World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Guildford Four and Maguire Seven

Article Id: WHEBN0000803610
Reproduction Date:

Title: Guildford Four and Maguire Seven  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: London Borough of Brent, Patrick Conlon, History of London, 1976 in England, 1974 in Northern Ireland
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Guildford Four and Maguire Seven

The Guildford Four and the Maguire Seven were the collective names of two groups whose convictions in English courts in 1975 and 1976 for the Guildford pub bombings of 5 October 1974 were eventually quashed after long campaigns for justice. The Guildford Four were convicted of bombings carried out by the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA), and the Maguire Seven were convicted of handling explosives found during the investigation into the bombings. Both groups' convictions were eventually declared "incorrect and unsatisfactory"[1] and reversed in 1989 and 1991 respectively after they had served up to 15–16 years in prison.

No one else was charged with the bombings, or supplying the materiel, three police officers were charged with conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and found not guilty.


  • Guildford Four 1
    • Alibis 1.1
  • Maguire Seven 2
  • Appeals 3
    • Quashing of the Guildford verdict 3.1
    • Quashing of the Maguire verdicts 3.2
  • Aftermath 4
  • See also 5
  • References 6
  • External links 7

Guildford Four

The Guildford Four were charged with direct involvement with the IRA attacks. They were:

Defendant Age at
time of trial
Convicted of
Paul Michael Hill 21
Gerard "Gerry" Conlon 21
  • Guildford bombings
Patrick "Paddy" Armstrong 25
  • Guildford bombings
  • Woolwich bombing
Carole Richardson 17
  • Guildford bombings

After their arrest, all four defendants confessed to the bombing under intense amount of coercion by the police.[2] These statements were later retracted, but nonetheless formed the basis of the case against them. They would later be alleged to be the result of coercion by the police, ranging from intimidation to torture—including threats against family members—as well as the effects of drug withdrawal.[3] Conlon argues in his autobiography that a key factor in his purportedly coerced confession was the fact that strengthened anti-terrorism laws passed in the early 1970s allowed the police to hold suspects without charges for up to a week, rather than the previous limit of 48 hours, and that he might have been able to withstand the treatment he had received had the original time limit been in effect.[4]

They were convicted in October 1975 for murder and other charges, and sentenced to life imprisonment - mandatory for adults convicted of murder. Richardson, a minor at the time of the bombings, received an indeterminate "at Her Majesty's pleasure" sentence for murder, but a life sentence for conspiracy. Mr Justice Donaldson, who also presided over the Maguire Seven trial, expressed regret that the Four had not been charged with treason, which then still had a mandatory death penalty;[5] although no executions had been carried out in the UK since 1964, treason still carried the death penalty until 1998. At the time, the normal practice was for judges to be consulted by the Home Secretary when considering release from a life sentence, rather than giving a tariff at trial, but the judge, believing he might be dead by the time they were released, recommended 30 years for Conlon, 35 for Armstrong and until "great age" for Hill.

There was never any evidence that any of the Guildford Four had been involved with the

  • Life for a life sentences to warn the IRA - A report on the sentencing phase of the original trial, The Guardian, October 23, 1975
  • Miscarriages of justice
  • Summary of the cases from the BBC
  • In the Name of the FatherJustice:Denied's review of the book and movie version of
  • Background to the Irish cases

