World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article
 

Taft Commission

This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
the Philippines

The Taft Commission, also known as Second Philippine Commission (bicameral legislature until it was supplanted in 1916 by an elected legislature established in 1916 by the Philippine Autonomy Act.

William Howard Taft was the first head of the Philippine Commission, a post he filled between March 16, 1900 and July 4, 1901, after which the commission head also became the Civil Governor of the Philippines.[1] He held the post until January 31, 1904 after he was appointed as the Secretary of War by Pres. Theodore Roosevelt.[2] The Philippine Commission was subsequently headed by a number of persons, but is often mentioned informally and collectively as the "Taft Commission".

Contents

  • Background 1
  • Commission membership 2
  • Legislative powers 3
    • Background 3.1
    • The Spooner Amendment (U.S.) 3.2
    • The Philippine Organic Act (U.S.) 3.3
  • Legislation 4
    • Specific major items of legislation 4.1
      • Reorganization of Local Government Units 4.1.1
      • The Civil Service Act 4.1.2
      • The Education Act of 1901 4.1.3
  • Friar lands 5
  • See also 6
  • References 7
  • Sources 8
  • Further reading 9
    • Books 9.1
    • Other items 9.2
  • External links 10

Background

The Second Philippine Commission (the Taft Commission), established by President civil service.[4] The 1901 municipal code provided for popularly elected presidentes, vicepresidentes, and councilors to serve on municipal boards. The municipal board members were responsible for collecting taxes, maintaining municipal properties, and undertaking necessary construction projects; they also elected provincial governors.[5]

Commission membership

Members of the Philippine Commission
1900-1916[6]
Original members Period of service
William Howard Taft March 16, 1900 – January 31, 1904
Henry Clay Ide March 16, 1900 – September 19, 1906
Luke Edward Wright March 16, 1900 – March 30, 1906
Dean Conant Worcester March 16, 1900 – September 15, 1913
Bernard Moses March 16, 1900 – December 31, 1902
Subsequent Members Period of service
Benito Legarda September 1, 1901 – October 31, 1907
Trinidad Pablo de Tavera September 1, 1901 – February, 1909
Jose Luzuriaga September 1, 1901 – October 27, 1913
James Smith January 1, 1903 – November 10, 1909
William Cameron Forbes June 5, 1904 – September 1, 1913
W. Morgan Schuster September 26, 1906 – February 28, 1909
Gregorio Araneta February 25, 1909 – October 27, 1913
Newton Gilbert July 6, 1908 – December 1, 1913
Rafael Palma July 6, 1908 – October 16, 1916
Juan Sumulong March 1, 1909 – October 26, 1913
Frank Branagan March 2, 1909 – October 26, 1913
Charles Burke Elliott February 14, 1910 – February 1, 1913
Francis Burton Harrison September 2, 1913 – October 16, 1916
Victorino Mapa October 27, 1913 – October 16, 1916
Jaime de Veyra October 27, 1913 – April 7, 1916
Vincente Iluste October 27, 1913 – October 16, 1916
Vincente Singson Encarnacion October 27, 1913 – October 16, 1916
Henderson Martin November 29, 1913 – October 16, 1916
Clinton Riggs November 29, 1913 – October 31, 1915
Eugene Reed May 24, 1916 – October 16, 1916
Wilford Denison January 27, 1914 – March 31, 1916

Legislative powers

Background

Article 1, Section 1 of the United States Constitution specifies that the U.S. Congress exercises legislative power. Since the Philippines was in a state of war, however, the Executive Branch ran affairs there without much congressional intervention. President McKinley's instruction to the Philippine Commission in April 1900 directed that, "... Beginning with the 1st day of September, 1900, the authority to exercise that part of the power of government in the Philippine Islands which is of legislative nature, is to be transferred from the Military Governor to this commission." The instruction also gave the Commission the power to appoint to officers under the judicial, educational, and civil service systems and in the municipal and departmental governments. The instruction charged the Commission, "... In all the forms of government and administrative provisions which they are authorized to proscribe, the Commission should bear in mind that the government which they are establishing is designed not for our satisfaction, or for the expression of our theoretical views, but for the happiness, peace and prosperity of the people of the Philippine islands, and measures adopted should be made to conform to their customs, their habits, and even their prejudices, to the fullest extent consistent with the accomplishment of just and effective government.".[3][7]

In a statement published on September 1, 1900, the commissioners announced the holding of public meetings every Wednesday and Friday to give interested parties the opportunity to comment and make suggestions on proposed legislative matters. The open sessions were mainly conducted in English and Spanish. As the Americans became familiar with Spanish, the commissioners allowed their guests to use the language of their choice.[8] William Forbes, later Governor General of the Philippines, wrote that he could not remember any instance where a commissioner protested because he could not understand an issue on linguistic grounds.[9]

The Spooner Amendment (U.S.)

