World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article
 

Siege of Dubrovnik

Siege of Dubrovnik
Part of the Croatian War of Independence

Bombardment of the Old Town of Dubrovnik
Date 1 October 1991 – 31 May 1992 (7 months, 4 weeks and 2 days)
Location Dubrovnik area, Croatia
Result Croatian victory
  • Siege lifted
  • Yugoslav troops pull back
Belligerents
Yugoslav People's Army Yugoslav People's Army and Navy
Republic of Montenegro Territorial Defence Force Republic of Montenegro Territorial Defence Force
Croatian National Guard (in October 1991)
Croatian Defence Forces Croatian Defence Forces (in October 1991)
Croatian Army (from November 1991)
Commanders and leaders
Yugoslav People's Army Pavle Strugar
Yugoslav People's Army Miodrag Jokić
Nojko Marinović
Janko Bobetko
(from May 1992)
Strength
7,000 troops 480–1,000 troops (1991)
Casualties and losses
165 killed 194 killed
82–88 Croatian civilians killed
16,000 Croatian refugees

The Siege of Dubrovnik (Croatian: Opsada Dubrovnika, Serbian: Blokada Dubrovnika) was a military engagement fought between the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA) and Croatian forces defending the city of Dubrovnik and its surroundings during the Croatian War of Independence. The JNA started its advance on 1 October 1991 and by late October had captured virtually all of the territory between the Pelješac and Prevlaka peninsulas on the coast of the Adriatic Sea—except for Dubrovnik itself. The JNA attacks and bombardment of Dubrovnik, including the Old Town—a UNESCO World Heritage Site—culminated on 6 December 1991. The bombardment provoked a strong international condemnation of the JNA and became a public relations disaster for Serbia and Montenegro, contributing to their diplomatic and economic isolation and the international recognition of the independence of Croatia. In May 1992, the JNA pulled back from Dubrovnik to Bosnia and Herzegovina, less than 1 kilometre (0.62 miles) from the coast in some places, and east of the city to hand over its equipment to the newly formed Army of Republika Srpska (VRS). During this time, the Croatian Army (HV) attacked from the west and pushed back the JNA/VRS from the areas west of Dubrovnik, both in Croatia and in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and by the end of May linked up with the HV unit defending the city. Fighting between the HV and the Yugoslav troops east of Dubrovnik gradually died down.

The siege and a naval blockade by the Yugoslav Navy caused the deaths of between 82 and 88 Croatian civilians and 194 Croatian military personnel. The JNA suffered 165 fatalities. By the end of 1992, when the entire region was recaptured by the HV in Operation Tiger and the Battle of Konavle, 417 HV troops had been killed. The offensive displaced 15,000 refugees—mainly from Konavle—who fled to Dubrovnik. Approximately 16,000 refugees were evacuated from Dubrovnik by sea and the city was resupplied by blockade-evading runabouts and a convoy of civilian vessels. 11,425 buildings suffered a degree of damage and numerous homes, businesses, and public buildings were looted or torched by the JNA.

The JNA operation was a part of a plan drawn up by top JNA officers aimed at securing the Dubrovnik area and then proceeding north-west to link up with the JNA troops in northern Dalmatia via western Herzegovina. The offensive came immediately after war propaganda in Montenegro, which said that Croatian troops were about to attack and capture the Bay of Kotor and that the offensive was a "war for peace", and that the Old Town was not being targeted by the JNA. Montenegrin President Milo Đukanović apologized for the attack in 2000, eliciting an angry response from his political opponents and from Serbia.

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) convicted three JNA or Yugoslav Navy officers and handed over a fourth to Serbia for prosecution. The ICTY indictment stated that the offensive was designed to detach the Dubrovnik region from Croatia and integrate it into a Serb-dominated state through an unsuccessful proclamation of the Dubrovnik Republic on 24 November 1991. In addition, Montenegro charged six former JNA soldiers with prisoner abuse in the Morinj camp, but as of 2012 no final verdicts had been rendered. Croatia also charged several former JNA or Yugoslav Navy officers and a former Bosnian Serb leader with war crimes but no trials have yet resulted from these indictments.

Contents

  • Background 1
  • Prelude 2
  • Order of battle 3
  • Timeline 4
    • JNA advance 4.1
    • Defence of Dubrovnik 4.2
    • Croatian counterattack 4.3
  • Aftermath 5
  • War crime charges 6
  • Footnotes 7
  • References 8
    • Books 8.1
    • News reports 8.2
    • Other sources 8.3

Background

Dubrovnik on the map of Croatia. RSK and Yugoslav Army-held area near Dubrovnik in early 1992 are highlighted red.

In August 1990, an insurrection centred on the predominantly Serb-populated areas of the Dalmatian hinterland around the city of Knin,[1] parts of the Lika, Kordun, and Banovina regions, and settlements in eastern Croatia with significant Serb populations took place in Croatia.[2] These areas were subsequently named the Republic of Serbian Krajina (RSK) and after declaring its intention to integrate with Serbia, the Government of Croatia declared the RSK a rebellion.[3] By March 1991, the conflict had escalated and the Croatian War of Independence erupted.[4] In June 1991, Croatia declared its independence as Yugoslavia disintegrated.[5] A three-month moratorium followed,[6] after which the decision came into effect on 8 October.[7] The RSK then initiated a campaign of ethnic cleansing against Croatian civilians, expelling most non-Serbs by early 1993. By November 1993, less than 400 ethnic Croats remained in the United Nations (UN) protected area known as Sector South,[8] and a further 1,500 – 2,000 remained in Sector North.[9]

As the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA) increasingly supported by the RSK and the Croatian Police was unable to cope with the situation, the Croatian National Guard (ZNG) was formed in May 1991. In November, the ZNG was renamed the Croatian Army (HV).[10] The development of the military of Croatia was hampered by a UN arms embargo introduced in September,[11] while the military conflict in Croatia continued to escalate with the Battle of Vukovar, which started on 26 August.[12]

Dubrovnik is the southernmost major Croatian city. It is located on the Adriatic Sea coast. The walled city centre, known as the Old Town, is a site of historical monuments and heritage buildings largely dating to the Republic of Ragusa; the city has been placed on the list of UNESCO World Heritage Sites. In 1991, the city had a population of approximately 50,000, of whom 82.4% were Croats and 6.8% were Serbs. Croatian territory surrounding the city stretches from the Pelješac peninsula to the west and the Prevlaka peninsula in the east at the entrance to the Bay of Kotor on the border with Montenegro.[13] This territory is very narrow, especially near Dubrovnik itself,[14] and consists of a 0.5 to 15 kilometres (0.31 to 9.32 miles) wide coastal strip of land.[15]

