World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Green belt (United Kingdom)

Article Id: WHEBN0000079445
Reproduction Date:

Title: Green belt (United Kingdom)  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Urban growth boundary, Greater Manchester, Conservation in the United Kingdom, Rural area, Duncan Sandys, Green belt, Grimsby, Bath and North East Somerset, Barnt Green, Tynecastle Stadium
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Green belt (United Kingdom)

Designated areas of green belt in England; the Metropolitan Green Belt outlined in red

In United Kingdom town planning, the green belt is a policy for controlling urban growth. The idea is for a ring of countryside where urbanisation will be resisted for the foreseeable future, maintaining an area where agriculture, forestry and outdoor leisure can be expected to prevail. The fundamental aim of green belt policy is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open, and consequently the most important attribute of green belts is their openness.

The Metropolitan Green Belt around London was first proposed by the Greater London Regional Planning Committee in 1935. The Town and Country Planning Act 1947 then allowed local authorities to include green belt proposals in their development plans. In 1955, Minister of Housing Duncan Sandys encouraged local authorities around the country to consider protecting land around their towns and cities by the formal designation of clearly defined green belts.[1][2]

England and Wales

The Government formerly set out its policies and principles towards green belts in England and Wales in Planning Policy Guidance Note 2: Green Belts [1], but this planning guidance was superseded by the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) in March 2012. Planning Authorities are strongly urged to follow the NPPF's detailed advice when considering whether to permit additional development in the green belt. In the green belt there is a general presumption against inappropriate development, unless very special circumstances can be demonstrated to show that the benefits of the development will outweigh the harm caused to the green belt. The NPPF sets out what would constitute appropriate development in the green belt.

According to the NPPF, there are five stated purposes of including land within the green belt:

  • To check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas
  • To prevent neighbouring towns from merging into one another
  • To assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment
  • To preserve the setting and special character of historic towns
  • To assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land.

Once an area of land has been defined as green belt, the stated opportunities and benefits include:

  • Providing opportunities for access to the open countryside for the urban population
  • Providing opportunities for outdoor sport and outdoor recreation near urban areas
  • The retention of attractive landscapes and the enhancement of landscapes, near to where people live
  • Improvement of damaged and derelict land around towns
  • The securing of nature conservation interests
  • The retention of land in agricultural, forestry and related uses.


The area designated as green belt land in England as at 31 March 2010 was estimated at 1,639,560 hectares, about 13 per cent of the land area.[3]

Green belt Urban core
Metropolitan Green Belt Greater London
North West Green Belt Merseyside and Greater Manchester
South and West Yorkshire Green Belt South Yorkshire and West Yorkshire
West Midlands Green Belt West Midlands
South West Hampshire/South East Dorset Green Belt Dorset, Bournemouth and Poole
Avon Green Belt Bristol and Bath
North East Green Belt Tyne and Wear, Durham and Hexham
Nottingham and Derby Green Belt Nottingham and Derby
Stoke-on-Trent Green Belt Stoke-on-Trent
Oxford Green Belt Oxford
Cambridge Green Belt Cambridge
York Green Belt York
Gloucester and Cheltenham Green Belt Gloucester and Cheltenham
Burton upon Trent and Swadlincote Green Belt Burton upon Trent and Swadlincote

The distribution of green belt designated land by region of England as at 31 March 2009[4] and 31 March 2010[5] was as follows:

Region 2009 area (hectares) 2010 area (hectares)
East/London/South East 580,410 580,730
East Midlands 78,620 78,930
North East 72,990 72,990
North West 262,730 262,780
South West 110,130 110,130
West Midlands 269,380 269,380
Yorkshire and the Humber 264,580 264,640
England total 1,638,840 1,639,560

The total area of green belt land in England since 2003 was as follows:

Year 2003 2004 2006 2007 2008/09 2009/10
Area (hectares) 1,671,580 1,678,190 1,631,830 1,635,670 1,639,650 1,639,560

Changes in green belt area are explained in part by alterations in land designation by local authorities, but also by improvements with measurement associated with digital mapping.