A few months before the inauguration of Taft as governor general, Senator John Spooner filed a bill giving unprecedented powers to the executive branch in the development of colonial policy in the Philippines.[10] The Democrats ferociously attacked the bill, resurrecting anti-imperialist arguments they had employed at the time of the Treaty of Paris. By February 1900, a filibuster was in full cry, with the Democrats determined to curb the powers of the Philippine Commission and reserve for Congress the right to grant franchises and sell lands in the Philippines.[11] The Spooner bill was rejected on September 1, 1900, but McKinley nevertheless granted the Taft commission legislative powers.[12] Republican legislators repackaged it as an amendment to it to the 1901 Army Appropriation Bill, the passage of which was assured because no sane lawmaker would dare risk denying funds to the army in time of war. The passage of the Spooner amendment was a significant milestone in the development of U.S.–Philippine policy because it allowed the president to govern the Philippines by authority of Congress and not by his wartime authority as commander in chief.[13]

The Philippine Organic Act (U.S.)

The Insular Government (1901-1935). (The term "insular" refers to an unincorporated island territory.) The act provided that future appointments of the civil governor, vice-governor, members the Philippine Commission, and heads of Executive Departments shall be made by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The act also provided for the establishment of a bicameral legislature composed of a lower house, the Philippine Assembly, which would be popularly elected, and an upper house consisting of the Philippine Commission. The two houses would share legislative powers, although the upper house alone would pass laws relating to the Moros and other non-Christian peoples. The act also provided for extending the United States Bill of Rights to Filipinos and sending two Filipino resident commissioners to Washington to attend sessions of the United States Congress. The Philippine Assembly elections of 1907 were held on 30 July and the 1st Philippine Legislature opened its first session on October 16, 1907.[5][14][15]

Legislation

The Taft Commission promulgated a total of 157 laws between September 1900 and July 4, 1901, when Taft became Civil Governor, classified as follows:[16]

Classification of Laws Passed by the Philippine Commission
Classification Quantity Percent
Local Government 46 29.30
Reorganization of Government Agencies 40 25.48
Appropriations for Government Expenditures 33 21.02
Judicial Reforms 12 7.65
Economic and Tariff 9 5.73
Public Works Projects 7 4.46
Public Health 4 2.55
Anti-Sedition 2 1.27
Church 2 1.27
Education 2 1.27
Totals 157 100.00

Following the advice of McKinley to start at the bottom and gradually move upward, over seventy percent of the laws dealt with local government and the bureaucracy; with more than half of these being acts extending the provision of the Provincial Government Act to the different provinces. Others were acts establishing municipalities, and the rest concerned the local police.[17]

The thirty-three appropriations laws passed were appropriations to pay certain expenses not covered by the General Appropriations Act, including salaries of government employees, burial benefits for victims of the war, funds for the construction of roads and bridges, and other miscellaneous expenses.[17]

Specific major items of legislation

Reorganization of Local Government Units

The Commission created and reorganized government offices, including the following:[18]
Act Office
Act No. 7 Bureau of Statistics
Act No. 16 Bureau of Forestry
Act No. 17 Bureau of Mining
Act No. 20 Office of the Auditor
Act No. 46 Inspectors of Customs
Act No. 157 Board of Health

President McKinley had declared in his message to Congress in December 1899 that Philippine reconstruction should proceed by building up from the bottom.[19] McKinley's instruction to the Commission stressed that the establishment of civilian government should start from the smallest unit of political organization and gradually move towards Manila. In compliance with this, on January 31, 1901 the Commission enacted Act No. 82, a Municipal Code to guide the formation and management of towns, and six days later passed Act No. 83, a Provincial Government Act which dealt with the procedure for the creation of provincial governments.[20]

In some instances, the Commission doled out government offices to persuade leaders of the resistance movement to give up the fight. General Martin Delgado, for example, was appointed governor of Iloilo and similar moves were done in Cavite, Bulucan, and Laguna with the appointment of Mariano Trias, Pablo Tecson, and Juan Cailles, respectively.[21]

