World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

2004 NCAA Division I-A football season

Article Id: WHEBN0004325707
Reproduction Date:

Title: 2004 NCAA Division I-A football season  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Mid-American Conference football individual awards, 2005 Sugar Bowl, 2004 GMAC Bowl, 2004 Hawaii Bowl, 2004 Houston Bowl
Collection: 2004 Ncaa Division I-A Football Season
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

2004 NCAA Division I-A football season

2004 NCAA Division I-A season
Heisman Trophy won by Matt Leinart for the 2004 season
Number of teams 118
Preseason AP #1 USC Trojans
Post-season
Duration December 14, 2004 –
January 4, 2005
Bowl games 28 (+5 All Star games)
Heisman Trophy Matt Leinart, USC QB
Championship bowl game
2005 Orange Bowl
Site Dolphin Stadium,
Miami Gardens, Florida
Winner USC Trojans (BCS title vacated)
Division I-A football seasons
← 2003
2005 →

The 2004 NCAA Division I-A football season ended with several undefeated teams vying for a spot in the national title game, triggering controversy. In the 2003 season, no team finished the regular season unbeaten, and five teams finished the season with one loss. In 2004, the situation became even more complicated, as five teams went without losing, a record in the BCS era (this record was tied in 2009, when five teams also went undefeated and a sixth, Florida, lost to undefeated Alabama in the SEC title game). USC of the Pac-10, Oklahoma of the Big 12, Auburn of the SEC, Utah of the MWC, and Boise State of the WAC all finished the regular season undefeated. USC and Oklahoma started the season ranked #1 and #2, respectively, but the other three teams were handicapped by starting out of the top 15. Thus USC and OU played for the BCS National Championship, while Auburn, Utah, and Boise State had to content themselves with other bowl games.

The

  1. ^ Jay Bilas, "Anyone know what NCAA's standards are?", ESPN.com, July 1, 2010.
  2. ^ Bryant Gumbel, "Student/Athlete Behavior", Real Sports with Bryant Gumbel, September 21, 2010.
  3. ^ Bryan Fischer, " Trojans never stood a chance after taking NCAA's best shot", CBSSports.com, May 26, 2011.
  4. ^ Pete Fiutak, "USC paying for NCAA's inconsistency?", FoxSports.com, May 26, 2011.
  5. ^ Stewart Mandel, "What USC's sanctions mean for Ohio State", SportsIllustrated.com, April 27, 2011.
  6. ^ http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/31040/what-we-learned-in-the-pac-12-week-14
  7. ^ http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/bigten/2004-08-04-replay-details_x.htm

References

See also

Other major awards

The Heisman Trophy is given annually to college football's most outstanding player

Heisman Trophy voting

UCLA vs. Wyoming in the 2004 Las Vegas Bowl

December bowl games

Other New Years Day bowls

Rankings given are AP rankings going into bowl games

BCS bowls

Bowl games

  1. USC (11-0) Previously (13-0), forced to vacate two wins in 2010.
  2. Auburn (13-0)
  3. Oklahoma (12-1)
  4. Utah (12-0)
  5. Texas (11-1)
  6. Louisville (11-1)
  7. Georgia (10-2)
  8. Iowa (10-2)
  9. California (10-2)
  10. Virginia Tech (10-3)
  11. Miami (9-3)
  12. Boise St. (11-1)
  13. Tennessee (10-3)
  14. Michigan (9-3)
  15. Florida State (9-3)
  16. Louisiana St. (9-3)
  17. Wisconsin (9-3)
  18. Texas Tech (8-4)
  19. Arizona State (9-3)
  20. Ohio St. (8-4)
  21. Boston College (9-3)
  22. Fresno St. (9-3)
  23. Virginia (8-4)
  24. Navy (10-2)
  25. Pittsburgh (8-4)
Utah Utes fans rush the field and carry the goalpost after defeating rival BYU, completing a perfect regular season, and becoming the first BCS Buster by clinching a spot in the 2005 Fiesta Bowl (hence the sombrero).

