World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Systemic lupus erythematosus

Article Id: WHEBN0021009880
Reproduction Date:

Title: Systemic lupus erythematosus  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Autoantibody, Sjögren's syndrome, Drug eruption, Dermatitis herpetiformis, Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus
Classification and external resources
Drawing of the typical "butterfly rash" found in lupus
ICD-10 M32
ICD-9 710.0
OMIM 152700
DiseasesDB 12782
MedlinePlus 000435
eMedicine med/2228 emerg/564
MeSH D008180

Systemic lupus erythematosus , often abbreviated as SLE or lupus, is a immune system to be unable to differentiate antigens and healthy tissue. As a result, the immune system directs antibodies against healthy tissue, which causes swelling, pain, and tissue damage. Although the underlying cause of autoimmune diseases is unknown, most doctors believe that lupus results from both genetic and environmental stimuli.

There are many kinds of lupus. The most common type is systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), which affects many internal organs in the body. SLE most often harms the heart, joints, skin, lungs, blood vessels, liver, kidneys, and nervous system. The course of the disease is unpredictable, with periods of illness (called flares) alternating with remissions. The disease occurs nine times more often in women than in men, especially in women in child-bearing years ages 15 to 35, and is also more common in those of non-European descent.[1][2][3]

While there is no cure for SLE. It is treated with immunosuppression, mainly with cyclophosphamide, corticosteroids and other immunosuppressants. The goal of these treatments is to keep symptoms under control. SLE can be fatal. The leading cause of death is from cardiovascular disease due to accelerated atherosclerosis. Survival for people with SLE in the United States, Canada, and Europe has risen to approximately 95% at five years, 90% at 10 years, and 78% at 20 years,[1] and now approaches that of matched controls without lupus.

Childhood systemic lupus erythematosus generally presents between the ages of 3 and 15, with girls outnumbering boys 4:1, and typical skin manifestations being butterfly eruption on the face and photosensitivity.[4]

Lupus is Latin for wolf. In the 18th century, when lupus was just starting to be recognized as a disease, it was thought that it was caused by the bite of a wolf.[5] This may have been because of the distinctive rash characteristic of lupus. (Once full-blown, the round, disk-shaped rashes heal from the inside out, leaving a bite-like imprint.)

Signs and symptoms

Common symptoms of SLE.[6]

SLE is one of several diseases known as "the great imitators" because it often mimics or is mistaken for other illnesses.[7] SLE is a classical item in differential diagnosis,[2] because SLE symptoms vary widely and come and go unpredictably. Diagnosis can thus be elusive, with some people suffering unexplained symptoms of untreated SLE for years.

Common initial and chronic complaints include fever, malaise, joint pains, myalgias, fatigue, and temporary loss of cognitive abilities. Because they are so often seen with other diseases, these signs and symptoms are not part of the diagnostic criteria for SLE. When occurring in conjunction with other signs and symptoms (see below), however, they are considered suggestive.[8]

While SLE can occur in both males and females, the symptoms associated with each sex are different. Females tend to have greater relapses, leukopenia, more arthritis, Raynaud phenomenon, and psychiatric symptoms. On the other hand, males tend to have more skin problems, seizures, renal disease serositis, and peripheral neuropathy.[9]


Micrograph showing vacuolar interface dermatitis, as may be seen in SLE. H&E stain.

As many as 70% of people with lupus have some dermatological symptoms. The three main categories of lesions are chronic cutaneous [discoid] lupus, subacute cutaneous lupus, and acute cutaneous lupus. Sufferers of discoid lupus may exhibit thick, red scaly patches on the skin. Similarly, subacute cutaneous lupus manifests as red, scaly patches of skin but with distinct edges. Acute cutaneous lupus manifests as a rash. Some suffer from the classic malar rash (or butterfly rash) associated with the disease.[10] Hair loss, mouth, nasal, urinary tract, and vaginal ulcers, and lesions on the skin are other possible manifestations. Tiny tears in the delicate tissue around the eyes can occur after even minimal rubbing.

Muscles and bones

The most commonly sought medical attention is for joint pain, with the small joints of the hand and wrist usually affected, although all joints are at risk. The Lupus Foundation of America estimates more than 90 percent of those affected will experience joint and/or muscle pain at some time during the course of their illness.[11] Unlike rheumatoid arthritis, lupus arthritis is less disabling and usually does not cause severe destruction of the joints. Fewer than ten percent of people with lupus arthritis will develop deformities of the hands and feet.[11] SLE patients are at particular risk of developing osteoarticular tuberculosis.[12]

A possible association between rheumatoid arthritis and SLE has been suggested,[13] and SLE may be associated with an increased risk of bone fractures in relatively young women.[14]


Anemia is common in children with SLE[15] and develops in about 50% of cases.[16] Low platelet and white blood cell counts may be due to the disease or a side effect of pharmacological treatment. People with SLE may have an association with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome[17] (a thrombotic disorder), wherein autoantibodies to phospholipids are present in their serum. Abnormalities associated with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome include a paradoxical prolonged partial thromboplastin time (which usually occurs in hemorrhagic disorders) and a positive test for antiphospholipid antibodies; the combination of such findings have earned the term "lupus anticoagulant-positive". Another autoantibody finding in SLE is the anticardiolipin antibody, which can cause a false positive test for syphilis.


A person with SLE may have inflammation of various parts of the heart, such as pericarditis, myocarditis, and endocarditis. The endocarditis of SLE is characteristically noninfective (Libman-Sacks endocarditis), and involves either the mitral valve or the tricuspid valve. Atherosclerosis also tends to occur more often and advances more rapidly than in the general population.[18][19][20]


Lung and pleura inflammation can cause pleuritis, pleural effusion, lupus pneumonitis, chronic diffuse interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary emboli, pulmonary hemorrhage, and shrinking lung syndrome.


Painless hematuria or proteinuria may often be the only presenting renal symptom. Acute or chronic renal impairment may develop with lupus nephritis, leading to acute or end-stage renal failure. Because of early recognition and management of SLE, end-stage renal failure occurs in less than 5% of cases.

A histological hallmark of SLE is membranous glomerulonephritis with "wire loop" abnormalities.[21] This finding is due to immune complex deposition along the glomerular basement membrane, leading to a typical granular appearance in immunofluorescence testing.


Neuropsychiatric syndromes can result when SLE affects the central or peripheral nervous systems. The American College of Rheumatology defines 19 neuropsychiatric syndromes in systemic lupus erythematosus.[22] The diagnosis of neuropsychiatric syndromes concurrent with SLE is one of the most difficult challenges in medicine, because it can involve so many different patterns of symptoms, some of which may be mistaken for signs of infectious disease or stroke.[23]

The most common neuropsychiatric disorder people with SLE have is headache,[24] although the existence of a specific lupus headache and the optimal approach to headache in SLE cases remains controversial.[25] Other common neuropsychiatric manifestation of SLE include cognitive dysfunction, mood disorder, cerebrovascular disease,[24] seizures, polyneuropathy,[24] anxiety disorder, and psychosis. It can rarely present with intracranial hypertension syndrome, characterized by an elevated intracranial pressure, papilledema, and headache with occasional abducens nerve paresis, absence of a space-occupying lesion or ventricular enlargement, and normal cerebrospinal fluid chemical and hematological constituents.[26]

More rare manifestations are acute confusional state, Guillain-Barré syndrome, aseptic meningitis, autonomic disorder, demyelinating syndrome, mononeuropathy (which might manifest as mononeuritis multiplex), movement disorder (more specifically, chorea), myasthenia gravis, myelopathy, cranial neuropathy and plexopathy.


Neural symptoms contribute to a significant percentage of morbidity and mortality in patients with lupus.[27] As a result, the neural side of lupus is being studied in hopes of reducing morbidity and mortality rates.[22] The neural manifestation of lupus is known as neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE). One aspect of this disease is severe damage to the epithelial cells of the blood–brain barrier.