Members of the Revolutionary Government who later joined the Taft administration[22]
Name Position under the
Aguinaldo Administration
Position under the
Taft Administration
Cayetano Arellano Secretary of State Chief Justice
Victorino Mapa Counselor of the Revolutionary Government Associate Justice
T.H. Pardo de Tavera Assistant Secretary of State Commissioner
Benito Lagarda Vice President of the Malalos Congress Commissioner
Jose Luzuriaga President of the Reverend Congress of Panay Commissioner
Felipe Buencamino Secretary of State Civil Service Board
Felix Roxas Member of the Filipino Junta in Paris Governor of Batangas
Ignacio Villamor Malolos Congress delegate Judge
Gregorio Araneta Secretary of Justice Solicitor General
Martin Delgado Commanding General of Panay Governor of Iloilo
Ambrosio Flores Assistant Secretary of War Governor of Rizal
Mariano Trias Secretary of War Governor of Cavite
Jose Serapio Colonel of the Revolutionary Army Governor of Bulacan
Gracio Gonzaga Secretary of the Interior Governor of Cagayan
Arsenio Cruz Herrera Assistant Secretary of Interior President of the Municipal Board of Manila
Jose Alejandrino General of the Revolutionary Army City Engineer of Manila
Modesto Reyes Member of the Filipino Junta in Paris City Attorney of Manila
Daniel Triona Secretary of War Provincial Secretary of Cavite
Mariano Cunanan Major in the Revolutionary Army Principal Secretary of Pampanga
Mariano Crisostomo Malolos Congress Delegate Provincial Fiscal of Bulacan

The Civil Service Act

The first major legislation passed by the commission was Act No. 5, the Civil Service Act, enacted on September 19, 1900. From the passage of this act until the departure of Taft from the Philippines, the number of Americans and Filipinos applying to serve the government continued to increase, as follows:[18]

Period covered Examined Passed Appointed Percentage
appointed
English Spanish English Spanish English Spanish English Spanish
Up to July 2, 1901 550 821 314 383 126 157 23 19
July 3, 1901 –
September 30, 1901
154 259 68 79 89 75 58 29
October 1, 1901 –
September 30, 1902
1,267 2,072 794 916 558 515 44 25
October 1, 1902 –
September 30, 1903
1,248 3,105 828 1,633 579 820 46 27
Totals 3,219 6,167 2,004 3,011 1,352 1,567 42.00 25.41

The Education Act of 1901

General

  • The Presidents of the Senate of the Republic of the Philippines .
  • List of Senators (– Scholar search), Senate of the Philippines, archived from the original on September 14, 2006, retrieved 2006-09-16  .
  • i'L Project - Philippine Laws and Jurispudance DatabankThe LAWPH, Arellano Law Foundation, retrieved 2006-09-16 .
  • McKinley, William, Instructions of President McKinley to the Taft Commission, 7 April 1900, In Filipiniana.net online digital library, retrieved 2008-01-07 .

External links

  • Philippine House of Representatives Congressional Library

Other items

  • Blount, James (1913), American Occupation of the Philippines, 1898-1912, New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons .
  • Pobre, Cesar P., Philippine Legislature 100 Years,  .
  • Forbes, William Cameron (1945), The Philippine Islands, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press .
  • Francisco, Luzviminda; Fast, Jonathan (1985), Conspiracy of Empire: Big Business, Corruption, and Politics for Imperialism in America, 1876-1907, Quezon City, Philippines: Foundation for Nationalist Studies .
  • Linn, Brian MacAllister (2000), The Philippine War, 1899-1902, Kansas: University Press of Kansas,  .
  • Leopold, Richard W. (1954), Elihu Root and the Conservative Tradition, Boston: Little, Brown and Company,  .
  • Willis, Henry Parker (1905), Our Philippine Problem: A Study of American Colonial Policy, New York: Henry Holt and Company .
  • Zaide, Sonia M. (1994), The Philippines: A Unique Nation, All-Nations Publishing Co.,  .

