Study Design

Clinical study design is the formulation of trials and experiments in medical and epidemiological research. Many of the considerations here are shared under the more general topic of design of experiments but there can be others, in particular related to patient confidentiality and ethics.

Outline of types of designs for clinical studies

Treatment studies

Observational studies

Important considerations

When choosing a study design, many factors must be taken into account. Different types of studies are subject to different types of bias. For example, recall bias is likely to occur in cross-sectional or case-control studies where subjects are asked to recall exposure to risk factors. Subjects with the relevant condition (e.g. breast cancer) may be more likely to recall the relevant exposures that they had undergone (e.g. hormone replacement therapy) than subjects who don't have the condition.

The ecological fallacy may occur when conclusions about individuals are drawn from analyses conducted on grouped data. The nature of this type of analysis tends to overestimate the degree of association between variables.

Seasonal studies

Conducting studies in seasonal indications (such as allergies, Seasonal Affective Disorder, influenza, and others) can complicate a trial as patients must be enrolled quickly. Additionally, seasonal variations and weather patterns can affect a seasonal study.[1][2]

Other terms

  • The term retrospective study is sometimes used as another term for a case-control study. This use of the term "retrospective study" is misleading, however, and should be avoided because other research designs besides case-control studies are also retrospective in orientation.
  • Superiority trials are designed to demonstrate that one treatment is more effective than another.
  • Non-inferiority trials are designed to demonstrate that a treatment is at least not appreciably worse than another.
  • Equivalence trials are designed to demonstrate that one treatment is as effective as another.
  • When using "parallel groups", each patient receives one treatment; in a "crossover study", each patient receives several treatments.
  • A longitudinal study assesses research subjects over two or more points in time; by contrast, a cross-sectional study assesses research subjects at one point in time.

See also

References

External links

  • Epidemiologic.org Epidemiologic Inquiry online weblog for epidemiology researchers
  • Epidemiology Forum An epidemiology discussion and forum community to foster debates and collaborations in epidemiology
  • Some aspects of study design Tufts University web site
  • Comparison of strength Description of study designs from the National Cancer Institute
  • Truman State University website
de:Forschungsdesign
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.