Lupus has a wide range of symptoms which span the body. The neurological symptoms include headaches,[24] depression, seizures, cognitive dysfunction, mood disorder, cerebrovascular disease,[24] polyneuropathy,[24] anxiety disorder, psychosis, and in some extreme cases, personality disorders.[28] In certain regions, depression reportedly affects up to 60% of women suffering from SLE.[29]


SLE causes an increased rate of fetal death in utero and spontaneous abortion (miscarriage). The overall live-birth rate in SLE patients has been estimated to be 72%.[30] Pregnancy outcome appears to be worse in SLE patients whose disease flares up during pregnancy.[31]

Neonatal lupus is the occurrence of SLE symptoms in an infant born from a mother with SLE, most commonly presenting with a rash resembling discoid lupus erythematosus, and sometimes with systemic abnormalities such as heart block or hepatosplenomegaly.[32] Neonatal lupus is usually benign and self-limited.[32]


Fatigue in SLE is probably multifactorial and has been related to not only disease activity or complications such as anemia or hypothyroidism, but also to pain, depression, poor sleep quality, poor physical fitness and lack of social support.[33][34]


There is no one specific cause of SLE. There are, however, a number of environmental triggers and a number of genetic susceptibilities.[35][36]


Exposure to sunlight has been identified as one possible environmental trigger for SLE. UV radiation can lead to the redistribution of nuclear antigens on cell surfaces or cause the body to produce novel forms of auto antigens, such as covalently linked protein-RNA conjugates. These autoantigens are favorable for the induction of autoimmunity involved in the mechanism of SLE pathology.[37] An association was seen between the amount of outdoor work in the 12 months preceding diagnosis, showing that UV exposure poses an occupational risk for SLE. Data supports the role of sun exposure as a trigger for SLE, particularly among people whose reaction to sun exposure presents itself as sunburn with blistering or a rash.[38] The differences seen within the reactions of people of different skin complexions to midday sun may then be correlated with the increased risk of SLE among certain minority populations in the United States.[39]

Mercury exposure is another proposed environmental trigger for SLE. Immune and autoimmune responses were monitored in mice injected with mercury over a period of 17 weeks. In susceptible mice, mercury exposure was found to affect specific cytokine requirements and inhibit FAS mediated cell death.[40] This leads to possible termination of self-tolerance and a production of a lupus-like state. This mimicry state of accelerated autoimmune responses with increased antinuclear antibodies potentially leads to subsets of lupus. Mercury can also be labeled as a possible contributor to the disturbed state of apoptosis found in patients with SLE.

The chemical trichloroethylene (TCE) and other related chemicals has also been seen to trigger systemic lupus through a mechanism much similar to mercury exposure.[41]

The function of both mercury and others chemical triggers can help to explain global incidence rates. Research into trichloroethylene contamination of groundwater wells found that those exposed to the chemical were 12.1% more likely to exhibit symptoms of SLE.[42] Regions or countries that are more exposed to mercury or TCE chemicals may show associations with drug-induced lupus, such as that found in Japan and Australia.[43][44]

Another possible cause for the development of SLE is the role of specific occupational and non-occupational exposures. Phthalates are man-made chemicals that have many different uses. They are often used to soften plastics, act as adhesives, or solvents, hold color, and scent in products. Phthalates can be found in paints, flooring, wall coverings, carpets, glues, printing inks, insect repellents, hair spray, shampoo, nail polish, cosmetics, medications, and medical intravenous bags and tubing made with polyvinyl chloride (PVC). [45] Inhalation and dermal absorption are two specific exposure routes for dibutyl phthalate in the general population and the workplace. Nail polishes contain xylene, toluene, toluene sulfonamide formaldehyde resin, formaldehyde and other chemicals. [46]

Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) is a reproductive and developmental toxicant in rats and is also a common ingredient used in nail enamel and polishes as a way of holding the color and prevent chipping. Manicurists are occupationally exposed to DBP through both inhalation and dermal absorption due to work practices and nail products. Phthalates are metabolized after exposure, generally excreted within 24 hours, and completely eliminated in 48 hours. [47] Although they are eliminated quickly, phthalate metabolites, active toxic species, are still detected in urine samples from the general population. The use of gloves may minimize this exposure to DBP.

Artificial nails, which are usually made with a two-part liquid and powder polymer acrylic resin chemistry borrowed from dentistry. Ethyl methacrylate (EMA) is the primary chemical used to make artificial nails. Skin sensitivity has been documented in dental personnel, who, like salon workers, are also exposed to EMA at work. Nationally there are 333,000 licensed manicurists, 12,000 of whom are licensed in the State of Massachusetts. A national survey of manicurists reveals that 96% are women of childbearing age; mean age is 38 years. 41% are White, and 38% are Vietnamese. [48] This can help account for the high rate of SLE incidence among women as opposed to men.


The first mechanism may arise genetically. Research indicates SLE may have a genetic link. SLE does run in families, but no single causal gene has been identified. Instead, multiple genes appear to influence a person's chance of developing lupus when triggered by environmental factors. HLA class I, class II, and class III genes are associated with SLE, but only classes I and II contribute independently to increased risk of SLE.[49] Other genes which contain risk variants for SLE are IRF5, PTPN22, STAT4,[50] CDKN1A,[51] ITGAM, BLK,[50] TNFSF4 and BANK1.[52] Some of the susceptibility genes may be population specific.[50]

Drug reactions

Drug-induced lupus erythematosus is a (generally) reversible condition that usually occurs in people being treated for a long-term illness. Drug-induced lupus mimics SLE. However, symptoms of drug-induced lupus generally disappear once the medication that triggered the episode is stopped. More than 38 medications can cause this condition, the most common of which are procainamide, isoniazid, hydralazine, quinidine, and phenytoin.[2]

Non-Systemic forms of lupus

Discoid (cutaneous) lupus is limited to skin symptoms and is diagnosed by biopsy of rash on the face, neck, scalp or arms. Approximately 5% of patients with DLE progress to SLE.[53]


One manifestation of SLE is abnormalities in apoptosis, a type of programmed cell death in which aging or damaged cells are neatly disposed of as a part of normal growth or functioning.

In SLE, the body's immune system produces antibodies against itself, particularly against proteins in the cell nucleus. SLE is triggered by environmental factors that are unknown.

The immune system must balance between being sensitive enough to protect against infection, and becoming sensitized to attack the body's own proteins (autoimmunity). During an immune reaction to a foreign stimulus, such as bacteria, virus, or allergen, immune cells that would normally be deactivated due to their affinity for self tissues can be abnormally activated by signaling sequences of antigen-presenting cells. Thus triggers may include viruses, bacteria, allergens (IgE and other hypersensitivity), and can be aggravated by environmental stimulants such as ultraviolet light and certain drug reactions. These stimuli begin a reaction that leads to destruction of other cells in the body and exposure of their DNA, histones, and other proteins, particularly parts of the cell nucleus. The body's sensitized B-lymphocyte cells will now produce antibodies against these nuclear-related proteins. These antibodies clump into antibody-protein complexes which stick to surfaces and damage blood vessels in critical areas of the body, such as the glomeruli of the kidney; these antibody attacks are the cause of SLE. Researchers are now identifying the individual genes, the proteins they produce, and their role in the immune system. Each protein is a link on the autoimmune chain, and researchers are trying to find drugs to break each of those links.[2][54][55]

SLE is a chronic inflammatory disease believed to be a type III hypersensitivity response with potential type II involvement.[56] Reticulate and stellate acral pigmentation should be considered a possible manifestation of SLE and high titers of anti-cardiolipin antibodies, or a consequence of therapy.[57]

Abnormalities in cell death signaling

Tingible body macrophages (TBMs) – large phagocytic cells in the germinal centers of secondary lymph nodes – express CD68 protein. These cells normally engulf B cells that have undergone apoptosis after somatic hypermutation. In some people with SLE, significantly fewer TBMs can be found, and these cells rarely contain material from apoptotic B cells. Also, uningested apoptotic nuclei can be found outside of TBMs. This material may present a threat to the tolerization of B cells and T cells. Dendritic cells in the germinal center may endocytose such antigenic material and present it to T cells, activating them. Also, apoptotic chromatin and nuclei may attach to the surfaces of follicular dendritic cells and make this material available for activating other B cells that may have randomly acquired self-specificity through somatic hypermutation.[58] Necrosis, a pro-inflammatory form of cell death, is increased in T lymphocytes, due to mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and depletion of ATP.[59]

Clearance deficiency

Clearance deficiency
Impaired clearance of dying cells is a potential pathway for the development of this systemic autoimmune disease. This includes deficient phagocytic activity and scant serum components in addition to increased apoptosis.

Monocytes isolated from whole blood of SLE sufferers show reduced expression of CD44 surface molecules involved in the uptake of apoptotic cells. Most of the monocytes and tingible body macrophages (TBMs), which are found in the germinal centres of lymph nodes, even show a definitely different morphology; they are smaller or scarce and die earlier. Serum components like complement factors, CRP, and some glycoproteins are, furthermore, decisively important for an efficiently operating phagocytosis. With SLE, these components are often missing, diminished, or inefficient.

