World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Lactarius

Article Id: WHEBN0001849446
Reproduction Date:

Title: Lactarius  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Lactarius deliciosus, Lactarius deterrimus, Lactarius baliophaeus, Lactarius resimus, Lactarius subbaliophaeus
Collection: Russulales, Russulales Genera
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Lactarius

Lactarius
Lactarius vietus
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Fungi
Division: Basidiomycota
Class: Agaricomycetes
Order: Russulales
Family: Russulaceae
Genus: Lactarius
Pers. (1797)
Diversity
c. 450 species
Synonyms[1]
  • Lactaria Pers. (1797)
  • Agaricus sect. Lactifluus Pers. (1801)
  • Agaricus subdiv. Galorrheus Fr. (1818)
  • Lactariella J.Schröt. (1898)
  • Lactariopsis Henn. (1901)
  • Gloeocybe Earle (1909)
  • Hypophyllum Earle (1909)

Lactarius is a genus of mushroom-producing, ectomycorrhizal fungi, containing several edible species. The species of the genus, commonly known as milk-caps, are characterized by the milky fluid ("latex") they exude when cut or damaged. Like the closely related genus Russula, their flesh has a distinctive brittle consistency. It is a large genus with roughly 450 known species, mainly distributed in the Northern hemisphere. Recently, the genus Lactifluus has been separated from Lactarius based on molecular phylogenetic evidence.

Contents

  • Systematics and taxonomy 1
    • Placement within Russulaceae 1.1
    • Relationships within Lactarius 1.2
  • Description 2
    • Macromorphology 2.1
    • Micromorphology 2.2
    • Species identification 2.3
  • Distribution 3
  • Ecology 4
  • Edibility 5
  • Chemistry 6
  • A selection of well-known species 7
  • See also 8
  • References 9
  • External links 10

Systematics and taxonomy

The genus Lactarius was described by Christian Hendrik Persoon in 1797[2] with L. piperatus as the original type species. In 2011, L. torminosus was accepted as the new type of the genus after the splitting-off of Lactifluus as separate genus.[3][4][5]

The name "Lactarius" is derived from the Latin lac, "milk".

Placement within Russulaceae




Lactarius


Multifurca



Russula



Lactifluus

Phylogenetic relationships of Lactarius, Lactifluus, Multifurca, and Russula according to Buyck et al. 2010.[6]

Molecular phylogenetics uncovered that, while macromorphologically well-defined, milk-caps were in fact a paraphyletic genus; as a consequence, the genera Lactifluus was split from Lactarius, and the species L. furcatus was moved to the new genus Multifurca, together with some former Russula species.[6][3] Multifurca also represents the likely sister group of Lactarius (see phylogeny, right). In the course of these taxonomical rearrangements, the name Lactarius was conserved for the genus with the new type species Lactarius torminosus; this way, the name Lactarius could be retained for the bigger genus with many well-known temperate species, while the name Lactifluus has to be applied only to a smaller number of species, containing mainly tropical, but also some temperate milk-caps such as Lactifluus volemus and Lf. vellereus.[3][4][5]

Relationships within Lactarius

Arcangeliella crassa is one of the milk-caps with closed fruitbodies that are phylogenetically nested within Lactarius.

Phylogenetic analyses have also revealed that Lactarius, in the strict sense, contains some species with closed (angiocarpous) fruitbodies, e.g. L. angiocarpus described from Zambia.[7] The angiocarpous genera Arcangeliella and Zelleromyces are phylogenetically part of Lactarius.[7][8]

Systematics within Lactarius is a subject of ongoing research. Three subgenera are currently accepted and supported by molecular phylogenetics:[9]

  • Piperites: Northern temperate region, three species in tropical Africa.
  • Russularia: Northern temperate region and tropical Asia.
  • Plinthogalus: Northern temperate region, tropical Africa, and tropical Asia.

Some more species, all tropical, do not seem to fall into these subgenera and occupy more basal positions within Lactarius.[8] This includes for example L. chromospermus from tropical Africa with an odd brown spore color.[8][10]

Currently, around 600 Lactarius species are described,[11] but roughly one fourth or 150 of these are believed to belong to Lactifluus,[12] while the angiocarpous genera Arcangeliella and Zelleromyces have not yet been synonymized with Lactarius. It is estimated that a significant number of Lactarius species remain to be described.[9]

Description

Macromorphology

Lactarius quietus exuding cream-colored latex from gills upon cut.
Spores of Lactarius alnicola showing a reticulate (net-like) ornament with an amyloid stain reaction.
Lactarius indigo is one of the most strikingly colored Lactarius.

