World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

The Sea Gull

Article Id: WHEBN0014180498
Reproduction Date:

Title: The Sea Gull  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: James Mason, Denholm Elliott, 1968 in film, David Warner (actor), Seagull (disambiguation), Harry Andrews, Eileen Herlie, Alexander Scourby, The Deadly Affair, Kathleen Widdoes
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

The Sea Gull

This article is about the 1968 film. For the 1926 film with the same name, see A Woman of the Sea.
The Sea Gull
File:Seagulllumetposter.jpg
Theatrical release poster
Directed by Sidney Lumet
Produced by F. Sherwin Green
Sidney Lumet
Written by Anton Chekhov
Moura Budberg
Starring Vanessa Redgrave
Simone Signoret
David Warner
James Mason
Music by Mikis Theodorakis
Cinematography Gerry Fisher
Editing by Alan Heim
Studio Sidney Lumet Productions
Warner Brothers/Seven Arts
Distributed by Warner Brothers/Seven Arts (US)
Warner-Pathé (UK)
Release date(s) 22 December, 1968
Running time 141 minutes
Country United States
United Kingdom
Greece
Language English

The Sea Gull is a 1968 British-American-Greek drama film directed by Sidney Lumet. The screenplay by Moura Budberg is adapted from Anton Chekhov's classic 1896 play The Seagull.

The Warner Brothers/Seven Arts release was filmed at the Europa Studios in Sundbyberg, Stockholms län, just outside of central Stockholm.

Plot synopsis

Set in a rural Russian house, the plot focuses on the romantic and artistic conflicts among an eclectic group of characters. Fading leading lady Irina Arkadina has come to visit her brother Sorin, a retired civil servant in ailing health, with her lover, the successful hack writer Trigorin. Her son, brooding experimental playwright Konstantin Treplev, adores the ingenue Nina, who in turn is mesmerized by Trigorin. Their interactions slowly lead to the moral and spiritual disintegration of each of them and ultimately lead to tragedy.

Principal cast

Principal production credits

Critical reception

In his review in the New York Times, Vincent Canby described the film as "so uneven in style, mood and performance that there are times when you could swear that the movie had shot itself — though not quite fatally . . . Lumet's way with this adaptation by Moura Budberg is implacably straightforward. It plows ahead, scene by scene, act by act, in which there always is first an establishing long shot and then cuts to individual actors as they act and react. This kind of Secret Storm technique inevitably flattens out the nuances and the pauses that give depth to the tangled personal relationships. It also makes too literal the boredom and quiet despair that should hang over the Chekovian characters like an unseen mist. Most of the performances are excellent, but all of the actors seem to be on their own . . . Miss Signoret is simply miscast, if only because of her Frenchness. Her speech rhythms are so jarring that it's often impossible to understand her . . . As a result of the variety of styles, the movie turns into a series of individual confrontations that seem as isolated as specialty acts. Without the single dominating influence that should have been provided by Lumet, the play is fragmented beyond repair." [1]

Time observed, "The paralyzing problem with this film version of Chekhov's first major play is that it is far too dramatic . . . Any traces of wit have been pretty well destroyed by Lumet's lumbering technique. The actors perform as if they were all on the verge of a nervous breakdown . . . Lumet moves his camera incessantly to give the illusion of action, but uses fadeouts to duplicate the curtain falling at the end of an act . . . Most disturbing of all, [he] and cinematographer Gerry Fisher have shot the whole film in softly gauzed pastel colors, thereby reducing Chekhov's intricate dramatic tapestry to the sleazy cheapness of a picture postcard." [2]

Variety called it "a sensitive, well-made and abstractly interesting period pic." [3]

According to the Time Out London Film Guide, it is "basically an actors' film . . . sometimes dull and almost always unsatisfactory, despite excellent performances." [4]

References

External links

  • at the Internet Movie Database

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.