Prelude

CroatiaMontenegro border at Prevlaka in the Bay of Kotor area

In mid-1991, top JNA commanders—including Yugoslav Federal Defence Minister General Veljko Kadijević, JNA Chief of the General Staff General Blagoje Adžić and deputy defence minister Vice Admiral Stane Brovet—planned a military offensive entailing an attack on the Dubrovnik area followed by a westward JNA advance towards western Herzegovina to link up with the JNA 9th Knin Corps in northern Dalmatia once the area was secured. General Jevrem Cokić submitted the plan of the Dubrovnik offensive to Adžić for his approval.[16]

In September 1991, the JNA and the leaders of Montenegro said that Dubrovnik should be attacked and neutralized to ensure Montenegro's territorial integrity, to prevent ethnic clashes and to preserve the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Montenegrin Prime Minister Milo Đukanović stated that Croatian borders needed be revised, attributing the existing border line to "poorly educated Bolshevik cartographers".[17] The propaganda, compounded by JNA Colonel General Pavle Strugar's allegations that 30,000 Croatian troops and 7,000 terrorists and Kurdish mercenaries were about to attack Montenegro and seize the Bay of Kotor led many in Montenegro to believe that Croatia had actually started an invasion.[18] The newspaper Pobjeda was the most significant media source that contributed to the spread of the propaganda.[19] In July 1991, high-ranking Serbian official Mihalj Kertes said at a political rally in Nikšić that a Serbian state was to be established west of Montenegro extending to the Neretva River with Dubrovnik—renamed Nikšić-at-Sea—as its capital.[20]

On 16 September 1991, the JNA mobilized in Montenegro citing the deteriorating situation in Croatia. Despite a radio broadcast appeal by the JNA 2nd Titograd Corps on 17 September, considerable numbers of reservists refused to respond to the call-up.[21] On 18 September, Đukanović threatened harsh punishment of deserters and those refusing to respond to the mobilization.[19] The mobilization and the propaganda were in contrast with assurances from Yugoslav federal authorities in Belgrade that there would be no attack against Dubrovnik.[22] The JNA's strategic plan to defeat Croatia included an offensive to cut off the southernmost parts of Croatia, including Dubrovnik, from the rest of the country.[23]

On 23 September, JNA artillery attacked the village of Vitaljina in the eastern part of Konavle and Brgat to the east of Dubrovnik.[19] Two days later, the Yugoslav Navy blockaded maritime routes to the city.[19] On 26 September, the JNA renamed its Eastern Herzegovina Operational Group the 2nd Operational Group and subordinated it directly to the Federal Ministry of Defence and the JNA General Staff.[24] Cokić was appointed the first commanding officer of the 2nd Operational Group but was replaced by General Mile Ružinovski on 5 October following the shooting down of Cokić's helicopter. Strugar replaced Ružinovski on 12 October.[16][25]

Order of battle

JNA positions overlooking Dubrovnik, 9 December 1991. Three 9K11 Malyutka anti-tank guided missiles in a firing position are visible.

The JNA tasked the 2nd Titograd Corps and the 9th Boka Kotorska Military-Maritime Sector (VPS)—both of which were elements of the 2nd Operational Group—with cutting off and capturing the Dubrovnik area. The 2nd Titograd Corps deployed the 1st Nikšić Brigade while the 9th Boka Kotorska VPS employed the 5th and the 472nd Motorized Brigades. The Corps boundary running north-to-south near Dubrovnik was set.[26] The 2nd Operational Group also commanded the 16th Border Patrol Detachment and 107th Coastal Artillery Group, and mobilised Territorial Defence units from Herceg-Novi, Kotor, Tivat, Budva, Bar, Mojkovac, Bijelo Polje and Trebinje. Strugar was in overall command of the 2nd Operative Group while the 9th Boka Kotorska VPS was commanded by Vice Admiral Miodrag Jokić.[27] Jokić replaced Admiral Krsto Đurović, who had died in uncertain circumstances hours before the offensive began.[28] Major General Nojko Marinović, once commanding the 472nd Motorized Brigade and subordinate of Đurović, said that the JNA had killed the admiral because he opposed the offensive. Marinović resigned his post on 17 September and joined the Croatian ZNG.[29] The JNA 2nd Operational Group initially deployed 7,000 troops and maintained similar troop levels throughout the offensive.[30][31]

The defences of Dubrovnik were almost non-existent—at the outset of hostilities there were 480 troops in the city area,[32] out of which only 50 had some training.[30] The only regular military unit was a platoon armed with light infantry weapons that was stationed in the


  • case"Pelagic"The . American Maritime Cases (Maritime Law Association of the United States) (2). 1994. Retrieved 30 March 2013. 
  • "Case Information Sheet "Dubrovnik" (IT-01-42) Pavle Strugar" (PDF).  
  • "Case Information Sheet "Dubrovnik" (IT-01-42/1) Miodrag Jokić" (PDF).  
  • "Case Information Sheet "Dubrovnik" (IT-01-42/2) Vladimir Kovačević" (PDF).  
  • "Case Information Sheet "Kosovo, Croatia & Bosnia" (IT-02-54) Slobodan Milošević" (PDF). International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Retrieved 26 April 2013. 
  • "Odluka" [Decision].  
  • "Situation of human rights in the territory of the former Yugoslavia".  
  • "Croatia human rights practices, 1993; Section 2, part d".  
  • McAlea, Dominic; Kaiser, Colin; Lund, Terje; Hoel, Oyvind (28 December 1994). "Final report of the United Nations Commission of Experts established pursuant to security council resolution 780 (1992), S/1994/674/Add.2 (Vol. V)".  
  • Rizmaul, Leon (26 September 1996). "Vremeplov" [Timeline] (in Croatian).  
  • "Full Contents of the Dubrovnik Indictment made Public (Dubrovnik Indictment)".  
  • "The Prosecutor of the Tribunal against Slobodan Milošević, Second Amended Indictment" (PDF).  
  • "Strength Without Bravery: Dubrovnik Defies Yugoslav Army".  
  • "Trial of Pavle Strugar - Transcript 040123ED".  
  • Pavlović, Srđa (2005). """Reckoning: The 1991 Siege of Dubrovnik and the Consequences of the "War for Peace. Spaces of Identity ( 
  • "The Prosecutor vs. Milan Martic - Judgement" (PDF).  
  • Lupis, Vinicije B.; Koncul, Antun; Sjekavica, Đivo (2012). "Majkovi u srednjem vijeku" [Majkovi in the Middle Ages]. Starohrvatska prosvjeta (in Croatian) (Museum of Croatian Archaeological Monuments) 3 (39).  
  • Marijan, Davor (2012). "Zamisao i propast napadne operacije Jugoslavenske narodne armije na Hrvatsku u rujnu 1991. godine" [The Concept and Failure of the Offensive Operation of the Yugoslav National Army in September 1991]. Journal of Contemporary History (in Croatian) (Croatian Institute of History) 44 (2).  

