World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Operation Kratos

Article Id: WHEBN0002517379
Reproduction Date:

Title: Operation Kratos  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Shoot to kill, Kratos, Gold–silver–bronze command structure, Anti-terrorist policies of the Metropolitan police, Police operations in the United Kingdom
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Operation Kratos

Operation Kratos referred to tactics developed by London's Metropolitan Police Service for dealing with suspected suicide bombers, most notably firing shots to the head without warning. The tactics were developed shortly after the 11 September 2001 attacks, based in part on consultation with Israeli and Sri Lankan law enforcement agencies on how to deal with suicide bombers. Little was revealed about these tactics until after the mistaken shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes on 22 July 2005, in the wake of the 7 July 2005 London bombings. The term is no longer used by the Metropolitan Police, although similar tactics remain in force.


  • Development 1
  • Details 2
  • London bombings and the de Menezes shooting 3
  • Reaction to the shooting 4
  • Wooden Pride 5
  • The law 6
  • References 7
  • External links 8


After the 11 September 2001 attacks, many police agencies worldwide began to seriously consider the possibility of suicide attacks in their own home countries and cities.[1] A Metropolitan Police team led by Barbara Wilding, Deputy Assistant Commissioner Specialist Operations, visited Israel, Sri Lanka and Russia, to learn from their experience of suicide attacks. They also consulted with UK government scientists.

Key findings were:

  • The explosives used by suicide bombers were very sensitive, and were likely to be detonated by the conventional tactic of firing at the chest, as well as by less-lethal weapons.
  • Suicide bombers were likely to detonate their devices on realising that they had been identified. Police must act covertly, and tactics must ensure immediate incapacitation to give the bomber no opportunity to detonate the bomb.

New tactics were developed in the first half of 2002 by Wilding and Sir David Veness, Assistant Commissioner Specialist Operations. These were designated Operation Kratos, named after the Greek demi-god Kratos (Ancient Greek: κράτος "strength or power"). Work on the policy was taken over by the Terrorism and Allied Matters Committee of the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) in January 2003. A paper entitled Operation Kratos People was circulated among UK police forces, and Operation Kratos became national policy.[2][3][4]


There are three separate plans under the generic title of Operation Kratos:
  • Operation Andromeda is designed to deal with the spontaneous sighting by a member of the public of a suspected suicide bomber.
  • Operation Beach is where there is an intelligence-led covert operation to locate and arrest persons suspected of involvement in acts of terrorism.
  • Operation Clydesdale is where intelligence has been received about a suicide attack on a pre-planned event.
    — Report to Metropolitan Police Authority on Suicide Terrorism[2]

These plans deal with identifying and confronting suicide attackers. Ideally, the confrontation would be arranged in a secluded location to avoid risk to police officers and members of the public. In extreme situations, the policy recommends that covert police officers fire on suspected suicide attackers without warning, aiming multiple shots at the brain stem to minimise the risk of detonation of a bomb.[2][5] The Metropolitan Police and other forces also issue Kratos officers with hollow point ammunition, but this has not been incorporated into national guidance.[6]

The decision whether to take such drastic action would be made by a Designated Senior Officer (DSO), an officer of Commander or Deputy Assistant Commissioner rank designated for that incident.[2] The Met had previously used an on-site Designated Senior Officer in policing the Notting Hill Carnival, to decide whether to employ baton rounds should a riot develop, but the situation never arose.[7] To deal with the more severe challenge of suicide bombers, Kratos DSOs would be centrally located, and would be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.[2]

London bombings and the de Menezes shooting

After the London Tube and Bus bombings of 7 July 2005, an internal email was sent to specialised police units reminding them of the secret tactics for dealing with suicide bombers.[1] Operation Kratos was first described publicly in an article in The Scotsman on 15 July 2005.[8] Between 21 July and 5 August, Designated Senior Officers were alerted on 11 occasions, with Armed Response Units deployed to 6 of these incidents.[2] On one of these occasions, they opened fire.

In the evening after the attempted 21 July 2005 London bombings, Specialist Firearms Officers supporting the search for the bombers were issued with hollow point ammunition. When police linked Hussain Osman and another suspect to a block of flats in Brixton, the block was placed under surveillance. Commander Cressida Dick, who would also act as Gold Commander of the operation, was appointed as Kratos DSO. The firearms team were informed that they faced suicide bombers, that a DSO was in place, and that they might be required to use "unusual tactics".[4]

On the morning of 22 July, surveillance officers believed that a man leaving the flats might have been Osman. In fact, the man was Jean Charles de Menezes, who had no connection to the bombers other than his home address. As the firearms team was not at the site (for unknown reasons), one of the watchers followed him onto a bus. de Menezes's innocent actions were misinterpreted as counter-surveillance measures, and a firearms team was called to intercept him. By the time they had arrived, de Menezes had entered Stockwell tube station and boarded a Tube train. Although no Kratos codeword had been given, the firearms officers believed him to be a suicide bomber. A surveillance officer seized de Menezes in a bear hug, and two plainclothes armed officers fired a total of nine shots, six of which struck his head from distances of 1 to 8 cm. Menezes died at the scene.[4]

