World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

VLAN hopping

Article Id: WHEBN0017512141
Reproduction Date:

Title: VLAN hopping  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Virtual LAN, Network security
Collection: Computer Network Security
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

VLAN hopping

VLAN hopping is a computer security exploit, a method of attacking networked resources on a Virtual LAN (VLAN). The basic concept behind all VLAN hopping attacks is for an attacking host on a VLAN to gain access to traffic on other VLANs that would normally not be accessible. There are two primary methods of VLAN hopping: switch spoofing and double tagging. Both attack vectors can be easily mitigated with proper switchport configuration.

Contents

  • Switch spoofing 1
    • Mitigation 1.1
  • Double tagging 2
    • Mitigation 2.1
    • Example 2.2
  • See also 3
  • Notes 4
  • References 5

Switch spoofing

In a switch spoofing attack, an attacking host imitates a trunking switch by speaking the tagging and trunking protocols (e.g. Multiple VLAN Registration Protocol, IEEE 802.1Q, Dynamic Trunking Protocol) used in maintaining a VLAN. Traffic for multiple VLANs is then accessible to the attacking host.

Mitigation

Switch spoofing can only be exploited when interfaces are set to negotiate a trunk. To prevent this attack on Cisco IOS, use one of the following methods:[1]

1. Ensure that ports are not set to negotiate trunks automatically.

Switch(config-if)# switchport nonegotiate

2. Ensure that ports that are not meant to be trunks are explicitly configured as access ports

Switch(config-if)# switchport mode access

Double tagging

In a double tagging attack, an attacking host connected on a 802.1q interface prepends two VLAN tags to packets that it transmits. The packet (which corresponds to the VLAN that the attacker is really a member of) is forwarded without the first tag, because it is the native VLAN. The second (false) tag is then visible to the second switch that the packet encounters. This false VLAN tag indicates that the packet is destined for a target host on a second switch. The packet is then sent to the target host as though it originated on the target VLAN bypassing the network mechanisms that logically isolate VLANs from one another. However, this attack allows to send packets toward the second switch, but possible answers are not forwarded to the attacking host.

Mitigation

Double Tagging can only be exploited when switches use "Native VLANs".[2] Ports with a specific access VLAN (the native VLAN) don't apply a VLAN tag when sending frames, allowing the attacker's fake VLAN tag to be read by the next switch.

Double Tagging can be mitigated by either one of the following actions (Incl. IOS example):

  • Simply do not put any hosts on VLAN 1 (The default VLAN). i.e., assign an access VLAN other than VLAN 1 to every access port
     Switch(config-if)# switchport access vlan 2
    
  • Change the native VLAN on all trunk ports to an unused VLAN ID.
    Switch(config-if)# switchport trunk native vlan 999
    
  • Explicit tagging of the native VLAN on all trunk ports. Must be configured on all switches in network autonomy.
    Switch(config)# vlan dot1q tag native
    

Example

As an example of a double tagging attack, consider a secure web server on a VLAN called VLAN2. Hosts on VLAN2 are allowed access to the web server; hosts from outside VLAN2 are blocked by layer 3 filters. An attacking host on a separate VLAN, called VLAN1(Native), creates a specially formed packet to attack the web server. It places a header tagging the packet as belonging to VLAN2 under the header tagging the packet as belonging to VLAN1. When the packet is sent, the switch sees the default VLAN1 header and removes it and forwards the packet. The next switch sees the VLAN2 header and puts the packet in VLAN2. The packet thus arrives at the target server as though it was sent from another host on VLAN2, ignoring any layer 3 filtering that might be in place.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Boyles, 2010, p. 163.
  2. ^ Boyles, 2010, p. 162.

References

  • Boyles, Tim (2010). CCNA Security Study Guide. Sybex.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.