Other sources

  • "Roads Sealed as Yugoslav Unrest Mounts".  
  • Engelberg, Stephen (3 March 1991). "Belgrade Sends Troops to Croatia Town".  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Williams, Carol J. (31 October 1991). "Peace Flotilla Due to Dock in Dubrovnik".  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Williams, Carol J. (29 January 1992). "Roadblock Stalls U.N.'s Yugoslavia Deployment".  
  • Bellamy, Christopher (10 October 1992). "Croatia built 'web of contacts' to evade weapons embargo".  
  •  
  • Šilović, Meri (6 July 1999). "Ratnog mučenika "Perasta" ubit će - mir" [War martyr "Perast" being killed by peace].  
  •  
  • "Veteran opet na vezu" [Veteran moored again].  
  • Kalajdžić, Ahmet (6 March 2004). "Aerodrom Dubrovnik za dio opljačkane opreme tražit će odštetu od JAT-a" [Dubrovnik Airport to seek compensation from JAT for a part of the looted equipment].  
  • "Kovačević mentalno oboleo i biće upućen na lečenje" [Kovačević suffers a mental disease and will be hospitalized] (in Serbian).  
  • Rat za mir" - 10 godina prerano" ["War for peace" - 10 years too soon]"" (in Croatian).  
  • "Rušitelj Dubrovnika još se brani sa slobode" [Destructor of Dubrovnik still defending on bail] (in Croatian).  
  • Canka, Mustafa (18 August 2008). "Podignuta optužnica protiv mučitelja iz Morinja" [Morinj torturers' indictment filed] (in Croatian).  
  • Gustin-Čuljak, Olivija (29 May 2009). Majsan" na Batali" ["Majsan" on Batala]"".  
  • " [Ahead of the 18th anniversary of the Libertas convoy]Libertas"Ususret obilježavanju 18. obljetnice Konvoja . Dubrovački vjesnik (in Croatian). 25 October 2009. Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • "Nojko Marinović: Mogli su ući da su bili spremni platiti cijenu!" [Nojko Marinović: They could have entered if they were prepared to pay the toll!]. Dubrovački vjesnik (in Croatian). 15 January 2010. Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • Jovanović, Vladimir (7 May 2010). "Dubrovačke optužnice" [Dubrovnik indictments].  
  • "Crna Gora: Ukinuta presuda za zločine nad hrvatskim zarobljenicima u Morinju" [Montenegro: Verdict on crimes against Croatian POWs in Morinj overturned].  
  • Bijelić, Gabrijela (10 March 2011). "Pošteno svjedočanstvo crnogorske strane" [A fair testimony from a Montenegrin side].  
  • "War-time mayor of Bosnia town arrested".  
  • Podgornik, Branko (28 May 2011). "Još ne znaju tko je granatirao Dubrovnik" [Still no clue who shelled Dubrovnik].  
  • "Sud u Beogradu odobrio izručenje Vučurevića, on ne želi da mu se sudi u Hrvatskoj" [Belgrade court approves Vučurević extradition, he does not want to be tried in Croatia].  
  • "20 godina Odreda naoružanih brodova" [20 years of the Armed Boats Squadron] (in Croatian).  
  • Jurica Turk, Varina (26 October 2011). "Kako je Dubrovniku "ukradena" brigada" [How a brigade was "stolen" from Dubrovnik]. Dubrovački list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • Mujan, Marko (20 November 2011). "Slavi li se okruženje Grada ili obrana Dubrovnika?" [Is the siege of the city celebrated or defence of Dubrovnik?]. Dubrovački list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • Jurica Turk, Varina (23 November 2011). "Igra na "Male Bare" II" [Male Bare games II]. Dubrovački list. Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • Jurica Turk, Varina (30 November 2011). "Opći napad" [General attack]. Dubrovački list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • "Dubrovnik obilježio 20. obljetnicu napada na grad" [Dubrovnik Marks the 20th Anniversary of the Assault on the City].  
  • Bijelić, Gabrijela (6 December 2011). "Svečani mimohod i postrojavanje branitelja grada Dubrovnika na Stradunu" [Parade and inspection of defenders of the city of Dubrovnik at Stradun].  
  • Radaljac, Danko (6 December 2011). "Obljetnica napada na Dubrovnik i Srđ, nakon koje svijet daje podršku Hrvatskoj" [Anniversary of Dubrovnik and Srđ attacks, after which the world supported Croatia].  
  • Jurica Turk, Varina (21 December 2011). "Herojski otpor u studenom" [Heroic resistance in November]. Dubrovački list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • Jurica Turk, Varina (4 January 2012). "Prekidi vatre i linije razgraničenja" [Ceasefires and lines of control]. Dubrovački list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • Jurica Turk, Varina (11 January 2012). "Haaški opis napada na Srđ" [Hague described the Srđ attack]. Dubrovački list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • "Dokumentarac "Konvoj Libertas" premijerno prikazan u Rijeci" ["Libertas Convoy" premieres in Rijeka].  
  • Jurica Turk, Varina (8 February 2012). "Okolnosti osnivanja 163. brigade" [Circumstances of foundation of the 163rd Brigade]. Dubrovački list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • Jurica Turk, Varina (7 March 2012). "I rat i mir" [Both war and peace]. Dubrovački list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • Jurica Turk, Varina (30 March 2012). "Prelazak u napadna djelovanja" [Transformation to an offensive]. Dubrovački list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • Jurica Turk, Varina (1 April 2012). "Kako došlo, tako prošlo" [Easy come, easy go]. Dubrovački list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • Jurica Turk, Varina (11 April 2012). "I "Tigrovi" kreću u napad" [The "Tigers" attack too]. Dubrovački list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • Jurica Turk, Varina (2 May 2012). "Teške svibanjske i lipanjske borbe" [Heavy fighting of May and June]. Dubrovački list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • "Vladimir Rambo Kovačević nesposoban za suđenje" [Vladimir Rambo Kovačević unfit for trial].  
  • "Sutra dan sjećanja na početak agresije 1. listopada 1991." [Tomorrow is the start of the aggression of 1 October 1991 remembered]. Dubrovački vjesnik (in Croatian). 30 September 2012. Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • "Na današnji dan 1991. godine otpočeo je napad na Dubrovnik" [Attack on Dubrovnik began on this day in 1991].  
  • Jurica Turk, Varina (3 October 2012). "Istina - dug prema povijesti" [Debt of truth to history]. Dubrovački list (in Croatian). Archived from the original on 29 November 2013. 
  • "Za "Morinj" naplatili 200.000 eura" [200,000 Euros charged for "Morinj"].  
  • Tomović, Predrag (23 November 2012). "Crna Gora: Ratni zločini bez kazne" [Montenegro: War crimes with no punishment] (in Montenegrin).  
  • "Optužen Srbin zbog paljenja Ćilipa" [A Serb charged over Čilipi arson] (in Serbian).  