Reaction to the shooting

The manner of the killing was such a departure from previous police practice that observers speculated that it had been carried out by military special forces. Most commentators agreed that the authorities must have been certain of an imminent threat to order such drastic action.[9] After the police admitted that they had shot an innocent man, the Operation Kratos policies came to national and international attention, with some commentators decrying the policies as unnecessarily violent and ineffective, and others supporting the difficult decisions made by the police in fighting terrorism.[5][10][11]

An Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) report identified a series of errors on the part of police, and recommended a number of changes.[4][12] No individual officers were charged, but the Metropolitan Police were later found guilty of breaching the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and fined.[13] The inquest into the death of de Menezes made further criticisms of the police, and returned an open verdict.[14]

ACPO reviewed Operation Kratos in March 2006 and declared it still "fit for purpose".[15] The Met made changes to the command structure of Operation Kratos after the shooting. In the future, authorisation of a critical shot would be communicated by a clear English phrase rather than code-words. Authorisation would still come from specially trained officers of Commander rank or higher, but these would now be called Extreme Threat Tactical Commanders rather than DSOs. Despite the high rank of this officer, they would not command the whole operation, but would monitor the operation and take over tactical command when a threat of suicide bombing became apparent. The number of such officers in the Met would be reduced to 12, and they would receive more intensive training. The term Operation Kratos was dropped at the beginning of 2008.[16][17][18]

Wooden Pride

After the 2008 Mumbai attacks by a group of highly trained men armed with automatic weapons, the MPS strategic planning team reviewed their planned response to a similar attack on an urban area in the UK. They concluded that the police armed units were inadequate to cope with such a situation and would have to rely on military special forces. Police firearms were upgraded and in a series of exercises over the following years called "Wooden Pride", police counter-terrorism and firearms units practiced a coordinated response with the Special Air Service and Special Boat Service.[19]

The law

For a general discussion on the policy and theory underlying the defence of self-defence and the defence of others, see the Theory of Self-Defence. For a more detailed discussion of the right to use deadly force in the prevention of crime, whether as a private citizen, police officer or member of the armed forces, see self-defence in English law and use of force.


  1. ^ a b Burns, Jimmy (25 July 2005). "Met adopted secret shoot-to-kill policy in the face of a new and deadly threat". Financial Times. 
  2. ^ a b c d e f Swain, Steve (27 October 2005). Suicide Terrorism (Report).  
  3. ^ Taylor, Peter (8 March 2006). "The terrorist who wasn't". The Guardian. 
  4. ^ a b c d Stockwell One: Investigation into the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes at Stockwell underground station on 22 July 2005 (PDF) (Report).  
  5. ^ a b Harrison, David; Johnston, Chris (24 July 2005). "Muslims back 'shoot to kill' despite an innocent man's death". The Daily Telegraph. 
  6. ^ Steele, John (16 November 2005). "Police used 'dum dum' bullets to kill de Menezes". The Telegraph. 
  7. ^ "Brian Paddick's evidence to de Menezes inquest" (PDF). 5 November 2008. 
  8. ^ Nelson, Fraser; Chamberlain, Gethin; Kirkup, James (15 July 2005). "Police may receive shoot-to-kill orders". The Scotsman. 
  9. ^ "Will police now shoot to kill?". BBC News. 22 July 2005. Retrieved 9 December 2009. 
  10. ^ Ansari, Fahad (June 2006). British Anti-Terrorism: A Modern Day Witch-hunt (PDF) (Report).  
  11. ^ Husain, Miranda (29 July 2005). "VIEW: Metropolitan Police — licensed to kill". Pakistan Daily Times. 
  12. ^ "Police censured over Menezes case". BBC News. 8 November 2007. 
  13. ^ Henry, Emma (1 November 2007). "De Menezes: Met guilty over health and safety". The Telegraph. 
  14. ^ Laville, Sandra; Siddique, Haroon (12 December 2008). "Jean Charles de Menezes inquest records open verdict". The Guardian. 
  15. ^ Steele, John (8 March 2006). "Shoot-to-kill tactic still viable, say police chiefs". The Telegraph. 
  16. ^ Williams, Rachel (12 December 2008). "De Menezes: How the Met tried to win the PR war". The Guardian. 
  17. ^ Wilson, Jeremy (2 April 2009). MPS response to the MPA Stockwell scrutiny (Report). Metropolitan Police Authority. 
  18. ^ Stewart, Moir (20 February 2009). Inquest into the death of Jean Charles de Menezes - Metropolitan Police Commissioner's response to the Rule 43 Report (PDF) (Report). Metropolitan Police Service. 
  19. ^ Gardner, Frank (26 September 2013). "Nairobi attack: Could it happen in Britain?". BBC News. 

External links

  • Stockwell reports, Metropolitan Police Authority.
  • Coroner's Inquest into the death of Jean Charles de Menezes (copy at Internet Archive)
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.