The eponymous "milk" and the brittle consistency of the flesh are the most prominent field characters of milk-cap fruitbodies. The milk or latex emerging from bruised flesh is often white or cream, but more vividly coloured in some species; it can change upon exposition or remain unchanged. Fruitbodies are small to very large, gilled, rather fleshy, without veil, often depressed or even funnel-shaped with decurrent gills. Cap surface can be glabrous, velvety or pilose, dry, sticky or viscose and is often zonate. Several species have pits (scrobicules) on the cap or pileus surface. Dull colors prevail, but some more colorful species exist, e.g. the blue Lactarius indigo or the orange species of section Deliciosi. Spore print color is white to ocher or, in some cases, pinkish. Some species have angiocarpous, i.e., closed fruitbodies.[7]

Micromorphology

Microscopically, Lactarius species have elliptical, rarely globoid spores with amyloid ornamentation in the form of more or less prominent warts or spines, connected by ridges, like other members of the Russulaceae family. The trama (flesh) contains spherical cells that cause the brittle structure. Unlike Russula, Lactarius also have lactiferous, i.e. latex-carrying hyphae in their trama.

Species identification

Distinguishing Lactarius from Lactifluus based on morphology alone is difficult; there are no synapomorphic characters known so far that define both genera unequivocally but tendencies exist:[9] zonate and viscose to glutinose caps are only found in Lactarius, as well as closed (angiocarpous) and sequestrate fruitbodies. All known annulate and pleurotoid (i.e., laterally stiped) milk-caps, on the contrary, belong to Lactifluus.

Characters important for identification of milk-caps (Lactarius and Lactifluus) are:[13][14][15] initial colour of the latex and color change, texture of cap surface, taste (mild, peppery, or bitter) of latex and flesh, odor, and microscopical features of the spores and the cap curticle (pileipellis). The habitat and especially the type of host tree can also be critical. While there are some easily recognizable species, others can be quite hard to determine without microscopical examination.[15]

Distribution

Lactarius is one of the most prominent genera of mushroom-forming fungi in the Northern hemisphere. It also occcurs natively in Northern Africa,[13] tropical Africa,[16] tropical Asia,[8][17] Central America,[18] and Australia.[19] Its possible native distribution in South America and different parts of Australasia is unclear, as many species in those regions, poorly known, might in fact belong to Lactifluus, which has a more tropical distribution than Lactarius.[12] Several species have also been introduced with their host trees outside their native range,[20] e.g. in South America,[21] Southern Africa,[16] Australia,[22] and New Zealand.[23]

Ecology

Lactarius belongs to a lineage of obligate ectomycorrhizal symbionts.[24] As such, they are dependent on the occurrence of possible host plants. Confirmed habitats apart from temperate forests include arctic tundra and boreal forest,[25] mediterranean maquis,[13][26][27] tropical African shrubland,[16] tropical Asian rainforest,[8][17] mesoamerican tropical oak forests,[18] and Australian Eucalyptus forests.[19]

Lactarius pyrogalus mainly associates with common hazel.

While most species display a preference towards either broadleaf or coniferous hosts,[13][14] some are more strictly associated with certain genera or species of plant hosts. A well-studied example is that of alders, which have several specialized Lactarius symbionts (e.g. L. alpinus, L. brunneohepaticus, L. lilacinus), some of which even evolved specificity to one of the Alnus subgenera.[28] Other examples of specialized associations of Lactarius are with Cistus shrubs (L. cistophilus and L. tesquorum),[26][27] beech (e.g. L. blennius), birches (e.g. L. pubescens), hazel (e.g. L. pyrogalus), oak (e.g. L. quietus), pines (e.g. L. deliciosus), or fir (e.g. L. deterrimus). For most tropical species, host plant range is poorly known, but species in tropical Africa seem to be rather generalist.[16]

Lactarius species are considered late-stage colonizers, that means, they are generally not present in early-colonizing vegetation, but establish in later phases of succession.[29] However, species symbiotic with early colonizing trees, such as L. pubescens with birch, will rather occur in early stages.[30] Several species have preferences regarding soil pH and humidity,[13][14] which will determine the habitats in which they occur.

Edibility

Lactarius deliciosus for sale on a market in Barcelona, Spain

Several Lactarius species are edible. L. deliciosus notably ranks among the most highly valued mushrooms in the Northern hemisphere, while opinions vary on the taste of others, such as L. indigo or L. deterrimus. Several species are reported to be regularly collected for food in Russia, Tanzania and Hunan, China.[31] Some Lactarius are considered toxic, for example L. turpis, which contains a mutagenic compound,[32] or L. helvus. There are, however, no deadly poisonous mushrooms in the genus. Bitter or peppery species, for example L. torminosus, are generally not considered edible, at least raw, but are nevertheless consumed in some regions, e.g. in Finland.[33] Some small, fragrant species, such as the "candy caps", are sometimes used as flavoring.

