World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Maputo Protocol

Article Id: WHEBN0020676855
Reproduction Date:

Title: Maputo Protocol  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Inter-African Committee on Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children, Gender equality, International human rights instruments, Right to food, Human rights in Mauritania
Collection: 2003 in Mozambique, African Union Treaties, Treaties Concluded in 2003, Treaties Entered Into Force in 2005, Treaties of Angola, Treaties of Benin, Treaties of Burkina Faso, Treaties of Cameroon, Treaties of Cape Verde, Treaties of Djibouti, Treaties of Ghana, Treaties of Guinea-Bissau, Treaties of Kenya, Treaties of Lesotho, Treaties of Liberia, Treaties of Malawi, Treaties of Mali, Treaties of Mauritania, Treaties of Mozambique, Treaties of Namibia, Treaties of Nigeria, Treaties of Rwanda, Treaties of Senegal, Treaties of Seychelles, Treaties of South Africa, Treaties of Tanzania, Treaties of the Comoros, Treaties of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Treaties of the Gambia, Treaties of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Treaties of Togo, Treaties of Uganda, Treaties of Zambia, Treaties of Zimbabwe, Women's Rights in Africa, Women's Rights Instruments
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Maputo Protocol

Maputo Protocol
Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa
Type Human rights instrument (women)
Drafted March 1995 (Lome, Togo)[1]
Signed 11 July 2003
Location Maputo, Mozambique
Effective 25 November 2005
Condition Ratification by 15 nations of the African Union
Signatories 46
Parties 30
Depositary African Union Commission
Languages English, French

The Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, better known as the Maputo Protocol, guarantees comprehensive rights to women including the right to take part in the political process, to social and political equality with men, to control of their reproductive health, and an end to female genital mutilation.[2] As the name suggests, it was adopted by the African Union in the form of a protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.


  • Origins 1
  • Adoption and ratification 2
    • Signed by 2.1
    • Ratified by 2.2
    • Neither signed nor ratified by 2.3
    • Reservations 2.4
  • 3 Articles
  • Opposition 4
    • Christian opposition 4.1
    • Muslim opposition 4.2
  • See also 5
  • References 6
  • External links 7


Following on from recognition that women's rights were often marginalised in the context of human rights, a meeting organised by Women in Law and Development in Africa (WiLDAF) in March 1995, in Lomé, Togo called for the development of a specific protocol to the African Charter on Human and People's Rights to address the rights of women. The OAU assembly mandated the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR) to develop such a protocol at its 31st Ordinary Session in June 1995, in Addis Ababa.[3]

A first draft produced by an expert group of members of the ACHPR, representatives of African NGOs and international observers, organised by the ACHPR in collaboration with the International Commission of Jurists, was submitted to the ACHPR at its 22nd Session in October 1997, and circulated for comments to other NGOs.[3] Revision in co-operation with involved NGO's took place at different sessions from October to January, and in April 1998, the 23rd session of the ACHPR endorsed the appointment of Julienne Ondziel Gnelenga, a Congolese lawyer, as the first Special Rapporteur on Women's Rights in Africa, mandating her to work towards the adoption of the draft protocol on women's rights.[3] The OAU Secretariat received the completed draft in 1999, and in 2000 at Addis Ababa it was merged with the Draft Convention on Traditional Practices in a joint session of the Inter African Committee and the ACHPR.[3] After further work at experts meetings and conferences during 2001, the process stalled and the protocol was not presented at the inaugual summit of the AU in 2002.

In early 2003, African Union to adopt the protocol, and the protocol's text was brought up to international standards. The lobbying was successful, the African Union resumed the process and the finished document was officially adopted by the section summit of the African Union, on 11 July 2003.[3]

Adoption and ratification

Current map of the Maputo Protocol's ratification process.

The protocol was adopted by the African Union on 11 July 2003 at its second summit in Maputo, Mozambique.[4] On 25 November 2005, having been ratified by the required 15 member nations of the African Union, the protocol entered into force.[5]

Of the 53 member countries in the African Union, the heads of states of 46 countries signed the protocol, and As of July 2010, 28 of those countries had ratified and deposited the protocol.[6]

Signed by

Algeria, Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d'Ivoire, Comoros, Congo, Djibouti, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Kenya, Libya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Mali, Mozambique, Mauritius, Namibia, Nigeria, Niger, Rwanda, Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe

Ratified by

Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon,[7] Cape Verde, Comoros, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Libya, Lesotho, Liberia, Mali, Malawi, Mozambique, Mauritania, Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Seychelles, South Africa, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Kenya

Neither signed nor ratified by

Botswana, Egypt, Eritrea, Tunisia


At the Maputo Summit, several countries expressed reservations.[1]

Tunisia, Sudan, Kenya, Namibia and South Africa recorded reservations about some of the marriage clauses. Egypt, Libya, Sudan, South Africa and Zambia had reservations about "judicial separation, divorce and annulment of marriage." Burundi, Senegal, Sudan, Rwanda and Libya held reservations with Article 14, relating to the "right to health and control of reproduction." Libya expressed reservations about a point relating to conflicts.