Books

Further reading

  • Blitz, Amy (2000), The Contested State: American Foreign Policy and Regime Change in the Philippines, Rowman & Littlefield,  .
  • Escalante, Rene R. (2007), The Bearer of Pax Americana: The Philippine Career of William H. Taft, 1900-1903, Quezon City, Philippines: New Day Publishers,  .
  • Kalaw, Maximo M. (1927), The development of Philippine politics, Oriental Commercial, retrieved 2008-01-21 .
  • Seekins, Donald M. (1993), "The First Phase of United States Rule, 1898-1935", in Dolan, Ronald E., Philippines: A Country Study (4th ed.), Washington, D.C.: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress, retrieved 2007-12-25 .
  • U.S. War Department (1901) Annual Report of the War Department Vol. I, Part 10 - Public Laws and Rules Passed by the Philippine Commission (Nos. 1 - 263).>>Government Printing Office, Washington.
  •  .
  •  .

Sources

  1. ^ U.S. War Department 1901, p. 11.
  2. ^ "American President: A Reference Resource". University of Virginia Miller Center. Retrieved on 2013-08-07.
  3. ^ a b Kalaw 1927, pp. 452–459 (Appendix F).
  4. ^ Chronology for the Philippine Islands and Guam in the Spanish-American War, U.S. Library of Congress, retrieved 2008-02-16 .
  5. ^ a b "Philippines — United States rule". U.S. Library of Congress. Retrieved 2007-08-20. .
  6. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 132–133, citing Worcester 1930, pp. 62–63.
  7. ^ Kalaw 1927, pp. 452–459
  8. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 88.
  9. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 88, citing Forbes 1945, p. 90.
  10. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 91, remarking that Secretary Root's biographer alleged that Root wrote the first paragraph of Spooner's bill in which the executive was empowered to establish civilian rule in the Philippines, citing Leopold 1954, p. 36.
  11. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 91, referencing Francisco & Fast 1985, pp. 221–237.
  12. ^ Blitz 2000, pp. 39–40.
  13. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 92; Blitz 2000, p. 41.
  14. ^ "The Philippine Organic Act of July 1902". July 1, 1902. Retrieved 2007-07-05. .
  15. ^ Zaide 1994, p. 285
  16. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 122–123.
  17. ^ a b Escalante 2007, p. 123.
  18. ^ a b Escalante 2007, p. 98, citing Willis 1905, p. 54.
  19. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 103, citing quote in Blount 1913, pp. 288–289.
  20. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 103–106.
  21. ^ Delgado, along with 30 officers and 140 riflemen, surrendered on January 10, 1901. Trias and 200 of his followers did the same thing on March 15, 1901. Escalante 2007, p. 109, citing Linn 2000, pp. 215, 295.
  22. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 110, citing U.S. Congress, House (1903), R.B. Horton, ed., Committee on Insular Affairs: Committee Reports, Hearings and Acts of Congress Pertaining Thereto 1901-1903, Washington: Government Printing Office, pp. 26–27 .
  23. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 99–100.
  24. ^ a b Act No. 74 ( Enacted January 21, 1901), lawph.com.
  25. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 100–101, citing U.S. Bureau of Census (1905), 1903 Census of the Philippine Islands III, Washington: Government Printing Office, p. 640 .
  26. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 101.
  27. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 142.
  28. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 144, citing Willis 1905, pp. 228–229.
  29. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 143–144
  30. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 144–145
  31. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 145.
  32. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 145–146.
  33. ^ Kalaw 1927, pp. 456–457.
  34. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 80.
  35. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 83–84.
  36. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 190–192.
  37. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 198–199.
  38. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 202–203
  39. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 221–226.
  40. ^ Seekins 1993

References

See also

This was the first program of modern land reform in the Philippines.

The Philippine Organic Act, enacted in July 1902, authorized the Insular Government to purchase the friar lands, empowering it to issue bonds for the purpose.[37] Taft traveled to Rome in May 1902, meeting with Pope Leo XIII and proposing to buy the lands. The Pope promised to study the issue and expressed support for the American pacification program.[38] On November 18, 1902, Papal representative Jean Baptiste Guidi arrived in Manila to negotiate the sale of the lands. Taft commissioned a survey to determine their market value, and a purchase price of $7,239,784.66 was paid in December 1903 by the Insular Government.[39] The holdings amounted to some 166,000 hectares (410,000 acres), of which one-half was in the vicinity of Manila. The land was eventually resold to Filipinos, some of them tenants but the majority of them estate owners.[40]

