World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Libertarian perspectives on intellectual property

Article Id: WHEBN0000215674
Reproduction Date:

Title: Libertarian perspectives on intellectual property  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Libertarianism, Minarchism, Agorism, Creative Commons, Law of equal liberty
Collection: Controversies Within Libertarianism, Economics of Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Activism, Intellectual Property Law
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Libertarian perspectives on intellectual property

Libertarians have differing opinions on the validity of intellectual property.


  • Political parties 1
  • Anarcho-capitalist views 2
  • Left-libertarian views 3
  • Ayn Rand's views 4
  • References 5

Political parties

The Libertarian Party of Canada takes "a moderate approach to patents and copyrights", calling for "a careful review of existing and proposed legislation".[1]

Anarcho-capitalist views

Since anarcho-capitalists oppose the existence of even a minimal state, this ideological framework requires that any functions served by intellectual property law promulgation and enforcement be provided through private sector institutions.

Murray Rothbard argues for allowing contractually arising infinite copyright terms and against the need for any government role in protecting intellectual property.[2] He states that government's involvement in defining arbitrary limits on the duration, scope, etc. of intellectual property in order to "promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts" is inherently problematic, since "By what standard do you judge that research expenditures are 'too much,' 'too little,' or just about enough?" He argues that intellectual property laws can actually hinder innovation, since competitors can be indefinitely discouraged from further research expenditures in the general area covered by the patent because the courts may hold their improvements as infringements on the previous patent, and the patent holder is discouraged from engaging in further research in this field because the privilege discourages his improvement of his invention for the entire period of the patent, with the assurance that no competitor can trespass on his domain.[3]

Morris and Linda Tannehill propose that ideas in the form of inventions could be registered in a privately owned "data bank"; the inventor could then buy insurance against the theft and unauthorized commercial use of the invention, and the insurance company would guarantee to not only compensate the inventor for any losses suffered due to such infringement but to stop such unauthorized use.[4]

Opponents to intellectual property rights include Wendy McElroy,[5] Tom G. Palmer,[6] Henri Lepage, Boudewijn Bouckaert, Jeffrey Tucker, and N. Stephan Kinsella.[7] Kinsella points out in Against Intellectual Property that patents may be inefficient since they divert resources from research and development to patent filing and lawsuits. He notices that theoretical research can not be patented as easily as practical research and thus theoretical research is relatively underfunded. Moreover, he argues that property rights can only apply to resources that are scarce, which intellectual property is not. Kinsella also claims that the only way that intellectual property rights can be implemented is by limiting others' physical property rights.[8]

David D. Friedman takes a neutral stance on intellectual property, claiming "there are good arguments on both sides of that question".[9]

Left-libertarian views

Roderick T. Long argues that the concept of intellectual property is not libertarian. He holds that prohibiting people from using, reproducing, and trading copyrighted material is an infringement of freedom of speech and freedom of the press, and that since information exists in people's minds and other people's property, one cannot own information without owning other people. Claiming that authors and publishers will continue to produce absent copyright protection, he cites the fact that hundreds of thousands of articles are uploaded onto the Internet by their authors every day, available to anyone in the world for free and that nearly all works written before the 20th century are in the public domain, yet pre-1900 works are still published and sold.[10]

Benjamin Tucker, opposing intellectual property, writes, "...the patent monopoly...consists in protecting inventors...against competition for a period long enough to extort from the people a reward enormously in excess of the labor measure of their services, – in other words, in giving certain people a right of property for a term of years in laws and facts of Nature, and the power to exact tribute from others for the use of this natural wealth, which should be open to all."[11]

Ayn Rand's views

Ayn Rand

, founder of Objectivism, supported copyrights and patents, noting in Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal:[12]

She held that patent should be granted for limited terms only:


  1. ^
  2. ^ "Chapter 3-Triangular Intervention". Retrieved 2009-06-21. 
  3. ^ "Chapter 10—Monopoly and Competition (continued)". Retrieved 2009-06-21. 
  4. ^ Tannehill, Morris and Linda (1993). "Property – The Great Problem Solver". The Market for Liberty. San Francisco: Fox & Wilkes. pp. 58–59.  
  5. ^ McElroy, Wendy (2011). "Contra Copyright, Again" (PDF). Libertarian Papers 3 (12). 
  6. ^ Palmer, Tom G. (1990). "Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified? The Philosophy of Property Rights and Ideal Objects" (PDF). Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 13 (3). 
  7. ^ Bouillon, Hardy (2009). "A Note on Intellectual Property and Externalities". In Hülsmann, Jörg Guido; Kinsella, Stephan. Property, Freedom, and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Ludvig von Mises Institute. p. 157.  
  8. ^ Kinsella, N. Stephan (2008). Against Intellectual Property (PDF). Ludvig von Mises Institute.  
  9. ^
  10. ^ "The Libertarian Case Against Intellectual Property Rights". Retrieved 2009-06-21. 
  11. ^ Benjamin Tucker, Instead of a Book, By a Man Too Busy to Write One: A Fragmentary Exposition of Philosophical Anarchism (New York: Tucker, 1893), p. 13.
  12. ^  
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.