World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Skilling v. United States

Article Id: WHEBN0027838745
Reproduction Date:

Title: Skilling v. United States  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Mail and wire fraud, David Wittig, Trial of Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling, Alaska political corruption probe
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Skilling v. United States

Skilling v. United States
Argued March 1, 2010
Decided June 24, 2010
Full case name Jeffrey K. Skilling v. United States
Docket nos. 08-1394
Citations 561 U.S. ___ (more)
Prior history Convictions affirmed, 554 F. 3d 529 (CA5), cert. granted, 558 U. S. ___ (2009)
Subsequent history Prison term of Jeffrey Skilling reduced from 292 months to 172 months (minus time served)
Holding
Pretrial publicity and community prejudice did not prevent Skilling from obtaining a fair trial. However, the honest services fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. §1346, is properly confined to cover only bribery and kickback schemes, which do not include Skilling's alleged misconduct. So construed, §1346 is not unconstitutionally vague. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Ginsburg, joined by Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito (part I); Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas (part II); Roberts, Stevens, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor (part III)
Concurrence Scalia, joined by Thomas; Kennedy (except part III)
Concurrence Alito
Concur/dissent Sotomayor, joined by Stevens, Breyer
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. V; 18 U.S.C. § 1346

Skilling v. United States, 561 U.S. ___ (2010), was a United States Supreme Court case interpreting the honest services fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1346. The court held, in the case involving former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling, that the honest services fraud statute, which prohibits "a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services", covers only bribes and kickback schemes. Ultimately, Skilling's sentence was reduced by 10 years as a result.

References

  • Amanda Becker, Lawyers prepare to reopen 'honest services' cases in wake of Supreme Court ruling, Washington Post, August 9, 2010
  • Artur Davis, Court could redefine insider trading. MarketWatch, March 11, 2011
  • Nicholas J. Wagoner, Honest-Services Fraud: The Supreme Court Defuses the Government's Weapon of Mass Discretion in Skilling v. United States, South Texas Law Review, Vol. 51, No. 4 (Winter 2010), p. 1121
  • Thomas P. Cimino, Jr., Junaid A. Zubairi, Rachel C. Adamczyk, Rachel T. Copenhaver, Vedder Price, Supreme Court Limits Scope of “Honest Services” Statute - Skilling v. United States. National Law Review, September 8, 2010
  • Justice Department Seeks a Broader Fraud Law to Cover Self-Dealing, New York Times, September 28, 2010
  • Wesley Burrell, , 44 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1289 (2011).The Right-to-Honest-Services Doctrine—Enron’s Final Victim: Pure Void-for-Vagueness in Skilling v. United States Available at: http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol44/iss3/19

External links

  • Slip opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.