[6]
Of the players who encountered Philidor, Sir Abraham Janssens, who died in 1775, seems to have been the best, Mr. George Atwood, a mathematician, one of Pitt's secretaries came next, he was of a class which we should call third or two grades of odds below Philidor, a high standard of excellence to which but few amateurs attain. One of most interesting features of Atwood as a chess player is that he recorded and preserved some of his games, an unusual practice at that time. These records have survived, among them the last games that Philidor played which were against Atwood at Parsloe's Club in London on 20 June 1795.
In England, Philidor astounded his peers by playing three blindfold chess games simultaneously in the chess club of St. James Street in London on 9 May 1783. Philidor let all three opponents play white, and gave up a pawn for the third player. Some affidavits were signed, because those persons who were involved doubted that future generations would believe that such a feat was possible. Today, three simultaneous blindfold games would be fairly unremarkable among many chess masters. Even when he was in his late years, when he was 67 years old (1793), he played and won two blindfold games simultaneously in London.
Philidor, both in England and France, was largely recognized in each of his fields and got a lot of admirers, protectors and also friends, like were the French philosophers Voltaire, Rousseau and the famous English actor David Garrick (1717–1779).
In December 1792, however, when he was age 65, Philidor had to definitively leave France for England. He was fleeing the French Revolution (1789–1799), because his name figured on the Revolutionary banishment list, established by the Convention nationale. This was not probably due to his ideas (indeed it seems Philidor was rather reserved about his opinions apart from music and chess), but very likely in view of the traditional attachment of his family to the King's family service [9].
Andrew Soltis writes that Philidor "was the best player in the world for 50 years. In fact, he was probably about 200 rating points better than anyone else yet alive—set apart by the mysteries of the game he had solved."[7]
Also interesting is GM Boris Alterman's opinion on Philidor play [10]:
500 years ago chess was different from today. Pawns didn't cost as much as they do today. The best players started games with the gambits. Pawns were only a small price to: Open a file or diagonal; Create an immediate attack on an opponent's king. It was the Italian style of chess. All positions of the King's Gambit were very popular... The best chess player of his day was Francois Andre Danican-Philidor... His published chess strategy stood for a hundred years without significant addition or modification. He preached the value of a strong pawn center, an understanding of the relative value of the pieces, and correct pawn formations...
In the same web-article, Alterman also noticed, analyzing the game Count Bruehl–Philidor, F, 0–1, London 1783, that Philidor understood very well modern concepts like: power of passed pawns; bad and good pieces; space advantage; open files; pawn structure; importance of center.
Jacques François Mouret, one of the best French players of the early 19th century, was Philidor's great-nephew.[8]
l'Analyse du jeu des Échecs
In 1749, Philidor published his famous book Analyse du jeu des Échecs. He printed a second edition in 1777, and a third edition in 1790.[9] The book was such an advance in chess knowledge that by 1871, it had gone through about 70 editions, and had been translated into English, German, Russian and Italian. In it, Philidor analyzed nine different types of game openings. Most of the openings of Philidor are designed to strengthen and establish a strong defensive center using pawns. He is the first one to realize the new role of the pawn in the chess game; and his most famous advice was the saying "The pawns are the soul of chess." More precisely Philidor said:
Mon but principal est de me rendre recommandable par une nouveauté dont personne ne s'est avisé, ou peut-être n'a été capable ; c'est celle de bien jouer les pions ; ils sont l'âme des Echecs : ce sont eux-mêmes qui forment uniquement l'attaque et la défense et de leur bon ou mauvais arrangement dépend entièrement le gain ou la perte de la partie.[10]
Translation: My main purpose is to make myself commendable by a novelty of which no one was aware or perhaps was capable [of discovering]; this is to play the pawns well; they are the soul of chess: it is they which uniquely determine the attack and the defence, and on their good or bad arrangement depends entirely the winning or losing of the game.
