World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Massachusetts Right to Repair Initiative


Massachusetts Right to Repair Initiative

Voting results by municipality. Of the state's 351 cities and towns, only Salisbury and Groveland had majorities opposing the measure. All other municipalities voted over 70% in support.

The Massachusetts "Right to Repair" Initiative, also known as Question 1, appeared on the Massachusetts 2012 general election ballot as an initiated state statute. The Right to Repair proposal was to require vehicle owners and independent repair facilities in Massachusetts to have access to the same vehicle diagnostic and repair information made available to the manufacturers’ Massachusetts dealers and authorized repair facilities.[1][2] The initiative passed with overwhelming voter support on November 6, 2012, with 86% for and 14% against.[3]

The measure, originally filed four times with the Massachusetts Attorney General, was filed by Arthur W. Kinsman, and was assigned initiative numbers 11-17. On the last day of session, a legislative compromise was agreed to. Although the compromise was enacted, Question 1 remains on the ballot due to timing issues.

Supporters and opponents of Question 1 had originally both stated that they would launch a campaign, together, to educate voters to vote "no" on the ballot measure in November, since the compromise was reached.[4]

However, The Massachusetts Right to Repair Committee decided that voters wanted the more stringent ballot initiative rather than the compromise legislation and were joined by AAA of Pioneer Valley in West Springfield and AAA of Southern New England in Providence in urging voters to vote YES on the initiative.[5]

Text of the measure

Ballot language

The ballot language of the measure reads as follows:[6]

A YES VOTE would enact the proposed law requiring motor vehicle manufacturers to allow vehicle owners and independent repair facilities in Massachusetts to have access to the same vehicle diagnostic and repair information made available to the manufacturers’ Massachusetts dealers and authorized repair facilities. A NO VOTE would make no change in existing laws.


The following is information obtained from the supporting side of the measure:

  • The main proponents of the measure, and the group that organized the petition drive, is the Right to Repair Coalition.
  • The primary goal, according to advocates, was to expand consumer choice with respect to service centers, and increase number of independent shops that have the ability to repair vehicles.
  • During a legislative hearing on the measure, Ray Magliozzi, co-host of a National Public Radio show, testified in favor of the legislation: “This legislation protects consumer choice and levels the playing field for independent repair shops. Right now, many repairers do not have access to the information and the customer pays big for that disadvantage.
  • State Representative Daniel Winslow stated at the same hearing that the measure should be passed by the legislature and not sent to the ballot, stating: "This legislation is about protecting customer choice, promoting safety, and saving consumers time and money. Consumers are enduring expensive dealership costs and the legislature has the ability to bring relief now. They need to act."


Opponents claimed repair shops could already access the data to proprietary information they need and categorized the ballot proposal as a "power grab" by after-market parts manufacturers to "seize" proprietary information.[7]


  1. ^ , "Consumers to Drive 2012 Massachusetts Right to Repair Vote", September 14, 2011The Sacramento Bee
  2. ^ , "Current Petitions Filed", Retrieved August 8, 2011Massachusetts Secretary of State
  3. ^ "Right to Repair Question 1 - 2012 Massachusetts Election Results".  
  4. ^ , "Mass. 'Right to Repair' compromise signed into law", August 7, 2012CBS News'
  5. ^ Massachusetts 'right to repair' ballot question, No. 1, could force auto makers to share data
  6. ^ , "2012 Information For Voters", Retrieved September 14, 2012Massachusetts Secretary of State
  7. ^ , "Attention and lobbying shifts to house on auto repair issue", May 22, 2012Daily News Transcript
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.