World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Carlisle Peace Commission

Article Id: WHEBN0022487403
Reproduction Date:

Title: Carlisle Peace Commission  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: American Revolutionary War, Battle of Cooch's Bridge, Battle of Red Bank, Battle of Gloucester (1777), Pennsylvania in the American Revolution
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Carlisle Peace Commission

The Earl of Carlisle, who headed the commission

The Carlisle Peace Commission was a group of British negotiators who were sent to North America in 1778, during the American War of Independence, with an offer to the rebellious Thirteen Colonies, who had declared themselves to be the United States, of self-rule and Parliamentary representation within the British Empire. The Continental Congress, aware that British troops were about to be withdrawn from Philadelphia, insisted on demanding full independence, which the commission was not authorised to grant. The Peace Commission marked the first time the British government formally agreed to negotiate with Congress; a previous attempt at negotiation in 1776 took place despite lacking that formality.

Background

The first attempt at negotiation between Great Britain and the rebellious Thirteen Colonies after the outbreak in April 1775 of the American War of Independence took place in September 1776, when a committee from the Second Continental Congress agreed to meet with Admiral Lord Richard Howe, who had been given limited powers to treat with colonies individually. The limited authority given to both Howe and the American negotiators made it a virtual certainty that nothing would come of the meeting. The meeting was a failure, in part because the Congress had recently declared independence from Britain, something Howe was not authorised to recognise, and because the American commissioners had no substantive authority from Congress to negotiate.

After the British defeat at Saratoga in October 1777, and fearful of French recognition of American independence, the Prime Minister, Lord North, had Parliament repeal such offensive measures as the Tea Act and the Massachusetts Government Act, and sent a commission to seek a negotiated settlement with the Continental Congress. The commission was empowered to offer a type of self-rule that Thomas Pownall had first proposed a decade earlier (and which later formed the foundation of British Commonwealth status).[1] The fact that the commission was authorised to negotiate with the Continental Congress as a body also represented a change in official British government policy, which had before then been to treat only with the individual states.[2]

Historian David Wilson is of the opinion that the war could have been avoided if the terms it proposed had been offered in 1775.[3] Historian Peter Whiteley, however, notes that [4]

Commission

West Florida. Walpole remarked that Carlisle, then a young man, was "very fit to make a treaty that will not be made"[5] and that he "was totally unacquainted with business and though not void of ambition, had but moderate parts and less application."[4] Richard Jackson declined to serve after it became known that the United States and France had signed a Treaty of Alliance.[6] The commissioners also learned of the Franco-American alliance before they set out in April.

One thing the commissioners did not learn before their departure was that General Sir Henry Clinton had been ordered to evacuate Philadelphia, even though his orders had been issued one month before they left. Carlisle was of the opinion that the administration had done this intentionally, since they might not otherwise have gone at all. Carlisle wrote to his wife of the situation, "We all look grave, and perhaps we think we look wise. I fear nobody will think so when we return ... I don't see what we have to do here."[7] Upon learning of the planned withdrawal, Carlisle appealed to Clinton to delay it, but Clinton cited his orders to act without delay in rejecting the appeal. This prompted Carlisle to observe that the administration wanted the commission to be "a mixture of ridicule, nullity, and embarrassments."[8] Eden was upset that he wasn't told of Clinton's orders, since the British intent to withdraw further stiffened American resolve.[9] On June 13, the commissioners sent a package of proposals to Congress, which was then holding sessions in York, Pennsylvania.[10] Congress replied insisting that either American independence be recognised, or that all British forces first withdraw from the states, terms the commission was not authorised to accept.[4] The commission attempted to appeal to public opinion, with warnings of widespread destruction, but was unsuccessful.[11] Johnstone tried to bribe some Congressmen, and the Marquis de Lafayette challenged Carlisle to a duel over some anti-French statements he had made.[12][13]

Gouverneur Morris wrote several essays against the proposals.[14] The Commissioners circulated a Manifesto,[15] which was printed in the Hartford Courant, October 10, 1778.[16] The Marquess of Rockingham, a leading opponent of the war, objected to the threats in the Manifesto, and moved to disavow it.[17]

Aftermath

Johnstone sailed to Britain in August, and the other commissioners returned in November 1778.[4] The British, being unable to bring Washington to a decisive engagement, resumed the military campaign, and turned to a "Southern Strategy" as their next attempt to win the war in North America.[3] There was, however, a further attempt in December 1780 to seek a diplomatic peace in the form of the Clinton-Arbuthnot peace commission, but it met with failure. There were no further substantive peace overtures until after the American victory at Yorktown in 1781.

Notes

  1. ^ Jerome R. Reich (1997). British friends of the American Revolution. M.E. Sharpe. p. 121.  
  2. ^ Neil Longley York (2003). Turning the world upside down. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 135–136.  
  3. ^ a b David K. Wilson (2005). The southern strategy. Univ of South Carolina Press. p. 61.  
  4. ^ a b c d Peter Whiteley (1996). Lord North. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 175.  
  5. ^ John E. Ferling (2007). Almost a miracle. Oxford University Press US. p. 270.  
  6. ^ Don Cook (1996). The Long Fuse. Atlantic Monthly Press. p. 299.  
  7. ^ Willcox, p. 229
  8. ^ Willcox, p. 230
  9. ^ Mary A. Giunta, J. Dane Hartgrove (1998). Documents of the emerging nation. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 72.  
  10. ^ James J. Kirschke (2005). Gouverneur Morris. Macmillan. p. 82.  
  11. ^ Lester H. Brune (2003). Chronological History of U.S. Foreign Relations: 1607-1932. Routledge.  
  12. ^ National Park ServiceDate in History: 1778
  13. ^  
  14. ^ James J. Kirschke (2005). Gouverneur Morris. Macmillan. p. 83.  
  15. ^ Benson John Lossing (1852). The Pictorial Field-book of the Revolution. Harper and Brothers. p. 350. 
  16. ^ , "Carlisle Commission Manifesto", 4 Pages.Connecticut CourantNewspaper; Hartford, 1778,
  17. ^ Jerome R. Reich (1997). British friends of the American Revolution. M.E. Sharpe. pp. 85–86.  

References

External links

  • Encyclopædia Britannica
  • Blackwell
  • , Alan AxelrodThe Real History of the American Revolution
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.