Recent research has found an association between certain lupus patients (especially those with lupus nephritis) and an impairment in degrading neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). These were due to DNAse1 inhibiting factors, or NET protecting factors in patient serum, rather than abnormalities in the DNAse1 itself.[60] DNAse1 mutations in lupus have so far only been found in some Japanese cohorts.[61]

The clearance of early apoptotic cells is an important function in multicellular organisms. It leads to a progression of the apoptosis process and finally to secondary necrosis of the cells if this ability is disturbed. Necrotic cells release nuclear fragments as potential autoantigens, as well as internal danger signals, inducing maturation of dendritic cells (DCs), since they have lost their membranes' integrity. Increased appearance of apoptotic cells also simulates inefficient clearance. That leads to maturation of DCs and also to the presentation of intracellular antigens of late apoptotic or secondary necrotic cells, via MHC molecules. Autoimmunity possibly results by the extended exposure to nuclear and intracellular autoantigens derived from late apoptotic and secondary necrotic cells. B and T cell tolerance for apoptotic cells is abrogated, and the lymphocytes get activated by these autoantigens; inflammation and the production of autoantibodies by plasma cells is initiated. A clearance deficiency in the skin for apoptotic cells has also been observed in people with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).[62]

Germinal centres

Accumulation in germinal centers

In healthy conditions, apoptotic lymphocytes are removed in germinal centres (GC) by specialized phagocytes, the tingible body macrophages (TBM), which is why no free apoptotic and potential autoantigenic material can be seen. In some people with SLE, accumulation of apoptotic debris can be observed in GC because of an ineffective clearance of apoptotic cells. In close proximity to TBM, follicular dendritic cells (FDC) are localised in GC, which attach antigen material to their surface and, in contrast to bone marrow-derived DC, neither take it up nor present it via MHC molecules.

Autoreactive B cells can accidentally emerge during somatic hypermutation and migrate into the germinal center light zone. Autoreactive B cells, maturated coincidentally, normally do not receive survival signals by antigen planted on follicular dendritic cells, and perish by apoptosis. In the case of clearance deficiency, apoptotic nuclear debris accumulates in the light zone of GC and gets attached to FDC. This serves as a germinal centre survival signal for autoreactive B-cells. After migration into the mantle zone, autoreactive B cells require further survival signals from autoreactive helper T cells, which promote the maturation of autoantibody-producing plasma cells and B memory cells. In the presence of autoreactive T cells, a chronic autoimmune disease may be the consequence.

Anti-nRNP autoimmunity

Autoantibodies to nRNP A and nRNP C initially targeted restricted, proline-rich motifs. Antibody binding subsequently spread to other epitopes. The similarity and cross-reactivity between the initial targets of nRNP and Sm autoantibodies identifies a likely commonality in cause and a focal point for intermolecular epitope spreading.[63]


Elevated expression of HMGB1 was found in the sera of patients and mice with systemic lupus erythematosus, high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a nuclear protein participating in chromatin architecture and transcriptional regulation. Recently, there is increasing evidence HMGB1 contributes to the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases due to its proinflammatory and immunostimulatory properties.[64]


Microphotograph of a histological section of human skin prepared for direct immunofluorescence using an anti-IgG antibody. The skin is from a person with systemic lupus erythematosus and shows IgG deposits at two different places: The first is a bandlike deposit along the epidermal basement membrane ("lupus band test" is positive); the second is within the nuclei of the epidermal cells (antinuclear antibodies are present).

Laboratory tests

Antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing and anti-extractable nuclear antigen (anti-ENA) form the mainstay of serologic testing for SLE. Several techniques are used to detect ANAs. Clinically the most widely used method is indirect immunofluorescence (IF). The pattern of fluorescence suggests the type of antibody present in the patient's serum. Direct immunofluorescence can detect deposits of immunoglobulins and complement proteins in the patient's skin. When skin not exposed to the sun is tested, a positive direct IF (the so-called lupus band test) is an evidence of systemic lupus erythematosus.[65]

ANA screening yields positive results in many connective tissue disorders and other autoimmune diseases, and may occur in normal individuals. Subtypes of antinuclear antibodies include anti-Smith and anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies (which are linked to SLE) and anti-histone antibodies (which are linked to drug-induced lupus). Anti-dsDNA antibodies are highly specific for SLE; they are present in 70% of cases, whereas they appear in only 0.5% of people without SLE.[2] The anti-dsDNA antibody titers also tend to reflect disease activity, although not in all cases.[2] Other ANA that may occur in people with SLE are anti-U1 RNP (which also appears in systemic sclerosis and mixed connective tissue disease), SS-A (or anti-Ro) and SS-B (or anti-La; both of which are more common in Sjögren's syndrome). SS-A and SS-B confer a specific risk for heart conduction block in neonatal lupus.[66]

Other tests routinely performed in suspected SLE are complement system levels (low levels suggest consumption by the immune system), electrolytes and renal function (disturbed if the kidney is involved), liver enzymes, and complete blood count.

The lupus erythematosus (LE) cell test was commonly used for diagnosis, but it is no longer used because the LE cells are only found in 50–75% of SLE cases, and they are also found in some people with rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, and drug sensitivities. Because of this, the LE cell test is now performed only rarely and is mostly of historical significance.[67]

Diagnostic criteria

Some physicians make a diagnosis on the basis of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria. The criteria, however, were established mainly for use in scientific research including use in randomized controlled trials which require higher confidence levels, so many people with SLE may not pass the full criteria.


The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) established eleven criteria in 1982,[68] which were revised in 1997[69] as a classificatory instrument to operationalise the definition of SLE in clinical trials. They were not intended to be used to diagnose individuals and do not do well in that capacity. For the purpose of identifying patients for clinical studies, a person has SLE if any 4 out of 11 symptoms are present simultaneously or serially on two separate occasions. Useful mnemonic for remembering the diagnostic findings or symptoms of SLE is SOAP BRAIN MD (S=serositis, O=oral ulcers, A=arthritis, P=photosensitivity, pulmonary fibrosis, B=blood cells, R=renal, Raynauds, A=ANA, I=immunologic (anti-Sm, anti-dsDNA), N=neuropsych, M=malar rash, D=discoid rash), however, not in order of diagnostic importance.

  1. Malar rash (rash on cheeks); sensitivity = 57%; specificity = 96%.[70]
  2. Discoid rash (red, scaly patches on skin that cause scarring); sensitivity = 18%; specificity = 99%.[70]
  3. Serositis: Pleurisy (inflammation of the membrane around the lungs) or pericarditis (inflammation of the membrane around the heart); sensitivity = 56%; specificity = 86% (pleural is more sensitive; cardiac is more specific).[70]
  4. Oral ulcers (includes oral or nasopharyngeal ulcers); sensitivity = 27%; specificity = 96%.[70]
  5. Arthritis: nonerosive arthritis of two or more peripheral joints, with tenderness, swelling, or effusion; sensitivity = 86%; specificity = 37%.[70]
  6. Photosensitivity (exposure to ultraviolet light causes rash, or other symptoms of SLE flareups); sensitivity = 43%; specificity = 96%.[70]
  7. Blood—hematologic disorder—hemolytic anemia (low red blood cell count) or leukopenia (white blood cell count<4000/µl), lymphopenia (<1500/µl) or thrombocytopenia (<100000/µl) in the absence of offending drug; sensitivity = 59%; specificity = 89%.[70] Hypocomplementemia is also seen, due to either consumption of C3[71] and C4 by immune complex-induced inflammation or to congenitally complement deficiency, which may predispose to SLE.
  8. Renal disorder: More than 0.5 g per day protein in urine or cellular casts seen in urine under a microscope; sensitivity = 51%; specificity = 94%.[70]
  9. Antinuclear antibody test positive; sensitivity = 99%; specificity = 49%.[70]
  10. Immunologic disorder: Positive anti-Smith, anti-ds DNA, antiphospholipid antibody, and/or false positive serological test for syphilis; sensitivity = 85%; specificity = 93%.[70] Presence of anti-ss DNA in 70% of cases (though also positive with rheumatic disease and healthy persons).[72]
  11. Neurologic disorder: Seizures or psychosis; sensitivity = 20%; specificity = 98%.[70]

Other than the ACR criteria, people with lupus may also have:[73]

  • fever (over 100 °F/ 37.7°C)
  • extreme fatigue
  • hair loss
  • fingers turning white and/or blue when cold (Raynaud's phenomenon)

Criteria for individual diagnosis

Some people, especially those with antiphospholipid syndrome, may have SLE without four of the above criteria, and also SLE may present with features other than those listed in the criteria.[74][75][76]

Recursive partitioning has been used to identify more parsimonious criteria.[70] This analysis presented two diagnostic classification trees:

  1. Simplest classification tree: SLE is diagnosed if a person has an immunologic disorder (anti-DNA antibody, anti-Smith antibody, false positive syphilis test, or LE cells) or malar rash. It has sensitivity = 92% and specificity = 92%.
  2. Full classification tree: Uses 6 criteria. It has sensitivity = 97% and specificity = 95%.

