World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Scare quotes

Article Id: WHEBN0001052957
Reproduction Date:

Title: Scare quotes  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Quotation marks in English, "Heroes" (David Bowie song), Degenerate Art Exhibition, Etiquette, Peer review/Nicolas Sarkozy/archive1
Collection: Doubt, Punctuation, Rhetoric
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Scare quotes

Scare quotes, shudder quotes,[1][2] or sneer quotes[3][4][5] are quotation marks placed around a word or phrase to signal that a term is being used in a nonstandard, ironic, or otherwise special sense.[6] They may be used to imply that a particular expression is not necessarily how the author would have worded a concept.[7] Scare quotes may serve a function similar to verbally preceding a phrase with the expression "so-called",[8] they may imply skepticism or disagreement, or that the writer intends an opposite sense of the words enclosed in quotes.[9]

Another completely different definition uses the term scare quotes to mean words or phrases that are quoted in order to scare the reader, or, in a political campaign, to smear an opposing candidate.[10][11][12] Scare quotes have also been defined as expressions or passages in a work of literature that cause an estrangement or cause something to seem unfamiliar in a supernatural way.[13]

Contents

  • History 1
  • Usage 2
  • Criticism 3
  • See also 4
  • References 5

History

The term "scare quotes" as it refers specifically to the punctuation marks dates back to at least 1956, when it was used in an essay "Aristotle and the Sea Battle" written by G.E.M. Anscombe, and published in Mind; a Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy.[14] The use of a graphic symbol on a text to indicate irony or dubiousness of a word or phrase, goes back much further: Authors of ancient Greece used a mark called a dipple for that purpose.[15] Beginning in the 1990s the use of scare quotes suddenly became very widespread.[16][17][18] Postmodernist authors in particular have theorized about bracketing punctuation including scare quotes and have found reasons for their frequent use in their writings.[2][19][20][21][22][23]

The other meaning of the term, that refers to the words or phrases being quoted, dates back to before 1946.[12][24][25] The Oxford English Dictionary notes the use of the terms "scare-line" and "scare-head", the latter as early as 1888; these terms would today be defined as "scare quotes" in this other sense.[26]

Usage

Scare quotes are used in this example:

  • Some "groupies" were following the band.

The scare quotes here may indicate that the word is not one the writer would normally use, or, depending on the context, they might indicate that the writer has an opinion that there is something dubious about the idea of groupies or its application to these people.[27]

Writers use scare quotes for a variety of reasons. Scare quotes are used to imply an element of doubt or ambiguity regarding the words or ideas with in the marks,[28] or even outright contempt.[29] They can indicate that a word or phrase is being purposely misused[30] or that the writer isn’t persuaded by what is being said,[31] and they can allow the writer to deny responsibility for what is being reported.[29]

The term scare quotes may be confusing because of the word scare. An author may use scare quotes not to convey alarm, but to signal a semantic quibble. Scare quotes may suggest or create a problematization with the words set in quotes.[32][33]

Criticism

Writers are encouraged to be cautious when using scare quotes, because they can be an evasive way of expression that will distance the writer, and leave the reader wondering if the author means what he or she is saying.[34]

Editor Greil Marcus, in a talk given at Case Western Reserve University, said "scare quotes are the enemy." They "kill narrative, they kill story-telling ... They are a writer’s assault on his or her own words."[35] Scare quotes have been described as "ubiquitous", and the use of them as expressing distrust in truth, reality, facts, reason and objectivity.[17] Political commentator Jonathan Chait wrote in The New Republic that "The scare quote is the perfect device for making an insinuation without proving it, or even necessarily making clear what you're insinuating."[36]

For example, author Paul Warmington points out that when the word race is constantly placed in scare quotes, but not any other social construct, it has the effect of trivializing the issue and the reality that people are experiencing.[37]

The philosopher David Stove examined the use of scare quotes in recent philosophy to "neutralize" or "suspend" success-words, "words importing more or less cognitive achievement, such as "knowledge", "discovery", "facts", "verified", "understanding", "explanation", "solution (of a problem)"".[38]

