was stripped of his title. Bolingbroke and Mowbray were exiled.[106]

The king's uncle Thomas of Woodstock, 1st Duke of Gloucester, Richard FitzAlan, 11th Earl of Arundel, and Thomas de Beauchamp, 12th Earl of Warwick, became known as the Lords Appellant when they sought to impeach five of the king's favourites and restrain what was increasingly seen as tyrannical and capricious rule.[106] Later they were joined by Henry Bolingbroke, the son and heir of John of Gaunt, and Thomas de Mowbray, 1st Duke of Norfolk. Initially, they were successful in establishing a commission to govern England for one year, but they were forced to rebel against Richard, defeating an army under Robert de Vere, Earl of Oxford, at the skirmish of Radcot Bridge.

The Black Prince's ten-year-old son succeeded as Richard II of England on the death of his grandfather, with government in the hands of a regency council.[103] His government levied a number of poll taxes to finance military campaigns and combined with the poor state of the economy resulted in the Peasants' Revolt in 1381,[104] followed by brutal reprisals against the rebels.[105]

Medieval painting of King Richard II
Portrait of Richard II (c1390)

Demise of the main line

After Blanche's death in 1369, John married Constance of Castile, trying unsuccessfully to obtain the throne of Castile. The marriage produced two children:
Constance died in 1394, after which John married Katherine Swynford on 13 January 1396. Their four children were born before they married. The pope legitimised them in 1396, as did Richard II by charter, on the condition that their children could not ascend the throne:
  • John of Gaunt (1340–1399)—married Blanche of Lancaster, the heiress to the duchy of Lancaster and a direct descendent of Henry III, and had six children with her:
  • Edward (1365–1371/2)
  • Richard (1367–1400)
  • Edward (1330–1376)—married his cousin Joan of Kent, a granddaughter of Edward I, with whom he had two sons:

The marriage of Edward III and Philippa of Hainault produced thirteen children and thirty-two grandchildren:[102]

Image of Richard II and the peasants revolt taken from Froissart
Richard II meets the rebels of the Peasants' Revolt in a painting from Froissart's Chronicles

Descendants of Edward III

Charles V of France resumed hostilities when the Black Prince refused a summons as Duke of Aquitaine, and Charles's reign saw the Plantagenets steadily pushed back in France.[97] The prince who had suffered a debilitating illness for nearly a decade which often restricted his movement to being carried in a litter,[94] returned to England where he soon died.[98] John of Gaunt assumed leadership in France, but the English lost towns and territory, including Poitiers and Bergerac,[99][100] and English dominance at sea was reversed by defeat at the Battle of La Rochelle, which undermined seaborne trade and threatened Gascony.[101]

Fighting in the Hundred Years War spilled from the French and Plantagenet lands into surrounding realms, including the dynastic conflict in Castile between Peter of Castile and Henry II of Castile. The Black Prince allied himself with Peter, defeating Henry at the Battle of Nájera before falling out with Peter, who had no means to reimburse him, leaving Edward bankrupt.[94] The Plantagenets continued to interfere, and John of Gaunt, 1st Duke of Lancaster, the Black Prince's brother, married Peter's daughter Constance, claiming the Crown of Castile in her name. He invaded with an army of 5000 men. Fighting was inconclusive before Gaunt agreed a treaty with King Juan of Castile.[95] Terms of the treaty included the marriage of John of Gaunt's daughter Katherine to Juan’s son, Enrique.[96]

, resumed the war with destructive chevauchées starting from Bordeaux. His army was caught by a much larger French force at Poitiers, but the ensuing battle was a decisive English victory resulting in the capture of John II of France. The Second Treaty of London was signed, promising a four million écus ransom. It was guaranteed by hostages from the Valois family being held in London while John returned to France to raise his ransom. Edward gained possession of Normandy, Brittany, Anjou, Maine and the coastline from Flanders to Spain, restoring the lands of the former Angevin Empire. The hostages quickly escaped back to France. Horrified that his word had been broken, John returned to England and died there. Edward invaded France, hoping to take advantage of the popular rebellion of the Jacquerie to seize the throne. Although no French army stood against him, he was unable to take Paris or Rheims. Edward and John's peace treaty was demonstrably popular in England where it was both ratified in parliament and celebrated with great ceremony. However, in order to reach agreement clauses were removed that would have had Edward renounce his claim to the French crown in return for territory in Aquitaine and the town of Calais. These were entered in another agreement to be effected only after the transfer of territory by November 1361 but both sides prevaricated over their commitments for the following nine years. [92]

Edward, the Black Prince
Image of the Battle of Crecy taken from Froissart
The victory at Crécy was an important Plantagenet victory of the Hundred Years War in France.