Other alternative criteria have been suggested, e.g. the St. Thomas' Hospital "alternative" criteria in 1998.[77]


SLE cannot be prevented, but the consequences can be prevented.[78]

As longevity of people with SLE increases, the likelihood of complications also increases in four areas: cardiovascular disease, infections, osteoporosis, and cancer. Standard preventive measures, screening for related diseases may be necessary to deal with the increased risks due to the side effects of medications. Extra vigilance is considered warranted in particular for cancers affecting the immune system.[79]


The treatment of SLE involves preventing flares and reducing their severity and duration when they occur.

Treatment can include corticosteroids and anti-malarial drugs. Certain types of lupus nephritis such as diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis require bouts of cytotoxic drugs. These drugs include cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate.

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was approved by the FDA for lupus in 1955.[80] Some drugs approved for other diseases are used for SLE 'off-label'. In November 2010, an FDA advisory panel recommended approving belimumab (Benlysta) as a treatment for the pain and flare-ups common in lupus. The drug was approved by the FDA in March 2011.[81][82] N-acetylcysteine has been shown to reverse depletion of the natural anti-oxidant glutathione and to safely improve disease activity in a double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study.[83]


Due to the variety of symptoms and organ system involvement with SLE, its severity in an individual must be assessed in order to successfully treat SLE. Mild or remittent disease may, sometimes, be safely left untreated. If required, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antimalarials may be used. Medications such as Prednisone, Cellcept and Prograf have been used in the past. A number of potential treatments are in clinical trials.[84]

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

Mycophenolic acid is also used for treatment of lupus nephritis, but it is not FDA-approved for this indication, and FDA is investigating reports that it may be associated with birth defects when used by pregnant women.[85]

Immunosuppressive drugs

In more severe cases, medications that modulate the immune system (primarily corticosteroids and immunosuppressants) are used to control the disease and prevent recurrence of symptoms (known as flares). Depending on the dosage, people who require steroids may develop Cushing's syndrome, symptoms of which may include obesity, puffy round face, diabetes mellitus, increased appetite, difficulty sleeping and osteoporosis. These may subside if and when the large initial dosage is reduced, but long-term use of even low doses can cause elevated blood pressure and cataracts.

Numerous new immunosuppressive drugs are being actively tested for SLE. Rather than suppressing the immune system nonspecifically, as corticosteroids do, they target the responses of individual [types of] immune cells. Some of these drugs are already FDA-approved for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.[80] See also Belimumab and Atacicept. Lupuzor has given encouraging results in a phase IIb trial.[86]


Since a large percentage of people with SLE suffer from varying amounts of chronic pain, stronger prescription analgesics (pain killers) may be used if over-the-counter drugs (mainly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) do not provide effective relief. Potent NSAIDs such as indomethacin and diclofenac are relatively contraindicated for patients with SLE because they increase the risk of kidney failure and heart failure.[80]

Pain is typically treated with opioids, varying in potency based on the severity of symptoms. When opioids are used for prolonged periods, drug tolerance, chemical dependency, and addiction may occur. Opiate addiction is not typically a concern, since the condition is not likely to ever completely disappear. Thus, lifelong treatment with opioids is fairly common for chronic pain symptoms, accompanied by periodic titration that is typical of any long-term opioid regimen.

Intravenous Immunoglobulins (IVIGs)

vasculitis. It is believed that they reduce antibody production or promote the clearance of immune complexes from the body, even though their mechanism of action is not well-understood.[87] Unlike immunosuppressives and corticosteroids, IVIGs do not suppress the immune system, so there is less risk of serious infections with these drugs.[88]

Lifestyle changes

Avoiding sunlight is the primary change to the lifestyle of SLE sufferers, as sunlight is known to exacerbate the disease, as is the debilitating effect of intense fatigue. These two problems can lead to patients becoming housebound for long periods of time. Drugs unrelated to SLE should be prescribed only when known not to exacerbate the disease. Occupational exposure to silica, pesticides and mercury can also make the disease worsen.[35]

Renal transplantation

Renal transplants are the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease, which is one of the complications of lupus nephritis, but the recurrence of the full disease is common in up to 30% of patients.[89]

Antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome is also related to the onset of neural lupus symptoms in the brain. In this form of the disease the cause is very different from lupus: thromboses (blood clots or "sticky blood") form in blood vessels, which prove to be fatal if they move within the blood stream.[74] If the thromboses migrate to the brain, they can potentially cause a stroke by blocking the blood supply to the brain.

If this disorder is suspected in patients, brain scans are usually required for early detection. These scans can show localized areas of the brain where blood supply has not been adequate. The treatment plan for these patients requires anticoagulation. Often, low-dose aspirin is prescribed for this purpose, although for cases involving thrombosis anticoagulants such as warfarin are used.[90]

Management of pregnancy

While most infants born to mothers who have SLE are healthy, pregnant mothers with SLE should remain under medical care until delivery. Neonatal lupus is rare, but identification of mothers at highest risk for complications allows for prompt treatment before or after birth. In addition, SLE can flare up during pregnancy, and proper treatment can maintain the health of the mother longer. Women pregnant and known to have anti-Ro (SSA) or anti-La antibodies (SSB) often have echocardiograms during the 16th and 30th weeks of pregnancy to monitor the health of the heart and surrounding vasculature.[78]

Contraception and other reliable forms of pregnancy prevention is routinely advised for women with SLE, since getting pregnant during active disease was found to be harmful. Lupus nephritis was the most common manifestation.


SLE is incurable, but treatable.

In the 1950s, most people diagnosed with SLE lived fewer than five years. Today, over 90% now survive for more than ten years, and many live relatively asymptomatically. 80-90% can expect to live a normal lifespan.[91]

Prognosis is typically worse for men and children than for women; however, if symptoms are present after age 60, the disease tends to run a more benign course. Early mortality, within 5 years, is due to organ failure or overwhelming infections, both of which can be altered by early diagnosis and treatment. The mortality risk is fivefold when compared to the normal population in the late stages, which can be attributed to cardiovascular disease from accelerated atherosclerosis, the leading cause of death for people with SLE.[80]

To reduce potential for cardiovascular issues, high blood pressure and high cholesterol should be prevented or treated aggressively. Steroids should be used at the lowest dose for the shortest possible period, and other drugs that can reduce symptoms should be used whenever possible.[80] High serum creatinine, hypertension, nephrotic syndrome, anemia and hypoalbuminemia are poor prognostic factors.[92]

The ANA is the most sensitive screening test for evaluation, whereas anti-Sm (anti-Smith) is the most specific. The dsDNA (double-stranded DNA) antibody is also fairly specific and often fluctuates with disease activity; as such, the dsDNA titre is sometimes useful to monitor disease flares or response to treatment.[93]


The rate of SLE varies considerably between countries, ethnicity, gender, and changes over time.[94] In the United States, one estimate of the prevalence of SLE is 53 per 100,000;[94] other estimates range from 322,000 to over 1 million.[95] In Northern Europe the rate is about 40 per 100,000 people.[96] SLE occurs more frequently and with greater severity among those of non-European descent.[95] That rate has been found to be as high as 159 per 100,000 among those of Afro-Caribbean descent.[94]

While the onset and persistence of SLE can show disparities between genders, socioeconomic status also plays a major role. Women with SLE and of lower socioeconomic status have been shown to have higher depression scores, higher body mass index, and more restricted access to medical care than women of higher socioeconomic statuses with the illness. SLE patients had more self-reported anxiety and depression scores if they were from a lower socioeconomic status[97]

There are assertions that race and SLE are correlated. However, a 2010 review of studies which correlate race and SLE identified several sources of systematic and methodological error, indicating that the connection between race and SLE may be spurious [98]. For example, studies show that social support is a modulating factor which buffers against SLE-related damage and maintains physiological functionality.[98] Studies have not been conducted to determine whether patients of different racial backgrounds receive differing levels of social support.[98] If there is a difference, this could act as a confounding variable in studies correlating race and SLE. Another caveat to note when examining studies about SLE is that symptoms are often self-reported. This process introduces additional sources of methodological error. Studies have shown that self-reported data is affected by more than just the patients experience with the disease- social support, level of helplessness, and abnormal illness-related behaviors also factor into a self-assessment. Additionally, other factors like the degree of social support which a patient receives, socioeconomic status, health insurance, and access to care can contribute to an individual’s disease progression.[98] [99]It is important to note that racial differences in lupus progression have not been found in studies that control for the socioeconomic status [SES] of participants.[98][100] Studies that control for the SES of its participants have found that non-white patients have more abrupt disease onset compared to white patients, and that their disease progresses more quickly. Non-white patients often report more hematological, serosal, neurological, and renal symptoms. However, the severity of symptoms and mortality are both similar in white and non-white patients. Studies that report different rates of disease progression in late stage SLE are most likely reflecting differences in socioeconomic status and the corresponding access to care.[98] The patients who receive medical care often have accrued less disease-related damage, and are less likely to be below the poverty line.[101] Additional studies have found that education, marital status, occupation, and income create a social context which contributes to disease progression.[98]