The main articles are:

  • Article 2: Elimination of Discrimination Against Women
  • Article 3: Right to Dignity
  • Article 4: The Rights to Life, Integrity and Security of the Person
  • Article 5: Elimination of Harmful Practices
  • Article 6: Marriage
  • Article 7: Separation, Divorce and Annulment of Marriage
  • Article 8: Access to Justice and Equal Protection before the Law
  • Article 9: Right to Participation in the Political and Decision-Making Process
  • Article 10: Right to Peace
  • Article 11: Protection of Women in Armed Conflicts
  • Article 12: Right to Education and Training
  • Article 13: Economic and Social Welfare Rights
  • Article 14: Health and Reproductive Rights
  • Article 15: Right to Food Security
  • Article 16: Right to Adequate Housing
  • Article 17: Right to Positive Cultural Context
  • Article 18: Right to a Healthy and Sustainable Environment
  • Article 19: Right to Sustainable Development
  • Article 20: Widows' Rights
  • Article 21: Right to Inheritance
  • Article 22: Special Protection of Elderly Women
  • Article 23: Special Protection of Women with Disabilities
  • Article 24: Special Protection of Women in Distress
  • Article 25: Remedies


There are two particularly contentious factors driving opposition to the Protocol: its article on reproductive health, which is opposed mainly by Catholics and other Christians, and its articles on female genital mutilation, polygamous marriage and other traditional practices, which are opposed mainly by Muslims.

Christian opposition

Human Life International, describes it as "a Trojan horse for a radical agenda."[9]

In Uganda, the powerful Joint Christian Council opposed efforts to ratify the treaty on the grounds that Article 14, in guaranteeing abortion "in cases of sexual assault, rape, incest, and where the continued pregnancy endangers the mental and physical health of the mother or the life of the mother or the foetus," is incompatible with traditional Christian morality.[10] In an open letter to the government and people of Uganda in January 2006, the Catholic Bishops' Conference of Uganda set out their opposition to the ratification of the Maputo Protocol.[11] It was nevertheless ratified on 22 July 2010.[12]

Muslim opposition

In Niger, the Parliament voted 42 to 31, with 4 abstentions, against ratifying it in June 2006; in this Muslim country, several traditions banned or deprecated by the Protocol are common.[13] Nigerien Muslim women's groups in 2009 gathered in Niamey to protest what they called "the satanic Maputo protocols", specifying limits to marriage age of girls and abortion as objectionable.[14]

In Djibouti, however, the Protocol was ratified in February 2005 after a subregional conference on female genital mutilation called by the Djibouti government and No Peace Without Justice, at which the Djibouti Declaration on female genital mutilation was adopted. The document declares that the Koran does not support female genital mutilation, and on the contrary practising genital mutilation on women goes against the precepts of Islam.[15][16][17]

See also


  1. ^ a b AU Executive Council endorses protocol on women's rights, Panafrican News Agency (PANA) Daily Newswire, 7 September 2003
  2. ^ The Maputo Protocol of the African Union, brochure produced by GTZ for the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development
  3. ^ a b c d e Rights of Women in Africa: Launch of a Petition to the African Union, Mary Wandia, Pambazuka News 162; 24 June 2004, republished in "African Voices on Development and Social Justice Editorial from Pambazuka News 2004" by Firoze Manji (Ed.) and Patrick Burnett (Ed.), Mkuki na Nyota Publishers, Tanzania, ISBN 978-9987-417-35-3
  4. ^ African Union: Rights of Women Protocol Adopted, press release, Amnesty International, 22 July 2003
  5. ^ UNICEF: toward ending female genital mutilation, press release, UNICEF, 7 February 2006
  6. ^ List of countries which have Signed, Ratified/Acceded the Maputo Protocol, African Union official website
  7. ^ Mforgham, Solomon Tembang (5 July 2009). "Abortion, homosexual row erupt in Cameroon". Africa News. Retrieved 2009-07-17. 
  8. ^ Pope to diplomats: Respect for rights, desires is only path to peace, 8 January 2007, Catholic News Service
  9. ^ Marking The International Day of Women, 8 March 2008, Vatican Radio
  10. ^ Rights Treaty in Uganda Snags on 'African Values', Women's eNews, 2 June 2008
  11. ^ Open Letter to the Government and People of Uganda Concerning the Ratification of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human Rights and Peoples' Right: On the Rights of Women in Africa, Catholic Bishops' Conference of Uganda, document hosted at Eternal Word Television Network
  12. ^!
  13. ^ Niger MPs reject protocol on women's rights, Independent Online, 6 June 2006
  14. ^ JOURNÉE NATIONALE DE LA FEMME NIGÉRIENNE: Les femmes musulmanes s’opposent aux ‘’textes sataniques’’ relatifs à la femme. Mamane Abdou, Roue de l’Histoire (Niamey) n° 456. 14 May 2009.
  15. ^ Djibouti ratifies the Maputo Protocol against the practice. Conference in Djibouti affirms Koran says nothing about it, WADI
  16. ^ DJIBOUTI: Anti-FGM protocol ratified but huge challenges remain, 14 December 2008, IRIN
  17. ^ Second Thematic Session Third Report – Le Protocole de Maputo, French, recording announcement of the Djibouti government's imminent intention to ratify the Maputo Protocol, No Peace Without Justice, 2 February 2005

External links

  • Treaties and protocols of the African Union – African Union official website
  • The Maputo Protocol in the news,, the website of the International Campaign for the Abandonment of Female Genital Mutilation
  • Page on the protocol at the official ACHPR website.
  • Maputo Protocol text
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.