External links

  1. ^ a b Pallister, David (19 October 1999). "An injustice that still reverberates". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 13 September 2010. 
  2. ^ Charles Patrick Ewing; Joseph T. McCann (2006). Minds on Trial: Great Cases in Law and Psychology. Oxford University Press. pp. 54–56.  
  3. ^ Moles, Robert N., Dr., ed. (20 October 1989). R. v. Richardson, Conlon, Armstrong and Hill EWCA Crim (Report). Networked Knowledge. 
  4. ^ a b Conlon, Gerry (22 March 1991). Proved Innocent: the story of Gerry Conlon and the Guildford Four. Penguin Books.  
  5. ^ Lizzie Seal (5 Mar 2014). Capital Punishment in Twentieth-Century Britain: Audience, Justice, Memory. Routledge. p. 27.  
  6. ^ Martin Roberts (2012). Secret History. AuthorHouse. p. 197.  
  7. ^ Magee, Kevin (6 June 2000). "The long road from prison to high society". BBC News Northern Ireland. BBC. Retrieved 13 September 2010. 
  8. ^ a b "20th Century Ireland - Joe O'Connell (born 1951)". Searc's Web Guide. 
  9. ^ Geoffrey Lane. "Judgement of the Court". R. v. Richardson, Conlon, Armstrong and Hill EWCA Crim. If they were prepared to tell this sort of lie, then the whole of their evidence becomes suspect and, I repeat, on their evidence depended the prosecution case. 
  10. ^ .  
  11. ^ Terry Kirby (1 July 1994). "Guildford Four 'plot' dismissed: An inquiry into one of Britain's worst miscarriages of justice makes many criticisms but rejects the idea of an official cover-up.". The Independent. Retrieved 25 Nov 2011. 
  12. ^ Kirby, Terry (21 April 1993). "Detectives 'lied about Guildford Four notes': Terry Kirby reports on accusations that police tampered with confessions to gain bomb convictions". University of San Francisco Law Review (The Independent). Retrieved 13 January 2014. 
  13. ^ "Blair apologises to Guildford Four family".  
  14. ^ "Courtney and Paul Hill go their own way". Irish Independent. Feb 15, 2006. Retrieved Nov 25, 2011. 
  15. ^ "Guildford Four man meets victim's brother". BBC News. 13 June 2000. Retrieved 4 May 2010. 
  16. ^ "'"Hill attending Colombia 'IRA trial. BBC News. 28 November 2002. Retrieved 4 May 2010. 
  17. ^ "Guildford bomb campaigner dies".  
  18. ^ "Gerry Conlon dies". BBC News. BBC. Retrieved 21 June 2014. 
  19. ^ a b Chrisafis, Angelique (10 February 2005). "After 16 years of waiting, an apology at last for the Guildford Four". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 4 May 2010. 
  20. ^ "RTÉ Radio 1". 13 November 2014. Retrieved 5 July 2015. 
  21. ^ Dan MacGuill. "Gerry Conlon and the Guildford Four were released 25 years ago today". Retrieved 5 July 2015. 
  22. ^ Maguire, Patrick; Gébler, Carlo (19 May 2008). My Father's Watch: The story of a child prisoner in 70s Britain. Fourth Estate.  
  23. ^ "Gerry Conlon dies: Guildford Four member who never gave up his fight for justice". 


See also

In terms of a legal aftermath, Sir John Donaldson went onto an illustrious judicial career and became Master of the Rolls, Head of the Appeal Court. The appeal case itself for R v Maguire 1981, is now the leading case for disclosure to the defence.

Gerry Conlon later joined a campaign to free the “Craigavon Two” – Brendan McConville and John Paul Wootton – convicted of the murder of a police officer in Northern Ireland. Conlon died at home in Belfast on 21 June 2014. His family issued a statement:  "He brought life, love, intelligence, wit and strength to our family through its darkest hours. He helped us to survive what we were not meant to survive. We recognise that what he achieved by fighting for justice for us had a far, far greater importance - it forced the world's closed eyes to be opened to injustice; it forced unimaginable wickedness to be acknowledged; we believe it changed the course of history".[23]

The autobiography of the youngest member of the Maguire Seven, Patrick Maguire, My Father's Watch: The Story of a Child Prisoner in 70s Britain was released in May 2008. It tells his story before, during, and after his imprisonment, and details its impact on his life and those of his family.[22]

Carole Richardson married and had a daughter soon after her release. She has since kept out of the public eye.[19] Although it wasn't reported at the time of Conlon's death there are two reputable citations that record that Carole Richardson died in 2012.[20][21]

Paddy Armstrong had problems with drinking and gambling. He eventually married and moved to Dublin.[19]

Gerry Conlon's autobiography Proved Innocent was adapted into the Oscar and Bafta award-nominated 1993 drama In the Name of the Father, starring Daniel Day-Lewis, Emma Thompson, and Pete Postlethwaite. The film depicts Conlon's attempt to rebuild his shattered relationship with his father, but is partly fictional - for example, Conlon never shared a cell with his father. He is reported to have settled with the government for a final payment of compensation in the region of £500,000.[1] His mother Sarah Conlon, who had spent 16 years campaigning to have the names of her husband and son cleared and helped secure the apology, died on 20 July 2008.[17] Conlon has given support to Tommy Sheridan in relation to the charges brought against him. Conlon had been working to have the conviction of the Craigavon Two overturned prior to his death in June 2014.[18]

In 1993, Paul Hill married Courtney Kennedy, a daughter of assassinated American senator Robert F. Kennedy and a niece of assassinated president John F. Kennedy. They had a daughter in 1999, but legally separated in 2006.[14] Hill had a televised meeting with the brother of murdered soldier Brian Shaw, who continued to accuse him.[15] He travelled to Colombia to attend the trial of the Colombia Three.[16]

On 9 February 2005, Tony Blair, then Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, issued an apology to the families of the 11 people imprisoned for the bombings in Guildford and Woolwich, and those related to them who were still alive. He said, in part, "I am very sorry that they were subject to such an ordeal and injustice... they deserve to be completely and publicly exonerated."[13]

Neither the bombings nor the wrongful imprisonment resulted in convictions. The bombings were most likely the work of the Balcombe Street Siege gang, who claimed responsibility. They were already serving life sentences, but were released under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement. Three British police officers—Thomas Style, John Donaldson, and Vernon Attwell—were charged with conspiracy to pervert the course of justice,[12] but each was found not guilty.


The convictions of the Maguire Seven were quashed in 1991.