SLE, like many autoimmune diseases, affects females more frequently than males, at a rate of almost 9 to 1.[94] This is due to the presence of two X chromosomes in the female as opposed to the one X chromosome present in males. The X chromosome carries immunological related genes, which can mutate and contribute to the onset of SLE. The Y chromosome has no identified mutations associated with autoimmune disease.[102]

Hormonal mechanisms could explain the increased incidence of SLE in females. The onset of SLE could be attributed to the elevated hydroxylation of estrogen and the abnormally decreased levels of androgens in female patients. In addition, differences in GnRH signalling have also shown to contribute to the onset of SLE. While females are more likely to relapse than males, the intensity of these relapses is the same for both sexes[103]

In addition to hormonal mechanisms, specific genetic influences found on the X chromosome may also contribute to the development of SLE. Studies indicate that the X chromosome can determine the levels of sex hormones. A study has shown an association between Klinefelter’s syndrome and SLE. XXY males with SLE have an abnormal X-Y translocation resulting the in the partial triplication of the PAR1 gene region.[104]

The incidence of SLE in the United States increased from 1.0 in 1955 to 7.6 in 1974. Whether the increase is due to better diagnosis or to increasing frequency of the disease is unknown.[94]

The global prevalence of SLE is approximately 20-70/100,000 people.The global age distribution of SLE ranges from ages 2-80+. In females, incidence is highest between 45-64 year of age. The lowest overall incidences exist in Iceland and Japan. The highest incidences exist in US and France. However, there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that SLE is less common in some countries compared to others, since there is significant environmental variability in these countries. For example, different countries receive different levels of sunlight, and exposure to UV rays affects dermatological symptoms of SLE. Certain studies hypothesize that a genetic connection exists between race and lupus which affects disease prevalence. If this is true, the racial composition of countries affects disease, and will cause the incidence in a country to change as the racial makeup changes. In order to understand if this is true, countries with largely homogenous and racially stable populations should be studied to better understand incidence. [105]


The history of SLE can be divided into three periods: classical, neoclassical, and modern. In each period, research and documentation advanced the understanding and diagnosis of SLE, leading to its classification as an autoimmune disease in 1851, and to the various diagnostic options and treatments now available to SLE patients. The advances made by medical science in the diagnosis and treatment of SLE has dramatically improved the life expectancy of a person diagnosed with SLE.[106]


There are several explanations ventured for the term lupus erythematosus. Lupus is Latin for wolf,[107] and "erythro" is derived from ερυθρός, Greek for "red." All explanations originate with the reddish, butterfly-shaped malar rash that the disease classically exhibits across the nose and cheeks.

  1. In various accounts, some doctors thought the rash resembled the pattern of fur on a wolf's face. More likely is that it is derived from the similarity in distribution to lupus vulgaris or chronic facial tuberculosis where the lesions are ragged and punched out and are said to resemble the bite of a wolf.
  2. Another account claims that the term "lupus" did not come from Latin directly, but from the term for a French style of mask that women reportedly wore to conceal the rash on their faces. The mask is called a "loup," French for "wolf."

Classical period

The classical period began when the disease was first recognized in the Middle Ages. The term lupus is attributed to 12th-centry Italian physician Rogerius Frugard, who used it describe ulcerating sores on the legs of patients.[108] No formal treatment for the disease existed and the resources available to physicians to relieve the suffering of their patients was limited.[109]

Neoclassical period

The neoclassical period began in 1851 when the skin disease now known as discoid lupus was documented by French physician, Pierre Cazenave. Cazenave termed the illness lupus and added the word erythematosus to distinguish this disease from other illnesses that affected the skin but were also infectious.[110] Cazenave observed the disease in several patients and made very detailed notes to assist others in itsdiagnosis. He was one of the first to document that lupus affected adults from adolescence into the early thirties and that the facial rash is its most distinguishing feature.[111]

Research and documentation of the disease continued in the neoclassical period with the work of Ferdinand von Hebra and his son-in-law, Moritz Kaposi. They documented the physical effects of lupus as well as some insights into the possibility that the disease caused internal trauma. von Hebra observed that lupus symptoms could last many years and that the disease could go "dormant" after years of aggressive activity and then re-appear with symptoms following the same general pattern. These observations led Hebra to term lupus a chronic disease in 1872.[112]

Kaposi observed that lupus assumed two forms: the skin lesions (now known as discoid lupus) and a more aggravated form that affected not only the skin but also caused fever, arthritis, and other systemic disorders in patients.[113] The latter also presented a rash confined to the face, appearing on the cheeks and across the bridge of the nose; he called this the "butterfly rash". Kaposi also observed those patients who developed the "butterfly rash" (or malar rash) often were afflicted with another disease such as tuberculosis, anemia, or chlorisis which often caused death.[111] Kaposi was one of the first persons to recognize what is now termed systemic lupus erythematosus in his documentation of the remitting and relapsing nature of the disease and the relationship of skin and systemic manifestations during disease activity.[114]

The 19th century's research into lupus continued with the work of [115] Osler's second paper noted that reoccurrence is a special feature of the disease and that attacks can be sustained for months or even years. Further study of the disease led to a third paper, published in 1903, documenting afflictions such as arthritis, pneumonia, the inability to form coherent ideas, delirium, and central nervous system damage as all affecting patients diagnosed with SLE.[111]

Modern period

The modern period, beginning in 1920, saw major developments in research into the cause and treatment of discoid and systemic lupus. Research conducted in the 1920s and 1930s led to the first detailed pathologic descriptions of lupus and demonstrated how the disease affected the kidney, heart, and lung tissue.[116] A major breakthrough was made in 1948 with the discovery of the LE cell (the lupus erythematosus cell—a misnomer, as it occurs with other diseases as well). Discovered by a team of researchers at the Mayo Clinic, they discovered that the white blood cells contained the nucleus of another cell that was pushing against the white's cell proper nucleus.[117] Noting that the invading nucleus was coated with anti-body that allowed it to be ingested by a phagocytic or scavenger cell, they named the antibody that causes one cell to ingest another the LE factor and the two-nuclei cell result the LE cell.[118] The LE cell, it was determined, was a part of an anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) reaction; the body produces antibodies against its own tissue. This discovery led to one of the first definitive tests for lupus for LE cells are found in approximately 60% of all people diagnosed with lupus.[119] (Note: The LE cell test is rarely performed as a definitive lupus test today as LE cells do not always occur in lupus patients and can occur in individuals with other autoimmune diseases. Their presence, however, can be helpful in establishing a diagnosis but is no longer indicates a definitive SLE diagnosis)

The discovery of the LE cell led to further research and this resulted in more definitive tests for lupus. Building on the knowledge that those with SLE had auto-antibodies that would attach themselves to the nuclei of normal cells, causing the immune system to send white blood cells to fight off these "invaders", a test was developed to look for the anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) rather than the LE cell specifically. This ANA test was easier to perform and led not only to a definitive diagnosis for lupus but also many other related diseases. This discovery led to the development of what are now known as autoimmune diseases.[120]

To ensure that the patient has lupus and not another autoimmune disease, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) established a list of clinical and immunologic criteria that, in any combination, point to SLE. The criteria include symptoms that the patient can identify (e.g. pain) and things that a physician can detect in a physical examination and through laboratory test results. The list was originally compiled in 1971, initially revised in 1982, and further revised and improved in 2009.[121]

Medical historians have theorized that people with porphyria (a disease that shares many symptoms with SLE) generated folklore stories of vampires and werewolves, due to the photosensitivity, scarring, hair growth, and porphyrin brownish-red stained teeth in severe recessive forms of porphyria (or combinations of the disorder, known as dual, homozygous, or compound heterozygous porphyrias).[122]

Useful medication for the disease was first found in 1894, when quinine was first reported as an effective therapy. Four years later, the use of salicylates in conjunction with quinine was noted to be of still greater benefit. This was the best available treatment until the middle of the twentieth century, when Hench discovered the efficacy of corticosteroids in the treatment of SLE.[122]

Notable cases


Since lupus is considered to be currently incurable, current research is being geared towards finding a possible cause, a cure, and more effective treatment plans to extend and increase the quality of life for lupus patients.