In 1337 Phillip confiscated the duchy of Aquitaine and the county of Ponthieu on the grounds that Edward III was harbouring his fugitive cousin and enemy, Robert of Artois. [92] Edward proclaimed himself king of France to encourage the Flemish to rise in open rebellion against the French king. The conflict, known as the Hundred Years War, included a significant English naval victory at the Battle of Sluys,[92] eventually followed by a victory on land at Crécy, leaving Edward free to capture the important port of Calais. A subsequent victory against Scotland at the Battle of Neville's Cross resulted in the capture of David II and reduced the threat from Scotland.[92] The Black Death brought a halt to Edward's campaigns by killing perhaps a third of his subjects.[92] The only Plantagenet known to have died from the Black Death was Edward III's daughter Joan, on her way to marry Peter of Castile.[93]

In 1328 Charles IV of France died without a male heir. His cousin Phillip of Valois and Queen Isabella (on behalf of her son Edward) were the major claimants to the throne. Philip, as senior grandson of Philip III in the male line, became king over Edward's claim as a matrilineal grandson of Philip IV of France, following the precedents of Philip V's succession over his niece Joan II of Navarre and Charles IV's succession over his nieces. Not yet in power, Edward III paid homage to Phillip as Duke of Aquitaine

Image of vellum manuscript from 1313 of Isabella, third from left, with her father, Philip IV, her future French king brothers, and Philip's brother, Charles of Valois
Isabella, third from left, with her father, Philip IV, her future French king brothers, and Philip's brother, Charles of Valois

Conflict with the House of Valois

The French monarchy asserted its rights to encroach on Edward's legal rights in Gascony. Resistance to one judgement in Saint-Sardos resulted in Charles IV declaring the duchy forfeit. Charles's sister, Queen Isabella, was sent to negotiate and agreed a treaty that required Edward to pay homage in France to Charles. Edward resigned Aquitaine and Ponthieu to his son Edward, who travelled to France to give homage in his stead. With the English heir in her power, Isabella refused to return to England unless Edward II dismissed his favourites, and she became the mistress of Roger Mortimer.[88] The couple invaded England and, with Henry, 3rd Earl of Lancaster, captured the king.[89] Edward II abdicated on condition that his son would inherit the throne rather than Mortimer. Although there is no historical record of the cause of death, he is popularly believed to have been murdered at Berkeley Castle by having a red-hot poker thrust into his bowels.[90][91] A coup by Edward III ended four years of control by Isabella and Mortimer. Mortimer was executed. Though removed from power, Isabella was treated well, and lived in luxury for the next 27 years.[88]

King Edward II's coronation oath on his succession in 1307 was the first to reflect the king's responsibility to maintain the laws that the community "shall have chosen" ("aura eslu").[79] He was initially popular but faced three challenges: discontent over the financing of wars; his household spending; and the role of his favourite Piers Gaveston.[80] When Parliament decided that Gaveston should be exiled the king was left with no choice but to comply.[81] Edward engineered Gaveston's return, but was forced to agree to the appointment of Ordainers, led by his cousin Thomas, 2nd Earl of Lancaster, to reform the royal household with Piers Gaveston exiled again.[82][83] When Gaveston returned again to England, he was abducted and executed after a mock trial.[84] The ramifications of this drove Thomas and his adherents from power. Edward's humiliating defeat by Bruce at the Battle of Bannockburn, confirming Bruce's position as an independent king of Scots, returned the initiative to Lancaster and Guy de Beauchamp, 10th Earl of Warwick, who had not taken part in the campaign, claiming that it was in defiance of the Ordinances.[85][86] Edward finally repealed the Ordinances after defeating and executing Lancaster at the Battle of Boroughbridge in 1322.[87]

Image of the Battle of Bannockburn reproduced from the Holkham Bible
Scene from the Holkham Bible, shows knights and foot soldiers from the period of Bannockburn

Edward was less successful in Gascony, which was overrun by the French. With his resources depleting, Edward was forced to reconfirm the Charters, including Magna Carta, to obtain the necessary funds. In 1303 the French king restored Gascony to Edward by signing the Treaty of Paris. Meanwhile, William Wallace rose in Balliol's name and recovered most of Scotland. Wallace was defeated at the Battle of Falkirk, after which Robert the Bruce rebelled and was crowned king of Scotland. Edward died while travelling to Scotland for another campaign.[78]

Edward asserted that the king of Scotland owed him feudal allegiance, and intended to unite the two nations by marrying his son Edward to Margaret, the sole heir of King Alexander III.[75] When Margaret died in 1290, competition for the Scottish crown ensued. By invitation of Scottish magnates, Edward I resolved the dispute, ruling in favour of John Balliol, who duly swore loyalty to him and became king. The competitors recognized Edward's "sovereign lordship of Scotland and [his] right to determine our several pretensions."[76] Edward insisted that he was Scotland's sovereign and possessed the right to hear appeals against Balliol's judgements, undermining Balliol's authority. Balliol allied with France in 1295;[77] Edward invaded Scotland the following year, deposing and exiling Balliol.[74]