The instructions of President McKinley to the commission stipulated that it was their duty to make a thorough investigation into the titles of large tracts of land held or claimed by individuals or by religious orders.[33] The commission conducted a series of public hearings into the matter beginning on July 31, 1900 and lasting until November.[34] On November 30, 1900, a 604 page report submitted by the commission discussed the friar lands in detail, recommending that "... the insular government buy the large haciendas of the friars and sell them out as small holdings to the present tenants."[35] In 1902, testifying in the U.S. before the House Committee on Insular Affairs, Taft repeated this recommendation, appraising the market value of the friar lands as between $2,500,000 to $7,000,000 in gold, and proposing that the Insular Government be allowed to float bonds for the purchase of the lands and use the proceeds from the sale of the lands to settle the bonds.[36]

Friar lands

As the years went by, the Thomasites won the respect and admiration not only of their students but also of their parents. The parents admired the way the American teachers treated their children and managed classroom activities. Specifically, they lauded the abolition of corporal punishment. The Thomasites' friendliness, informality, and approachability were admired by many Filipinos, who still remembered bad experiences with the aristocratic Spanish.[32]

Another problem encountered was difficulty in promoting equality among the students, as children of wealthy families thought they were entitled to special privileges. Some wealthy parents openly opposed the American educational system because of the insecurities it created. For them, education was a privilege of their class and should not be extended to the common people. They believed that general education would create an imbalance in the country's workforce, with the labor market having a surplus of people seeking white-collars and a shortage of people willing to engage in manual work. To address this concern, education officials propagated the trade and agricultural schools, explaining that graduates of these schools were at a par with those earning degrees from the normal school and universities.[31]

From the very start, serious problems threatened the success of the educational program. Problems encountered included opposition from Catholic clerics, language difficulties, health problems and difficulty in adjusting to the tropical climate, financial problems brought on by delayed salary payments, lack of school buildings (many of the 2,167 primary schools existing before the war had either been destroyed or pressed into use by the army as barracks, prisons, or hospitals[28]), etc.[29] Cultural values which had developed under Spanish rule also posed a severe hindrance. The Thomasites had a difficult time convincing their students to give more importance to activities that developed critical thinking than to those which simply required rote memorization, or that coming an hour late or being absent to attend a town fiesta was a big shortcoming.[30]

At the time Taft arrived in the Philippines, the student-teacher ratio was one teacher for 4,179 students.[27] Section 15 of Act 74 empowered the general superintendent to import 1,000 teachers from the U.S. The first batch of 48 American teachers arrived in June 1901.The second batch of 509 teachers (386 men and 141 women, accompanied by 4 nurses, 13 spouses) arrived in August, and became known as the Thomasites, after the USS Thomas, one of the ships which transported them.

On January 21, 1901, the commission enacted Act No. 74, establishing the Department of Public Instruction.Section one of the act provided that primary instruction should be free of charge and open to all Filipinos.[24] Commissioner Bernard Moses became Secretary of Public Instruction and Dr. Atkinson became General Superintendent of Public Instruction. Atkinson was tasked to put up a school in every pueblo and empowered to fix the salaries of teachers, formulate curricula, purchase school supplies, construct school buildings, and disburse the funds of the Department. A Superior Advisory Board assisted Atkinson in policy making concerning educational needs and the condition of the islands. Act 74 divided the archipelago into divisions composed of school districts and ordered the creation of Normal and a Trade schools in Manila and a School of Agriculture in Negros.[26]

  • That a comprehensive modern school system for the teaching of elementary English be inaugurated at the earliest possibler moment.
  • That industrial schools for manual training be established as soon as a fair knowledge of English has been acquired.
  • That all schools under government control be conducted in the English language so far as in any way practicable, and that the use of Spanish and the dialects be only for a period of transition.
  • That English teachers, well trained in primary instruction, be brought over from the U.S. in sufficient numbers to take charge of the schools of the larger towns at least.
  • That a well-equipped normal school be established for instructing natives to be teachers of English.
  • That in the larger towns a portion, at least, of the school house must be made of modern structure, plainly but well and properly equipped.
  • That the school supported by the Government be absolutely divorced from the Church. If the natives desire schools in which religious instruction is to be given, that they furnish the entire support for the same from private sources, but attendance from the latter schools shall not excuse the children from attendance at the public school where English is taught. In addition, the Parochial Church school, if such are maintained, shall be required to be equal in character of general instruction to the public school.

Commissioner Bernard Moses, who had been an educator at the University of California, worked with Captain Albert Todd and Dr. Fred Atkinson to draft Act No. 74, also known as the Education Act of 1901.[24] The act was largely based on a report which Todd submitted to the Commission on April 17, 1900. Some of the recommendations in the Todd Report were:[25]

[23]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.