It was said that the reason why Philidor emphasized the pawns in the chess game was related to the political background during the eighteenth century of France, and that he regarded pawns as the "Third rank" on the chess board (citizens were regarded as the third rank of the society before the French Revolution started in 1789). He also included analysis of certain positions of rook and bishop versus rook, such analysis being still current theory even today. He is most famous for showing an important drawing technique with a rook and pawn versus rook endgame, in a position known as the Philidor position. The Philidor Defense (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6) is named for him. Philidor’s book was the very first (1) that gave detailed annotations on how to play the middlegame, (2) that presented chess strategy as a whole, and (3) that presented the concepts of the blockade, prophylaxis, positional sacrifice, and mobility of the pawn formation.[11]
Early critics of the Analyse du jeu des Échecs include those of the Modenese School (Ercole del Rio, Lolli or Ponziani), who in contrast to the French, advocated a free piece play, gambit openings and tactical complications; they also found some of the variations reported in the Analyse to be unsound (in particular those related with f7–f5 push in the Philidor Defence 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 f5). Some of Philidor's disciples -- Bernard, Carlier, Leger, and Verdoni, who met at the Café de la Régence under the name of Société des Amateurs—also criticized his work. In their book, Traité des Amateurs, they expressed many criticisms and comments on his earlier printed book, arguing that the variations reported in Philidor's Analyse are more instructive than correct. Nevertheless, the games of the Traité can be regarded, together of those of Philidor, as typical examples of the understanding of chess during the Enlightenment, and the Société des Amateurs was much closer to Philidor than to the Modenese school.
Notable chess games
-
Captain Smith vs François André Philidor, London, England 1790, Bishop's Opening: Berlin Defense (C24), 0–1 Good sample of Philidor's ideas about pawns; plus a nice mating combination at the end
-
François André Philidor vs NN, Unknown 1749, Bishop's Opening: Boi Variation (C23), 1–0 This game—possibly a composition by Philidor—demonstrates the value of passed pawns
Final years
Philidor was stranded in England when the French Revolution occurred. Because of many of his social connections mentioned above, the Revolutionary Government put him on the banned list. He died on August 31, 1795, in London and was buried in St James, Piccadilly. A few days later, his relatives succeeded in getting his name removed from the list.
Chess topics named after him
Philidor's name is used for three well-known chess topics:
Battez Philidor !
A one-act opéra-comique with music by Amédée Dutacq and libretto by Abraham Dreyfus entitled Battez Philidor ! (Beat Philidor!) was premiered on 13 November 1882 at the Opéra-Comique. Set in 1777, a poor musician is required to beat Philidor at chess before he can win the hand of his sweetheart. Although Philidor agrees to lose the match to help out, by distraction he nonetheless wins the game, although all turns out well for the lovers in the end. Battez Philidor ! also features Philidor's sometime collaborator A A H Poinsinet.[12]
Works
Notes
-
^ Rushton J. François-André Danican Philidor. In: The New Grove Dictionary of Opera. Macmillan, London and New York, 1997.
-
^ H. J. R. Murray, A History of Chess, Oxford University Press, 1913, p. 862. ISBN 0-19-827403-3.
-
^ The Saturday magazine, Volumes 18–19 (1841) Page 238
-
^ The Chess player's chronicle (1879) Page 50
-
^ G. Allen and T. von der Lasa, The life of Philidor, musician and chess-player, Philadelphia 1865, page 51
-
^ H. E. Bird, Chess History and Reminiscences (London, 1882)
-
^ Andrew Soltis, "Tools of the Trade . . .", Chess Life, July 1995, p. 14.
-
^ The Oxford Companion to Chess–David Hooper and Kenneth Whyld (1992) p. 265
-
^ Murray, p. 863.
-
^ This quote first appears on pages xiii–xiv of the preface of Philidor's Le jeu des échecs, 1792 edition.
-
^ David Hooper and Kenneth Whyld, The Oxford Companion to Chess, Oxford University Press; 2nd edition (November 21, 1996)
-
^ Soubies A, Malherbe C. Histoire de l'opéra comique — La seconde salle Favart 1840–1887. Flammarion, Paris, 1893.
References
-
World Chess Champions by Edward G. Winter, editor. 1981 ISBN 0-08-024117-4
-
Life of Philidor: Musician and Chess-Player by George Allen, Tassilo von Heydebrand und der Lasa; Da Capo Press; 1971. ISBN 0-306-70075-1
-
The World's Great Chess Games by Reuben Fine; Dover; 1983. ISBN 0-486-24512-8
-
The Batsford Encyclopedia of Chess by Nathan Divinsky; 1990. ISBN 0-7134-6214-0
External links
-
Works by or about François-André Danican Philidor at Internet Archive
-
François-André Danican Philidor player profile and games at Chessgames.com
-
[11] [12] [13] [14] Philidor at Res musica (French)
-
Free scores by François-André Danican Philidor at the International Music Score Library Project
-
Philidor at mjae.com (French)
-
Analyse du jeu des échecs (1777 edition, London) at Google Books. (French)
-
Analysis of the game of chess (1790 English edition, London) at Google Books.[[Category:French male writer/