News reports

  •  
  • Sonja Biserko, ed. (2006). ]Dubrovnik: "War for peace" [Dubrovnik: "Rat za mir" (PDF) (in Serbian).  
  • Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States. Routledge. 1999.  
  • Armatta, Judith (2010). Twilight of Impunity: The War Crimes Trial of Slobodan Milosevic.  
  • Blaskovich, Jerry (1997). Anatomy of Deceit: An American Physician's First-hand Encounter with the Realities of the War in Croatia (PDF). Dunhill Publishing.  
  • Crnobrnja, Mihailo (1996). The Yugslav Drama.  
  • Delpla, Isabelle; Bougarel, Xavier; Fournel, Jean-Louis (2012). Investigating Srebrenica: Institutions, Facts, Responsibilities.  
  • Hooker, Norman (1997). Maritime casualties, 1963-1996. LLP.  
  • Lucarelli, Sonia (2000). Europe and the breakup of Yugoslavia: a political failure in search of a scholarly explanation.  
  • Mesić, Stepan (2004). The demise of Yugoslavia: a political memoir. Central European University Press.  
  • Ramet, Sabrina P. (2006). The Three Yugoslavias: State-Building And Legitimation, 1918–2006.  
  • Schabas, William A. (2006). The UN International Criminal Tribunals: The Former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone.  
  • Stewart, James (2006). Cadogan Guide Croatia.  
  • Thomas, Nigel; Mikulan, Krunoslav; Pavlović, Darko (2006). The Yugoslav Wars (1): Slovenia & Croatia 1991–95.  
  • Thompson, Wayne C. (2012). Nordic, Central & Southeastern Europe 2012.  
  • Zabkar, Anton (1995). The Drama in Former Yugoslavia: The Beginning of the End Or the End of the Beginning?. DIANE Publishing.  

Books

References

  1. ^ The New York Times 19 August 1990
  2. ^ ICTY 12 June 2007
  3. ^ The New York Times 2 April 1991
  4. ^ The New York Times 3 March 1991
  5. ^ The New York Times 26 June 1991
  6. ^ The New York Times 29 June 1991
  7. ^ Narodne novine 8 October 1991
  8. ^ Department of State 31 January 1994
  9. ^ ECOSOC 17 November 1993, Section J, points 147 & 150
  10. ^ EECIS 1999, pp. 272–278
  11. ^ The Independent 10 October 1992
  12. ^ UNSC 28 December 1994, Section III
  13. ^ Pavlović 2005, p. 58
  14. ^ Lupis, Koncul & Sjekavica 2012, p. 222
  15. ^ UNSC 28 December 1994, Section II/A
  16. ^ a b c d Monitor 7 May 2010
  17. ^ Pavlović 2005, p. 61
  18. ^ Pavlović 2005, pp. 66–67
  19. ^ a b c d Pavlović 2005, p. 60
  20. ^ Ramet 2006, p. 501
  21. ^ Pavlović 2005, pp. 61–62
  22. ^ a b c Pavlović 2005, p. 67
  23. ^ a b c CIA 2002, p. 103
  24. ^ Marijan 2012, p. 268
  25. ^ Dubrovački list 30 November 2011
  26. ^ CIA 2002, Map 7
  27. ^ Pavlović 2005, Note 40
  28. ^ a b c Pavlović 2005, p. 63
  29. ^ Armatta 2010, pp. 184–185
  30. ^ a b c Armatta 2010, p. 182
  31. ^ IWPR 30 January 2003
  32. ^ Dubrovački list 20 November 2011
  33. ^ UNSC 28 December 1994, Section IV/B
  34. ^ a b c Dubrovački list 23 November 2011
  35. ^ Slobodna Dalmacija 29 May 2009
  36. ^ Dubrovački vjesnik 15 January 2010
  37. ^ Dubrovački list 21 December 2011
  38. ^ The New York Times 9 November 1991
  39. ^ Ramet 2006, p. 185
  40. ^ Dubrovački list 8 February 2012
  41. ^ Hrvatski vojnik 26 September 1996
  42. ^ HRT 23 September 2011
  43. ^ Ramet 2006, p. 416
  44. ^ CIA 2002, pp. 103–104
  45. ^ a b Marijan 2012, p. 270
  46. ^ a b c d Pavlović 2005, p. 68
  47. ^ Dubrovački vjesnik 30 September 2012
  48. ^ a b c Pavlović 2005, p. 70
  49. ^ a b UNSC 28 December 1994, Section VI/B
  50. ^ a b c d e f g h i j UNSC 28 December 1994, Section VI/C
  51. ^ Pavlović 2005, p. 66
  52. ^ Pavlović 2005, pp. 64–65
  53. ^ Pavlović 2005, p. 65
  54. ^ a b Pavlović 2005, p. 71
  55. ^ a b Ramet 2006, p. 409
  56. ^ Ramet 2006, p. 182
  57. ^ Dubrovački list 26 October 2011
  58. ^ a b c d e Pavlović 2005, p. 69
  59. ^ a b c d CIA 2002, p. 104
  60. ^ Stewart 2006, p. 297
  61. ^ Slobodna Dalmacija 6 July 1999
  62. ^ Hooker 1997, p. 9
  63. ^ American Maritime Cases 1994
  64. ^ a b UNSC 28 December 1994, Section VI/D
  65. ^ Novi list 6 December 2011
  66. ^ Dubrovački list 4 January 2012
  67. ^ Zabkar 1995, p. 75
  68. ^ Mesić 2004, pp. 389–390
  69. ^ Dubrovački vjesnik 25 October 2009
  70. ^ Los Angeles Times 31 October 1991
  71. ^ The New York Times 15 November 1991
  72. ^ a b c d UNSC 28 December 1994, Section VI/E
  73. ^ a b UNSC 28 December 1994, Section VII/C
  74. ^ Dubrovački list 11 January 2012
  75. ^ Slobodna Dalmacija 6 December 2001
  76. ^ a b UNSC 28 December 1994, Section VI/F
  77. ^ a b The New York Times 3 January 1992
  78. ^ Los Angeles Times 29 January 1992
  79. ^ Thompson 2012, p. 417
  80. ^ CIA 2002, p. 158
  81. ^ a b Dubrovački list 7 March 2012
  82. ^ CIA 2002, p. 109
  83. ^ Ramet 2006, p. 382
  84. ^ Ramet 2006, p. 428
  85. ^ Ramet 2006, p. 427
  86. ^ a b CIA 2002, p. 154
  87. ^ CIA 2002, pp. 155–156
  88. ^ a b CIA 2002, p. 156
  89. ^ Delpla, Bougarel & Fournel 2012, p. xv
  90. ^ Thomas, Mikulan & Pavlović 2006, p. 54
  91. ^ CIA 2002, pp. 154–155
  92. ^ a b CIA 2002, p. 155
  93. ^ a b Dubrovački list 30 March 2012
  94. ^ a b Dubrovački list 11 April 2012
  95. ^ a b Dubrovački list 2 May 2012
  96. ^ Dubrovački list 1 April 2012
  97. ^ Blaskovich 1997, p. 33
  98. ^ CIA 2002, p. 110
  99. ^ Lucarelli 2000, pp. 125–129
  100. ^ Dubrovački list 3 October 2012
  101. ^ CIA 2002, pp. 157–158
  102. ^ Al Jazeera 6 December 2011
  103. ^ Jutarnji list 6 December 2011
  104. ^ Slobodna Dalmacija 1 October 2012
  105. ^ Helsinki Committee 2006, p. 620
  106. ^ Helsinki Committee 2006, pp. 549–550
  107. ^ Helsinki Committee 2006, p. 553
  108. ^ Helsinki Committee 2006, p. 552
  109. ^ Jutarnji list 7 December 2010
  110. ^ UNSC 28 December 1994, Section VIII/B
  111. ^ UNSC 28 December 1994, Section VIII/C
  112. ^ UNSC 28 December 1994, Section IX/A
  113. ^ UNSC 28 December 1994, Section IX/C
  114. ^ CIA 2002, Note II/53
  115. ^ Slobodna Dalmacija 6 March 2004
  116. ^ The New York Times 10 August 1997
  117. ^ Armatta 2010, p. 186
  118. ^ Helsinki Committee 2006, p. 402
  119. ^ Helsinki Committee 2006, p. 640
  120. ^ Novi list 28 May 2011
  121. ^ BBC News 25 June 2000
  122. ^ Helsinki Committee 2006, p. 616
  123. ^ Helsinki Committee 2006, p. 564
  124. ^ Pavlović 2005, Note 4
  125. ^ Index.hr 30 May 2007
  126. ^ Slobodna Dalmacija 10 March 2011
  127. ^ Helsinki Committee 2006, p. 518
  128. ^ Novi list 19 January 2012
  129. ^ ICTY 23 January 2004, p. 1145
  130. ^ Schabas 2006, pp. 3–4
  131. ^ ICTY 23 October 2002, pp. 2–3
  132. ^ ICTY 2 October 2001
  133. ^ Helsinki Committee 2006, p. 512
  134. ^ Crnobrnja 1996, p. 172
  135. ^ ICTY IT-02-54, p. 1
  136. ^ ICTY IT-01-42, p. 1
  137. ^ ICTY IT-01-42/1, p. 1
  138. ^ ICTY IT-01-42, p. 2
  139. ^ B92 15 March 2004
  140. ^ Nova TV 18 August 2007
  141. ^ Blic 25 May 2012
  142. ^ ICTY IT-01-42/2, pp. 1–2
  143. ^ Deutsche Welle 18 August 2008
  144. ^ RFE/RL 23 November 2012
  145. ^ Dan 30 October 2012
  146. ^ a b Nacional 11 September 2011
  147. ^ a b B92 4 April 2011
  148. ^ Helsinki Committee 2006, p. 504
  149. ^ B92 6 December 2012