A study called BLISS-76 tested the drug, Belimumab (HGS1006, LymphoStat-B ), a fully human monoclonal anti-BAFF (or anti-BLyS) antibody.[82] stimulates and extends the life of B lymphocytes, which produce antibodies against foreign and self cells.[146] The drug, branded Benlysta, was approved by the FDA in March 2011.[81]

See also


  1. ^ a b "Harrison's Internal Medicine, 17th ed. Chapter 313. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus". Retrieved 2011-08-06. 
  2. ^ a b c d e f Anisur Rahman and David A. Isenberg (February 28, 2008). "Review Article: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus". N Engl J Med 358 (9): 929–939.  
  3. ^ "LUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA". Retrieved 2007-07-04. 
  4. ^ James, William; Berger, Timothy; Elston, Dirk (2005). Andrews' Diseases of the Skin: Clinical Dermatology. (10th ed.). Saunders. ISBN 0-7216-2921-0.
  5. ^ Blotzer JW (June 1983). "Systemic lupus erythematosus I: historical aspects.". Md State Med J 32 (6): 439–41.  
  6. ^ MedicineNet: Systemic Lupus (cont.) Last Editorial Review: 2009-01-30
  7. ^ """Lupus, "The Great Imitator. University Health Care. Retrieved 2009-02-03. 
  8. ^ "Lupus: Symptoms —". Retrieved 2008-07-14. 
  9. ^ Wasef, Sherif Z. Yacoub. "Gender Differences in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus." Gender Medicine 1.1 (2004): 12-17. Web.
  10. ^ Tebbe, B; Orfanos, CE (1997). "Epidemiology and socioeconomic impact of skin disease in lupus erythematosus". Lupus 6 (2). 
  11. ^ a b Joint and Muscle Pain Lupus Foundation of America
  12. ^ Hodkinson B, Musenge E, Tikly M (February 2009). "Osteoarticular tuberculosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus".  
  13. ^ Hemminki K, Li X, Sundquist J, Sundquist K (February 2009). "Familial associations of rheumatoid arthritis with autoimmune diseases and related conditions".  
  14. ^ Mendoza-Pinto C, García-Carrasco M, Sandoval-Cruz H, et al. (February 2009). "Risk factors of vertebral fractures in women with systemic lupus erythematosus". Clin. Rheumatol. 28 (5): 579–85.  
  15. ^ Lam, SK; Quah, TC (1990). "Anemia in systemic lupus erythematosus.". The Journal of the Singapore Paediatric Society 32 (3-4): 132–6.  
  16. ^ Giannouli, S (1 February 2006). "Anaemia in systemic lupus erythematosus: from pathophysiology to clinical assessment". Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 65 (2): 144–148.  
  17. ^ Syuto T, Shimizu A, Takeuchi Y, et al. (February 2009). "Association of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus". Clin. Rheumatol. 28 (7): 841–5.  
  18. ^ Yu Asanuma, M.D., Ph.D., Annette Oeser, B.S., Ayumi K. Shintani, Ph.D., M.P.H., Elizabeth Turner, M.D., Nancy Olsen, M.D., Sergio Fazio, M.D., Ph.D., MacRae F. Linton, M.D., Paolo Raggi, M.D., and C. Michael Stein, M.D. (December 2003). "Premature coronary-artery atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus". N Engl J Med 349 (25): 2407–14.  
  19. ^ Bevra Hannahs Hahn, M.D. (December 2003). "Systemic lupus erythematosus and accelerated atherosclerosis". N Engl J Med 349 (25): 2379–80.  
  20. ^ Mary J. Roman, M.D., Beth-Ann Shanker, A.B., Adrienne Davis, A.B., Michael D. Lockshin, M.D., Lisa Sammaritano, M.D., Ronit Simantov, M.D., Mary K. Crow, M.D., Joseph E. Schwartz, Ph.D., Stephen A. Paget, M.D., Richard B. Devereux, M.D., and Jane E. Salmon, M.D. (December 2003). "Prevalence and correlates of accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus". N Engl J Med 349 (25): 2399–2406.  
  21. ^ "General Pathology Images for Immunopathology". Retrieved 2007-07-24. 
  22. ^ a b "The American College of Rheumatology nomenclature and case definitions for neuropsychiatric lupus syndromes". Arthritis Rheum. 42 (4): 599–608. April 1999.  
  23. ^ Neuwelt CM and Young RG (April 2, 2009). "Managing neuropsychiatric lupus: Top 10 clinical pearls". The Journal of Musculoskeletal Medicine 26 (4). 
  24. ^ a b c d e f Honczarenko K, Budzianowska A, Ostanek L (2008). "Neurological syndromes in systemic lupus erythematosus and their association with antiphospholipid syndrome". Neurol. Neurochir. Pol. 42 (6): 513–7.  
  25. ^ Omdal R (2002). "Some controversies of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus". Scand. J. Rheumatol. 31 (4): 192–7.  
  26. ^ Xue Z, Wang X, Liu F, et al. (February 2009). "Intracranial hypertension syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus: Clinical analysis and review of the literature". J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. Med. Sci. 29 (1): 107–11.  
  27. ^ West SG (September 1996). "Lupus and the central nervous system". Curr Opin Rheumatol 8 (5): 408–14.  
  28. ^ "Lupus site (SLE)". Retrieved 2009-11-06. 
  29. ^ Zakeri Z, Shakiba M, Narouie B, Mladkova N, Ghasemi-Rad M, Khosravi A (January 2011). "Prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Iranian experience". Rheumatol Int 32 (5): 1179–87.  
  30. ^ Smyth, Andrew; Guilherme H.M. Oliveira; Brian D. Lahr; Kent R. Bailey; Suzanne M. Norby; Vesna D. Garovic (November 2010). "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Lupus Nephritis". Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 5 (11): 2060–2068.  
  31. ^ Cortés‐Hernández, J.; J. Ordi‐Ros, F. Paredes, M. Casellas, F. Castillo, and M. Vilardell‐Tarres (December 2001). "Clinical predictors of fetal and maternal outcome in systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective study of 103 pregnancies". Rheumatology 41 (6): 643–650.  
  32. ^ a b > neonatal lupus Citing: Dorland's Medical Dictionary for Health Consumers. Copyright 2007
  33. ^ D'Cruz DP (April 2006). "Systemic lupus erythematosus". BMJ 332 (7546): 890–4.  
  34. ^ Jump RL, Robinson ME, Armstrong AE, Barnes EV, Kilbourn KM, Richards HB (September 2005). "Fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus: contributions of disease activity, pain, depression, and perceived social support". J. Rheumatol. 32 (9): 1699–705.  
  35. ^ a b D'Cruz DP, Khamashta MA, Hughes GR (February 2007). "Systemic lupus erythematosus". Lancet 369 (9561): 587–96.  
  36. ^ Kanta H, Mohan C (March 2009). "Three checkpoints in lupus development: central tolerance in adaptive immunity, peripheral amplification by innate immunity and end-organ inflammation". Genes Immun. 10 (5): 390–6.  
  37. ^ Parks, C. G., and G. S. Cooper. "Occupational Exposures and Risk of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review of the Evidence and Exposure Assessment Methods in Population-and Clinic-based Studies." Lupus 15.11 (2006): 728-36
  38. ^ Cooper, Glinda S., Kathleen M. Gilbert, Eric L. Greidinger, Judith A. James, Jean C. Pfau, Leslie Reinlib, Bruce C. Richardson, and Noel R. Rose. "Recent Advances and Opportunities in Research on Lupus: Environmental Influences and Mechanisms of Disease." Environmental Health Perspectives 116.6 (2008): 695-702.
  39. ^ Pons-Estel, Guillermo J., Graciela S. Alarcón, Lacie Scofield, Leslie Reinlib, and Glinda S. Cooper. "Understanding the Epidemiology and Progression of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus." Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 39.4 (2010): 257-68.
  40. ^ Tchounwou, Paul B., Wellington K. Ayensu, Nanuli Ninashvili, and Dwayne Sutton. "Review: Environmental Exposure to Mercury and Its Toxicopathologic Implications for Public Health." Environmental Toxicology 18.3 (2003): 149-75
  41. ^ Cooper, Glinda S., Kathleen M. Gilbert, Eric L. Greidinger, Judith A. James, Jean C. Pfau, Leslie Reinlib, Bruce C. Richardson, and Noel R. Rose. "Recent Advances and Opportunities in Research on Lupus: Environmental Influences and Mechanisms of Disease." Environmental Health Perspectives 116.6 (2008): 695-702.
  42. ^ Kilburn, Kaye H., and Raphael H. Warshaw. "Prevalence of Symptoms of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and of Fluorescent Antinuclear Antibodies Associated with Chronic Exposure to Trichloroethylene and Other Chemicals in Well Water." Environmental Research 57.1 (1992): 1-9.
