World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article
 

Electoral Reform Society

Electoral Reform Society
Founded 1884
London, United Kingdom
Type Non-governmental organization
Focus Democracy, electoral reform, elections
Location
Area served
United Kingdom
Method lobbying, research, innovation
Key people
Website electoral-reform.org.uk

The Electoral Reform Society (ERS) is a political pressure group based in the United Kingdom which promotes electoral reform. It seeks to replace the first-past-the-post voting system with one of proportional representation, advocating the single transferable vote. It is the world's oldest operating organisation concerned with political and electoral reform.

Contents

  • Overview 1
  • History 2
  • Activities 3
    • AV referendum 3.1
    • Police and crime commissioners 3.2
    • Voter registration 3.3
    • European Union 3.4
  • Related organisations 4
  • See also 5
  • References 6
  • External links 7

Overview

The Electoral Reform Society seeks a "representative democracy fit for the 21st century."[1] The Society advocates the replacement of the first-past-the-post and plurality-at-large voting systems with a proportional voting system, the single transferable vote. First-past-the-post is currently used for elections to the House of Commons and for most local elections in England and Wales, while Plurality-at-large is used in multi-member council wards in England and Wales, and was historically used in the multi-member parliamentary constituencies before their abolition.[2] It also campaigns for improvements to public elections and representative democracy, and is a regular commentator on all aspects of representation, public participation and democratic governance in the United Kingdom.

History

The ERS was founded in January 1884 as the Proportional Representation Society by the Victorian naturalist, archaeologist and polymath Proportional Representation Society of Ireland, the Society succeeded in getting STV introduced in local and then national elections in Ireland, and in numerous religious, educational and professional organisations.

A PRS pamphlet of the 1920s described the organization's aims thusly: 1. to reproduce the opinions of the electors in parliament and other public bodies in their true proportions 2. to secure the majority of electors shall rule and all other considerable minorities shall be heard 3. to give electors a wider freedom in the choice of representation 4. to give representative greater independence by freeing them from the pressure of sectional interests (perhaps party discipline and back-room deals were meant] 5. to ensure to parties representation by their ablest and most trusted members. [3]

After World War II the Society suffered from financial problems and a lack of public appetite for reform. When Fianna Fáil put to a referendum a proposal to revert to first-past-the-post voting twice (1959 and 1968), the Society, under the leadership of Enid Lakeman, led a successful campaign to keep the STV system in Ireland[4]

In 1973 STV was introduced in Northern Ireland for elections to local councils and to the new Northern Ireland Assembly, and the Society and its staff were called upon to advise in the programme of education set up by the government to raise public awareness.[5]

Interest in Non-Governmental Organisation with Consultative Status.

Activities

The Society has campaigned successfully for the introduction of STV for local elections in Scotland,[6] and led the call for a referendum on the voting system in the wake of the United Kingdom parliamentary expenses scandal as part of the Vote for a Change campaign.[7] It is a founding member of the Votes at 16 Coalition.

AV referendum

The Society was later a principal funder of the YES! To Fairer Votes campaign in the unsuccessful bid for a Yes vote in the 2011 referendum on the Alternative Vote.[8] Its Chief Executive, Katie Ghose, served as the campaign's chair.

Police and crime commissioners

In 2012, the Society criticised Government handling of its policy of elected Police and Crime Commissioners - which led to the lowest turnout in British peacetime history.

In August 2012 the Society predicted turnout could be as low as 18.5% and outlined steps to salvage the elections, mobilising support from both candidates and voters.[9] The Government did not change tack, dubbing the prediction a "silly season story".[10] Following the result, the Society branded the Government's approach to elections as a "comedy of errors", views that were reiterated by Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper.[11]

Voter registration

The Society led bids to change the Government's approach to introduction of Individual Electoral Registration, which the New Statesman dubbed "the biggest political scandal you've never heard of".[12] Electoral Commission sources estimated as many as 10 million voters could disappear from the electoral roll under government plans, predominantly poor, young or black, and more liable to vote Labour.[13] The Society succeeded in securing changes to the legislation.[14]

European Union

The Society argues that there is a democratic deficit in the European Union. A 2014 report recommended several ways to make the EU more accountable. These included: better scrutiny of EU legislation by the British parliament, a voting system which gives voters more influence over individual candidates (e.g. single transferable vote) and recruitment of party candidates with a wider ranges of views on the EU.[15]

Related organisations

The Society has three closely related organisations:

  • Electoral Reform Services Limited (ERS, formerly Electoral Reform Ballot Services): A company, in which the Electoral Reform Society is a minority shareholder and which the ERS receives an annual dividend from,[16] established in 1988 to provide an independent balloting and polling service to organisations conducting elections and polls. The service is widely used by trade unions, political parties, building societies and companies when balloting their members or shareholders in ways defined by the law and their internal management. In many cases these organisations are forbidden from conducting their ballots internally in an attempt to ensure that the ballots are conducted impartially.
  • Electoral Reform International Services (ERIS): A company established in 1991 to provide assistance in conducting elections worldwide. Activities include advice, training and election monitoring.

See also

References

  1. ^ "What we stand for". Retrieved 23 October 2015. 
  2. ^ Dunleavy, Patrick; Travers, Tony; Gilson, Chris (13 November 2012). "The LSE’s simple guide to UK voting systems". London School of Economics. Retrieved 24 February 2015. 
  3. ^ The Influence of the Method of Election upon the Constitution of Local Authorities, London: PRS, [1926]
  4. ^ (Sinnott, Richard, 1999. ‘The electoral system’, pp. 99–126 in John Coakley and Michael Gallagher (eds), Politics in the Republic of Ireland, 3rd ed. London: Routledge and PSAI Press.)
  5. ^ "CAIN: Politics: Elections: Introduction to the Electoral System in Northern Ireland". ulst.ac.uk. 
  6. ^ "What is Fairshare?". Archived from the original on 4 February 2012. Retrieved 22 October 2015. 
  7. ^ "Parliament in crisis: When will MPs start to listen to the people?". TheGuardian.com. Guardian News and Media. 24 May 2009. Retrieved 24 February 2015. 
  8. ^ Curtis, Polly; Kollewe, Julia (3 May 2011). "AV referendum: full details of donations to yes and no campaigns". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 24 February 2015. 
  9. ^ "Police and crime commissioner candidates warn of turnout". BBC News. 26 September 2012. Retrieved 24 February 2015. 
  10. ^ Beckford, Martin (18 August 2012). "'"Turnout of 18% predicted for police commissioner election 'shambles. The Daily Telegraph (London). Retrieved 24 February 2015. 
  11. ^ "Yvette Cooper MP". 16 November 2012. Archived from the original on 25 January 2013. 
  12. ^ Hasan, Mehdi (6 October 2011). "Electoral registration: the biggest political scandal you've never heard of". New Statesman (London). Retrieved 24 February 2015. 
  13. ^ Wintour, Patrick (15 September 2011). "Shocked MPs told electoral plan could remove 10m voters". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 24 February 2015. 
  14. ^ "An important victory for voters, but no time for complacency". Retrieved 23 October 2015. 
  15. ^ Close the Gap — Tackling Europe's Democratic Deficit.
  16. ^ "The Electoral Reform Society's Finances". 2014. Retrieved 18 August 2015. 

External links

  • Official website
  • Electoral Reform Services
  • Electoral Reform International Services
  • Electoral Reform Society companies grouped at OpenCorporates
  • Guardian Special Report - Electoral Reform
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.