On his accession, Edward I sought to organise his realm, enforcing his claims to primacy in the British Isles. Llywelyn ap Gruffudd considered he ruled North Wales "entirely separate from" England but Edward viewed him to be "a rebel and disturber of the peace". Edward's determination, military experience and skilful naval manoeuvres ended what was to him rebellion. The invasion was executed by one of the largest armies ever assembled by an English king, comprising Anglo-Norman cavalry and Welsh archers and laying the foundation for future victories in France. Llywelyn was driven into the mountains, later dying in battle. The Statute of Rhuddlan established England's authority over Wales, and Edward's son was proclaimed the first English Prince of Wales upon his birth. Edward spent vast sums on his two Welsh campaigns with a large portion of it spent on a network of castles.[74]

Map of Wales in 1267 showing territory controlled by Edward and various Welsh princes
Wales after the Treaty of Montgomery in 1267
  Gwynedd, Llywelyn ap Gruffudd's principality
  Territories conquered by Llywelyn ap Gruffudd
  Territories of Llywelyn's vassals
  Lordships of the Marcher barons
  Lordships of the King of England

Expansion in Britain

With the Statutes of Mortmain, Edward imposed his authority over the Church; the statutes prohibited land donation to the Church, asserted the rights of the Crown at the expense of traditional feudal privileges, promoted the uniform administration of justice, raised income and codified the legal system.[72] Edward is sometimes called "The English Justinian" because of his legal reforms but whether he was a reformer or an autocrat responding to events is a matter of debate.[73] His military campaigns left him in heavily debt and when Philip IV of France confiscated the Duchy of Gascony in 1294, Edward needed funds to wage war in France. Edward summoned a precedent-setting assembly and in order to obtain support for more taxes for military finance, he included lesser landowners and merchants. The result was a parliament including barons, clergy, knights, and burgesses.[73]

  • Thomas (1300–1338), whose daughter Margaret inherited his estates. Margaret's grandson, Thomas Mowbray, was the first duke of Norfolk, but Henry IV exiled him and stripped him of his titles.
  • Edmund, Earl of Kent (1301 to 1330). Edmund’s loyalty to his half-brother, Edward II, resulted in his execution by order of the rebel Mortimer and his lover, Edward’s queen, Isabella. His daughter, Joan, inherited his estates and married her own cousin, Edward the Black Prince; together, they had Richard, who later became the English king.
  • Eleanor (1306–1311).

Following Eleanor's death in 1290, Edward married Margaret of France, daughter of Philip III of France, in 1299. Edward and Margaret had two sons, who both lived to adulthood, and a daughter who died as a child:[71]

Edward married Eleanor of Castile, daughter of King Ferdinand of Castile, in 1254. Edward and Eleanor had sixteen children; five daughters survived to adulthood, but only one son survived Edward:[70]

Constitutional change and the reform of feudalism

Disagreements between the barons and the king intensified. The barons, under Simon de Montfort, 6th Earl of Leicester, captured most of southeast England in the Second Barons' War. At the Battle of Lewes in 1264, Henry and Prince Edward were defeated and taken prisoner. De Montfort assembled the Great Parliament, recognized as the first Parliament because it was the first time the cities and burghs had sent representatives.[67] Edward escaped, raised an army and defeated and killed de Montfort at the Battle of Evesham in 1265.[68] Savage retribution was inflicted upon the rebels, and authority restored to Henry. With the realm now peaceful, Edward left England to join Louis IX on the Ninth Crusade; he was one of the last crusaders. Louis died before Edward's arrival, but Edward decided to continue. The result was disappointing; Edward's small force only enabled him to capture Acre and launch a handful of raids. After surviving an assassination attempt, Edward left for Sicily later in the year, never to participate in a crusade again. When Henry III died, Edward acceded to the throne; the barons swore allegiance to him even though he did not return for two years.[69]

Photograph of a 13th-century representation of the death of Simon de Montfort
Death of Simon de Montfort at the Battle of Evesham

Henry was bankrupted by his military expenditure and general extravagance. The pope offered Henry's brother Richard the Kingdom of Sicily, but the military cost of displacing the incumbent Emperor Frederick was prohibitive. Matthew Paris wrote that Richard stated: "You might as well say, 'I make you a present of the moon—step up to the sky and take it down'." Instead, Henry purchased the kingdom for his son Edmund, which angered many powerful barons. The barons led by Henry's brother-in-law Simon de Montfort forced him to agree to the Provisions of Oxford, under which his debts were paid in exchange for substantial reforms. In France, with the Treaty of Paris, Henry formally surrendered the territory of his Angevin ancestors lost to Louis IX of France, received Gascony as a vassal of the french king and the title duke of Aquitaine. [41][66]