See also

References

  1. ^ Boolos, Geroge. Logic, Logic, and Logic. Harvard University Press (1999) ISBN 9780674537675 page 400.
  2. ^ a b Pinker, Steven. The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person's Guide to Writing in the 21st Century. Penguin (2014) ISBN 9780698170308
  3. ^ Miles, Murray. Inroads: Paths in Ancient and Modern Western Philosophy. University of Toronto Press (2003) ISBN 9780802085313 page 134
  4. ^ Herbert, Trevor. Music in Words : A Guide to Researching and Writing about Music. Oxford University Press (2009) ISBN 9780199706150 page 126
  5. ^ Horn, Barbara. Copy-editing. The Publishing Training Center. (2008) page 68
  6. ^ University of Chicago Press staff. Chicago Manual of Style. University of Chicago Press (2010). page 365
  7. ^ Hart, Carol. A History of the Novel in Ants. SpringStreet Books (2010) ISBN 9780979520433 page 246
  8. ^  
  9. ^ Siegal, Allan M. The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage. Three Rivers Press (1999) ISBN 9780812963892 page 280
  10. ^ Harries, Martin. Scare Quotes from Shakespeare: Marx, Keynes, and the Language of Reenchantment. Stanford University Press (2000) ISBN 9780804736213 page 6
  11. ^ Kaplan, Alice Yeager. Reproductions of Banality: Fascism, Literature, and French Intellectual Life; Volume 36 of Theory and History of Literature. University of Minnesota Press (1986) ISBN 9781452901497
  12. ^ a b McWilliams, Carey (1946), Southern California: An Island on the Land, p. 298,  
  13. ^ Harries, Martin. Scare Quotes from Shakespeare: Marx, Keynes, and the Language of Reenchantment. Stanford University Press (2000) ISBN 9780804736213 page 3 - 6
  14. ^ Anscombe, G.E.M. “Aristotle and the Sea Battle.” Mind; a Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy. Volume lxv. No. 257. January 1956.
  15. ^ Finnegan, Ruth. Why Do We Quote?: The Culture and History of Quotation. Open Book Publishers (2011) ISBN 9781906924331 page 86
  16. ^ Howells, Richard, editor. Outrage: Art, Controversy, and Society. Palgrave Macmillan. (2012) ISBN 9780230350168 page 89
  17. ^ a b Haack, Susan, editor. Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate: Unfashionable Essays. University of Chicago Press (2000) ISBN 9780226311371 page 202
  18. ^ Perlman, Merrill. “Scare” Tactics. Columbia Journalism Review. 28 January 2013.
  19. ^ Nash, Christopher. The Unravelling of the Postmodern Mind. Edinburgh University Press. (2001) ISBN 9780748612154 page 92
  20. ^ Saguaro, Shelley. Garden Plots: The Politics and Poetics of Gardens. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. (2006) ISBN 9780754637530 page 62
  21. ^ Olson, Gary A. Worsham, Lynn. Postmodern Sophistry: Stanley Fish and the Critical Enterprise. SUNY Press (2004) ISBN 9780791462133 page 18
  22. ^ Protevi, John. Time and Exteriority: Aristotle, Heidegger, Derrida. Bucknell University Press (1994) page 120. ISBN 9780838752296
  23. ^ Elmer, Johathan. Reading at the Social Limit: Affect, Mass Culture, and Edgar Allan Poe. Stanford University Press (1995) ISBN 9780804725415 page 34
  24. ^ Harries, Martin. Scare Quotes from Shakespeare: Marx, Keynes, and the Language of Reenchantment. Stanford University Press (2000) ISBN 9780804736213 page 6
  25. ^ Kaplan, Alice Yeager. Reproductions of Banality: Fascism, Literature, and French Intellectual Life; Volume 36 of Theory and History of Literature. University of Minnesota Press (1986) ISBN 9781452901497
  26. ^ Craigie, W. A.; Onions, C. T. (1933). A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles: Introduction, Supplement, and Bibliography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  27. ^ McArthur, Thomas Burns. McArthur, Roshan. Concise Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford University Press (2005) ISBN 9780192806376
  28. ^ Stove, David C. Against the Idols of the Age. Transaction Publishers (1999) ISBN 9781412816649 page xxv — xxvi
  29. ^ a b Trask, Robert Lawrence. Say what You Mean!: A Troubleshooter's Guide to English Style and Usage. David R. Godine Publisher (2005) ISBN 9781567922639 page 228
  30. ^ Gibaldi, Joseph. MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. The Modern Language Association of America (1995) ISBN 0-87352-565-5 page 56
  31. ^ Fogarty, Mignon. The Grammar Devotional: Daily Tips for Successful Writing from Grammar Girl. Macmillan (2009) ISBN 9781429964401 page 207
  32. ^ Davidson, Arnold. I. The Emergence of Sexuality: Historical Epistemology and the Formation of Concepts. Harvard University Press (2004) ISBN 9780674013704 page 87 — 88.
  33. ^ Sharma, Nandita Rani. Home Economics: Nationalism and the Making of 'Migrant Workers' in Canada. University of Toronto Press (2006) ISBN 9781551930589 page 169
  34. ^ Kemp, Gary. What is this thing called Philosophy of Language? Routledge (2013) ISBN 9781135084851 page xxii
  35. ^ [1] Marcus, Greil. "Greil Marcus - Notes on the Making of A New Literary History of America". Adapted from a talk given at Case Western Reserve University on April 10, 2010.
  36. ^ Jonathan Chait, "Scared Yet?, The New Republic, Dec. 31, 2008.
  37. ^ Warmington, Paul. Black British Intellectuals and Education: Multiculturalism’s Hidden History. Routledge (2014) ISBN 9781317752363
  38. ^ Stove, David (1982). Popper and After: Four Modern Irrationalists. Oxford: Pergamon Press, Part 1, Chapter 1. http://ontology.buffalo.edu/stove/chapter-01.htm Reprinted as Anything Goes: Origins of the Cult of Scientific Irrationalism (1998) Macleay Press. ISBN 1 876492 01 5
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.