### Dit (information)

A ban, sometimes called a hartley (symbol Hart) or a dit (short for decimal digit), is a logarithmic unit which measures information or entropy, based on base 10 logarithms and powers of 10, rather than the powers of 2 and base 2 logarithms which define the bit. As a bit corresponds to a binary digit, so a ban is a decimal digit. A deciban is one tenth of a ban; the name is formed from ban by the SI prefix deci-, even though the ban and deciban are not SI units, analogous to how the name decibel is formed from bel.

One ban corresponds to about 3.32 bits (log2(10)), or 2.30 nats (ln(10)). A deciban is about 0.33 bits.

## History

The ban and the deciban were invented by Alan Turing with I. J. Good in 1940, to measure the amount of information that could be deduced by the codebreakers at Bletchley Park using the Banburismus procedure, towards determining each day's unknown setting of the German naval Enigma cipher machine. The name was inspired by the enormous sheets of card, printed in the town of Banbury about 30 miles away, that were used in the process.[1]

Jack Good argued that the sequential summation of decibans to build up a measure of the weight of evidence in favour of a hypothesis, is essentially Bayesian inference.[1] Donald A. Gillies, however, argued the ban is, in effect, the same as Karl Popper's measure of the severity of a test.[2]

The term hartley is after Ralph Hartley, who suggested this unit in 1928.[3][4]

The ban pre-dates Shannon's use of bit as a unit of information by at least eight years, and remains in use in the early 21st Century.[5]

## Usage as a unit of probability

The deciban is a particularly useful measure of information in odds ratios or weights of evidence. 10 decibans corresponds to an odds ratio of 10:1; 20 decibans to 100:1 odds, etc. According to I. J. Good, a change in a weight of evidence of 1 deciban (i.e., a change in an odds ratio from evens to about 5:4) is about as finely as humans can reasonably be expected to quantify their degree of belief in a hypothesis.[6]