World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Forcing notrump

Article Id: WHEBN0001201303
Reproduction Date:

Title: Forcing notrump  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Flannery, 2/1 game forcing, Bridge convention, Glossary of contract bridge terms, Bridge conventions
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Forcing notrump

The forcing notrump is a bidding convention in the card game of bridge.

In Standard American bidding, the response of 1NT to an opening bid of 1 or 1 shows 6 to 9 high card points and is non-forcing. Opener, with a balanced minimum, may pass the 1NT response and, if the opponents also pass, that will become the contract.

A partnership may agree that this bid is forcing for one round; if the intervening opponent passes, opener must bid at least once more. This guarantees the responder at least one more opportunity to bid or pass. This mechanism allows the partnership to use the 1NT response for a greater variety of hands: in particular, invitational as well as minimum responder holdings. The forcing notrump is used over major suits only; 1NT is always standard and non-forcing over the minor suits.

A bid of 1 forcing notrump shows 6 to 12 HCP, denies the ability to make a single raise (but not necessarily an invitational raise), and denies holding four spades if the opening bid was 1 heart.

As the forcing notrump creates problems of its own, a popular variation that overcomes these is the forcing next step.


  • Opener's rebid 1
  • Responder's rebid 2
  • Further bidding 3
  • Tactical raise 4
  • System implications 5
  • False preference 6
  • Unusual two spades 7
  • Semi-forcing notrump 8
  • Forcing next step 9

Opener's rebid

Opener is forced to bid again:

  • 2 of original major shows a six-card suit
  • 2 of a lower-ranking suit shows a second suit (which of necessity may be short - see below)
  • 2NT is natural and invitational (showing about 18 HCP)
  • 3 of a new suit (jump shift) is natural, normally agreed to be game-forcing, and shows about 19 points or more

When opener does not have a six-card original suit nor a four-card lower-ranking second suit, she will have to bid a short suit. Normally, she bids her three-card minor. If she has three cards in both minors, she bids 2 clubs.

If opener holds exactly four spades, five hearts, two diamonds and two clubs (and thus originally opened 1 heart), she bids 2 clubs (a two-card suit!). There is no point in showing the spades, because responder has denied holding four spades (having skipped the 1 spade response to bid 1 notrump). After a 1 spade opening, however, there is no distribution that would compel opener to rebid a two-card suit.

Some partnerships agree not to rebid a 2-card suit, preferring to promise 3+ cards. This allows responder to pass with 0,1 hearts and 4+ clubs. Instead, these partnerships rebid 2 (violating rule #1), or pass (if playing Semi-forcing notrump.)

The forcing next step variation (discussed below) overcomes these problems by allowing opener to show a balanced hand, or any second suit and guarantee 4 cards in it, yet still offer the option of playing in 2 of the major.

Responder's rebid

Responder categorizes her hand as either minimum (6-9 HCP) or invitational (10-12 HCP).

The minimum responder rebids are:

  • 2 of opener's original major (shows two-card support)
  • 2 of a new suit (shows a five-card or longer suit; some play a six-card or longer suit)
  • pass denies either of the above (shows a distinct preference for opener's second-bid suit)

The invitational responder rebids are:

  • 3 of opener's original major (shows exactly a three-card limit raise)
  • 3 of a new suit (shows a six-card or longer suit)
  • 2NT (natural)
  • 3 of opener's second suit (shows at least four-card support)
  • over a first suit of hearts unusual 2 may apply (see below)

Variation. There is more than one school of thought for responder's second call. The above text represents only one theory. Another widely utilized theory is:

With a minimum (6-9 support points):

  • pass (or raise) holding 5+ cards in the suit bid: exception - see false preference.
  • bid openers first suit with 2 card-support: exception see false preference.
  • pass holding 4+ cards in the current suit bid
  • with a 6+ card suit with reasonable top-cards in the suit, bid that if it is between the current suit and 2 of openers suit. Example: (opponents passing) 1 – 1NT; 2♣ – ?. 2 would fit this bid, but 2♠ would not (as the responder would have bid 1♠ the first time, see Unusual two spades below)
  • if none of these options work, usually pass with 3 in the current suit, otherwise bid openers first suit false preference (see below) may apply.

Further bidding

When responder rebids 2 of a new suit, opener should pass with a minimum and two or more cards in the suit. With a singleton or void in responder's suit, opener should rebid her original major. Responder may yet have a doubleton there and pass, or will be able correct to 3 of opener's second suit or her own good six-card (or longer) suit. In this way, the partnership is normally assured of at least a seven-card fit.

After an invitational responder rebid, opener is expected to pass (or sign off below game) with a minimum opening hand, or to bid game with extra values.