Henry III had nine children:[61]

In early 1225 a great council approved a tax of £40,000 to dispatch an army, which quickly retook Gascony.[56] During an assembly of the barons, bishops and magnates, in which the feudal prerogatives of the king were debated and discussed the barons demanded that the King reissue the Magna Carta and the Charter of the Forest in exchange for agreeing to support Henry.[57][58] Henry declared that the charters were issued of his own "spontaneous and free will" and confirmed them with the royal seal, giving the new Great Charter and the Charter of the Forest of 1225 much more authority than any previous versions.[59][60]

, was appointed regent for the nine-year-old King Henry on King John's death. Thereafter, support for Louis declined, and he renounced his claims in the Treaty of Lambeth after Marshal's victories at the battles of Lincoln and Sandwich in 1217.[41] The Marshal regime issued an amended Magna Carta as a basis for future government.[53] Despite the Treaty of Lambeth, hostilities continued and Henry was forced to compromise with the newly crowned Louis VIII of France and Henry's stepfather, Hugh X of Lusignan. They both overran much of Henry's remaining continental lands, further eroding the Angevins' power on the continent. In his political struggles, Henry perceived many similarities between himself and England's patron saint, Edward the Confessor.[54] Consequently, he named his first son Edward and built the existing magnificent shrine for the Confessor.[55] The barons opposed a war to restore Plantagenet lands on the continent, since it would require many soldiers and much money.

William Marshal, 1st Earl of Pembroke
Photograph of the Cast of the effigy of King Henry the third in Westminster Abbey, c. 1272
Cast of the effigy of Henry III in Westminster Abbey, c. 1272

John also had illegitimate children with several mistresses. These children probably included nine sons (Richard, Oliver, Henry, Osbert Gifford, Geoffrey, John FitzJohn or Courcy, Odo or Eudes FitzRoy,Ivo, Henry, Richard the constable of Wallingford Castle and three daughters (Joan, Matilda the abbess of Barking and Isabella la Blanche.[51] Joan was the best known of these, since she married Prince Llewelyn the Great of Wales.[52]

Many English monarchs were descendants of the Angevin line via John, who had five legitimate children with Isabella:

Baronial conflict and the establishment of Parliament

Main line

By 1214 John had re-established his authority in England and planned what Gillingham has called a grand strategy to recapture Normandy and Anjou.[44] The plan was that John would draw the French from Paris, while another army, under his nephew Otto IV, the Holy Roman Emperor, and his half-brother William attacked from the north. The plan failed when John's allies were defeated at the Battle of Bouvines. Otto retreated and was soon overthrown, William was captured by the French and John agreed to a five-year truce. [39][26] John's defeat weakened his authority in England, and his barons forced him to agree to the Magna Carta, which limited royal power. Both sides failed to abide by the terms of the Magna Carta, leading to the First Barons' War, in which rebellious barons invited Prince Louis, the husband of Blanche, Henry II's granddaughter, to invade England.[39] Louis did so and John died in October 1216, before the conflict was conclusively ended.[45] The official website of the British Monarchy presents John's death as the end of the Angevin dynasty and the beginning of the Plantagenet dynasty.[46]

Richard's failure to provide an heir caused a succession crisis and conflict between supporters of the claim of his nephew, Arthur, and John. Guillaume des Roches led the magnates of Anjou, Maine, and Touraine declaring for Arthur.[39] Once again Philip II of France attempted to disturb the Plantagenet territories on the European mainland by supporting his vassal Arthur's claim to the English crown. John won a significant victory when Arthur's forces threatened his mother, capturing the entire rebel leadership at the Battle of Mirebeau.[40] As a result of John's behaviour the powerful Thouars, Lusignan, and des Roches families rebelled and John lost control of Anjou, Maine, Touraine, and northern Poitou. His son, King Henry III, maintained the claim to the Angevin territories until December 1259 when he formally surrendered them and in return was granted Gascony as duke of Aquitaine and a vassal of the king of France.[41] It was rumoured in the Margam annals that Arthur was murdered by John himself while drunk and if not true it is almost certain John ordered the killing.[39] There are two contrasting schools of thought explaining John's sudden capitulation. Sir James Holt suggest this was the inevitable result of superior French resources. John Gillingham identifies diplomatic and military mismanagement and points out that Richard managed to hold the Angevin territory with comparative finances.[42] Nick Barratt has calculated that Angevin resources available for use in the war were 78 per cent of those of Phillip; a disadvantage but not a disastrous difference.[43]

Photograph of one of the four surviving copies of Magna Carta held in British Museum
One of only four surviving exemplifications of the 1215 text of Magna Carta

Decline and the loss of Anjou


This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.