Footnotes

In October 2008, Croatia indicted Božidar Vučurević—the mayor of Trebinje and Bosnian Serb leader in eastern Herzegovina at the time of the offensive—for attacks against the civilian population of Dubrovnik.[146][147] Jokić confirmed that he received orders from both Strugar and Vučurević.[148] On 4 April 2011, Vučurević was arrested in Serbia and Croatia requested his extradition. He was released on bail on 17 June.[147] In September, the extradition request was approved but Vučurević left Serbia and returned to Trebinje, avoiding extradition.[146] In 2009, Croatian authorities filed charges against ten JNA officers, including Cokić, Ružinovski, Strugar, Jokić, Zec and Kovačević. They were charged with war crimes committed in the area of Dubrovnik prior to or after 6 December 1991, which were not covered by the ICTY indictments. The charges were made after the ICTY supplied documents collected during its investigation.[16] In 2012, Croatia indicted the commanding officer of the 3rd Battalion of the JNA 5th Motorized Brigade and charged him with arson for burning 90 houses, businesses and public buildings in Čilipi from 5 to 7 October 1991.[149]

In 2008, authorities in Montenegro charged six former JNA soldiers with prisoner abuse committed in Morinj in 1991 and 1992.[143] As of November 2012, the trial is ongoing. The inefficiency of the legal proceedings has been attributed to incompetent prosecutors and the lack of political will to prosecute crimes attributable to present-day high-ranking officials in Montenegro.[144] A number of former prisoners of the Morinj camp sued Montenegro and were paid compensation.[145]

The trial of Slobodan Milošević was never completed because Milošević died on 11 March 2006 while in ICTY custody.[135] Strugar was transferred to ICTY custody on 21 October 2001. The trial and appeals process was completed in 2008, with a final verdict of conviction of crimes—including attacks on civilians, devastation not required by military necessity and violation of the laws and customs of war. He was sentenced to seven and a half years in prison. Strugar was granted an early release in 2009, seven years and four months after his transfer to the ICTY.[136] Jokić was turned over to the ICTY on 12 November 2001. He pleaded guilty and was convicted of crimes including murder, cruel treatment, attacks on civilians and violations of laws of war. In 2004, he was sentenced to seven years in prison. The verdict was confirmed and became final in 2005. Jokić was transferred to Denmark to serve his sentence and was released on 1 September 2008.[137] The ICTY withdrew charges against Zec on 26 July 2002.[138] Kovačević was arrested in 2003 in Serbia and transferred to the ICTY. Following an insanity defence,[139] he was provisionally released on 2 June 2004 and the proceedings were transferred to the judiciary in Serbia in 2007 and he underwent psychiatric treatment at the Military Medical Academy in Belgrade.[140] As of May 2012, Kovačević was considered unfit to stand trial by authorities in Serbia.[141] The charges against him include murder, cruel treatment, devastation not required by military necessity and violations of laws of war.[142]

Prosecutors of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), set up in 1993 and based on UN Security Council Resolution 827,[130] indicted Milošević, Strugar, Jokić, the JNA 9th VPS chief of staff Captain Milan Zec and the commanding officer of the 3rd Battalion of the JNA 472nd Motorized Brigade Captain 1st Class Vladimir Kovačević. The charges included allegations that the offensive against Dubrovnik aimed to detach the area from Croatia and annex it to Serbia or Montenegro.[131][132] Jokić said that the offensive only aimed to blockade Dubrovnik,[133] but that claim was later refuted by Cokić.[16] Mihailo Crnobrnja, a former Yugoslav ambassador to the European Union, speculated that the siege was intended to force an end to blockades of JNA barracks in Croatia and to claim the Prevlaka Peninsula for Montenego.[134]

