World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Away goal rule

Article Id: WHEBN0025127256
Reproduction Date:

Title: Away goal rule  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Qarabağ FK, FC Vaduz, AC Omonia, Grasshopper Club Zürich, 2007 OFC Champions League, FK Jelgava, 2007 Copa Libertadores, 2007 Copa Libertadores knockout stages
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Away goal rule

The away goals rule is a method of breaking ties in association football and other sports when teams play each other twice, once at each team's home ground. By the away goals rule, the team that has scored more goals "away from home" will win if scores are otherwise equal.[1]

The away goals rule is most often invoked in two-leg fixtures, where the initial result is determined by the aggregate score — i.e. the scores of both games are added together. In many competitions, the away goals rule is the first tie-breaker in such cases, with a penalty shootout as the second tie-breaker if each team has scored the same number of away goals. Rules vary as to whether the away goals rule applies at the end of normal time of the second leg, after extra time, or both. It was first introduced by UEFA, in 1965.


Originally, the away goal rule was introduced in football as an expedite way of doing away with play offs or tie breaker in neutral grounds to resolve a logistical, physical and calendar problem when two teams where so closely matched the final score over the two legs remained in absolute parity, which could remain even after a third game tie breaker. Nowadays, the away goals rule is intended to encourage the away team to be more aggressive. In football, at least, it sometimes leads to a nervous first leg: the home team is unwilling to commit large numbers of players to attack lest they concede a goal, whilst the away team attempts to defend and snatch an away goal to aid them in the second leg. Such tactics arguably make the second leg more exciting, after a low-scoring first leg leaves both sides with a chance to win. There are sometimes debates over whether the away goals rule gives an unfair advantage to the team playing away first — with the other team squandering their home advantage in the first leg due to away goal fears — and this may be a factor in its somewhat patchy adoption for competitions.

There is also the issue that if extra time is played in the second leg, the away team gets an extra 30 minutes to take advantage of the away goals rule. This can be countered by the fact that in extra time, the home team has the advantage of playing the extra 30 minutes at home.

Anecdotal evidence certainly suggests that most teams feel an away goal puts them in the driving seat, such as Liverpool being able to draw 1-1 at Arsenal in the 2008 UEFA Champions League quarterfinals; Liverpool did eliminate Arsenal to advance to the semifinals.[2]

Many commentators have described the importance of a team being away to score an away goal, even when losing that leg, as it mathematically does give that team a chance to redeem itself on home soil by leveling the tie on aggregate while using the away goal as a tiebreaker.[3] For example in the 2007 UEFA Champions League round of 16, while Bayern Munich lost the first leg 3-2 at Real Madrid, Bayern later won 2-1 at home to level the tie on aggregate, but it was Bayern's away goals scored during their first leg loss that let them advance.[4] In a recent instance, at the 2013 UEFA Champions League semifinals, despite falling 4-1 in the first leg at Dortmund, Real Madrid would be able to advance if at home it managed to hold Dortmund to 3-0. (Real Madrid did score two goals in the last ten minutes to win the second leg 2-0 but were unable to score the third goal that would have sent them through to the finals.) In the other semifinal, however, as Barcelona was shutout at Bayern Munich 4-0, commentators have considered Barca essentially eliminated as Bayern could seal the tie by scoring one away goal even if Barca managed to score five goals.[5]

The away goals rule results in the "lead" of the two legged tie swinging back and forth. For instance in the 2005 UEFA Champions League round of 16 between Barcelona and Chelsea, Barca was ahead on aggregate after a 2-1 win in the first leg at home. During the second leg held in London, Chelsea managed to first score three straight goals to take the lead on aggregate (4-2), but Barca responded with two goals to level the aggegate score at 4-4 while taking the lead on away goals (2-1). Chelsea managed to score again, though, to advance on aggregate 5-4.[6]


The away goals rule is applied in many football competitions that involve two-leg fixtures, including the knockout stages of the UEFA Champions League, UEFA Europa League, CAF Champions League, CAF Confederation Cup, GAD North v South games and any two-legged playoffs in qualification for the FIFA World Cup or European Championships.

Not all competitions use the away goals rule. For example, before 2005, CONMEBOL used neither the away goals rule nor extra time in any of its competitions, such as the Copa Libertadores. Series that were level on aggregate went to an immediate penalty shootout. The away goals rule (without extra time) was introduced to the Copa Libertadores in 2005. In Latin America, an example of a tournament that always has used this rule is Copa do Brasil (Brazilian Cup).

