World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Linear canonical transform

Article Id: WHEBN0007438899
Reproduction Date:

Title: Linear canonical transform  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Fourier transform, Time–frequency analysis
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Linear canonical transform

In Hamiltonian mechanics, the linear canonical transformation (LCT) is a family of integral transforms that generalizes many classical transforms. It has 4 parameters and 1 constraint, so it is a 3-dimensional family, and can be visualized as the action of the special linear group SL2(R) on the time–frequency plane (domain).

The LCT generalizes the Fourier, fractional Fourier, Laplace, Gauss–Weierstrass, Bargmann and the Fresnel transforms as particular cases. The name "linear canonical transformation" is from canonical transformation, a map that preserves the symplectic structure, as SL2(R) can also be interpreted as the symplectic group Sp2, and thus LCTs are the linear maps of the time–frequency domain which preserve the symplectic form.

Definition

The LCT can be represented in several ways; most easily,[1] it can be viewed as a 2×2 matrix with determinant 1, i.e., an element of the special linear group SL2(R). Taking a matrix \left(\begin{smallmatrix}a & b\\c & d\end{smallmatrix}\right), with ad − bc = 1, the corresponding integral transform is:

X_{(a,b,c,d)}(u) = \sqrt{-i} \cdot e^{i \pi \frac{d}{b} u^{2}} \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i 2 \pi \frac{1}{b} ut}e^{i \pi \frac{a}{b} t^2} x(t) \; dt \, ,   when b ≠ 0,
X_{(a,0,c,d)}(u) = \sqrt{d} \cdot e^{i \pi cdu^{2}} x(du) \, , when b = 0.

Special cases

Many classical transforms are special cases of the linear canonical transform:

\begin{bmatrix}

 a & b \\
 c & d

\end{bmatrix}

= 

\begin{bmatrix}

 0  & 1 \\
 -1 & 0

\end{bmatrix}.

\begin{bmatrix}

 a & b \\
 c & d

\end{bmatrix}

= 

\begin{bmatrix}

 \cos \theta & \sin \theta \\
-\sin \theta & \cos \theta

\end{bmatrix}.

\begin{bmatrix}

 a & b \\
 c & d

\end{bmatrix}

= 

\begin{bmatrix}

 1  & \lambda z \\
 0 & 1

\end{bmatrix}.

where z is distance and λ is wave length.
  • The Laplace transform corresponds to rotation by 90° into the complex domain, and can be represented by the matrix:

\begin{bmatrix}

 a & b \\
 c & d

\end{bmatrix}

= 

\begin{bmatrix}

 0 & i \\
 i & 0

\end{bmatrix}.

  • The Fractional Laplace transform corresponds to rotation by an arbitrary angle into the complex domain, and can be represented by the matrix:[2]

\begin{bmatrix}

 a & b \\
 c & d

\end{bmatrix}

= 

\begin{bmatrix}

 i \cos \theta & i \sin \theta \\
 i \sin \theta & -i \cos \theta

\end{bmatrix}.

Composition

Composition of LCTs corresponds to multiplication of the corresponding matrices; this is also known as the "additivity property of the WDF".

In detail, if the LCT is denoted by OF(a,b,c,d), i.e.

X_{(a,b,c,d)}(u) = O_F^{(a,b,c,d)}[x(t)] \,

then

O_F^{(a2,b2,c2,d2)} \left \{ O_F^{(a1,b1,c1,d1)}[x(t)] \right \} = O_F^{(a3,b3,c3,d3)}[x(t)] \, ,

where

\begin{bmatrix}

 a3 & b3 \\
 c3 & d3

\end{bmatrix}

= 

\begin{bmatrix}

 a2  & b2 \\
 c2 & d2

\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}

 a1  & b1 \\
 c1 & d1

\end{bmatrix}.

In optics and quantum mechanics

Paraxial optical systems implemented entirely with thin lenses and propagation through free space and/or graded index (GRIN) media, are quadratic phase systems (QPS); these were known before Moshinsky and Quesne (1974) called attention to their significance in connection with canonical transformations in quantum mechanics. The effect of any arbitrary QPS on an input wavefield can be described using the linear canonical transform, a particular case of which was developed by Segal (1963) and Bargmann (1961) in order to formalize Fok's (1928) boson calculus.[3]

Applications

Canonical transforms are used to analyze differential equations. These include diffusion, the Schrödinger free particle, the linear potential (free-fall), and the attractive and repulsive oscillator equations. It also includes a few others such as the Fokker–Planck equation. Although this class is far from universal, the ease with which solutions and properties are found makes canonical transforms an attractive tool for problems such as these.[4]

Wave propagation through air, a lens, and between satellite dishes are discussed here. All of the computations can be reduced to 2×2 matrix algebra. This is the spirit of LCT.