Map of the Old Town indicating JNA bombardment damage

War crime charges

All armies in the past did their best and refused to wage war or to target and to bomb the city of Dubrovnik. It was simply impossible for anyone to attack and demolish Dubrovnik. In the 1800s, Dubrovnik was captured by Napoleon, but without a fight. The Russian fleet of Admiral Senyavin came to attack Dubrovnik but they lowered their guns and gave up on the attack. There was not a single shell or bullet fired at Dubrovnik. That's Dubrovnik's history, and that indicates the level of the human civilisation, the level of respect afforded to Dubrovnik. What we did is the greatest shame that was done in 1991.[129]

Nikola Samardžić, former Montenegrin foreign minister, during Strugar's trial at the ICTY.

In 2007, Montenegrin filmmaker Koča Pavlović released a documentary entitled Rat za mir (War for peace), covering the role of propaganda in the siege, testimonies of Morinj camp prisoners and interviews with JNA soldiers.[124][125] In 2011, Radio Television of Montenegro broadcast a documentary series using archive footage titled Rat za Dubrovnik (War for Dubrovnik), although an attempt to destroy records of warmongering television and Pobjeda newspaper reports had been made.[126][127] In 2012, Aleksandar Črček and Marin Marušić produced a feature documentary titled Konvoj Libertas (Libertas Convoy), which was about the delivery of humanitarian aid to Dubrovnik through the naval blockade.[128]

Following attempts to justify the JNA offensive, authorities in Serbia and Montenegro tried to deny damage to the Old Town. Radio Television of Serbia said that smoke rising from the Old Town was the result of automobile tyres set on fire by the population of Dubrovnik,[116] echoing Kadijević.[117] Officials and media in Montenegro referred to the offensive as the "war for peace",[118] or a blockade—applying the term to land operations and the naval blockade.[119] According to a 2010 survey of public opinion in Serbia, 40% of those polled did not know who bombarded Dubrovnik, while 14% believed that no shelling occurred.[120] In a June 2000 meeting with Croatian President Mesić, the President of Montenegro Milo Đukanović apologized to Croatia for the attack.[121] The gesture was welcomed in Croatia,[122] but it was condemned by Đukanović's political opponents in Montenegro and by authorities in Serbia.[123]

11,425 buildings in the region sustained damage; 886 were totally destroyed and 1,675 sustained damage.[110] The cost of the damage was estimated at 480 million Deutsche Marks.[111] Damage to the Old Town of Dubrovnik was observed by a UNESCO team which stayed in the city from 27 November until 20 December 1991.[112] It was estimated that 55.9% of buildings were damaged, that 11.1% were heavily damaged and 1% were burnt down. Seven burnt Baroque palaces were the greatest losses.[113] Additional damage was caused by the JNA troops looting museums, businesses and private homes. All exhibits held by Vlaho Bukovac Memorial Museum in Cavtat were taken away by the JNA,[54] as were contents of hotels in Kupari. The Franciscan monastery of St. Jerome in Slano was also targeted.[48] The JNA admitted that looting took place, but Jokić said the property would be distributed to Serbian refugees by a special JNA administration set up on 15 December 1991. It is probable, however, that the looted property ended up in private homes or was sold on the black market.[114] Dubrovnik Airport in Čilipi was also targeted. Its equipment was taken to Podgorica and Tivat Airports.[115]

Sveti Vlaho, the first vessel of the Armed Boats Squadron Dubrovnik, is on permanent display in Dubrovnik

Between October and December 1991, the JNA captured approximately 1,200 square kilometres (460 square miles) of territory around Dubrovnik—all of which the HV recaptured in its May 1992 counterattack as the JNA pulled back east of Dubrovnik, and in subsequent HV offensives—Operation Tiger and the Battle of Konavle between July and October 1992.[100][92][101] Between 82 and 88 Croatian civilian deaths were caused by the JNA advance and siege.[73] 194 Croatian military personnel were also killed.[102] 94 of these were killed between October and December 1991.[103] A total of 417 were killed in all military operations around Dubrovnik by the end of October 1992.[104] The JNA suffered 165 fatalities during the siege.[105] Approximately 15,000 refugees from Konavle and other areas around Dubrovnik fled to the city, and about 16,000 refugees were evacuated by sea from Dubrovnik to other parts of Croatia.[49] The JNA set up two prisoner-of-war camps—the Bileća and Morinj camp—to detain those it captured. During and after the offensive, 432 people, mainly civilians from Konavle, were imprisoned there—292 in Morinj and 140 in Bileća—and subjected to physical and psychological abuse.[106] The abuse was perpetrated by the JNA personnel and paramilitaries as well as civilians, and included beatings and mock executions.[107] A large portion of the prisoners was exchanged for prisoners of war held by Croatia on 12 December 1991,[108] but the camps JNA operated until August 1992.[109]

Regardless of its military outcome, the Siege of Dubrovnik is primarily remembered for the large-scale looting by JNA troops and the artillery bombardment of Dubrovnik—especially its Old Town. The reaction of the international media and media coverage of the siege reinforced an opinion, already taking shape since the fall of Vukovar, that the conduct of the JNA and the Serbs was barbaric and intent on dominating Croatia—regardless of the destruction of priceless cultural heritage that occurred in the process.[59] Serbian authorities thought the international community had no moral grounds to judge because they did not interfere when hundreds of thousands of Serbs were brutally killed in Croatian concentration camps during World War II. Besides the protests made by Mayor Zaragoza, Vance and the ECMM,[72] 104 Nobel Prize laureates published a full-page advertisement in the The New York Times on 14 January 1992 at the incentive of Linus Pauling, urging governments throughout the world to stop the unrestrained destruction by the JNA.[97] Because the siege shaped the international opinion of the Croatian War of Independence, it became a major contributor to a shift in the international diplomatic and economic isolation of Serbia and rump Yugoslavia[59] and their public relations disaster because an image of an aggressor-state was created.[98] On 17 December 1991, the European Economic Community agreed to recognize the independence of Croatia on 15 January 1992.[99]

