World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

St Catherines Milling and Lumber Co v R

Article Id: WHEBN0003207579
Reproduction Date:

Title: St Catherines Milling and Lumber Co v R  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Supreme Court of Canada cases
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

St Catherines Milling and Lumber Co v R

St Catherines Milling and Lumber Co v R
Court Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Full case name St Catherines Milling and Lumber Company v The Queen
Decided 12 December 1888
Citation(s) [1888] UKPC 70, 14 App Cas 46
Case history
Appealed from St. Catharines Milling and Lumber Co. v. R 1887 CanLII 3, 13 SCR 577 (20 June 1887), Canada), affirming a decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario,[1] which affirmed the judgment of the Chancery Division,[2] restraining the defendants from cutting timber on lands in Ontario claimed to be public lands of the Province.
Court membership
Judges sitting Earl of Selborne, Lord Watson, Sir Arthur Hobhouse, Sir Barnes Peacock, Sir Montague E. Smith and Sir Richard Couch
Case opinions
Decision by Lord Watson

St Catherines Milling and Lumber Co v R[3] was the leading case on aboriginal title in Canada for more than 80 years. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, affirming a ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada, held that aboriginal title over land was allowed only at the crown's pleasure, and could be taken away at any time. This case, involving Ojibway Treaty No. 3 which had never been previously litigated before any court, is a leading decision in Canada on the differences between the division of legislative powers and property rights under the Constitution of Canada.

Contents

  • Background 1
  • The courts below 2
  • At the Privy Council 3
  • Impact 4
  • References 5
  • External links 6

Background

At issue were treaty lands thought to be within Rupert's Land when Canada entered into Treaty 3 in 1873. Following the Ontario-Manitoba Boundary Case,[4] the Canada (Ontario Boundary) Act 1889[5] placed about two-thirds of the treaty area in Ontario. Canada believed that it was entitled under the Treaty, and its legislative authority under section 91 (24) of the Constitution Act, 1867 for "Indians and Lands reserved for the Indians", to administer Treaty lands. The lumber company was granted a federal permit to a timber berth on Lake Wabigoon, and that permit was challenged by the Province.

The courts below

In 1885, Chancellor Boyd of the Chancery Division held that the phrase "Lands reserved for the Indians" referred only to “Indian Reserves”, and "such words do not cover lands which have never been the subject of treaty or surrender, and as to which the Legislature or executive Government have never specifically appropriated or 'reserved' for the Indian population." On appeal, the Court of Appeal affirmed this, as well as stating that the lands transferred by the 1889 Act, other than that covered by Indian reserves, vested in the Crown in right of Ontario. This was affirmed on appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.

At the Privy Council

The SCC ruling was affirmed by the Board. Lord Watson identified the source of aboriginal title as the Royal Proclamation of 1763, and he noted:

Impact

Other issues arose from this decision. The Privy Council said, for example, that Ontario must relieve Canada of its obligations under the treaty since Ontario had the benefit of it, but subsequent litigation by Canada failed on that point too. In Ontario Mining Co. v. Seybold,[6] the Privy Council extended the rule to deny the Indians any beneficial interest in the reserves that had been set apart for them under the Treaty. It took a series of federal/provincial agreements, culminating in the Canada/Ontario Indian Reserve Lands Agreement,[7] to provide an interim solution to the problems created these decisions. A further resolution was reached in 1986, with the passage of the Indian Lands Agreement (1986) Act.[8]

Even though some of Lord Watson's observations were later varied by the Supreme Court of Canada in Guerin v. The Queen, this case is the starting point for an understanding of Aboriginal law in Canada.

References

  1. ^ St. Catharines Milling and Lumber Co. v. R. 1886 CanLII 30, 13 Ont. App. R. 148 (20 April 1886), Court of Appeal (Ontario, Canada)
  2. ^ (1885), 10 O.R. 196
  3. ^ St. Catherines Milling and Lumber Company v The Queen [1888] UKPC 70, [1888] 14 AC 46 (12 December)
  4. ^ "Ontario-Manitoba Boundary Case". 22 July 1884. Retrieved 18 January 2013. 
  5. ^ "Canada (Ontario Boundary) Act, 1889, 52-53 Vict., c. 28 (U.K.)". 12 August 1889. Retrieved 18 January 2013. 
  6. ^ The Ontario Mining Company Limited and The Attorney General for the Dominion of Canada v The Attorney General for the Province of Ontario [1902] UKPC 46, [1903] AC 73 (12 November) (on appeal from Canada)
  7. ^ as approved by S.C. 1924, c. 48, and S.O. 1924, c. 15
  8. ^ (S.C. 1988, c. 39)Indian Lands Agreement (1986) Act, with corresponding provincial approval in (S.O. 2010, c. 1, sch. 10)Indian Lands Agreement (1986) Confirmation Act, 2010

External links

  • summary of the case
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.