World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Spinal fusion

Article Id: WHEBN0003047799
Reproduction Date:

Title: Spinal fusion  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Hangman's fracture, Surgery, Orthopedic surgery, Intractable pain, Boston brace
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Spinal fusion

Spinal fusion
Intervention
A 24-year-old male showing a normal kyphosis curve after a 13-level spinal fusion to correct Scheuermann's disease
ICD-9-CM 81.0
MeSH
MedlinePlus

Spinal fusion, also called spondylodesis or spondylosyndesis, is a orthopedic surgical technique used to join two or more vertebrae. Supplementary bone tissue, either from the patient (autograft) or a donor (allograft), and/or artificial bone substitutes are used in conjunction with the body's natural bone growth (osteoblastic) processes to fuse two or more adjoining vertebrae.

Spinal fusion is used in a variety of pathological conditions to eliminate abnormal motion of the vertebrae causing pain, neurological deficit or spinal deformity. Common conditions incorporating spinal fusion in their surgical treatment are spinal stenosis,spondylolisthesis, cervical discopathy,spine fractures, scoliosis and kyphosis.

Medical uses

Spinal fusion is done most commonly in the lumbar region of the spine, but it is also used to treat cervical and thoracic problems. The indications for lumbar spinal fusion are controversial.[1] People rarely have problems with the thoracic spine because there is little normal motion in the thoracic spine. Spinal fusion in the thoracic region is most often associated with spinal deformities, such as scoliosis and kyphosis.

Cervical spinal fusion can be performed for several reasons. Following injury, this surgery can help stabilize the neck and prevent damage to the spinal cord. Additionally, cervical spinal fusion can be used to remove or reduce pressure on nerve roots caused by bone ingrowth osteophytes or herniated intervertebral disks.

Patients requiring spinal fusion have either neurological deficits or severe pain which has not responded to conservative treatment. Spinal fusion surgeries are also common in patients who suffer from moderate to severe back deformities that require reconstructive surgery.

When performing spinal fusion, the surgeon will usually do two procedures: 1.Implant screws, cages, plates or other stabilizing mechanical constructs to prevent motion between the fused vertebrae 2.Implant bone and/or bone-inducing products to encourage the patient's natural bone osteoblasts to unite the fused vertabrae, similar to the way a bone fracture heals.

Conditions where spinal fusion may be considered include the following:

Contraindications

Bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP) should not be routinely used in any type of anterior cervical spine fusion, such as with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.[2] There are reports of this therapy causing swelling of soft tissue which in turn can cause life-threatening complications due to difficulty swallowing and pressure on the respiratory tract.[2]

Epidemiology

According to a report by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), approximately 488,000 spinal fusions were performed during U.S. hospital stays in 2011 (a rate of 15.7 stays per 10,000 population), which accounted for 3.1% of all operating room procedures.[3] This was a 70 percent growth in procedures from 2001.[4]

Technique

Types of spinal fusion

There are two main types of lumbar spinal fusion, which may be used in conjunction with each other:

Posterolateral fusion places the bone graft between the transverse processes in the back of the spine. These vertebrae are then fixed in place with screws and/or wire through the pedicles of each vertebra attaching to a metal rod on each side of the vertebrae.

Interbody fusion places the bone graft between the vertebra in the area usually occupied by the intervertebral disc. In preparation for the spinal fusion, the disc is removed entirely, for example in ACDF. A device may be placed between the vertebra to maintain spine alignment and disc height. The intervertebral device may be made from either plastic or titanium. The fusion then occurs between the endplates of the vertebrae. Using both types of fusion is known as 360-degree fusion. Fusion rates are higher with interbody fusion. The types of interbody fusion are:

  • Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)- the disc is accessed from an anterior abdominal incision
  • Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) – the disc is accessed from a posterior incision
  • Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) – the disc is accessed from a posterior incision on one side of the spine
  • Transpsoas interbody fusion (DLIF or XLIF) – the disc is accessed from an incision through the psoas muscle on one side of the spine
  • Oblique (posterior) lumbar interbody fusion (OLLIF) – the disc is accessed from an incision through the psoas muscle obliquely

Procedure

Stabilization rods used after spinal fusion surgery.

