World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

More popular than Jesus

"More popular than Jesus" (or "Bigger than Jesus")[1] was a controversial remark made by the Beatles' John Lennon in 1966. Lennon said that Christianity was in decline and that the Beatles had become more popular than Jesus Christ. The comment drew no controversy when originally published in the United Kingdom, but angry reactions flared up in Christian communities when it was republished in the United States five months later.

Lennon had originally made the remark in March 1966 during an interview with Maureen Cleave for the London Evening Standard, which drew no public reaction. When Datebook, a US teen magazine, quoted Lennon's comments in August, five months later, extensive protests broke out in the Southern United States. Some radio stations stopped playing Beatles songs, their records were publicly burned, press conferences were cancelled, and threats were made. The controversy coincided with the group's US tour in August 1966, and Lennon and Brian Epstein attempted to quell the dispute at a series of press conferences. Some tour events experienced disruption and intimidation, including a picketing by the Ku Klux Klan. The controversy contributed to the Beatles' lack of interest in public live performances, and the US tour was the last they undertook, after which they became a studio-only band.


  • Background 1
  • Response in the US 2
  • Aftermath 3
  • Other mentions 4
  • See also 5
  • References 6


John Lennon at JFK Airport, New York, in February 1964, two years before the controversy

In March 1966, the Paul McCartney respectively. The articles were completed by journalist Maureen Cleave,[3] who knew the group well and had interviewed them regularly since the start of Beatlemania in the UK. Three years previously she had written they were "the darlings of Merseyside",[3] and had accompanied them on the plane on the group's first US tour in February 1964.[3][4] For her lifestyle series in March 1966, she chose to interview the group individually, rather than all together, as was the norm.[3]

Cleave interviewed Lennon on 4 March 1966. At his home, Aldous Huxley,[2] and The Passover Plot, by Hugh J. Schonfield, which had influenced Lennon's ideas about Christianity.[6] Cleave's article mentioned that Lennon was "reading extensively about religion",[2] and quoted a comment he made:

Christianity will go. It will vanish and shrink. I needn't argue about that; I'm right and I'll be proved right. We're more popular than Jesus now; I don't know which will go first—rock 'n' roll or Christianity. Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. It's them twisting it that ruins it for me.[2][7]

Cleave's interview with Lennon was published in the Evening Standard in March 1966 and provoked no public reaction in the UK.[8] Church attendance there was in decline and the Christian churches were making no secret of their efforts to transform their image into something more relevant to modern times.[8] Music historian Jonathan Gould wrote, "The satire comedians had had a field day with the increasingly desperate attempts of the Church to make itself seem more relevant ('Don't call me vicar, call me Dick ...')."[8] In 1963, the Anglican Bishop of Woolwich, John A. T. Robinson, published a controversial but popular book, Honest to God, urging the nation to reject traditional church teachings on morality and the concept of God as an "old man in the sky", and instead embrace a universal ethic of love.[8] Bryan R. Wilson's 1966 text Religion in Secular Society explained that increasing secularization led to British churches being abandoned. However, in the US, churches remained popular.[9]

Both McCartney and Harrison had been baptised in the Roman Catholic Church, but neither of them followed Christianity.[10] At the start of Beatlemania, the group came into contact with the Revd Ronald Gibbons, who told reporters that a Beatles version of "O Come All Ye Faithful" might provide the Church of England with "the very shot in the arm it needs".[8]

Response in the US

The day after Cleave's article appeared in the Evening Standard, Beatles press officer Tony Barrow offered Datebook, a US teen magazine, rights to all four interviews. Barrow believed the pieces were important to show fans that the Beatles were progressing beyond simple pop music and producing more intellectually challenging work. As Datebook had already run pieces on fashion designer Mary Quant and on the effects of LSD, it seemed like a suitable vehicle to carry this information.[11]

In late July 1966, nearly five months after UK publication, Datebook republished the interviews. However, art editor Art Unger decided to deliberately put Lennon's quote about Christianity on its front cover, cutting the prose before it.[12][13] In

