World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Citizens Against Government Waste

Article Id: WHEBN0002884441
Reproduction Date:

Title: Citizens Against Government Waste  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Government waste, Concord Coalition, Orson Swindle, United States Senate election in Arizona, 2012, Matt Salmon
Collection: 501(C)(3) Nonprofit Organizations, Political Advocacy Groups in the United States, Waste of Resources
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Citizens Against Government Waste

Citizens Against Government Waste
Abbreviation CAGW
Formation 1984
Type Advocacy group
Headquarters 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Location
  • Washington, D.C.
Region served United States
President Thomas A. Schatz
Website http://www.cagw.org

Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) is a inefficiency in the federal government."

Contents

  • History 1
  • Publications 2
  • Activity of CAGW 3
  • Controversies 4
    • Microsoft's Antitrust Case (Litigation) 4.1
    • Freeware Initiative 4.2
    • CAGW and tobacco 4.3
    • Other controversies 4.4
    • "Chinese Professor" ad 4.5
  • See also 5
  • References 6
  • External links 7

History

Located in Washington, DC, CAGW was founded in 1984 by industrialist J. Peter Grace and syndicated columnist Jack Anderson, former members of the Grace Commission or President's Private Sector Survey on Cost Control.[1] CAGW's current President is Thomas A. Schatz. Schatz has been president since 1992.[2]

Publications

CAGW produces a number of publications critical of what it calls "pork-barrel" projects. The Congressional Pig Book Summary (Pig Book) is an annual list of such projects and their sponsors.

The 2008 Pig Book identified 10,610 projects in the 11 appropriations bills that constitute the discretionary portion of the federal budget for fiscal 2008, costing taxpayers $17.2 billion.[3] Related publications include Prime Cuts, a list of recommendations for eliminating waste in the federal government and Porker of the Month, a monthly press release.

Also, since 1989, the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste (CCAGW) has examined Congressional roll-call votes to determine which members of Congress are voting in what they view as the interest of taxpayers. CAGW makes public what legislators are engaging in "pork-barrel" spending based on 'key' votes for each congressional session.

Activity of CAGW

CAGW and CCAGW seek to influence public policy through public education, lobbying, and mobilization for email- and letter-writing campaigns. CAGW claims to have helped save taxpayers $944 billion through the implementation of Grace Commission findings and other recommendations.

CAGW was one of the critics of the 2001 $23.5 billion Air Force plan to lease and then buy 100 refueling tankers from Boeing Co. Congress squashed the plan after it was revealed that an Air Force official inflated the price in exchange for an executive job at Boeing.[4]

CAGW was a prominent critic of Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) and his efforts to secure a record $2.3 billion federal loan for a railroad company that once employed him as a lobbyist. The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) cited an “unacceptably high risk to taxpayers” in denying the loan to the Dakota, Minnesota, and Eastern Railroad (DM&E) in 2007.[5]

CAGW named Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) its June 2008 Porker of the Month for accepting a preferential mortgage deal from Countrywide Financial which stood to benefit from a mortgage bailout bill he was pushing through Congress.[6]

Controversies

Microsoft's Antitrust Case (Litigation)

In 2001, the Los Angeles Times reported that at least two dead people sent a form letter by CAGW opposing the antitrust case against Microsoft to Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff. According to the Times, family members crossed out the names on the form letters and signed for them. This brought about the "Microsoft Supported by Dead People" controversy[7] from Microsoft's and CAGW's opponents and the CAGW's response that they were not tied to Microsoft or to ATL despite Microsoft having donated money to CAGW.[8]

Freeware Initiative

In 2003, CAGW put out a press release opposed to what they called the "Freeware Initiative", which they claimed would have required "that all IT expenditures in 2004 and 2005 be made on an open-source/Linux format".[9]

Responding to the press release, the state's secretary for administration and finance, Eric Kriss, denied the existence of a 'Freeware Initiative' and said the state was simply considering ways to integrate disparate systems using open standards such as HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol), XML (Extensible Markup Language) and Java. "I never heard that term. I never said it. We're not pursuing any kind of 'Freeware Initiative' and anyone who is saying that is making inaccurate statements," he said.[10]

CAGW and tobacco

The

  • Official website
  • Campaign finance reports and data at the FEC
    • 2009-2010 Cycle Reports and Reports Image Index
  • Independent Expenditures and Outside Spending at OpenSecrets.org (by year)
  • Profile at Sourcewatch

