World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article
 

Massachusetts Sales Tax Relief Act

Massachusetts Question 3, filed under the name, the 3% Sales Tax Relief Act, appears on the November 2, 2010 ballot in the state of Massachusetts as an initiative. The measure, if enacted by voters, would reduce the state sales tax rate from 6.25 to 3 percent. The measure is being sponsored by the Alliance to Roll Back Taxes headed by Carla Howell. The measure would be enacted into a law 30 day after the election if approved by voters.[1][2][3][4][5]

Contents

  • Text of measure 1
    • Ballot title 1.1
    • Summary 1.2
  • Fiscal impact 2
  • Support 3
    • Supporters 3.1
    • Arguments 3.2
  • Opposition 4
    • Opponents 4.1
    • Arguments 4.2
    • Finance 4.3
  • Media endorsements 5
    • Support 5.1
    • Opposition 5.2
  • Path to the ballot 6
  • References 7

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title of the measure reads:

Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 4, 2010? [6]

Summary

The summary of the measure reads:

This proposed law would reduce the state sales and use tax rates (which were 6.25 percent as of September 2009) to 3 percent as of Jan. 1, 2011. It would make the same reduction in the rate used to determine the amount to be deposited with the state Commissioner of Revenue by non-resident building contractors as security for the payment of sales and use tax on tangible personal property used in carrying out their contracts.

The proposed law provides that if the 3 percent rates would not produce enough revenues to satisfy any lawful pledge of sales and use tax revenues in connection with any bond, note, or other contractual obligation, then the rates would instead be reduced to the lowest level allowed by law.

The proposed law would not affect the collection of moneys due the Commonwealth for sales, storage, use or other consumption of tangible personal property or services occurring before Jan. 1, 2011.

The proposed law states that if any of its parts were declared invalid, the other parts would stay in effect.

A YES VOTE would reduce the state sales and use tax rates to 3 percent.

A NO VOTE would make no change in the state sales and use tax rates.[6]

Fiscal impact

Proponents of the measure say rolling back the sales tax to 3% will stimulate $132 million in private sector investment; put an average of $688 back in the pockets of 3,400,000 taxpayers and create 33,000 new, private sector jobs. Political leaders in the state have claimed that there is no current backup plan if the measure is approved by voters.[2]

Support

Supporters

  • The Alliance to Roll Back Taxes is the sponsor of the measure, which they also refer to as the Initiative to Roll Back the Sales Tax, and is headed by Carla Howell and Michael Cloud.
  • Republican Gubernatorial Candidate Christy Mihos[7]
  • Massachusetts Package Store Association

Arguments

  • The passage of the amendment would create as many as 32,929 jobs in the private sector.
  • liquor stores have been negatively impacted by new alcohol and sales tax.
  • vendors at the border between the state and New Hampshire are affected even more because New Hampshire does not have a sales tax
  • Reducing the sales tax is a big step in ending the recession by giving families more income to spend.
  • Voters made the decision last election not to support cutting the income tax and in return the sales tax was raised by 1.25% to 6.25%.

Opposition

Opponents

Arguments

Arguments that have been made against the measure include:

  • we will be looking at major cuts to the budget.

Finance

State reports showing key campaign financers:[11]

Contributor Amount
National Education Association $1,325,000.00
Massachusetts Teachers Association $1,062,000.00
Service Employees International Union $888,000.00
American Federation of Teachers - Massachusetts $704,000.00
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees $200,000.00
Boston Teachers Union $150,000.00
Mass Nurses Association $104,000.00

Media endorsements

Support

  • The Boston Herald, A major Boston news paper stated support for the initiative in an editorial published on October 7, 2010, writing "Sometimes a proposition is known by the enemies it makes - and lining up against the tax rollback are all the usual suspects. Unions - mostly public employee unions - have thus far built a $1.3 million kitty to pay for the coming onslaught of radio and TV ads." and "Taxpayers and voters are just fed up with lawmakers who listen more to special interests, more to public employee unions, more to advocates than to those paying the bills. Sometimes voters have to shout to be heard. This is one of those times"[12]

Opposition

  • The Republican, a western Massachusetts publication, stated opposition to the sales tax rollback in an editorial published on April 29, 2010, writing, "Someday these taxes should be lowered or eliminated, because they can hurt businesses and consumers. But someday is not today. The Legislature is dealing with a proposed $27.8 billion for fiscal 2011 that is at least $2 billion out of whack in an economy that is still sputtering."[13]

Path to the ballot

Activists stated during the week of November 19, 2009 that they had collected enough signatures to place the measure on the 2010 ballot.

  1. ^ , "Elections: Initiative Petition for Law"Massachusetts Secretary of State
  2. ^ a b , "Mass. leaders: No ‘Plan B’ if sales tax cut passes", May 23, 2010Boston Herald
  3. ^ , "Massachusetts ballot questions announced by secretary of state", July 15, 2010Wicked Local
  4. ^ , "Fitch Rates Massachusetts' $358MM GO Bonds 'AA+'; Outlook Stable", August 17, 2010PR Inside
  5. ^ Massachusetts Attorney General, http://www.mass.gov/?pageID=cagoterminal&L=3&L0=Home&L1=Government&L2=Initiatives+%26+Other+Ballot+Questions&sid=Cago&b=terminalcontent&f=government_initiativepetitiontracking&csid=Cago
  6. ^ a b Massachusetts Secretary of State
  7. ^ , "Republicans to pick top candidate for Massachusetts governor's race", April 16, 2010Massachusetts Local News
  8. ^ a b c , "Sales tax cut a tough sell", February 22, 2010The Sun Chronicle
  9. ^ , "Should Massachusetts Reduce Its Sales Tax?", April 30, 2010Fox News
  10. ^ , "Newton mayor warns about danger of sales tax rollback", October 6, 2010Wicked Local
  11. ^ , " The Office of Campaign & Political Finance (OCPF)", Retrieved October 25, 2010efs.cpf.state.ma.us
  12. ^ on Question 3- Boston Herald
  13. ^ , "Editorial: It's not right time to roll back Massachusetts taxes", April 29, 2010The Republican
  14. ^ , "Effort gains steam to trim sales tax", November 19, 2009The Republican
  15. ^ , "Backers say sales tax cut to be on ballot", June 24, 2010Boston.com

References

On July 13, 2010, the Secretary of the Commonwealth affirmed that the sales tax roll back to 3% measure will be on the ballot as Question 3.

On June 23, 2010, initiative supporters turned in approximately 19,000 signatures, giving them a good chance of making the ballot in November. Carla Howell, the leader of the initiative campaign, stated that the measure will be placed on the ballot since that number of signatures was well over the 11,099 required.[15]

[14]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.