L. deliciosus is one of the few ectomycorrhizal mushrooms that has been successfully cultivated.[34][35]

Chemistry

Different bioactive compounds have been isolated from Lactarius species, such as volatiles,[37][38] and mutagenic substances.[32] Pigments have been isolated from colored Lactarius species, such as L. deliciosus[39] or L. indigo.[40]

A selection of well-known species

See also

References

  1. ^ "Lactarius"MycoBank: . Retrieved 2014-09-28. 
  2. ^ Persoon CH. (1797). Tentamen dispositionis methodicae Fungorum (in Latin). 
  3. ^ a b c Buyck B, Hofstetter V, Verbeken A, Walleyn R. (2010). nom. cons. (Basidiomycota) with conserved type"Lactarius"Proposal to conserve . Taxon 59: 447–453. 
  4. ^ a b Barrie F. (2011). "Report of the General Committee: 11". Taxon 60 (4): 1211–1214. 
  5. ^ a b Norvell LL. (2011). "Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi: 16". Taxon 60: 223–226. 
  6. ^ a b Buyck B, Hofstetter V, Eberhardt U, Verbeken A, Kauff F. (2008). "Ochricompactae sect. Russula: the dilemma of Lactarius and Russula"Walking the thin line between (PDF). Fungal Diversity 28: 15–40. 
  7. ^ a b c Eberhardt U, Verbeken A. (2004). "Sequestrate Lactarius species from tropical Africa: L. angiocarpus sp. nov. and L. dolichocaulis comb. nov.". Mycological Research 108: 1042–1052.  
  8. ^ a b c d e Verbeken A, Stubbe D, van de Putte K, Eberhardt U, Nuytinck J. (2014). "Tales of the unexpected: angiocarpous representatives of the Russulaceae in tropical South East Asia". Persoonia 32: 13–24.  
  9. ^ a b c Verbeken A, Nuytinck J. (2013). "Lactarius"Not every milkcap is a (PDF). Scripta Botanica Belgica 51: 162–168. 
  10. ^ Buyck B, Verbeken A. (1995). "Studies in tropical African Lactarius species, 2: Lactarius chromospermus Pegler". Mycotaxon 56: 427–442. 
  11. ^ Kirk PM. "Species Fungorum (version September 2014). In: Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life". Retrieved 2014-09-27. 
  12. ^ a b "Lactifluus and Lactarius"Contrasting evolutionary patterns in two sister genera of macrofungi: . Retrieved 2014-09-27. 
  13. ^ a b c d e Courtecuisse R, Duhem B. (2013). Champignons de France et d'Europe. Guide Delachaux (in French). Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé.  
  14. ^ a b c Eyssartier G, Roux P. (2011). Le guide des champignons: France et Europe (in French). Paris: Editions Belin.  
  15. ^ a b Kuo M. (2011). "Lactarius"MushroomExpert.com: The genus . Retrieved 2014-09-28. 
  16. ^ a b c d Verbeken A, Buyck B. (2002). Diversity and ecology of tropical ectomycorrhizal fungi in Africa. In: Tropical Mycology: Macromycetes (eds. Watling R, Frankland JC, Ainsworth AM, Isaac S, Robinson CH.) (PDF). pp. 11–21. 
  17. ^ a b Le HT, Stubbe D, Verbeken A, Nuytinck J, Lumyong S, & Desjardin DE (2007). "Plinthogali subgenus Lactarius in Northern Thailand: 2. Lactarius" (PDF). Fungal Diversity 27: 61–94. 
  18. ^ a b Halling RE, Mueller GM. (2002). Agarics and boletes of neotropical oakwoods. In: Tropical Mycology: Macromycetes (eds. Watling R, Frankland JC, Ainsworth AM, Isaac S, Robinson CH.) (PDF). pp. 1–10. 
  19. ^ a b Miller OK Jr, Hilton RN. (1986). "New and interesting agarics from Western Australia" (PDF). Sydowia 39: 126–137. 
  20. ^ Vellinga EC, Wolfe BE, Pringle A. (2009). "Global patterns of ectomycorrhizal introductions". New Phytologist 181 (4): 960–973.  
  21. ^ Sà MCA, Baseia IG, Wartchow F. (2013). "Checklist of Russulaceae from Brazil" (PDF). Mycotaxon: online 125: 303. 
  22. ^ Dunstan WA, Dell B, Malajczuk. (1998). "The diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with introduced Pinus spp. in the Southern Hemisphere, with particular reference to Western Australia". Mycorrhiza 8 (2): 71–79.  