Shelling of the Old Town

Aftermath

The 1st Guards Brigade, supported by elements of the 115th Infantry Brigade, captured Čepikuće on 21 May and Slano on 22–23 May. The Armed Boats Squadron Dubrovnik landed troops in Slano the previous night, but they were repulsed by the JNA.[94] On the night of 23–24 May, the JNA attacked Sustjepan and the northern outskirts of Dubrovnik. On 26 May, the JNA started to pull out of Mokošica and Žarkovica.[95] The 163rd Infantry Brigade advanced from Dubrovnik; its 1st Battalion took positions in Brgat and Župa Dubrovačka, and the 2nd Battalion deployed to Osojnik.[93] On 29 May, the 4th Guards Brigade recaptured Ravno.[96] On 31 May, the 2nd Battalion of the 163rd Brigade pushed the JNA to the Golubov Kamen massif overlooking the Adriatic Highway section tracing around the Rijeka Dubrovačka embayment, but failed to capture the massif. The brigade was relieved by the 145th Infantry Brigade on 15 June. Dubrovnik was targeted by the JNA artillery continuously until 16 June, and then intermittently until 30 June.[95] On June 7, the 1st Guards and the 4th Guards Brigades ceased their advance in Dubrovačko Primorje in the vicinity of Orahov Do, a village to the north of Slano.[94]

The VRS/JNA force attacked north of Ston on 11 April, pushing back elements of the HV 115th Infantry Brigade and elements of the arriving HV Guards Brigades for only modest territorial gain. The frontline stabilized by 23 April and the HV counterattacked and reclaimed some ground after 27 April. On 17 May, Bobetko ordered a major attack of the two full guards brigades. The 1st Guards Brigade was tasked with advancing to link up with the Ston Company guarding access to the Pelješac Peninsula and advance to Slano. The 4th Guards Brigade was ordered to secure the hinterland of the Dubrovačko Primorje by advancing along the rim of the Popovo field. At the same time, the JNA was pressured by the international community to pull back east of Dubrovnik to Konavle.[93]

In April 1992, the JNA began offensive operations against the HV and the HVO in areas of western and southern Herzegovina near 1st Guards and the 4th Guards Brigades.[92][81]

The capabilities of the HV increased dramatically in the first few months of 1992 because it acquired large stockpiles of JNA's weapons in the Battle of the Barracks.[76][82] After the JNA disengaged in Croatia, its personnel prepared to set up a new Bosnian Serb army, later renamed the Army of Republika Srpska (VRS). The move followed the Bosnian Serb declaration of the Serbian Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina on 9 January 1992, ahead of the 29 February–1 March 1992 referendum on independence of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The referendum would later be cited as a pretext for the Bosnian War,[83] which had begun by 4 April when VRS artillery began shelling Sarajevo.[84] The JNA and the VRS in Bosnia and Herzegovina were confronted by the Army of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Croatian Defence Council (HVO), reporting to the Bosniak-dominated central government and the Bosnian Croat leadership respectively. The HV sometimes deployed to Bosnia and Herzegovina to support the HVO.[85]

On 7 December 1991, another ceasefire was agreed and the JNA force besieging Dubrovnik became largely inactive.[59][76] In January 1992, the Sarajevo Agreement was signed by representatives of Croatia, the JNA and the UN, and fighting was paused.[77] The United Nations Protection Force (UNPROFOR) was deployed to Croatia to supervise and maintain the agreement.[78] Serbia continued to support the RSK.[79] The conflict largely passed onto entrenched positions and the JNA soon retreated from Croatia into Bosnia and Herzegovina, where a new conflict was anticipated.[77] The only exception was the Dubrovnik area,[80] where the JNA attacked westward from Dubrovačko Primorje, pushing back elements of the HV's 114th and 116th Infantry Brigades and reaching the outskirts of Ston by the beginning of 1992.[81]

Map of the HV advance to Dubrovnik in May 1992 and the subsequent Operation Jackal

Croatian counterattack

All of the Croatian defences were 3 to 4 kilometres (1.9 to 2.5 miles) away from the Old Town, except for the Fort Imperial about 1 kilometre (0.62 miles) to the north.[72] The fortress was attacked at 5:50 am—minutes after the bombardment of the Old Town began. The attack was executed by the 3rd Battalion of the JNA 472nd Motorized Brigade, advancing simultaneously from two directions. The primary attack consisted of a company-sized force, and the secondary of a platoon of infantrymen—both supported by T-55 tanks and artillery. By 8 am, the infantry reached the Fort Imperial, forcing the defending force to retreat into the fortification and request help. Marinović ordered the HV artillery to fire directly onto the fortress and dispatched a special police unit to reinforce the Fort Imperial garrison. By 2 pm, the JNA called off the attack.[74] That day, Sveti Vlaho—the first vessel commissioned by the Armed Boats Squadron Dubrovnik and named after the patron saint of the city Saint Blaise —was sunk by a wire-guided missile.[75]

On 2–3 December, the JNA resumed infantry weapons fire against the Old Town, followed by mortar fire against the Fort Imperial on 4 December.[64] The heaviest bombardment of the Old Town started at 5:48 am on 6 December. The Old Town was struck by 48 82-millimetre (3.2 in) missiles, 232 82-millimetre (3.2 in) and 364 120-millimetre (4.7 in) mortar shells, as well as 22 wire-guided missiles. Two impact craters indicated the use of heavier weapons. The bombardment was concentrated on Stradun—the central promenade of the Old Town—and areas north-east of Stradun, while other parts of the Old Town sustained relatively few impacts. The attack subsided at 11:30 am. It killed 13 civilians—the heaviest loss of civilian life during the siege.[72][73] The Dubrovnik Inter-University Centre library containing 20,000 volumes was also destroyed in the attack and the Libertas Hotel was bombarded by JNA artillery aiming to kill firefighters putting out fires caused by an attack earlier that day.[58] The 6 December attack of the Old Town was met with strong protests from the international media, UNESCO Director-General Federico Mayor Zaragoza, Special Envoy of the Secretary-General of the United Nations Cyrus Vance and the ECMM on the day of the bombardment. Later that day, the JNA issued a statement of regret and promised an inquiry. On 7 December, representatives of the JNA visited the Old Town to inspect the damage but no further actions were noted.[72]

Hotel Grand, Kupari – destroyed during the siege.