External links

  1. ^ "Remarks on Receiving the Final Report of the President's Private Sector Survey on Cost Control in the Federal Government". President Ronald Reagan Speech October 28, 1985. Retrieved April 29, 2008. 
  2. ^ "A Hole in the Government’s Pocket". FrontPage Magazine. Retrieved April 29, 2008. 
  3. ^ puts pet spending in spotlight"Pig book". MSNBC. Retrieved April 29, 2008. 
  4. ^ "Right-Left Coalition Denounces Boeing Corporate Welfare Deal". CommonDreams.org. Retrieved April 29, 2008. 
  5. ^ "Sen. Thune avoids being named 'Porker of the Year’". Rapid City Journal. Retrieved April 29, 2008. 
  6. ^ CAGW Names Sen. Dodd Porker of the Month
  7. ^ Olavsrud, Thor (August 23, 2001). "Microsoft Supported by Dead People". InternetNews.com. Retrieved December 19, 2006. 
  8. ^ Schatz, Thomas A. (August 23, 2001). "CAGW Criticizes LA Times Story". politech. Retrieved December 19, 2006. 
  9. ^ Citizens Against Government Waste: NewsRelease_09302003b
  10. ^ | InfoWorld | News | 2003-10-03 | By Paul Roberts, IDG News Service
  11. ^ [1], Letter supporting Youth Smoking Reduction Act by CAGW
  12. ^ [2], Letter against Youth Smoking Reduction Act by several public health agencies
  13. ^ [3], Recap of ASSIST Meeting
  14. ^ When tobacco needed a voice, CAGW spoke up and profited, St. Petersburg Times, April 2, 2006
  15. ^ (kpx21c00)
  16. ^ a b For price, watchdog will be an advocate, St. Petersburg Times, April 2, 2006
  17. ^ "Senate Report: Five Nonprofit Groups Sold Clout to Abramoff". Washington Post. 2006-10-12. 
  18. ^ http://www.cagw.org/VoteCenter?page=voteInfo&voteId=4964
  19. ^ http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/nw/?postId=5176
  20. ^ Yang, Jeff (2010-10-27). "Politicians Play The China Card". Tell Me More ( 
  21. ^ Lyden, Jacki (2010-10-27). "Critics Say Political Ads Hint Of Xenophobia".  
  22. ^ a b Smith, Ben (2010-10-22). "Behind The Chinese Professor". 
  23. ^ Chi, Frank (2010-11-08). "In campaign ads, China is fair game; Chinese-Americans are not". The Boston Globe. 
  24. ^ Fallows, James (2010-10-21). "The Phenomenal Chinese Professor Ad". 
  25. ^ a b c Osnos, Evan (November 6, 2012) "The Year China-Bashing Went Mainstream", The New Yorker.

References

See also

One of the extra actors who took part in the ad reported that he was lied to by the producers who told him they were filming a scene for Transformers 3.[25] The same actor said "I saw the commercial and it’s pretty intense and one thing I did not know that the commercial would do, is put this almost red-scare type of fear in the eyes of Americans (effectiveness wise, the political ad works, not saying I agree with the tactics)."[25] Chinese were baffled by the ad, especially by its exaggeration of Chinese economic power, given the fact that the average Chinese citizen still earns less than one-fifth of that is earned by an American citizen.[25]

The CAGW launched an ad, now commonly referred to as "Chinese Professor", which portrays a 2030 conquest of the West by China (cf. Yellow Peril), using local Asian American extras to play Chinese, although the actors were not informed of the nature of the shoot.[20] Columnist Jeff Yang said that in the campaign there was a "blurry line between Chinese and Chinese-Americans".[21] Larry McCarthy, the producer of "Chinese Professor," defended his work by saying that "this ad is about America, it's not about China."[22] Other editorials commenting on the video have called the video not anti-Chinese.[23][22][24]

"Chinese Professor" ad

In 2007, CAGW supported a bill that would limit damages resulting from malpractice lawsuits.[18] Many consumer watchdog groups opposed the bill.[19]

A Senate Finance Committee investigating ties between CAGW and other non-profits and [17]

According to the St. Petersburg Times in 2006, the Pig Book has been used to benefit corporate donors, specifically health clubs who donated to CAGW. The Pig Book listed federal grants to YMCAs who compete with those health clubs as waste. CAGW's president countered that "The Ys are there because they qualify as pork. Period."[16]

Throughout its history, CAGW has been accused of fronting lobbying efforts of corporations to give them the appearance of "grassroots" support.[16] In part, this is because CAGW has accepted donations from Phillip Morris, the Olin Foundation, the Bradley Foundation, Microsoft, Merrill Lynch, and Exxon-Mobil.

Other controversies

Asked about his group's tobacco work, CAGW president Tom Schatz said, "We have always welcomed contributions to support the issues we support. Many of them have to do with fighting higher taxes and more regulations."[14] [15]

[13] CAGW was also contacted to by Phillip Morris to include ASSIST, a federal tobacco control program, in their Pig Book. ASSIST was considered an imminent threat to industry activities at the time.[12][11]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.