  23. ^ McNabb RFR. (1971). DC ex S. F. Gray"Lactarius"The Russulaceae of New Zealand 1. . New Zealand Journal of Botany 9: 46–66.  
  24. ^ Rinaldi AC, Comandini O, Kuyper TW. (2008). "Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity: separating the wheat from the chaff" (PDF). Fungal Diversity 33: 1–45. 
  25. ^ Geml J, Laursen GA, Timling I, McFarland JM, Booth MG, Lennon N, Nusbaum C, Tayler DL. (2009). Pers. (Russulales; Basidiomycota) in Alaska, based on soil and sporocarp DNA"Lactarius"Molecular phylogenetic biodiversity assessment of arctic and boreal ectomycorrhizal (PDF). Molecular Ecology 18: 2213–2227.  
  26. ^ a b Comandini O, Contu M, Rinaldi AC. (2006). ectomycorrhizal fungi"Cistus"An overview of (PDF). Mycorrhiza 16 (6): 381–395.  
  27. ^ a b Nuytinck J, Verbeken A, Rinaldi AC, Leonardi M, Pacioni G, Comandini O. (2004). taxa"Lactarius sp. and molecular phylogeny of related European Cistus ectomycorrhizae on Lactarius tesquorum"Characterization of . Mycologia 96 (2): 272–282.  
  28. ^ Rochet J, Moreau P-A, Manzi S, Gardes M. (2011). "Comparative phylogenies and host specialization in the alder ectomycorrhizal fungi Alnicola, Alpova and Lactarius (Basidiomycota) in Europe". BMC Evolutionary Biology 11: 40.  
  29. ^ Visser S. (1995). "Ectomycorrhizal fungal succession in jack pine stands following wildfire". New Phytologist 129: 389–401.  
  30. ^ Twieg BD, Durall DM, Simard SW. (2007). "Ectomycorrhizal fungal succession in mixed temperate forests". New Phytologist 176 (2): 437–447.  
  31. ^ Härkonen M. (2002). Mushroom collecting in Tanzania and Hunan (Southern China): Inherited wisdom and folklore of two different cultures. In: Tropical Mycology: Macromycetes (eds. Watling R, Frankland JC, Ainsworth AM, Isaac S, Robinson CH.) (PDF). pp. 149–165. 
  32. ^ a b Suortti T, von Wright A, Koskinen A. (1983). "Necatorin, a highly mutagenic compound from Lactarius necator". Phytochemistry 22: 2873–2874.  
  33. ^ Veteläinen M, Huldén M, Pehu T. (2008). State of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture in Finland. Second Finnish National Report (PDF). Country Report on the State of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (Report) (Sastamala, Finland: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry): 14. 
  34. ^ Guerin-Laguette A., Cummings N., Butler R.C., Willows A., Hesom- Williams N., Li S. & Wang Y. (2014). "Lactarius deliciosus and Pinus radiata in New Zealand: towards the development of innovative gourmet mushroom orchards". Mycorrhiza 24: 511–523.  
  35. ^ "Edible Forest Fungi New Zealand". Retrieved 2014-09-28. 
  36. ^ Anke H, Bergendorff O, Sterner O. (1989). "Assays of the biological activities of guaiane sesquiterpenoids isolated from the fruit bodies of edible Lactarius species". Food and Chemical Toxicology 27 (6): 393–397.  
  37. ^ Rapior S, Fons F, Bessière J-M. (2000). "The fenugreek odor of Lactarius helvus". Mycologia 92: 305–308.  
  38. ^ Wood WF, Brandes JA, Foy BD, Morgan CG, Mann TD, DeShazer DA. (2012). "The maple syrup odour of the "candy cap" mushroom, Lactarius fragilis var. rubidus". Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 43: 51–53.  
  39. ^ Yang X-L, Luo D-Q, Dong Z-J, Liu J-K (2006). "Lactarius deliciosus"Two new pigments from the fruiting bodies of the basidiomycete (PDF). Helvetica Chimica Acta 89: 988–990.  
  40. ^ Harmon AD, Weisgraber KH, Weiss U. (1979). "Preformed azulene pigments of Lactarius indigo (Schw.) Fries (Russulaceae, Basidiomycetes)". Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 36: 54–56.  

External links

  • North American species of Lactarius by L. R. Hesler and Alexander H. Smith, 1979 (full text of monograph).
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.