On 12 July 1990, the Home Secretary David Waddington published the Interim Report on the Maguire Case: The Inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the convictions arising out of the bomb attacks in Guildford and Woolwich in 1974,[10] which criticised the trial judge Mr Justice Donaldson and unearthed improprieties in the handling of scientific evidence and declared the convictions unsound recommending referral back to the Court of Appeal. The report "strongly criticise[d] the decision by the prosecution at the Guildford trial not to disclose to the defence a statement supporting Mr Conlon's alibi."[11]

Quashing of the Maguire verdicts

Paul Hill had also been convicted of the murder of a British soldier, Brian Shaw, based on his confession while in the custody of Surrey Police. This did not fall under the ambit of the Lane appeal. He was released on bail, pending his appeal against this conviction. In 1994, the Her Majesty's Court of Appeal in Belfast quashed Hill's conviction for Brian Shaw's murder.

The Four were released on 19 October 1989, after having their convictions quashed.

We have no doubt that these events make the convictions of all of these 4 appellants in respect of the Guildford and the Woolwich events unsafe, even though the latest revelations have no direct bearing on the evidence relating to the Woolwich bombing.

Lane remarked :

The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Lane, concluded that, regardless of the impact of the content of the material discovered by Somerset and Avon, or indeed the alibis or additional evidence the appellants wished to introduce, the level of duplicity meant that the all the police evidence was suspect, and hence the case for the prosecution was unsafe.[9]

The appeal hearing had been adjourned to January 1990 at the request of the Guildford Four, but once the findings of the Somerset and Avon report were available, the hearing was resumed, with the Crown stating that they did not wish to support the convictions.

An appeal was already under way on the basis of other evidence. Lord Gifford QC represented Paul Hill, and others were represented by human rights solicitor, Gareth Peirce.

Thirdly detention record were inconsistent with the times and durations of the claimed interviews, reported by the Surrey police.

Secondly a series of manuscript notes relating to an interview with Hill, which showed that Hill's fifth statement was taken in breach of Judges' Rules, and may well have been inadmissible as evidence. The information was not made available to the DPP or the prosecution. Further, the officers involved had denied under oath that such an interview had happened.

Firstly typed notes from Patrick Armstrong's police interviews, which had been heavily edited. Deletions and additions had been made, and the notes had been rearranged. These notes, and their amendments, were consistent with hand-written and typed notes presented at the trial, which suggested that the hand-written notes were made after the interviews had been conducted. The notes presented had been described in court as contemporaneous records.

In 1989, a detectives from Avon and Somerset Constabulary, investigating the handling of the case, found three significant pieces of evidence in relation to Surrey Police's handling of the Guildford Four and their statements.

Quashing of the Guildford verdict

The Guildford Four tried to obtain from the Home Secretary a reference to the Court of Appeal under Section 17 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 (later repealed), but were unsuccessful. In 1987, the Home Office issued a memorandum recognising that it was unlikely they were terrorists, but that this would not be sufficient evidence for appeal.

In February 1977, during the trial of the Balcombe Street ASU, the four IRA men instructed their lawyers to "draw attention to the fact that four totally innocent people were serving massive sentences", referring to the Guildford Four.[8] Despite claims to the police that they were responsible[8] they were never charged with these offences, and the Guildford Four remained in prison for another twelve years.

Both the Guildford Four and the Maguire Seven unsuccessfully sought leave to appeal their convictions immediately. Despite this, a growing body of disparate groups pressed for a re-examination of the case.


Giuseppe Conlon had travelled from Belfast to help his son, Gerry Conlon, in the Guildford Four trial. Conlon, who had troubles with his lungs for many years, died in prison in January 1980, while the other six served their sentences and were released.

Defendant Relationship Age at
time of trial
Anne Maguire 40 14 years
Patrick Maguire Anne's husband 42 14 years
Patrick Maguire Son of Anne and Patrick 14 4 years
Vincent Maguire Son of Anne and Patrick 17 5 years
Sean Smyth Brother of Anne Maguire 37 12 years
Patrick O'Neill Family friend 35 12 years
Patrick "Giuseppe" Conlon Brother-in-law of Anne 52 12 years

They were tried and convicted on 4 March 1976 and received the following sentences:

The Maguire Seven were charged with possessing nitroglycerine allegedly passed to the IRA to make bombs after the police raided the West Kilburn house of Anne Maguire on 3 December 1974.

Maguire Seven

On the night of the attacks, Richardson was in London seeing the band Jack the Lad at the South Bank Polytechnic. She was unable to recall this upon being arrested, but witnesses came forward. However, the prosecution put together a version of events in which she left for Guildford at high speed by car. Hill and Armstrong also presented alibis, Hill's placing him at Southampton. A witness named Charles Burke placed Conlon at a London hostel, but his evidence was not presented at trial.


[7] Paul Michael Hill was born and raised in Belfast in a mixed-religion marriage.[4]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.