World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

2009 Judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Article Id: WHEBN0024985414
Reproduction Date:

Title: 2009 Judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, Roger Toulson, Lord Toulson, Nicholas Wilson, Lord Wilson of Culworth, List of House of Lords cases 2009, Jenny Rowe
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

2009 Judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

This is a complete list of the judgments given by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom between the court's opening on 1 October 2009 and the end of that year. Most of the cases were heard in the House of Lords before judgments were given in the new Supreme Court. The court heard 17 cases during this time; they are listed in order of each case's Neutral citation number.

The table lists judgments made by the court and the opinions of the judges in each case. Judges are treated as having concurred in another's judgment when they either formally attach themselves to the judgment of another or speak only to acknowledge their concurrence with one or more judges. Any judgment which reaches a conclusion which differs from the majority on one or more major points of the appeal has been treated as dissent.

Because every judge in the court is entitled to hand down a judgment, it is not uncommon for groups of judges to reach the same conclusion (i.e. whether to allow or dismiss the appeal) in materially different ways, for example if a panel of 9 judges heard a case with 4 judges dismissing the appeal, 3 finding for the appellant on one point and 2 on another - the table should show 5 judges as the majority and the 4 judges who actually held the more mainstream view as dissenting. The table also does not reflect how significantly judges differed, or how much of a contribution a paticualar judge made to the overall judgment.

Table key

Delivered a judgment (majority)

Concurred in the judgment of another justice (majority)

Delivered a judgment (dissenting)

Concurred in the judgment of another justice (dissent)

Did not participate in the decision

2009 Judgments

Case name Citation Argued Decided Phillips Hope Saville Rodger Walker Hale Brown Mance Collins Kerr Clarke Judge Neuberger Scott
R (E) v JFS[1] [2009] UKSC 1 1 October 14 October
Re Sigma Finance [2009] UKSC 2 1–2 July 29 October
R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2009] UKSC 3 13–14 July 29 October
Louca v Germany [2009] UKSC 4 29 July 19 November
Re B (a child) [2009] UKSC 5 14 October 19 November
OFT v Abbey National [2009] UKSC 6 23–25 June 25 November
PE (Cameroon) v Home Secretary [2009] UKSC 7 30 July 26 November
R (A) v Croydon [2009] UKSC 8 20–23 July 26 November
R (Barclay) v Justice Secretary [2009] UKSC 9 15–16 July 1 December
I (A Child) [2009] UKSC 10 10–11 June 1 December
Environment Secretary v Meier & Ors [2009] UKSC 11 10–11 June 1 December
R(A) v B [2009] UKSC 12 10–11 June 1 December
Barratt Homes Ltd v Welsh Water [2009] UKSC 13 27–28 July 9 December
R v Horncastle[2] [2009] UKSC 14 7–9 July 9 December
R (E) v JFS[3] [2009] UKSC 15 27–29 October 16 December
Mahad (Ethiopia) v Entry Clearance Officer [2] [2009] UKSC 16 9–11 November 16 December
Re S-B (Children) [2009] UKSC 17 25–26 November 14 December


  1. ^ Procedural issue before the main appeal reported at UKSC 15
  2. ^ a b An augmented panel of 7 judges sat in this case
  3. ^ An augmented panel of 9 judges sat in this case


  • Lord Scott is a former Lord of Appeal in Ordinary. He did not formally accept a position in the reformed Supreme Court but was invited to take part in several cases. If Scott had accepted the position, his mandatory retirement would have been 2 October 2009 - the day after the Court officially opened.
  • Lord Neuberger is the Master of the Rolls and not an official member of the Supreme Court. As a senior judge he is entitled to sit in cases at the court's discretion.

Further reading


This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.