The away goals rule is sometimes used in round robin competitions (that is, leagues or qualifying groups), where it may be used to break ties involving more than two teams. For example, away goals are the third tiebreaker in the group stage of both the UEFA Champions League[7] and UEFA Cup.[8] In Group C of the UEFA Champions League 2000–01, Olympique Lyonnais took the second qualifying spot ahead of Olympiacos on away goals.[9] Because other tiebreakers take precedence, the away goals rule is rarely invoked in such tournaments. In many group tournaments, the away goals rule is never applicable; for example, in World Cup qualification.[10]

The away goals rule was first applied in the UEFA Cup Winners' Cup when Budapest Honvéd beat Dukla Prague in the second round in 1965–66. It was introduced in the Fairs Cup in 1966–67,[11] and in the European Cup in 1967–68 for the first round,[12] 1968–69 for the second round,[13] and 1970–71 for later rounds.[14] Previously, ties level on aggregate had gone to a playoff on neutral ground.[15]


If the two clubs contesting a two-legged fixture share the same stadium, each club may be the home club in one leg, and the rule may still apply. For example, the 2003 UEFA Champions League Semi-Finals drew Inter Milan and AC Milan together. Both legs were played at the San Siro, their shared stadium in Milan:

  • First leg: AC Milan 0 – 0 Inter Milan
  • Second leg: Inter Milan 1 – 1 AC Milan

With an aggregate of 1–1, AC Milan was declared the winner because they were the "away" side in the second game. In this example, as in many such cases, most tickets for each leg will be reserved for the "home" side's fans, so the designation was not totally arbitrary. Same as happened in 2009 Copa Sudamericana, in which, Rio de Janeiro's Flamengo and Fluminense played both matches in Maracanã Stadium. After a scoreless tie in first leg, a 1-1 draw in the second caused Fluminense to go forward for being the "away club".

  • First leg: Fluminense FC 0 – 0 CR Flamengo
  • Second leg: CR Flamengo 1 – 1 Fluminense FC

Not all competitions with the away goals rule suffer from this anomaly, however: the Copa do Brasil has developed its rules to avoid some anomalies, such as the above. In that Cup, if two teams share either the same stadium or the same home town, neither is considered the home club and thus the away goals rule does not apply. This exception was seen, for example, in the 2006 final between Flamengo and Vasco, when both legs were played at the Maracanã Stadium.

More anomalous was a qualification play-off for the 1991 World Youth Championship between Australia and Israel: Australia won on away goals even though, due to security concerns arising from the First Intifada, Israel's "home" leg was played in Australia.[16] The same situation occurred in the 2010 FIFA World Cup qualification tie between the Bahamas and the British Virgin Islands, when the Bahamas advanced on the away goals rule even though both legs were played in the Bahamas.[17]

There has been at least one case of a wrong application of the away goals rule by a referee in an international club tournament. It happened in a second-round tie in the 1971–72 European Cup Winners' Cup between Rangers and Sporting Clube de Portugal. This fixture had the following scorelines:

  • First leg: Rangers 3 – 2 Sporting
  • Second leg, after 90 minutes: Sporting 3 – 2 Rangers
  • Second leg, after extra time: Sporting 4 – 3 Rangers

Since the teams were now level 6–6 on aggregate, the Dutch referee Laurens van Raavens ordered a penalty shootout, which Sporting won 3–0. Rangers appealed the loss, however, on the grounds that Van Raavens should not have ordered the shootout, since the Rangers goal in extra time in Lisbon gave them a lead of three away goals to two. Rangers won the appeal and went on to win the Cup Winners' Cup that season.

CONCACAF has a different rule for its CONCACAF Champions League, employing away goals at the end of full-time of the second leg, but not applying the rule at the end of extra time. For example, the semifinal of the 2008–09 CONCACAF Champions League between Cruz Azul and the Puerto Rico Islanders had the following scorelines:

  • First leg: Puerto Rico Islanders 2 – 0 Cruz Azul
  • Second leg, after 90 minutes: Cruz Azul 2 – 0 Puerto Rico Islanders
  • Second leg, after extra time: Cruz Azul 3 – 1 Puerto Rico Islanders

Since CONCACAF does not apply the away goals rule for goals scored after extra time, the game went to a penalty shootout, which Cruz Azul won 4–2.


Below is a summary of the variations of rules used in different competitions. In most examples in the table below, a penalty shootout is used to determine the winner if all criteria used remain tied. The exception is Primera División de México play-offs, where the higher seed, which has the better regular season record, wins the tie if the aggregate score is level.

Aggregate score is level after regulation (90 mins) of second leg
Away goals rule applied after regulation? Extra time played? Away goals rule applied after extra time? Examples
Yes Yes Yes FIFA World Cup qualification
UEFA Champions League and Europa League
Yes Yes No CONCACAF Champions League
AFC Champions League and AFC Cup
Yes No N/A Copa Libertadores and Copa Sudamericana (except finals)
CAF Champions League and Confederation Cup Primera División de México play-offs (except final)
No Yes Yes Football League Cup semi-finals
No Yes No Football League play-off semi-finals and MLS Cup Playoffs


This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.