  • Cross, Craig (2005). The Beatles: Day-by-Day, Song-by-Song, Record-by-Record.  
  • Cadogan, Patrick (2008). The Revolutionary Artist: John Lennon's Radical Years. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.  
  • Gould, Jonathan (2008). Can't Buy Me Love: The Beatles, Britain and America.  
  • Hewitt, Paolo (2012). Love Me Do: 50 Great Beatles Moments. Quercus.  
  • Huq, Rupa (2007). Beyond Subculture: Pop, Youth and Identity in a Postcolonial World. Routledge.  
  • Ingham, Chris (2003). The Rough Guide to The Beatles.  
  • Jones, Jack (1992). Let Me Take You Down: Inside the Mind of Mark David Chapman, the Man Who Killed John.  
  • Lewisohn, Mark (1992). The Complete Beatles Chronicle:The Definitive Day-By-Day Guide To The Beatles' Entire Career (2010 ed.). Chicago Review Press.  
  • Pawlowski, Gareth L (1990). How They Became The Beatles. McDonald & Co.  
  • Womack, Kenneth; Davis, Todd (2012). Reading the Beatles: Cultural Studies, Literary Criticism, and the Fab Four. SUNY Press.  

Cited sources

  1. ^ Womack & Davis 2012, p. 103.
  2. ^ a b c d Gould 2008, pp. 308–309.
  3. ^ a b c d e Gould 2008, p. 307.
  4. ^ Pawlowski 1990, p. 175.
  5. ^ Harry 2000, p. 449.
  6. ^ Cadogan 2008, p. 4.
  7. ^ a b Cleave, Maureen (5 October 2005). "The John Lennon I knew". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 5 August 2014. 
  8. ^ a b c d e Gould 2008, p. 342.
  9. ^ Brown, Callum G.; Snape, Michael Francis, eds. (2010). Secularisation in the Christian World: Essays in Honour of Hugh McLeod. Ashgate Publishing. p. 205.  
  10. ^ a b c Pisa, Nick (11 April 2010). "Vatican forgives The Beatles for 'bigger than Jesus' comment". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 5 August 2014. 
  11. ^ Hewitt 2012, p. 82.
  12. ^ a b c d e Hewitt 2012, p. 83.
  13. ^ Chittenden, Maurice (23 November 2008). "John Lennon forgiven for Jesus claim". The Sunday Times. Retrieved 2 June 2011. (subscription required (help)). 
  14. ^ a b c d Gould 2008, pp. 340–341.
  15. ^ Cross 2005, p. 176.
  16. ^ a b c d e f g Gould 2008, pp. 346–347.
  17. ^ "South Africa Squashes Beatles".  
  18. ^ Hewitt 2012, p. 84.
  19. ^ Miles 1997, p. 293.
  20. ^ Miles 1997, p. 295.
  21. ^ Hewitt 2012, p. 85.
  22. ^ Wiener 1991, p. 12.
  23. ^ Wiener 1991, p. 11.
  24. ^ Cross 2005, p. 622.
  25. ^ Spangler, Jay (19 August 1966). "Beatles Interview: Memphis, Tennessee". Beatles Interviews. Retrieved 2 June 2011. 
  26. ^ MacDonald 2005, pp. 212–213.
  27. ^ MacDonald 2005, p. 213.
  28. ^ Lewisohn 1992, pp. 350–351.
  29. ^ Harry 2000, p. 412.
  30. ^ a b Huq 2007, p. 143.
  31. ^ Itzkoff, Dave (12 April 2010). "Vatican Gets Around to Praising the Beatles". The New York Times. Retrieved 3 August 2011. 
  32. ^ "Vatican "Forgives" Beatles; Ringo Starr Says Bugger Off". 15 April 2010. Retrieved 3 August 2011. 
  33. ^ Han, Phil (12 April 2010). "'"Ringo Starr: 'Vatican has more to talk about than the Beatles. CNN. Retrieved 3 August 2011. 
  34. ^ "Vatican newspaper responds to Ringo Starr's dismissal of Beatles coverage"., Catholic World News. 14 April 2010. Retrieved 18 November 2013.
  35. ^ Smith, Nathan (August 10, 2012). "Seriously: Are the Beatles More Popular Than Jesus?".  
  36. ^ Cross 2005, p. 233.
  37. ^ a b c Ingham 2003, p. 262.
  38. ^ Wynne-Jones, Jonathan (12 July 2008). "Bigger than Jesus? The Beatles were a Christian band". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 1 August 2012. 
  39. ^ Cross 2005, p. 296.
  40. ^ "Lennon Won't Play Jesus".  
  41. ^ Wiener 1991, p. 6.
  42. ^ Cook, Dana (8 December 2005). "Imagine all the people". Salon Media Group, Inc. Retrieved 5 July 2011. 
  43. ^ Wiener 1991, p. 161.
  44. ^ Jones 1992, p. 115.
  45. ^ Jones 1992, p. 118.