  43. ^ Yamakage, Akio, and Hidekazu Ishikawa. "Generalized Morphea-Like Scleroderma Occurring in People Exposed to Organic Solvents."Dermatology 165.3 (1982): 186-93.
  44. ^ Walder, Brian. "Solvents And Scleroderma." The Lancet 286.7409 (1965): 436-37.
  45. ^ “Kwapniewski, Rachel, Sarah Kozaczka, Russ Hauser, Manori J. Silva, Antonia M. Calafat, and Susan M. Duty.” "Occupational Exposure to Dibutyl Phthalate Among Manicurists." Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 50.6 (2008): 705-11. ProQuest. Web. 1 Dec. 2014.
  46. ^ Roelofs, Cora, Lenore S. Azaroff, Christina Holcroft, Huong Nguyen, and Tam Doan. "Results from a Community-based Occupational Health Survey of Vietnamese-American Nail Salon Workers." Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health (2007): 353-61. ProQuest. Web. 1 Nov. 2014.
  47. ^ Kwapniewski, Rachel, Sarah Kozaczka, Russ Hauser, Manori J. Silva, Antonia M. Calafat, and Susan M. Duty. "Occupational Exposure to Dibutyl Phthalate Among Manicurists." Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 50.6 (2008): 705-11. ProQuest. Web. 1 Dec. 2014.
  48. ^ Kwapniewski, Rachel, Sarah Kozaczka, Russ Hauser, Manori J. Silva, Antonia M. Calafat, and Susan M. Duty. "Occupational Exposure to Dibutyl Phthalate Among Manicurists." Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 50.6 (2008): 705-11. ProQuest. Web. 1 Dec. 2014.
  49. ^ Martens HA, Nolte IM, van der Steege G, et al. (March 2009). "An extensive screen of the HLA region reveals an independent association of HLA class I and class II with susceptibility for systemic lupus erythematosus". Scand. J. Rheumatol. 38 (4): 1–7.  
  50. ^ a b c Yang W, Ng P, Zhao M, et al. (February 2009). "Population differences in SLE susceptibility genes: STAT4 and BLK, but not PXK, are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus in Hong Kong Chinese". Genes Immun. 10 (3): 219–26.  
  51. ^ Kim K, Sung YK, Kang CP, Choi CB, Kang C, Bae SC (March 2009). "A regulatory SNP at position -899 in CDKN1A is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis". Genes Immun. 10 (5): 482–6.  
  52. ^ Rhodes B, Vyse TJ (November 2008). "The genetics of SLE: an update in the light of genome-wide association studies". Rheumatology (Oxford) 47 (11): 1603–11.  
  53. ^ Millard, L. G. "Abnormal Laboratory Test Results and Their Relationship to Prognosis in Discoid Lupus Erythematosus. A Long-term Follow-up Study of 92 Patients." Archives of Dermatology 115.9 (1979): 1055-058.
  54. ^ Mary K. Crow (February 28, 2008). "Collaboration, Genetic Associations, and Lupus Erythematosus". N Engl J Med 358 (9): 956–961.  
  55. ^ Geoffrey Hom, Robert R. Graham, Barmak Modrek, et al. (February 28, 2008). "Association of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with C8orf13–BLK and ITGAM–ITGAX". N Engl J Med 358 (9): 900–9.  
  56. ^ "University of South Carolina School of Medicine lecture notes, Immunology, Hypersensitivity reactions. General discussion of hypersensitivity, not specific to SLE". 2010-07-07. Retrieved 2011-08-06. 
  57. ^ Scheinfeld NS, DiCostanzo DD, Cohen SR (December 2003). "Reticulate and stellate acral pigmentation associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and high titers of circulating anticardiolipin antibodies: a possible association with acral microlivedo". Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD 2 (6): 674–6.  
  58. ^ Gaipl US, Kuhn A, Sheriff A, et al. (2006). "Clearance of apoptotic cells in human SLE". Curr. Dir. Autoimmun. Current Directions in Autoimmunity 9: 173–87.  
  59. ^ Gergely P Jr, Grossman C, Niland B, Puskas F, Neupane H, Allam F, Banki K, Phillips PE, Perl A. "Mitochondrial hyperpolarization and ATP depletion in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.". 
  60. ^ Hakkim A, Fürnrohr BG, Amann K, et al. (May 2010). "Impairment of neutrophil extracellular trap degradation is associated with lupus nephritis". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 (21): 9813–8.  
  61. ^ Yasutomo K, Horiuchi T, Kagami S, et al. (2001). "Mutation of DNASE1 in people with systemic lupus erythematosus". Nat. Genet. 28 (4): 313–4.  
  62. ^ Gaipl US, Munoz LE, Grossmayer G, et al. (2007). "Clearance deficiency and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)". J. Autoimmun. 28 (2–3): 114–21.  
  63. ^ Poole BD, Schneider RI, Guthridge JM, et al. (February 2009). "Early targets of nuclear RNP humoral autoimmunity in human systemic lupus erythematosus".  
  64. ^ Pan HF, Wu GC, Li WP, Li XP, Ye DQ (February 2009). "High Mobility Group Box 1: a potential therapeutic target for systemic lupus erythematosus". Mol. Biol. Rep. 37 (3): 1191–5.  
  65. ^ Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2011; 7: 27–32. The lupus band test in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Adam Reich, Katarzyna Marcinow, and Rafal Bialynicki-Birula
  66. ^ Buyon JP, Clancy RM (December 2003). "Maternal autoantibodies and congenital heart block: mediators, markers, and therapeutic approach". Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 33 (3): 140–54.  
  67. ^ NIM encyclopedic article on the LE cell test
  68. ^ "Article on the classification of rheumatic diseases". 2011-06-08. Retrieved 2011-08-06. 
  69. ^ "Revision of's diagnostic criteria". 2011-06-08. Retrieved 2011-08-06. 
  70. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Edworthy SM, Zatarain E, McShane DJ, Bloch DA (1988). "Analysis of the 1982 ARA lupus criteria data set by recursive partitioning methodology: new insights into the relative merit of individual criteria". J. Rheumatol. 15 (10): 1493–8.  
  71. ^ Weinstein, A; Bordwell, B; Stone, B; Tibbetts, C; Rothfield, NF (February 1983). "Antibodies to native DNA and serum complement (C3) levels. Application to diagnosis and classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.". The American journal of medicine 74 (2): 206–16.  
  72. ^ "UpToDate Patient information article on DNA antibodies". Retrieved 2011-08-06. 
  73. ^ "Common Symptoms of Lupus". Lupus Foundation of America. Retrieved 7 June 2013. 
  74. ^ a b Asherson RA, Cervera R, de Groot PG, et al. (2003). "Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: international consensus statement on classification criteria and treatment guidelines". Lupus 12 (7): 530–4.  
  75. ^ Sangle S, D'Cruz DP, Hughes GR (2005). "Livedo reticularis and pregnancy morbidity in patients negative for antiphospholipid antibodies". Ann. Rheum. Dis. 64 (1): 147–8.  
  76. ^ Hughes GR, Khamashta MA (2003). "Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome". Ann. Rheum. Dis. 62 (12): 1127.  
  77. ^ Hughes GR (1998). "Is it lupus? The St. Thomas' Hospital "alternative" criteria". Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 16 (3): 250–2.  
  78. ^ a b "Handout on Health: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus". The National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. National Institutes of Health. August 2003. Retrieved 2007-11-23. 
  79. ^ Yazdany J (2008). "Strategies for preventive care in systemic lupus erythematosus". The Journal of Musculoskeletal Medicine. 
  80. ^ a b c d e f Vasudevan AR and Ginzler EM (August 4, 2009). "Established and novel treatments for lupus". The Journal of Musculoskeletal Medicine 26 (8). 
  81. ^ a b "FDA approves first new lupus drug in 56 years". Retrieved 6 May 2011. 
  82. ^ a b Vincent FB, Morand EF and Mackay F (2012). "BAFF and innate immunity: new therapeutic targets for systemic lupus erythematosus". Immunology and cell biology 90 (3): 293–303.  
  83. ^ Lai ZW, Hanczko R, Bonilla E, Caza TN, Clair B, Bartos A, Miklossy G, Jimah J, Doherty E, Tily H, Francis L, Garcia R, Dawood M, Yu J, Ramos I, Coman I, Faraone SV, Phillips PE, Perl A. "N-acetylcysteine reduces disease activity by blocking mammalian target of rapamycin in T cells from systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.". 
  84. ^ "Table 1. Current lupus drugs in development". 2009. 
  85. ^ "FDA Alert: Mycophenolate Mofetil (marketed as CellCept) and Mycophenolic Acid (marketed as Myfortic)". May 16, 2008. 