Final AP Poll

2004 ACC football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#10 Virginia Tech   7 1         10 3  
#15 Florida State   6 2         9 3  
#11 Miami   5 3         9 3  
#23 Virginia   5 3         8 4  
North Carolina   5 3         6 6  
Georgia Tech   4 4         7 5  
Clemson   4 4         6 5  
NC State   3 5         5 6  
Maryland   3 5         5 6  
Wake Forest   1 7         4 7  
Duke   1 7         2 9  
† – BCS representative as conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2004 Big 12 football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
North
Colorado xy   4 4         8 5  
Iowa State x   4 4         7 5  
Missouri   3 5         5 6  
Nebraska   3 5         5 6  
Kansas   2 6         4 7  
Kansas State   2 6         4 7  
South
#3 Oklahoma xy   8 0         12 1  
#5 Texas   7 1         11 1  
#18 Texas Tech   5 3         8 4  
Texas A&M   5 3         7 5  
Oklahoma State   4 4         7 5  
Baylor   1 7         3 8  
Championship: Oklahoma 42, Colorado 3
† – BCS representative as conference champion
‡ – BCS at-large representative
x – Division champion/co-champions
y – Championship game participant
Rankings from AP Poll
2004 Big East football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#25 Pittsburgh §   4 2         8 4  
#21 Boston College §   4 2         9 3  
West Virginia §   4 2         8 4  
Syracuse §   4 2         6 6  
Connecticut   3 3         8 4  
Rutgers   1 5         4 7  
Temple   1 5         2 9  
† – BCS representative as conference champion
§ – Conference co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
2004 Big Ten football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#14/12 Michigan §   7 1         9 3  
#8/8 Iowa §   7 1         10 2  
#17/18 Wisconsin   6 2         9 3  
Northwestern   5 3         6 6  
#20/19 Ohio State   4 4         8 4  
Purdue   4 4         7 5  
Michigan State   4 4         5 7  
Minnesota   3 5         7 5  
Penn State   0* 6         0* 7  
Illinois   1 7         3 8  
Indiana   1 7         3 8  
† – BCS representative as conference champion
§ – Conference co-champions
2004 Conference USA football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#6 Louisville   8 0         11 1  
Memphis   5 3         8 4  
Southern Miss   5 3         7 5  
Cincinnati   5 3         7 5  
UAB   5 3         7 5  
TCU   3 5         5 6  
Tulane   3 5         5 6  
South Florida   3 5         4 7  
Houston   3 5         3 8  
East Carolina   2 6         2 9  
Army   2 6         2 9  
† – Conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2004 Division I-A independents football records
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
Navy           10 2  
Florida Atlantic           9 3  
Notre Dame           6 6  
Rankings from AP Poll
2004 Mid-American Conference football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
East
Miami x   7 1         8 5  
Akron   6 2         6 5  
Marshall   6 2         6 6  
Kent State   4 4         5 6  
Ohio   2 6         4 7  
Buffalo   2 6         2 9  
UCF   0 8         0 11  
West
Toledo xy   7 1         9 4  
Northern Illinois x   7 1         9 3  
Bowling Green   6 2         9 3  
Eastern Michigan   4 4         4 7  
Central Michigan   3 5         4 7  
Ball State   2 6         2 9  
Western Michigan   0 8         1 10  
Championship: Toledo 35, Miami 27
† – Conference champion
x – Division champion/co-champions
y – Championship game participant
Rankings from AP Poll
2004 Mountain West Conference football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#4 Utah   7 0         12 0  
New Mexico   5 2         7 5  
BYU   4 3         5 6  
Wyoming   3 4         7 5  
Air Force   3 4         5 6  
Colorado State   3 4         4 7  
San Diego State   2 5         4 7  
UNLV   1 6         2 9  
† – Conference champion and BCS representative as top
000non-AQ school to meet automatic qualification criteria
Rankings from AP Poll
2004 Pacific-10 football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#1 USC   8 0         13 0  
#9 California   7 1         10 2  
#19 Arizona State   5 3         9 3  
Oregon State   5 3         7 5  
UCLA   4 4         6 6  
Oregon   4 4         5 6  
Washington State   3 5         5 6  
Stanford   2 6         4 7  
Arizona   2 6         3 8  
Washington   0 8         1 10  
† – Conference champion
  • USC later vacated 2 wins (1 in conference), as well as the BCS and PAC-10 Championships, due to NCAA sanctions.
    Rankings from AP Poll
2004 SEC football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
Eastern Division
#13 Tennessee x   7 1         10 3  
#7 Georgia   6 2         10 2  
Florida   4 4         7 5  
South Carolina   4 4         6 5  
Kentucky   1 7         2 9  
Vanderbilt   1 7         2 9  
Western Division
#2 Auburn x   8 0         13 0  
#16 LSU   6 2         9 3  
Alabama   3 5         6 6  
Arkansas   3 5         5 6  
Ole Miss   3 5         4 7  
Mississippi State   2 6         3 8  
Championship: Auburn 38, Tennessee 28
† – BCS representative as conference champion
x – Division champion/co-champions
Rankings from AP Poll
2004 Sun Belt football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
North Texas   7 0         7 5  
Troy   4 2         7 5  
New Mexico State   3 2         5 6  
Louisiana–Monroe   3 3         5 6  
Middle Tennessee   4 4         5 6  
Arkansas State   3 4         3 8  
Louisiana–Lafayette   2 5         4 7  
Utah State   2 5         3 8  
Idaho   2 5         3 9  
† – Conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll
2004 WAC football standings
Conf     Overall
Team   W   L         W   L  
#12 Boise State   8 0         11 1  
UTEP   6 2         8 4  
#22 Fresno State   5 3         9 3  
Louisiana Tech   5 3         6 6  
Hawaii   4 4         8 5  
Nevada   3 5         5 7  
Tulsa   3 5         4 8  
SMU   3 5         3 8  
Rice   2 6         3 8  
San Jose State   1 7         2 9  
† – Conference champion
Rankings from AP Poll

