World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Democrats for Life of America

Article Id: WHEBN0000601304
Reproduction Date:

Title: Democrats for Life of America  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Abortion in the United States, Republican National Coalition for Life, United States pro-choice movement, Eunice Kennedy Shriver, Factions in the Democratic Party (United States)
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Democrats for Life of America

Democrats for Life of America
Type 501(c)(4) non-profit
Focus Pro-life political advocacy within the Democratic Party
Area served United States
Key people Kristen Day (Executive Director)

Democrats for Life of America (DFLA) is an American political pro-life Democrats and to promote the pro-life position within the Democratic Party regarding euthanasia, capital punishment and abortion. Democrats for Life of America's position on abortion is in opposition to the current platform of the Democratic Party, which supports legal access to abortion.

The group takes no position on most socio-economic issues or any foreign policy. They have drafted the Pregnant Women Support Act, a comprehensive package of federal legislation and policy proposals that supporters hope will reduce the number of abortions. They have an affiliated political action committee, DFLA PAC.

History

In 1999, Democrats for Life of America was founded to coordinate, at a national level, the efforts of pro-life Democrats.

In the 1960s and 1970s, pro-life Democrats comprised a substantial portion of the Party's membership in the [2] Governor Casey's son Bob Casey, Jr., also a pro-life Democrat, spoke during the 2008 Democratic National Convention.[3]

Mission

A DFLA banner at the 2006 March for Life.
"Democrats for Life of America exists to foster respect for life, from the beginning of life to natural death. This includes, but is not limited to, opposition to abortion, capital punishment, and euthanasia. Democrats for Life of America is one of over 200 member organizations of Consistent Life: an international network for peace, justice and life."—former Democrats For Life website

Many members of Democrats for Life agree with the Consistent life ethic, a term coined by the late Joseph Bernardin, Roman Catholic Cardinal Archbishop of Chicago, which advocates the defense of all human life from the "womb to the tomb". Proponents of the CLE not only oppose abortion and capital punishment, but also advocate policies that address social and economic issues that are considered to unjustly violate the sanctity of life. For example, many who advocate a CLE would see the question of universal access to affordable health care as a "pro-life" issue.

According to the DFLA, the Democratic Party has suffered in elections from its absolutist pro-choice stance. DFLA points to polls suggesting that the pro-choice policies of the Democratic Party at the national level have cost Democratic candidates votes among religious Americans, especially Roman Catholics and the Eastern Orthodox. DFLA maintains the position that many religious or pro-life Americans would be more willing to support a Democratic candidate, if that candidate were to work to limit or end abortion in the United States through positive social programs and means.

Some pro-life Democrats feel that abortion should be strictly illegal under all conditions except instances in which the mother's life is in danger. Others feel that abortion should be legal under additional circumstances, such as rape and incest. Democrats For Life stresses that pro-life and pro-choice Democrats should unite in a common cause to make abortion rare through social programs, despite their differences of opinion on whether and to what degree abortion should be legal.

Relationships

As its name implies, DFLA aims to encompass members of the Democratic Party who are pro-life, cutting against the stereotype that Democrats are naturally pro-choice and that those who are pro-life are naturally Republicans.

Relationship to the Democratic National Committee

At the national level, the Democratic Party is supportive of a woman's right to choose abortion. From the 2008 Democratic Party platform:

"The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman's right to choose a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay, and we oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right. The Democratic Party also strongly supports access to comprehensive affordable family planning services and age-appropriate sex education which empower people to make informed choices and live healthy lives. We also recognize that such health care and education help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and thereby also reduce the need for abortions." [4]

Despite its strongly pro-choice platform, in recent years the party leadership has begun to support pro-life Democrats in some cases.[5]

Relationship with other pro-life organizations

In 2010, the previously cordial relationship between DFLA and the pro-life movement at large was significantly damaged amid controversy over the March 2009 decision of pro-life congressman National Right to Life Committee and the Susan B. Anthony List) decried the deal as a farce, saying the executive order lacked the legal force to prevent tax dollars from being used for abortions.[6] In response, DFLA has contended that the health-care reform law accomplishes important pro-life goals,[7] that federal funds will not in fact be used to support abortion,[8] and that other pro-life groups (especially SBA List) are more interested in supporting Republicans than in supporting non-partisan pro-life principles.[9] Several pro-life Democrats were targeted for defeat by national pro-life groups over the PPACA vote, and the ranks of pro-life Democrats were cut roughly in half in the 2010 elections.[10]

Pro-life Democrats in recent elections

2004

In 2003, the group was denied permission to put a link on the Democratic National Committee's website. That same year pollster John Zogby found that 43% of Democrats "agreed with the statement that abortion 'destroys a human life and is manslaughter.'"[11]

During the 2004 Democratic National Convention, DFLA met in Massachusetts State House that was attended by Eunice Kennedy Shriver, among other notable political figures. They also held a rally in front of the statue of Samuel Adams at Faneuil Hall where former mayor of Boston and ambassador Ray Flynn and other elected officials from around the country spoke. Members of the Board of Directors and rank and file members attended the convention, which was held inside the Fleet Center, and witnessed the delegates adopt a platform that took a much harder line on the issue of abortion. In 2000 the platform stated

The Democratic Party is a party of inclusion. We respect the individual conscience of each American on this difficult issue, and we welcome all our members to participate at every level of our party. This is why we are proud to put into our platform the very words which Republicans refused to let Bob Dole put into their 1996 platform and which they refused to even consider putting in their platform in 2000: "While the party remains steadfast in its commitment to advancing its historic principles and ideals, we also recognize that members of our party have deeply held and sometimes differing views on issues of personal conscience like abortion and capital punishment. We view this diversity of views as a source of strength, not as a sign of weakness, and we welcome into our ranks all Americans who may hold differing positions on these and other issues. Recognizing that tolerance is a virtue, we are committed to resolving our differences in a spirit of civility, hope and mutual respect."[12]

In contrast, the 2004 Democratic Party Platform, as quoted above, is supportive of a woman's right to choose abortion and does not offer any big tent language, though it did state that the Democratic Party aimed to make abortion "safe, legal and rare".