  86. ^ "ImmuPharma Announces Final Results Of PhaseIIb Study Of LUPUZOR™ In Lupus". Retrieved 2011-08-06. 
  87. ^ "Handout on Health: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services". Retrieved 2010-10-13. 
  88. ^ "Intravenous Immunoglobulins (IVIGs) in Lupus Central Station, sourced from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services". Retrieved 2010-10-13. 
  89. ^ Cochat P, Fargue S, Mestrallet G, et al. (February 2009). "Disease recurrence in paediatric renal transplantation". Pediatr. Nephrol. 24 (11): 2097–108.  
  90. ^ Danchenko N, Satia JA, Anthony MS (2006). "Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison of worldwide disease burden". Lupus 15 (5): 308–18.  
  91. ^ "Prognosis and a Hopeful Future". Lupus Foundation of America website. Retrieved 14 December 2010. 
  92. ^ "Poor prognostic factors,Sudheer, SLE document". Retrieved 2011-08-06. 
  93. ^ EARLY STEROIDS MAY PREVENT RELAPSES IN LUPUS, P Jarman (Published in Journal Watch (General) July 18, 1995)
  94. ^ a b c d e Danchenko N, Satia JA, Anthony MS (2006). "Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison of worldwide disease burden". Lupus 15 (5): 308–18.  
  95. ^ a b "OMHD|AMH|Factsheets|Lupus". 
  96. ^ Rahman A, Isenberg DA (February 2008). "Systemic lupus erythematosus". N. Engl. J. Med. 358 (9): 929–39.  
  97. ^ Sule, S., and M. Petri. "Socioeconomic Status in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus." Lupus 15.11 (2006): 720-23. Web.
  98. ^ a b c d e f g Pons-Estel, Guillermo J; Alarcon, Graciela S; Scofield, Lacie; Cooper, Glinda S (2/2010). "Understanding the Epidemiology and Progression of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus". Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 39 (4): 257 .  
  99. ^ Ow, M.Y.; Ho, P.C.; Thumboo, J.; Wee, H.L. (2010 Nov-Dec). "Factors associated with health services utilization in patents with systemic lupus erthematosus: a systematic review". Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 28 (6): 892 . 
  100. ^ Yelin, Edward; Yazdany, Jinoos; Tonner, Chris; Criswell, Lindsey A; Katz, Patricia; Schamjuk, Gabriela (2014). "Interactions between patients, providers, and health systems and technical quality of care". Arthritis Care & Research.  
  101. ^ Yelin, Edward; Yazdany, Jinoos; Tonner, Chris; Criswell, Lindsey A; Katz, Patricia; Schamjuk, Gabriela (2014). "Interactions between patients, providers, and health systems and technical quality of care". Arthritis Care & Research.  
  102. ^ Tsokos GC (December 2011). "Systemic lupus erythematosus". N. Engl. J. Med. 365 (22): 2110–21.  
  103. ^ Wasef, Sherif Z. Yacoub. "Gender Differences in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus." Gender Medicine 1.1 (2004): 12-17. Web.
  104. ^ Zandman-Goddard, Gisele, Elena Peeva, and Yehuda Shoenfeld. "Gender and Autoimmunity." Autoimmunity Reviews 6.6 (2007): 366-72. Web
  105. ^ Danchenko, N.; Satia, J.A.; Anthony, M.S. (2006). "Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison of worldwide disease burden". Lupus 15 (5): 308-318. 
  106. ^ Lupus Foundation of America. 
  107. ^ "Definition in". Retrieved 2012-10-24. 
  108. ^ Thomas, Jr., Donald E. (2014). The Lupus Encyclopedia: A Comprehensive Guide for Patients and Families. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 4.  
  109. ^ Thomas, Jr., Donald E. (2014). The Lupus Encyclopedia: A Comprehensive Guide for Patients and Families. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 463.  
  110. ^ Phillips, Robert H. (2012). Coping with Lupus: A Practical Guide to Alleviating the Challenges of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Penguin Group. pp. 11–12.  
  111. ^ a b c d Talbott, John H. (1966). "Historical Background of Discoid and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus". In Dubois, Edmund L. Lupus Erythematosus: A review of the current status of Discoid and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. New York: McGraw Hill. pp. 1–9. 
  112. ^ Hebra, Ferdinand (1866). Fagge, C. Hilton, ed. Diseases of the skin including the Exanthemata (Vol. 1 ed.). London, England: The New Sydemhan Society. pp. 114–116. 
  113. ^ Blau, Sheldon Paul; Schultz, Dodi (1984). Lupus:The body against itself (2nd Ed. ed.). New York: Doubleday & Company Inc. p. 6. 
  114. ^ Rostein, J. (1974). Kargar, S., ed. "Immunosuppresion Systemic Lupus Erythematosus". Rheumatology: An Annual Review (New York) 5 (5 volumes 1967 - 1974): 52–53. 
  115. ^ Carr, Ronald I. (1986). Lupus Erythematosus: A Handbook for Physicians, Patients, and their Families (2nd ed.). Lupus Foundation of America Inc. p. 3. 
  116. ^ Wallace, Daniel J. (1995). The Lupus Book. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 8. 
  117. ^ Carr, Robert I. (1986). Lupus Erythematosus: A Handbook for Physicians, Patients and Their Families (2nd ed.). Lupus Foundation of America Inc. p. 15. 
  118. ^ Lahita, and Robert H. Phillips, Robert G. (2004). Lupus Q&A: Everything you need to know (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Penguin Group (USA). pp. 65–66.  
  119. ^ Phillips, Robert H. (2012). Coping with Lupus: A Practical Guide to Alleviating the Challenges of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Penguin Group. p. 24.  
  120. ^ Thomas, Jr., Donald E. (2014). The Lupus Encyclopedia: A Comprehensive Guide for Patients and Families. Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 26.  
  121. ^ Thomas, Jr., Donald E. (2014). The Lupus Encyclopedia: A Comprehensive Guide for Patients and Families. Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 17–21.  
  122. ^ a b Hochberg MC (October 1991). "The history of lupus erythematosus". Md Med J 40 (10): 871–3.  
  123. ^ Celebrities with Lupus: Charles Kuralt. Updated: August 11, 2008.
  124. ^ Cramer, Gary. Former chess coach named to Hall of Fame. Penn State Intercom, 26 September 2002.
  125. ^ Famous Lupus Patient: Ferdinand Marcos. Updated: August 11, 2008.
  126. ^ Flannery O'Connor (1925–1964). New Georgia Encyclopedia. Sarah Gordon, Georgia College and State University. Updated 2008-03-21
  127. ^ 1963: Labour leader Hugh Gaitskell dies. On This Day, BBC News, 18 January 1963.
  128. ^ A battle with the wolf. Gardner, Anthony. Mail on Sunday, October 10, 2008.
  129. ^ J Dilla/Jay Dee, Retrieved February 2, 2009.
  130. ^ Larry King Live interview, CNN, 1 June 2010.
  131. ^ "Lady Gaga & Lupus — Larry King Interview". National Ledger. June 2, 2010. Retrieved June 3, 2010. 
  132. ^ "Lady Gaga 'can't walk,' postpones shows". USA Today. February 13, 2013. Retrieved February 13, 2013. 
  133. ^ Jewett-Tennant, Jeri. Celebrities with Lupus: Lauren Schuler Donner. Updated: August 28, 2008.
  134. ^ [1], CNN Entertainment, 29 September 2009.
  135. ^ [2], Lupus Foundation of America, 20 April 2011.
  136. ^ Hirschhorn N, Greaves IA (2007). "Louisa May Alcott: her mysterious illness". Perspect. Biol. Med. 50 (2): 243–59.  
  137. ^ Celebrities with Lupus: Mary Elizabeth McDonough. Updated: October 28, 2008.
  138. ^ Jewett-Tennant, Jeri. Celebrities with Lupus: Mercedes Scelba-Shorte. Updated: August 28, 2008.
  139. ^ Jewett-Tennant, Jeri. Celebrities with Lupus: Michael Jackson. Updated: August 11, 2008.
  140. ^ Mclellan, Dennis. Michael Wayne, 68; Producer, Guardian of His Father's Legacy. Los Angeles Times, April 4, 2003.
  141. ^ Jewett-Tennant, Jeri. Celebrities with Lupus: Ray Walston. Updated: August 11, 2008.
  142. ^ Angie Davidson interviews top glamour model Sophie Howard,, accessed 21 November 2008
  143. ^ In the Beginning, 1949–1954 — Teddi King. Retrieved February 2, 2009.
  144. ^ Jewett-Tennant, Jeri. Celebrities with Lupus: Tim Raines. Updated: August 28, 2008
  145. ^ "LUPUS FORCES SINGER TONI BRAXTON INTO LA HOSPITAL". AP. Retrieved 8 December 2012. 
  146. ^ Bliss76 Study – UNC School of Medicine. Retrieved 2009-11-30.

External links

  • Systemic lupus erythematosus at DMOZ

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.