World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Expeditionary economics

Article Id: WHEBN0038956127
Reproduction Date:

Title: Expeditionary economics  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Economy, Outline of economics, Innovation economics, Georgism, Agricultural economics
Collection: Economics Articles
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Expeditionary economics

Expeditionary economics is an emerging field of economic enquiry that focuses on the rebuilding and reconstructing of economies in post-conflict nations and providing support to disaster-struck nations. The term was first introduced in an essay by Carl Schramm, the former President and CEO of the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.[1] It focuses on the need for good economic planning on the part of developed nations to help prevent the creation of failed states. It also emphasizes the need for the structuring on new firms to rebuild the national economies.[2]

Since then, the theory has been used by the U.S. Government and the U.S Army to restructure the economies of countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan and helping Haiti which suffered from a severe earthquake. Its aim is to provide economic stabilization and support the counterinsurgency tactics in such nations.[3]

Contents

  • History and theory 1
  • Criticism 2
  • See also 3
  • References 4
  • Bibliography 5
  • External links 6

History and theory

Expeditionary economics first appeared as a feature article by Carl Schramm in Foreign Affairs in the May/June edition in 2010.[4]

According to Schraam, governments and armies must focus on infusing entrepreneurship and "messy capitalism" which prevails is the U.S.[5] He describes the strategy adopted by economists to quickly establish a trajectory toward economic growth with the formation of firms that can generate rapid growth in revenue and employment. He also asks the U.S Army to "treat economic reconstruction as part of any successful three-legged strategy of invasion, stabilization or pacification, and economic reconstruction."

The Pentagon has confirmed that it has applied the theory as a “weapon” to stabilize operations in countries with past-conflict such as Iraq and Afghanistan and has planned various measures which will come into effect just as the army leaves the countries. With special reference to Iran and Afghanistan, reports show that significant resources have been dedicated to such efforts over the past decade, with hundreds of billions of dollars spent in the two countries. The theory rests to a huge extent on the dynamism of new firms, which constantly introduce innovations into the economy. The U.S Government's recent engagements have made it appreciate that post-conflict economic reconstruction must become a core competence of the U.S. military. However, their actions do not present any such appreciation.

Criticism

There has widespread criticism of the theory, particularly on the point that it should be carried out by the invading army. Many economists questioned the relative chances of its application by other post-conflict and military nations. There have also been questions on whether the U.S Army should be held liable or whether the objectives should be outsourced to private-sector enterprises or to other departments of the U.S. Government. The U.S. Army Stability Operations field manual (published in 2009)[6] offers no relevant guidance on what role economic development should play in the United States' post conflict strategy or how to help build dynamic, growth-oriented economies.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation Website". Retrieved March 16, 2013. 
  2. ^ "Expeditionary Economics: A New Model for Post-Conflict Countries". Milken Institute. Retrieved March 29, 2013. 
  3. ^ "Role of Military in Reconstruction". Center for Conflict Studies. Retrieved March 29, 2013. 
  4. ^ Schramm, Carl (May–June 2010). "Expeditionary Economics, Carl Schramm". Foreign Affairs. 
  5. ^ "Haiti 2010 Earthquake and Expeditionary Economics". Retrieved March 29, 2013. 
  6. ^ Army, United States; William B. Caldwell, IV; Flournoy, Michele (2009-02-24). U.S Army Stability Operations Field Manual, 2009.  

Bibliography

  • Nanto, Dick K. and National Security: Issues and Implications for U. S. Policy. DAINE Publishing House. Pg 4
  • Milonakis, Dimitris; Fine, Ben. From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the social and the historical in the evolution of economic theory. Pg 306

External links

  • Website Kauffman Foundation
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.