World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Local access and transport area

Article Id: WHEBN0000041328
Reproduction Date:

Title: Local access and transport area  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Modification of Final Judgment, Area codes 978 and 351, Telcordia LERG Routing Guide, Area code 314, Area code 618
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Local access and transport area

Map of LATAs in the US

Local access and transport area (LATA) is a term used in U.S. telecommunications regulation. It represents a geographical area of the United States under the terms of the Modification of Final Judgment (MFJ) entered by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in Civil Action number 82-0192 or any other geographic area designated as a LATA in the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. Tariff FCC No. 4. that precipitated the breakup of the original AT&T into the "Baby Bells" or created since that time for wireline regulation.

Generally, a LATA represents an area within which a divested Regional Bell operating company (RBOC) is permitted to offer exchange telecommunications and exchange access services. Under the terms of the MFJ, the RBOCs are generally prohibited from providing services that originate in one LATA and terminate in another.

LATA boundaries tend to be drawn around markets, and not necessarily along existing state, province, or even area code borders. Some LATAs cross over state boundaries, such as those for the New York metropolitan area and Greenwich, Connecticut; Chicago, Illinois; Portland, Oregon; and areas between Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia. Area codes and LATAs do not necessarily share boundaries; many LATAs exist in multiple area codes, and many area codes exist in multiple LATAs.

Originally, the LATAs were grouped into regions within which one particular RBOC was allowed to provide services. The LATAs in each of these regions are numbered beginning with the same digit. Generally the LATAs were associated with carriers or other indications in the following manner:

Digit Area/Use RBOC
0xx unused
1xx New York & New England NYNEX (now Verizon and FairPoint)
2xx Mid-Atlantic Bell Atlantic (now Verizon and Frontier)
3xx Great Lakes Ameritech (now AT&T Inc.)
4xx Southeast BellSouth (now AT&T Inc.)
5xx South-central Southwestern Bell (now AT&T Inc.)
6xx Pacific Northwest, Midwest, and Rocky Mountains US West (now CenturyLink)
7xx California and Nevada Pacific Bell (now AT&T Inc.)
8xx Non-contiguous and international areas
9xx Other/Expansion

In addition to this list, two local carriers were made independent: Cincinnati Bell in the Cincinnati area, and SNET (now a unit of AT&T Inc., but in the process of being sold to Frontier) in Connecticut. These were assigned LATAs in the 9xx range.

Since the breakup of the original AT&T in 1984, however, some amount of deregulation, as well as a number of phone company mergers, have blurred the significance of these regions. A number of new LATAs have been formed within these regions since their inception, most beginning with the digit 9.

LATAs contribute to an often confusing aspect of long distance telephone service. Due to the various and overlapping regulatory limitations and inter-business arrangements, phone companies typically provide differing types of “long distance” service, each with potentially different rates:

  • within same LATA, within same state
  • within same LATA, between different states
  • between different LATAs, within same state
  • between different LATAs, between different states

Given the complexity of the legal and financial issues involved in each distinction, many long distance companies tend to not explain the details of these different rates, which can lead to billing questions from surprised customers.

In addition, since the term LATA is itself a mouthful, local carriers make up various terms for it, such as “Service Area” by Pacific Bell in California, or “Regional Calling Area” by Verizon in Maryland.

In order to facilitate the sharing of Telcordia telephone routing databases between countries, LATAs were later defined for the provinces of Canada, the other countries and territories of the North American Numbering Plan, and Mexico. Aside from U.S. territories, LATAs have no regulatory purpose in these areas. In 2000, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission eliminated all Canadian provincial LATAs in favor of a single LATA for Canada (888).

No LATAs exist with a second digit of 0 or 1, which distinguished them from traditional area codes.


  • List of LATAs 1
    • US state LATAs 1.1
      • Alabama 1.1.1
      • Alaska 1.1.2
      • Arizona 1.1.3
      • Arkansas 1.1.4
      • California 1.1.5
      • Colorado 1.1.6
      • Connecticut 1.1.7
      • Delaware 1.1.8
      • Washington, D.C. 1.1.9
      • Florida 1.1.10
      • Georgia 1.1.11
      • Hawaii 1.1.12
      • Idaho 1.1.13
      • Illinois 1.1.14
      • Indiana 1.1.15
      • Iowa 1.1.16
      • Kansas 1.1.17
      • Kentucky 1.1.18
      • Louisiana 1.1.19
      • Maine 1.1.20
      • Maryland 1.1.21
      • Massachusetts 1.1.22
      • Michigan 1.1.23
      • Minnesota 1.1.24
      • Mississippi 1.1.25
      • Missouri 1.1.26
      • Montana 1.1.27
      • Nebraska 1.1.28
      • Nevada 1.1.29
      • New Hampshire 1.1.30
      • New Jersey 1.1.31
      • New Mexico 1.1.32
      • New York 1.1.33
      • North Carolina 1.1.34
      • North Dakota 1.1.35
      • Ohio 1.1.36
      • Oklahoma 1.1.37
      • Oregon 1.1.38
      • Pennsylvania 1.1.39
      • Rhode Island 1.1.40
      • South Carolina 1.1.41
      • South Dakota 1.1.42
      • Tennessee 1.1.43
      • Texas 1.1.44
      • Utah 1.1.45
      • Vermont 1.1.46
      • Virginia 1.1.47
      • Washington 1.1.48
      • West Virginia 1.1.49
      • Wisconsin 1.1.50
      • Wyoming 1.1.51
    • U.S. territory LATAs 1.2
    • Non-U.S. LATAs (non-regulatory) 1.3
  • Canada 2
    • Local interconnection region 2.1
  • See also 3
  • Notes 4
  • External links 5