In most cases, the fusion is augmented by a process called fixation, involving the placement of metallic screws (pedicle screws often made from titanium), rods, plates, or cages to stabilize the vertebrae and facilitate bone fusion. The fusion process typically takes 6 to 12 months after surgery. During this time external bracing (orthotics) may be required. External factors such as smoking, osteoporosis, certain medications, and heavy activity can prolong or even prevent the fusion process. If fusion does not occur, patients may require reoperation.

Some newer technologies are being introduced which avoid fusion and preserve spinal motion. Such procedures, such as artificial disc replacement, are being offered as alternatives to fusion in the cervical spine. Their advantage over fusion has not been well established. Minimally invasive techniques have also been introduced to reduce complications and recovery time for lumbar spinal fusion.[5]

In spinal fusion, the accuracy with which screws are inserted in the pedicles has a direct effect on the surgical outcome. Accurate placement generally involves considerable judgmental skills that have been developed through a lengthy training process. Because the impact of misaligning one or more pedicle screws can directly affect patient safety, a number of navigational and trajectory verification approaches have been described and evaluated in the literature to provide some degree of guidance to surgeons. For example, Manbachi et. al (2013) presented an overview of the need and the current status of the guidance methods available for improving the surgical outcomes in spinal fusion. They also describe educational aids that have the potential for reducing the training process.[6] Accurate guidance systems, such as the Mazor Robotics "Renaissance", have been developed to assist with spinal fusion procedures.

Society

Frequency of use

According to a report by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), approximately 488,000 spinal fusions were performed during U.S. hospital stays in 2011 (a rate of 15.7 stays per 10,000 population), which accounted for 3.1% of all operating room procedures.[3]

Notable persons who underwent spinal fusion

References

  1. ^
  2. ^ a b , which cites
  3. ^ a b
  4. ^
  5. ^
  6. ^ Manbachi, A., et al. (2013). Guided pedicle screw insertion: Techniques and training. The Spine Journal 13(4) 1–15.
  7. ^
  8. ^
  9. ^
  10. ^
  11. ^
  12. ^

Further reading

  • Cervical Spinal Fusion. WebMD.
  • A Patient's Guide to Anterior Cervical Fusion. University of Maryland Medical Center.
  • Boatright, K. C. and S. D. Boden. Chapter 12: Biology of Spine Fusion. In: Lieberman, J., et al., Eds. Bone Regeneration and Repair. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press. 2005. pp. 225–239. ISBN 978-0-89603-847-9.
  • Holmes, C. F., et al. Chapter 9: Cervical Spine Injuries. In: Schenck, R. F., AAOS. Athletic Training in Sports Medicine. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. 2005. pp. 197–218. ISBN 0-89203-172-7
  • Camillo, F. X. Chapter 36: Arthrodesis of the Spine. In: Canale, S. T. and J. H. Beaty. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 2. (11th Ed.). Philadelphia: Mosby. 2007. pp. 1851–1874. ISBN 978-0-323-03329-9.
  • Williams, K. D. and A. L. Park. Chapter 39: Lower Back Pain and Disorders of Intervertebral Discs. In: Canale, S. T. and J. H. Beaty. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 2. (11th Ed.). Philadelphia: Mosby. 2007. pp. 2159–2224. ISBN 978-0-323-03329-9.
  • Weyreuther, M., et al., Eds. Chapter 7: The Postoperative Spine. MRI Atlas: Orthopedics and Neurosurgery – The Spine. trans. B. Herwig. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 2006. pp. 273–288. ISBN 978-3-540-33533-7.
  • Tehranzadehlow, J., et al. (2005). Advances in spinal fusion. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT, and MRI 26(2): 103–113.
  • Resnick, D. K., et al. Surgical Management of Low Back Pain (2nd Ed.). Rolling Meadows, Illinois: American Association of Neurosurgeons. 2008. ISBN 978-1-60406-035-5.

External links

  • Wheeless, C. R., et al., Eds. Fusion of the Spine. Wheeless' Textbook of Orthopaedics. Division of Orthopedic Surgery. Duke University Medical Center.
  • Spinal Fusion. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. June 2010. Accessed 1 June 2013.
  • Spinasanta, S. What is Spinal Instrumentation and Spinal Fusion? SpineUniverse. September 2012. Accessed 1 June 2013.
  • Spinal fusion. Encyclopedia of Surgery. Accesses 1 June 2013.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.