World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Robert Fox (activist)

Article Id: WHEBN0008988421
Reproduction Date:

Title: Robert Fox (activist)  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Robert Fox, History of African-American civil rights, WikiProject Louisville/Watchall
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Robert Fox (activist)


Robert Fox sparked a civil rights battle in Louisville, Kentucky, in the late 19th century.

Contents

  • Activism career 1
    • After lawsuit 1.1
    • Ride ins 1.2
    • After second trial 1.3
  • See also 2
  • Resources 3

Activism career

In January 1871, Robert Fox boarded a streetcar, dropped his money into the fare box and sat down in the white section of the car. Ordered to move, he refused; the driver then threw him off the car. Shortly after, Fox filed a charge of assault and battery against the streetcar company in federal court, claiming that separate seating policies based on race were unlawful and the driver's actions were therefore improper. A jury found the company rules to be invalid and awarded damages of $15 to Fox.

After lawsuit

The company defied the jury's finding and continued racially segregated seating. Louisville black leaders decided to launch a full-scale "ride-in." At 7 P.M. on May 12, a young African-American boy boarded a streetcar, walked past the driver and took a seat among the white passengers. The driver, under new company regulations, did not attempt to throw him off, but simply stopped the car, lit a cigar and refused to proceed until the black youth moved to "his place." While the governor, the Louisville chief of police and other prominent citizens looked on from the sidewalks, a large crowd that included an increasingly noisy mob of jeering white teen-agers gathered around the streetcar.

Ride ins

Before long, there were shouts of "Put him out!" "Hit him!" "Kick him!" "Hang him!" Several white youths climbed into the car and began yelling insults in the face of the young black rider. He refused to answer—or to move. The youths dragged him from his seat, pulled him off the car and began to beat him. Only when the youth started to defend himself did the city police intervene; they arrested him for disturbing the peace and took him to jail.

This time the trial was held in Louisville city court. The youth was fined and the judge delivered a warning to Louisville blacks that further ride-ins would be punished.

After second trial

In the following days, streetcar after streetcar was boarded by African-Americans who took seats in the white section. Now the drivers got off the cars entirely. On several occasions, black passengers drove the cars themselves, to the sound of cheers from black spectators. Then violence erupted. Bands of white youths and men began to throw black riders off the cars; windows were broken, cars were overturned and for a time a general race riot threatened.

By this time, newspapers across the country were carrying reports of the conflict, and many editorials denounced the seating regulations. In Louisville, federal marshals and the United States Attorney backed the rights of the Black riders and stated that federal court action would be taken if necessary. There were even rumors that President Ulysses Grant might send troops.

Under these threats, the streetcar company capitulated. Soon, all the city transit companies declared that "it was useless to try to resist or evade the enforcement by the United States authorities of the claim of Blacks to ride in the cars." To "avoid serious collisions," the company would thereafter allow all passengers to sit where they chose. Although a few disturbances took place in the following months, mixed seating became a common practice.

See also

Resources

  • Freedom's Main Line
  • An Early Instance of Nonviolence: The Louisville Demonstrations of 1870- 1871
  • Westin, Alan F. Ride-in!: Ride-ins and sit-ins are not new tactics of the Negro. They were first tried back in the 1870s, and with great success. But that time High Court decisions were very different. American Heritage Magazine. August 1962, Volume 13, Issue 5. Retrieved September 23, 2006.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.