In line with the above Variation, when responder bids their own suit it is 'drop-dead', and Pass should be the expected response. However, with a good hand and 3+ card support a raise may be appropriate. Otherwise, the only reason to bid should be a good hand with 0 cards in the bid suit, and extra length in one of the first 2 suits, as partner has at most 1 card in our major and 3 cards in our minor.

Tactical raise

When responder has a very weak hand (0-4 points), but yet support for opener's major (three or more cards), standard bidding dictates a pass (because opener may have a very good hand and get over-enthused after a single raise). This may allow the opponents to get into the bidding at a low level. Playing the forcing notrump, however, it is sometimes tactically advantageous to bid 1NT with this hand and then correct to 2 of opener's major. The 1NT bid tends to shut out the opponents and make partner cautious at the same time.

System implications

The forcing notrump is required for players using the 2/1 game forcing system, but may be used to advantage by other players as well.

False preference

When in the maxi-minimum range (8-9 support points), and holding 2 cards in opener's major and 5 cards in opener's minor, you are worried about passing and missing game when partner has some extra-values. So you take 'preference' to 2 of openers major. This keeps the bidding alive and allows partner to take another call even though your preference would in fact be for the minor.

When in the mini-minimum range (6-7 support points) and holding 2 cards in opener's major and 4 cards in opener's minor, you Pass. Even though the 'rule' says to prefer the major, the last thing you need is for partner to take another bid with extra values. By passing in a known fit, you hope to ensure the partnership a plus score.

Unusual two spades

Specific to the auctions: 1 – 1NT - 2 and 1 – 1NT - 2. In these auctions responder is known to have fewer than 4 spades. Thus, a call of 2 would have no sensible meaning. In these situations the raise of partner's minor is a slightly weaker hand, and the 2 bid is a 'power' raise to opener's minor, usually based on 5+ of partners minor and invitational values.

Semi-forcing notrump

As a variation, some partnerships choose to play their 1NT response as semi-forcing. The rebids and subsequent auctions are the same as with the forcing notrump, except that the opener is allowed to pass with a 5-3-3-2 minimum and no interest in game opposite a limit raise (including 3-card support for opener's major).

This changes follow-up auctions in that opener is assumed to either have 4 or more cards in any new suit bid, or some extra values when holding only 3 cards in a newly bid minor.

Forcing next step

With this approach, the next step bid over the major open is forcing and unspecified. "Forcing next step," also known as the "Kaplan Inversion", is a mid-chart convention in the ACBL.

  • 1 - 1NT is forcing, unspecified
  • 1 - 1 is forcing, with responder having 0-4 spades
  • 1 - 1NT is forcing with responder showing 5+ spades.

One immediate benefit of this is that the correct major fit can be found. In standard forcing notrump, responder with 5 spades bids 1 over opener's 1 but if she also has 2 hearts she does not then know whether to rebid 2 or 2. In forcing next step, opener will raise 1 - 1NT to 2 if she has support, so if she makes another bid, responder can happily give preference to 2.

The forcing next step approach has the further benefit over the classic forcing notrump of allowing an opener with a balanced hand to define his point count range more tightly.

Here is a simple approach. Assuming the use of strong 1NT openings, the sequence 1 - 1 - 1NT would show a balanced 12-14 HCP with five hearts and 1 - 1 - 2NT would show 18-19 HCP with five hearts.

Here is a more complex approach: Over a sequence of 1 - 1NT, opener rebids:

  • 2 = 12-16, 4 clubs, or balanced. (2 from responder finds out which, as well as the strength range.)
  • 2/ = 12-16, 4 card suit
  • 2 = 12-16, 6+ card suit
  • 2NT = 17-18 balanced
  • 3 any = 17+ natural

If responder wishes to know further about the 2 bid, she asks with 2. Opener rebids 2 = 12-14 balanced, 2 = 12-14 club suit, 2NT = 15-16 balanced, 3 = 15-16 clubs.

Similarly with a sequence starting 1 - 1, opener rebids:

  • 1NT = 12-16, balanced, or 4 spades. (2 from partner finds out which, as well as the strength range.)
  • 2/ = 12-16, 4 card suit
  • 2 = 12-16, 6+ card suit
  • 2NT = 17-18 balanced
  • 3 any = 17+ natural

If responder wishes to know further about the 1NT bid, she asks with 2. Opener rebids 2 = 12-14 balanced, 2 = 12-14 spade suit, 2 = 15-16 spade suit, 2NT = 15-16 balanced. Note that if responder and opener both have 4 spades, they can still play in 2 in spite of the artificial response.

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.