There is one green belt in Wales, between Newport and Cardiff.[6]

Northern Ireland

Northern Ireland has 30 green belt areas,[7] accounting for approximately 226,600 hectares, about 16 percent of its total area.[8]


Green belt policy in Scotland is set out in Scottish Planning Policy (SPP) 21, published by the Scottish Government in February 2010. On 29 November, the Government published "Green Belt Policy in Scotland 10/85"

As of 2010 Scotland had 10 green belt areas: Aberdeen, Ayr, Clackmannanshire, East Lothian, Edinburgh, Falkirk and Grangemouth, Greater Glasgow, Midlothian and Stirling. There are also plans for green belts around Dunfermline, Perth and St Andrews.

The Scottish Government is clear that:
The purpose of green belt designation in the development plan as part of the settlement strategy for an area is to: direct planned growth to the most appropriate locations and support regeneration, protect and enhance the quality, character, landscape setting and identity of towns and cities, and protect and give access to open space within and around towns and cities[9]
However, the Scottish Government recognises that certain types of development might actually promote and support appropriate rural diversification:
  • Development associated with agriculture, including the re-use of historic agricultural buildings,
  • Woodland and forestry, including community woodlands,
  • Horticulture, including market gardening and directly connected retailing,
  • Recreational uses that are compatible with an agricultural or natural setting, and
  • essential infrastructure such as electronic communications infrastructure and electricity grid connections[10]
The Government requires that locally established green belt plans: maintain the identity of a city by the clearly establishing physical boundaries and preventing coalescence; provide countryside for recreation of denizens; and maintain the landscape setting of the city in question. In its Planning Policy (129), the Scottish Government states that
“All public bodies, including planning authorities, have a duty to further the conservation of biodiversity under the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004, and this should be reflected in development plans and development management decisions. Biodiversity is important because it provides natural services and products that we rely on, is an important element of sustainable development and makes an essential contribution to Scotland's economy and cultural heritage.”[9]


The introduction of green belts was the culmination of over 50 years of environmentalist pressure with roots in the garden city movement and widespread academic interest in combating urban sprawl and ribbon development, as well as pressure from campaign groups such as the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE).

Implementation of the notion dated from Herbert Morrison's 1934 leadership of the London County Council. It was first formally proposed by the Greater London Regional Planning Committee in 1935, "to provide a reserve supply of public open spaces and of recreational areas and to establish a green belt or girdle of open space". It was again included in an advisory Greater London Plan prepared by Patrick Abercrombie in 1944. However, it was some 14 years before the elected local authorities responsible for the area around London had all defined the area on scaled maps with some precision.

New provisions for compensation in the 1947 Town and Country Planning Act allowed local authorities around the country to incorporate green belt proposals in their first development plans. The codification of Green Belt policy and its extension to areas other than London came with the historic Circular 42/55 inviting local planning authorities to consider the establishment of Green Belts.

As the outward growth of London was seen to be firmly repressed, residents owning properties further from the built-up area also campaigned for this policy of urban restraint, partly to safeguard their own investments but often invoking an idealised scenic/rustic argument which laid the blame for most social ills upon urban influences. In mid-1971, for example, the government decided to extend the Metropolitan Green Belt northwards to include almost all of Hertfordshire. The Metropolitan Green Belt now covers parts of 68 different Districts or Boroughs.


Several academics, policy groups and town planning organisations in recent years have criticised the idea and implementation of green belts in the UK. Greenbelt policy has been attacked as too rigid in the face of new urban and environmental challenges. Amongst other things, it has been claimed that areas of green belt can be of unremarkable environmental quality, and may not be well managed or provide the recreational opportunities originally envisaged.

