World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain

Article Id: WHEBN0035534562
Reproduction Date:

Title: A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Owen Hatherley, Urban renewal, National Union of Mineworkers headquarters
Collection: 2010 Books, Books About Politics of the United Kingdom, Books About the United Kingdom, Books About Urbanism, Urban Renewal, Urban Society in the United Kingdom
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain

A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain
Author Owen Hatherley
Country United Kingdom
Language English
Subject British architecture and urbanism, modern architecture, brutalist architecture
Published 2010 (Verso Books)
Media type Print
Pages 400[1]
ISBN ISBN 9781844676514

A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain is a book by the British writer Owen Hatherley, published by Verso Books in November 2010.[1] The book is a critique of the architecture and urbanism of postmodern Britain,[2] taking the form of a tour of British cities.[3]


  • Background 1
  • Overview 2
  • Critical reception 3
  • References 4
  • External links 5


A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain is Hatherley's second book, following a quartet of essays entitled Militant Modernism published in 2008. Considerable overlap and repetition exists between the two works.[4]


Hatherley introduces A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain as "an autopsy of the urban renaissance", referring to a program initiated under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown and associated with the private finance initiative, city academies and the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment.[2] In his introduction, Hatherley quotes Karl Seitz's statement upon the opening of the Karl Marx-Hof in Vienna: "by these stones shall we be judged." Seitz's words, set in the context of the attack on the Karl Marx-Hof a year later by fascists fighting the Austrian Civil War, serve as guiding principles for the book.[5] The book forms a catalogue raisonné of what the author describes as "pseudomodernism".[4]

The journey, on which Hatherley was accompanied by photographer Joel Anderson,[6] begins in Southampton, where Hatherley grew up, and takes in Milton Keynes, Nottingham, Manchester, Tyneside, Glasgow, Cambridge, several towns in Yorkshire, Cardiff, Liverpool and Greenwich. Hatherley focuses on the prior decade's programmes of regeneration and the remains of past civic improvements.[3] In Cambridge, Hatherley reluctantly praises the Accordia development;[2] while in Glasgow he describes BBC Pacific Quay as "decent, upstanding, moderate modernism" and praises buildings in the vicinity of Glasgow Central station;[5] and in Tyneside he praises T. Dan Smith's desire to build a "Brasilia of the North".[4]

Hatherley most keenly explores the public and municipal architecture of the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s, including Thamesmead in Greenwich, Red Road in Glasgow, Park Hill in Sheffield and the Get Carter car park in Gateshead.[2] Particular attention is paid to "the Former Socialist Republic of South Yorkshire", where Hatherley sees the promise of Socialist Brutalism having come closest to fulfillment. Hatherley criticises Bob Kerslake, the former chief executive of Sheffield City Council who presided over the demolition of council housing, and the Pathfinder scheme.[4]

Hatherley's influences include Ian Nairn,[3] Nikolaus Pevsner,[3] J. B. Priestley's English Journey[2][3][5] and Iain Sinclair.[3]

Critical reception

Patrick Wright, writing in Architecture Today compares Hatherley's approach to that of William Cobbett, the 19th century agitator who criticised industrialisation in his Rural Rides; but points out that while Cobbett defended the British countryside, Hatherley is concerned with the urban Britain envisioned by post-war Modernist architects which he argues has fallen victim to regeneration schemes.[2]

Rowan Moore, writing in The Observer, describes Hatherley as "not entirely fair" for his failure to grant a right of reply to those he criticises, the book's lack of input from the citizens and residents of the areas described, and its lack of any proposed alternative, but describes A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain as "essentially right: for all the talk of renewal, renaissance, regeneration and world-class architecture, and all the billions expended, our cities are, with some exceptions, more screwed up than they have ever been."[3]

Will Self, reviewing Militant Modernism and A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain in the London Review of Books, describes the latter as "engaging and even stimulating", but argues that Hatherley fails to accept the deep-seated and philoprogenitive bad taste of the masses, instead favouring an ethic shaped by urban reductionism. Self also alleges similarities between Hatherley's argument regarding "pseudomodernism" and that of the architect Rem Koolhaas, whose work Hatherley criticises.[4]


  1. ^ a b "A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain".  
  2. ^ a b c d e f  
  3. ^ a b c d e f g  
  4. ^ a b c d e  
  5. ^ a b c "Book review: A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain".  
  6. ^ Worpole, Ken (11 December 2010). "A Guide to the New Ruins of Great Britain".  

External links

  • Official blog, comprising "collected addenda, photographs and further instalments"
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.