Electromagnetic wave propagation


Assuming the system looks like as depicted in the figure, the wave travels from plane xi, yi to the plane of x and y. The Fresnel transform is used to describe electromagnetic wave propagation in air:

U_0(x,y) = - \frac{j}{\lambda} \frac{e^{jkz}}{z} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{j \frac{k}{2z} [ (x-x_i)^2 +(y-y_i)^2 ] } U_i(x_i,y_i) \; dx_i\; dy_i,

with

k = 2 π / λ    : wave number;
λ  : wavelength;
z  : distance of propagation;
j  : imaginary unit.

This is equivalent to LCT (shearing), when

\begin{bmatrix}

 a & b \\
 c & d 

\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}

 1 & \lambda z \\
 0 & 1 

\end{bmatrix}.

When the travel distance (z) is larger, the shearing effect is larger.

Spherical lens


With the lens as depicted in the figure, and the refractive index denoted as n, the result is:[5]

U_0(x,y) = e^{jkn \Delta} e^{-j \frac{k}{2f} [x^2 + y ^2]} U_i(x,y)

with f the focal length and Δ the thickness of the lens.

The distortion passing through the lens is similar to LCT, when

\begin{bmatrix}

 a & b \\
 c & d 

\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}

 1 & 0 \\
 \frac{-1}{\lambda f} & 1 

\end{bmatrix}.

This is also a shearing effect: when the focal length is smaller, the shearing effect is larger.

Spherical Mirror


The spherical mirror—e.g., a satellite dish—can be described as a LCT, with

\begin{bmatrix}

 a & b \\
 c & d 

\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}

 1 & 0 \\
 \frac{-1}{\lambda R} & 1 

\end{bmatrix}.

This is very similar to lens, except focal length is replaced by the radius of the dish. Therefore, if the radius is smaller, the shearing effect is larger.

Example


The system considered is depicted in the figure to the right: two dishes – one being the emitter and the other one the receiver – and a signal travelling between them over a distance D. First, for dish A (emitter), the LCT matrix looks like this:

\begin{bmatrix}

 1 & 0 \\
 \frac{-1}{\lambda R_A} & 1 

\end{bmatrix}.

Then, for dish B (receiver), the LCT matrix similarly becomes:

\begin{bmatrix}

 1 & 0 \\
 \frac{-1}{\lambda R_B} & 1 

\end{bmatrix}.

Last, for the propagation of the signal in air, the LCT matrix is:

\begin{bmatrix}

 1 & \lambda D \\
 0 & 1 

\end{bmatrix}.

Putting all three components together, the LCT of the system is:

\begin{bmatrix}

 a & b \\
 c & d 

\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}

 1 & 0 \\
 \frac{-1}{\lambda R_B} & 1 

\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}

 1 & \lambda D \\
 0 & 1 

\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}

 1 & 0 \\
 \frac{-1}{\lambda R_A} & 1 

\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}

 1-\frac{D}{R_A} & - \lambda D \\
 \frac{1}{\lambda} (R_A^{-1} + R_B^{-1} - R_A^{-1}R_B^{-1}D)  & 1 - \frac{D}{R_B} 

\end{bmatrix} \, .

See also

  • Segal–Shale–Weil distribution, a metaplectic group of operators related to the chirplet transform
Other time–frequency transforms
Applications

Notes

References

  • J.J. Ding, "Time–frequency analysis and wavelet transform course note", the Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University (NTU), Taipei, Taiwan, 2007.
  • K.B. Wolf, "Integral Transforms in Science and Engineering", Ch. 9&10, New York, Plenum Press, 1979.
  • S.A. Collins, "Lens-system diffraction integral written in terms of matrix optics," J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 60, 1168–1177 (1970).
  • M. Moshinsky and C. Quesne, "Linear canonical transformations and their unitary representations," J. Math. Phys. 12, 8, 1772–1783, (1971).
  • B.M. Hennelly and J.T. Sheridan, "Fast Numerical Algorithm for the Linear Canonical Transform", J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22, 5, 928–937 (2005).
  • H.M. Ozaktas, A. Koç, I. Sari, and M.A. Kutay, "Efficient computation of quadratic-phase integrals in optics", Opt. Let. 31, 35–37, (2006).
  • Bing-Zhao Li, Ran Tao, Yue Wang, "New sampling formulae related to the linear canonical transform", Signal Processing '87', 983–990, (2007).
  • A. Koç, H.M. Ozaktas, C. Candan, and M.A. Kutay, "Digital computation of linear canonical transforms", IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 56, no. 6, 2383–2394, (2008).
  • Ran Tao, Bing-Zhao Li, Yue Wang, "On sampling of bandlimited signals associated with the linear canonical transform", IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 56, no. 11, 5454–5464, (2008).
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.