In keeping with their policy of endorsing only pro-life Democrats, the group did not endorse George W. Bush for President in 2004. Following the defeats of the 2004 election, DFLA called on the Party to be more welcoming of pro-life Democrats. They analyzed the results and published them as The Case for Pro-Life Democrats.

In January 2005, former Democratic Representative Howard Dean's attempts to reach out to pro-life Democrats.

In their 2005 book, Take It Back: Our Party, Our Country, Our Future, Paul Begala and James Carville praised Democrats For Life for their work that led to the Pregnant Women Support Act. In the book they say the legislation "is built around seventeen concrete policy proposals that would reduce the number of abortions.... We believe these proposals would do more to prevent abortions than all the speeches, all the marches and all the campaign ads the pro-lifers have used over the past 30 years." They go on to call it "both good politics and, we think, good policy". The initiative has become legislation known as the Pregnant Women Support Act, which "has gained broad support and even has attracted some Republican backers".[1] The Commonwealth of Virginia is the first state to pass a version of the PWSA.

Organizations and Individuals who support the bill include the National Association of Evangelicals, Sojourners/Call to Renewal, U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Americans United for Life, National Council on Adoption, Life Education and Resource Network, Redeem the Vote, Care Net, Tony Campolo (founder of the Evangelical Association for the Promotion of Education), Joe Turnham (Chairman, Alabama Democratic Party), U.S. Senator Bob Casey, Jr., and actor Martin Sheen.[13]

2006

For the 2006 midterm elections, the Democratic Party showed signs of being more open to high-profile pro-life candidates, most notably when the pro-choice head of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Senator Chuck Schumer, endorsed the ultimately victorious pro-life Senatorial Candidate Bob Casey, Jr. of Pennsylvania. Casey, along with the other pro-life Democrats in the Senate, gave Democrats the margin of control after the 2006 election, which resulted in Democrats getting a 51–49 division of the Senate.[14]

In the House, Democrats had a 31-vote majority following the 2006 elections, and 37 pro-life members of the caucus. Not a single Democrat lost their seat in either chamber in 2006. The number of victories of pro-life Democrats placed Democrats over the margin, helping to give Democrats control of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives.[14]

2008

In an e-mail to supporters, Nancy Keenan of NARAL Pro-Choice America stated that DFLA is growing in strength and a threat to the continued pro-choice stance of the Democratic Party.

DFLA officially endorsed 8 candidates in the 2008 elections,[15] 4 of whom were elected. None had been elected to Congress before 2008, though two were incumbents who had been successful in special elections earlier in 2008 (Travis Childers, who easily won re-election in the 1st district of Mississippi; and Don Cazayoux, who was narrowly defeated in the 6th district of Louisiana). Two were competing for open seats (Bobby Bright, successful in the 2nd district of Alabama; and David Boswell, unsuccessful in the 2nd district of Kentucky). Four were challenging incumbents (Kathy Dahlkemper, successful in the 3rd district of Pennsylvania; Steve Driehaus, successful in the 1st district of Ohio; Jim Esch, unsuccessful in the 2nd district of Nebraska; and Bill O'Neill, unsuccessful in the 14th district of Ohio).

2010

The organization has endorsed Congresswoman above).

See Also

References

  1. ^ a b Shailagh Murray (January 21, 2007). "Democrats Seek to Avert Abortion Clashes". The Washington Post. p. A5. 
  2. ^ The New Republic: Casey And The Democratic Convention. April 19, 2007.
  3. ^ Washington Post: Casey Speaks to a Changed Party. August 26, 2008.
  4. ^ Official Democratic Party platform, p. 50
  5. ^ Interview with Bob Casey, Jr. | Valerie Schmalz | July 29, 2005
  6. ^ Democrats for Life Keeps Trashing Pro-Life Groups on ObamaCare, Abortion
  7. ^ Thomas C. Berg, Abortion and Key Provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), www.democratsforlife.org, 12 July 2010, accessed 23 January 2011
  8. ^ Obama Administration reiterates that that no federal funds will be used for abortion, www.democratsforlife.org, 16 July 2010, accessed 23 January 2011
  9. ^ Susan B. Anthony List acts with reckless disregard for the truth, www.democratsforlife.org, 15 October 2010, accessed 23 January 2011
  10. ^ Tobin Grant and Ruth Moon, The Death of Pro-Life Democrats, Christianity Today, 28 October 2010, accessed 23 January 2011
  11. ^ "New National Abortion Poll Shows Majority of Americans are Pro-Life". Zogby International. 2004. Retrieved 2007-01-24. 
  12. ^ http://a9.g.akamai.net/7/9/8082/v001/www.democrats.org/pdfs/2000platform.pdf
  13. ^ Rep. Lincoln Davis (2006). "Davis Introduces Comprehensive Proposal". Archived from the original on 2007-01-11. Retrieved 2007-01-24. 
  14. ^ a b Democrats For Life of America
  15. ^ "Act Blue" page of Democrats for Life
  16. ^ Health vote haunts anti-abortion Democrats

External links

  • Democrats For Life Official Website
  • Where the Rubber Meets Roe, by William Saletan, The Washington Post, October 1, 2006 (retrieved January 11, 2007)
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.