In November, Dubrovnik began receiving the largest deliveries of humanitarian aid since the beginning of the siege. The first successful attempt to sustain the city was the Libertas convoy—a fleet of civilian vessels, the largest being Jadrolinija's Slavija—which arrived in Dubrovnik on 31 October. The convoy sailed from Rijeka and made several port calls, growing to 29 vessels as it approached Dubrovnik. The convoy—which also carried the ECMM observers, at least 1,000 protesters, the President of the Presidency of Yugoslavia Stjepan Mesić and the former Prime Minister of Croatia Franjo Gregurić—was initially stopped by the Yugoslav frigate JRM Split between the islands of Brač and Šolta, and the next day by Yugoslav patrol boats off Korčula before the Armed Boats Squadron linked up with the fleet and escorted it to the Port of Dubrovnik in Gruž.[68][69][70] On its return, the 700-capacity Slavija evacuated 2,000 refugees from Dubrovnik, although she had to sail to the Bay of Kotor first for inspection by the Yugoslav Navy.[71]

JNA artillery and the Yugoslav Navy resumed the bombardment of Dubrovnik between 9 and 12 November, targeting the Old Town, Gruž, Lapad and Ploče, as well as the Belvedere, Excelsior, Babin Kuk, Tirena, Imperial and Argentina hotels. Wire-guided missiles were used to attack boats in the Old Town harbour,[50] while some larger ships at the port of Gruž—including the ferryboat Adriatic[62] and the American-owned sailing ship Pelagic,[63] were set ablaze and destroyed by gunfire. The Fort Imperial was attacked by the JNA on 9, 10 and 13 November.[50] These attacks were followed by a lull which lasted until the end of November when the European Union Monitoring Mission (ECMM) mediated in negotiations between the JNA and Croatian authorities in Dubrovnik. The ECMM was withdrawn in mid-November after its personnel were attacked by the JNA, and the mediation was taken over by French State Secretary for Humanitarian Affairs Bernard Kouchner and UNICEF Mission Chief Stephan Di Mistura. The negotiations produced ceasefire agreements on 19 November and 5 December, but neither yielded any specific results on the ground.[64] Instead, the JNA 2nd Corps units located in Dubrovačko Primorje, north-west of Dubrovnik, closed in on the city, reaching the farthest point of their advance on 24 November,[46] as the city defences were pushed back to Sustjepan–Srđ–Belvedere Hotel line.[65] That day, the JNA tried to establish the Dubrovnik Republic in the area it occupied,[66] but the attempt ultimately failed.[67]

The JNA continued its artillery strikes against Dubrovnik on 30 October and the bombardment continued until 4 November, targeting the western areas of Dubrovnik—Gruž and Lapad—as well as the Babin Kuk and Argentina hotels, which were housing refugees.[58][50] On 3–4 November, JNA troops attacked the Old Town and the Argentina Hotel using small arms and sniper fire from positions held by the 3rd Battalion of the JNA 472th Motorized Brigade, which occupied the positions closest to the city centre.[58][50][28] The next day, the Fort Imperial was bombarded once again.[50] On 7 November, the JNA issued a new ultimatum demanding the surrender of Dubrovnik by noon. The demand was rejected and Jokić announced that the JNA would only spare the Old Town from destruction.[58] The same day, fighting resumed near Slano.[61]

Daily routine at Stradun during the war

Defence of Dubrovnik

On 23 October, the JNA started a sustained artillery bombardment of Dubrovnik, including the Old Town within the city walls,[56] drawing a protest from the United States Department of State the next day.[55] The JNA 9th VPS captured Župa Dubrovačka and Brgat on 24 October,[57] while the Yugoslav Navy bombarded Lokrum Island.[50] The next day, the JNA issued an ultimatum to the city, demanding its surrender and the removal of elected officials from Dubrovnik.[58] On 26 October, the JNA captured the Žarkovica promontory 2.3 kilometres (1.4 miles) south-east from the city centre, and took most of the high ground overlooking Dubrovnik by 27 October.[46][50][59] The JNA 2nd Corps south-western drive towards Dubrovnik was slower. It destroyed a large portion of the Trsteno Arboretum.[60] The JNA advance displaced about 15,000 refugees from the areas it captured. About 7,000 people were evacuated from Dubrovnik by sea in October; the rest took refuge in hotels and elsewhere in the city.[48]

On 15 October, Croatia offered peace talks to Montenegro, but the President of Serbia Slobodan Milošević dismissed the offer.[51] The offer was made to the Montenegrin officials because the offensive was first officially endorsed by the Montenegrin government on October 1.[22] Three days later, Serbia publicly distanced itself from the move, blaming Croatia for provoking the JNA.[52] On the seventh day of the offensive, the Montenegrin parliament blamed the JNA for the attack.[53] On 16 October—a day after Milošević declined the Croatian offer—the JNA 9th Boka Kotorska VPS force captured Cavtat.[54] The capture of Cavtat was supported by an amphibious landing operation approximately 5 kilometres (3.1 miles) east of Dubrovnik and an airstrike on Ploče district of Dubrovnik on 18 October.[50] The following day, a ceasefire was agreed but it was violated as soon as it came into effect.[55] On 20 October, the Yugoslav Air Force attacked Dubrovnik and on 22 October, the Yugoslav Navy bombarded hotels housing refugees in the Lapad area of the city.[50]

Over the next three days, the JNA made slow progress. Its artillery attacked Srđ Hill, the Fort Imperial and Žarkovica on 2 October. The next day, the JNA shelled Dubrovnik's Belvedere Hotel, where a ZNG defence post was located, and the Yugoslav Air Force bombarded the city's Argentina Hotel.[46] On 4 October, the JNA 2nd Corps captured Slano in Dubrovačko Primorje, interdicting the Adriatic Highway there and isolating Dubrovnik from the rest of Croatia.[45] On 5 October, the Ploče district of Dubrovnik was shelled, followed by a Yugoslav Air Force strike on the Fort Imperial the next day.[50]

On 1 October, the JNA started its offensive towards Dubrovnik, moving the 2nd Titograd Corps west through the Popovo field north of the city.[23] The JNA 2nd Corps destroyed the village of Ravno[43] before turning south towards Dubrovačko Primorje area, aiming to envelop Dubrovnik from the west.[23] The second axis of the JNA advance was assigned to the 9th Boka Kotorska VPS. It originated in the Bay of Kotor about 35 kilometres (22 miles) south-east of Dubrovnik and was directed through Konavle.[44] The advance started at 5 am after preparatory artillery fire against Vitaljina and other targets in Konavle. The advance, using several roads in the region, was supported by the Yugoslav Navy and the Air Force.[28] Croatian defences were nonexistent in Konavle and light in Dubrovačko Primorje—the only JNA casualties of the day occurred during a successful ZNG ambush in Čepikuće village.[45] On the first day of the offensive, the JNA artillery attacked Srđ Hill and the Žarkovica promontory just to the north and east of Dubrovnik,[46] while the Yugoslav Air Force MiG-21s raided Komolac in Rijeka Dubrovačka to the west,[47] destroying supplies of electricity and water to Dubrovnik.[48] Until the end of December, Dubrovnik relied on fresh water supplied by boats and electricity from the few electric generators.[49]

Map of the JNA advance to Dubrovnik in 1991

JNA advance

Timeline

[42][41] blockade.Yugoslav Navy consisting of 23 vessels of various sizes and 117 volunteers, was established on 23 September to counter the Croatian Navy, a volunteer military unit of the Armed Boats Squadron Dubrovnik The [40]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.