List of LATAs

US state LATAs

The city or place name given with some LATAs is the name given to identify the LATA, not the limit of its boundary. Generally this is the most significant metropolitan area in the LATA. In some cases a LATA is named after the largest phone exchange in the LATA that was historically served by an RBOC. For example, the largest city in the Pahrump LATA in Nevada is Las Vegas. Since Las Vegas was not historically served by an RBOC, the LATA is named after the smaller town of Pahrump, which was historically served by Nevada Bell (now AT&T Inc.). Also, listing under a state does not necessarily limit the LATA's territory to that state; there may be overlaps as well as enclaves. Areas that include notable portions of other states are explained, but not all LATA state overlaps may be detailed.

LATA boundaries are not always solidly defined. Inter-carrier agreements, change proposals to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and new wiring developments into rural areas can and do often alter the effective borders between LATAs. Many sources on LATA boundary information conflict with each other at detailed levels. Telcordia data may provide the most up-to-date details of LATA inclusions.



  • 832






  • 920


  • 228 [1]

Washington, D.C.


Map of FL 5-digit LATAs
  • Florida is a special case in which state regulators have also assigned 5-digit LATA codes which overlay the Federally-assigned 3-digit LATAs. See map on the right for details. Some carriers may refer to these by the 3-digit LATA, others by the 5-digit.



  • 834









  • 120



  • 126 Western Massachusetts
  • 128 Eastern Massachusetts





  • 520 St. Louis
    • Includes part of south-central Illinois southwest of Springfield.
  • 521 Westphalia
  • 522 Springfield
  • 524 Kansas City
    • Includes eastern portion of Kansas as far out as U.S. 73 and U.S. 59 and south as far as U.S. 54
  • 573 Central Missouri: Columbia and surrounding areas


  • 648 Great Falls
  • 650 Billings
  • 963 Kalispell (historical)
    • note: LATA 963 appears on many LATA lists, and at least one map, but is no longer a separate LATA-equivalent area. It is now part of LATA 648.



New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

  • 664

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota





Rhode Island

  • 130 Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

  • 640







West Virginia


  • 350 Northeast Wisconsin
  • 352 Northwest Wisconsin
  • 354 Southwest Wisconsin
  • 356 Southeast Wisconsin


  • 654

U.S. territory LATAs

Non-U.S. LATAs (non-regulatory)


As LATAs exist for US regulatory purposes, where they serve as a demarcation between intra-LATA calls (handled by regional Bell operating companies) and inter-LATA calls (handled by interstate long distance carriers such as AT&T), they have no legal significance in Canada.

As of 2000, all of Canada (except for non-geographic numbers) is identified as LATA 888.

The use of this LATA set to identify individual provinces is therefore deprecated:

Local interconnection region

Canada does define local interconnection regions (LIR's), which determine where points of interconnection (POI) must be provided by competing local exchange and mobile carriers to provide local number portability.[4] A Canadian LIR is geographically smaller than a US LATA, typically comparable in size to a small city's flat-rate local calling area or to an entire large regional municipality. In areas where a small-city Digital Multiplex System controls a group of remote switching centres, one for each surrounding village, the local interconnect region normally includes each exchange in the city plus all downstream remotes of those exchanges.[5] In a Toronto-sized city, the LIR will include only the city itself.

While the LIRs resemble local calling areas in geographic size, there are some key differences:

  • LIR's normally do not include incumbent local independent telephone company exchanges in locations not opened to competition, where the independent numbers are currently not portable.
  • LIR's closely follow network topology, which often does not match a local flat-rate calling area as local calling is defined by arbitrary regulatory constructs.

One example: The tiny unincorporated village of Beebe Plain, divided by the Quebec-Vermont border, is served by +1-819-876 Rock Island, Quebec, Canada (a remote station controlled from Magog) and +1-802-873 Derby Line, Vermont, USA (a remote station controlled from St. Johnsbury). Magog and St. Johnsbury are both a long-distance call from anywhere in Beebe Plain, even though Canadian subscribers can place local calls to Sherbrooke, US subscribers can locally call Newport and an international call within the village is local. An LIR assignment which follows network topology places the Canadian remote station in Magog's LIR, not Sherbrooke's LIR.[6]

See also


  1. ^ a b LATA 228 includes all of Delaware as well as the metro area of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  2. ^ a b Half of LATA 636 occupies eastern North Dakota, the other half takes up the northwest quarter of Minnesota.
  3. ^ American Samoa entered the NANP in October 2004 and presumably was allocated a LATA by that time. Telcordia LERG data suggests that American Samoa uses LATA 884.
  4. ^
  5. ^ List of Canadian LIRs on
  6. ^ Rock Island QC on

External links

  • U.S. LATA map and list
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.