Standings

  • Instant replay would make its debut in college football, as the Big Ten Conference began to use it on a one year experimental basis.[7]
  • Officials are allowed to announce the number of a player committing a penalty, similar to the NFL.
  • Modifying the rule regarding offensive substitutions made and rushing to snap the ball before the defense can make their changes; eliminating the five yard penalty for the first offense (but stopping play and warning the offensive team), but maintaining the 15 yard unsportsmanlike conduct penalty for further violations.
  • Allowing the head coach to request a time-out.
  • Allowing the receiving team the option to enforce encroachment penalties on punts/kickoffs either from the end of the return or from the previous line of scrimmage, requiring a re-kick.
  • Leaping on PAT/Field Goal attempts is prohibited.
  • Defensive pass interference will not be called when a kicker throws a ball high and downfield to simulate a pass.
  • Roughing the passer will not be called if a defensive player is blocked into the passer.

The NCAA Rules Committee adopted the following rule changes for the 2004 season:

Rule changes

Contents

  • Rule changes 1
  • Standings 2
  • Final AP Poll 3
  • Bowl games 4
    • BCS bowls 4.1
    • Other New Years Day bowls 4.2
    • December bowl games 4.3
  • Heisman Trophy voting 5
  • Other major awards 6
  • See also 7
  • References 8

In conference moves, Miami (FL) and Virginia Tech left the Big East to join the ACC, giving the ACC 11 members. Connecticut left the Independent ranks to join the Big East. Troy State also left their Independent status behind and joined the Sun Belt Conference. Florida Atlantic University made the move up from Division I-AA and became a I-A Independent. The total membership of Division I-A schools playing football now stood at 118.

In another first, the LSU Tigers lost to the Iowa Hawkeyes on a last second Hail Mary pass in the Capital One Bowl, becoming the first school to lose a non-BCS bowl a year after winning the BCS National Championship Game.

The Associated Press, as a result of two consecutive seasons of BCS controversy, prohibited the BCS from using their poll as part of its ranking formula. The AP poll was replaced by the Harris Interactive poll, and the AP continues to award its own national championship trophy.

There was also a controversy in selecting the BCS bowls' second at-large team (Utah being the first). The University of California expected to get the invite, being ranked fourth in the BCS entering the last week of the regular season; the Texas Longhorns, who had been left out of the BCS the year before, was fifth before the final BCS rankings were released. Both teams finished at 10-1, but the Longhorns ultimately received enough support from poll voters to move into the fourth slot, which ensured they would also receive the final at-large bid. Texas coach Mack Brown was criticized for publicly politicking voters to put Texas ahead of California; Cal coach Jeff Tedford called for coaches' votes to be made public. Texas went on to defeat Michigan in the Rose Bowl, while California lost to Texas Tech in the Holiday Bowl.

As with previous seasons, fans of successful teams left out of the BCS were disappointed. Auburn, Utah, and Boise State all went unbeaten but were not offered a chance to compete for the championship. Auburn was especially the focus of national media attention on this topic; many thought that since Auburn managed to go undefeated in the traditionally tough SEC, they deserved a shot at the title. Adding to the BCS frustration was the fact that Auburn and Utah, though both in BCS bowl games, would not be able to play each other as a match-up of highly ranked unbeatens. The fact that the dismay over the shutout of several deserving unbeaten teams was paired with an understanding of the 2004 season details--that USC and Oklahoma deserved their top 2 BCS spots by having perfect seasons after their initial top rankings, that Auburn was fairly ranked in the preseason as a good but not great-looking team, and that Utah and Boise State played in mid-major conferences--made 2004 a seminal year for serious momentum building behind a multi-team playoff system in college football.

Auburn played in the Sugar Bowl and beat Virginia Tech, the #8 ranked ACC champion. Utah became the first BCS Buster and beat Pitt, the #21 ranked champion of the Big East, in the Fiesta Bowl. Boise State lost a close, high scoring game in the Liberty Bowl to Louisville, the #10 ranked Conference USA champion.

[6]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.