The Town and Country Planning Association, an organisation heavily involved in initiating the concept several decades previously, published a policy statement in 2002[11] which proposed a more flexible policy which would allow the introduction of green wedge and strategic gap policies rather than green belts, and so permit the expansion of some urban areas. Similarly, in October 2007, Sir Martin Doughty, then Chair of Natural England, argued for a review of green belts, saying: "The time has come for a greener green belt. We need a 21st century solution to England's housing needs which puts in place a network of green wedges, gaps and corridors, linking the natural environment and people.".[12]

Lewis Abbott has identified greenbelt barriers to urban expansion as one of several major protectionist political-economic barriers to housebuilding with negative effects on the supply, cost/prices, and quality of new homes. (The others include new housing development taxes and quasi-taxes; political discrimination against particular classes of new housing supplier, household consumer, and housing product; and controls on housing technical-product development – in particular, the blocking of innovative low-cost housebuilding using new materials and production technologies). Abbott argues that the greenbelts actually defeat their own stated objective of saving the countryside and open spaces. By preventing existing towns and cities from extending normally and organically, they result in more land-extensive housing developments further out – i.e., the establishment beyond the greenbelts of new communities with lower building densities, their own built infrastructure and other facilities, and greater dependence on cars and commuting, etc. Meanwhile, valuable urban green space and brownfield sites best suited to industry and commerce are lost in existing conurbations as more and more new housing is crammed into them.[13][14]

Commentators such as James Heartfield[15] and Alan Evans[16] have called for outright abolition of green belts, principally on the grounds that by inhibiting the free use of land they restrict home ownership.

However, in England, where 65% of people are property-owners who benefit from scarcity of building land, the concept of "green belt" has become entrenched as a fundamental part of government policy, and the possibility of reviewing boundaries is often viewed with considerable hostility by neighboring communities and their elected representatives.[17][18]

Related concepts

The general concept of "green belt" has evolved in recent years to encompass "Greenspace" and "Greenstructure", taking into account urban greenspace, an important aspect of sustainable development in the 21st century. However, while in general these concepts are quite distinct in the UK from the green belt as a statutory development plan designation, an exception occurs in London where land may be designated as "Metropolitan Open Land" (MOL). Areas of MOL are subject to the same planning restrictions as the Green Belt while lying within the urban area. In 2005, the European Commission's COST Action C11 (COST European Cooperation in Science and Technology) undertook in-depth city case studies into cities across 15 European countries. Sheffield was one such case study city for the UK. Conclusions were published in "Case studies in Greenstructure Planning".

See also


  1. ^ "Q&A: England's green belt". BBC News. 15 August 2007. Retrieved 4 May 2010. 
  2. ^ Geography; An Integrated Approach - David Waugh
  3. ^ "Local Planning Authority Green Belt Statistics: England 2009/10". 
  4. ^
  5. ^
  6. ^ "BBC NEWS | UK | Q&A: England's green belt". Retrieved 25 September 2014. 
  7. ^ "Q&A: England's green belt". BBC. 15 August 2007. Retrieved 2 January 2009. 
  8. ^ "e-Digest Statistics about: Land Use and Land Cover". Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 1 June 2005. Retrieved 2 January 2009. 
  9. ^ a b "Scottish Planning Policy". Retrieved 25 September 2014. 
  10. ^ Scottish Parliament Green Belt Policy
  11. ^
  12. ^ Time for a greener green belt, says Natural England
  13. ^ “Greenbelt Barriers To Urban Expansion”, in Political Barriers To Housebuilding In Britain: A Critical Case Study Of Protectionism & Its Industrial-Commercial Effects, ISR/Google Books, New edition 2002. ISBN 978-0-906321-21-8. [2]
  14. ^ "Housebuilding and Land (2): Political and Legal Influences" in Housebuilding and the New Homes Market: A Survey, ISR/Google Books, Revised second edition 2008. ISBN 978-0-906321-45-4. [3]
  15. ^ Don’t protect the Green Belt - build on it, 3 August 2005, By James Heartfield, Spiked
  16. ^ Call for green belt rules to be scrapped
  17. ^ "Oxford Green Belt Network Website". Retrieved 25 September 2014. 
  18. ^ "Documents | Friends of the Earth". Retrieved 25 September 2014. 

External links

  • Map of England & Wales green belts (High resolution; 1.5 MB)
  • Map of England & Wales green belts (Low resolution; 115 KB)
  • Planning Policy Guidance Note 2 for England & Wales
  • SPP21 for Scotland
  • For topical summaries of discussions about the possible release of green belt land for various developments or urbanisation: [4]
  • For an academic bibliography: [5]
  • For views critical of green belt policy: [6]
  • Campaign to Protect Rural England
  • Oxford Green Belt Network
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.