World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

North American energy independence

Article Id: WHEBN0000251655
Reproduction Date:

Title: North American energy independence  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Weatherization, Ralph Klein, Brian Schweitzer, Apollo Alliance, 2007 State of the Union Address, Leo Gerard, Jerome Ringo, Energy independence, America Daitōryō Senkyo, Peak uranium
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

North American energy independence

Imported crude oil as a percent of US consumption.

North American energy independence is a stated goal of those who believe that the North American nations - the United States, Canada and Mexico - must eliminate their reliance on oil purchased from outside the continent. A related, less absolute, policy may be called North American energy security. In 2012 in an editorial in a Canadian newspaper, Mexican president elect Enrique Peña Nieto, called North American energy security a "common goal" of Canada and Mexico.[1]

The benefits are argued to be the reduction of North America's energy dependence on unstable regions such as the Middle East and South America and limiting oil imperialism to the North American Free Trade Area, reducing exposure to terrorism abroad; lower balance of trade and foreign exchange stresses on the U.S. economy in an era when suppliers may begin to price oil in euros; the development of renewable energy sources to displace fossil fuels; and the promotion of energy conservation and technology (such as insulation, green roof, and lighting efficiency) exportable to energy-poor nations.

The Apollo Alliance, a coalition of businesses, strategists, labor unions, and environmental organizations is advocating a ten-point plan for energy independence. Another group is the Set America Free Coalition formed by prominent individuals and non-profit organizations concerned about the security and economic implications of America’s growing dependence on foreign oil.

In a 2012 poll of energy experts by Foreign Policy magazine, almost two-thirds of respondents said energy independence was not a sensible goal.[2]

Context

American political rhetoric includes the phrase "foreign oil" as something of which the United States must reduce or eliminate its imports. This is related to the general perception that the major global oil exporting countries are either openly hostile to US foreign policy and interests (Iran, Venezuela, and formerly Iraq), are former or potential future rivals (Russia) or are unsavoury allies (Saudi Arabia). However, most of American imports of oil come not from these countries, but from Canada and Mexico. As well Canada and Mexico export natural gas, uranium, and electricity to the United States. At the same time oil is globalized, fungible commodity: even if the United States does not buy oil from Iran, a price disruption cause by a drop in Iranian supplies would still impact American consumers. During the early 2010s American demand for energy dropped as a result of the Great Recession, and American production of oil and especially natural gas increase with new shale gas finds coming into production. Foreign dependence is not the only factor in North American energy politics, however; environmental concerns around land and water pollution as well as greenhouse gasses related to are also a matter of controversy. In Canada and Mexico there is also the concern not to have energy policy dictated by the United States, as well as tension over American ownership of energy companies.

History

Programs to limit US energy interests in Canada and Mexico

In 1937 Mexico passed a constitutional amendment to nationalize its oil industry, which led to the creation of Pemex, the national oil company. There have been several proposals to privatize Pemex since, but they have never come to fruition as many Mexicans fear foreign control of this stragetic industry.

The 1957 Canadian election as fought partially in response to the 1956 Pipeline Debate which concerned whether or not the government should allow a U.S.-owned company to build a trans-Canadian gas pipeline and whether or not the route should be entirely within Canada or partly through the United States. The right-leaning Progressive Conservatives and leftist Co-operative Commonwealth Federation opposition parties opposed American involvement in the pipeline while the Liberal government supported it. The Liberals were defeated in the 1957 election.

In 1973, the Liberals and the leftist New Democratic Party voted together to create Canada's own state energy company Petro-Canada, which began operations in 1976, though it bought assets from private companies rather than seizing them as in many other countries. In 1980, with the Liberals again in power, the National Energy Program was launched to create oil self-sufficiency within Canada. It attempted to use tax incentives to discourage oil exports (mostly from Western Canada, primarily the province of Alberta) to the US, and redirect these towards to the oil importing provinces of Eastern Canada. The Liberals also created the Foreign Investment Review Agency to screen foreign (mostly US) takeovers of Canadian companies. These policies were bitterly opposed by the provincial government of Alberta, and were repealed and reserved during the Conservative government of 1984-1993 which sought closer economic ties with the US, including the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement of 1988.

Bush's 2006 "Addicted to oil" speech

In his 2006 State of the Union Address, George W. Bush used the phrase addicted to oil, a phrase widely discussed in the media.[3][4][5]

Obama

U.S. President Barack Obama has repeatedly stated that the U.S. has begun "freeing ourselves from foreign oil" including during his 2012 reelection speech[7] Canadian observers have noted that his usage of "foreign" does not include Canada. Yet he has not yet approved the Keystone XL pipeline because of domestic environmental concerns over water quality as well as the general antipathy of the environmental movement to pipeline building, and the production practices in the source (the Athabasca Oil Sands).

See also

References

  1. ^ http://m.theglobeandmail.com/commentary/for-mexico-and-canada-theres-room-to-grow/article5698332/?service=mobile
  2. ^ Yergin, Daniel; "How is Energy Remaking the World?" Foreign Policy July/August 2012 pg. 61
  3. ^ The State of the Union: A Look Between the Lines, NPR
  4. ^ Bush: U.S. must cut oil dependence, MSNBC
  5. ^ Bush in a lighter shade of green, BBC News
  6. ^ President Bush's State of the Union Address, The Washington Post
  7. ^ http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/Obama+could+dally+Keystone+decision/7516081/story.html

External links

  • American Energy Independence
  • Turning Oil into Salt: Energy Independence Through Fuel Choice
  • How Dependent Is the United States on Foreign Oil?
  • American Energy Independence Day 2008
  • Energy Independence Plan
  • USA Energy Independence.com
  • "Dangers of U.S dependence on foreign oil"
  • Humankind public radio's "Passengers" program interview with Policy Director Matt Maryl
  • U.S. to Be World’s Top Oil Producer in 5 Years, Report Says November 12, 2012
  • Herberg, Mikkal (2014). Energy Security and the Asia-Pacific: Course Reader. United States: The National Bureau of Asian Research.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.