  1. ^ Although "Bigger than Jesus" has been used in analysis of the controversy,[1] the specific words used were "more popular than Jesus".[2]



See also

Lennon was murdered on 8 December 1980 by Mark David Chapman, who had become a born-again Christian in 1970[44] and was incensed by Lennon's "more popular than Jesus" remark, calling it blasphemy. He later stated that he was further enraged by the songs "God" and "Imagine"—even singing the latter with the altered lyric: "Imagine John Lennon dead".[45]

On 3 December 1969,[39] Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice asked Lennon to play the part of Jesus in the stage production of Jesus Christ Superstar, which he declined,[37] although he said he would have been interested if Ono could play the part of Mary Magdalene.[40] Lennon mentioned Jesus again in his 1970 song, "God", singing, "I don't believe in Jesus", but also sang that he did not believe in the Bible, Buddha, Gita, and the Beatles.[41] While living in Los Angeles with May Pang, Lennon once said to DJ Wolfman Jack, "To boogie or not to boogie, that is the Christian."[42] Critics of Lennon's lyrics also focused the line "Imagine there's no heaven" on Lennon's 1971 song, "Imagine".[43]

On 18 May 1968, Lennon summoned the other Beatles to a meeting at Apple Corps to announce that he was the living reincarnation of Jesus: "I have something very important to tell you all. I am Jesus Christ. I'm back again."[36] The meeting was adjourned for lunch and Lennon never mentioned the subject again.[37] In May 1969, Lennon and McCartney recorded "The Ballad of John and Yoko", with Lennon singing the lines, "Christ, you know it ain't easy, You know how hard it can be, The way things are going, They're gonna crucify me."[37] In a BBC interview a few months later, Lennon called himself "One of Christ's biggest fans", talked about the Church of England, his vision of heaven, and unhappiness over being unable to marry Yoko Ono in church.[38]

Other mentions

In 2012, the Houston Press music blog compared several aspects of popular media and concluded Jesus is more popular than the Beatles.[35]

In response to the statement, Starr said "Didn't the Vatican say we were [34] In 2010, Starr said that he had now found religion, adding, "For me, God is in my life ... I think the search has been on since the 1960s."[10]

"The remark by John Lennon, which triggered deep indignation, mainly in the United States, after many years sounds only like a 'boast' by a young working-class Englishman faced with unexpected success, after growing up in the legend of Elvis and rock and roll. The fact remains that 38 years after breaking up, the songs of the Lennon-McCartney brand have shown an extraordinary resistance to the passage of time, becoming a source of inspiration for more than one generation of pop musicians."[31]

In a 2008 article marking the 40th anniversary of the Beatles' double album The Beatles (also known as the "White Album"), the Vatican newspaper, L'Osservatore Romano, issued the statement:

In 1993, Michael Medved wrote in The Sunday Times that "today, comments like Lennon's could never cause controversy; a contemptuous attitude to religion is all but expected from all mainstream pop performers."[30] In 1997, Noel Gallagher claimed that his band Oasis were "bigger than God", but reaction was minimal.[30]

Lennon was asked about the controversy three years later during a trip to Canada, in 1969. He repeated his opinion that the Beatles were more influential on young people than Christ, adding that some ministers had agreed with him. He called the protestors in the US "fascist Christians", saying he was "very big on Christ. I've always fancied him. He was right."[29] In 1978, he thanked Jesus for an end to the Beatles' touring, saying "if I hadn't said [that] and upset the very Christian Ku Klux Klan, well, Lord, I might still be up there with all the other performing fleas! God bless America. Thank you, Jesus."[7]


The group hated the tour, partly due to the controversy and adverse reaction from Lennon's comments, and were unhappy about Epstein continuing to organise live performances that were increasingly at odds with their studio work.[26] Harrison seriously contemplated leaving the band, but was persuaded to stay on the condition that the Beatles would from now on be a studio-only group.[27] After a break, they reconvened to record Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, which drew strong commercial success and critical praise when released in June 1967.[28]

The [25] which led the group to believe they were the target of gunfire.[16]

When the tour began, it was marred by protests and disturbances.[16] Telephone threats were received, and concerts were picketed by the Ku Klux Klan.[16] Daily Express writer Robert Pitman, responding to the US outcry, wrote, "It seems a nerve for Americans to hold up shocked hands, when week in, week out, America is exporting to us a subculture that makes the Beatles seem like four stern old churchwardens."[14] The reaction was also criticised in the US; a Kentucky radio station declared that it would give the Beatles' music airplay to show its "contempt for hypocrisy personified", and the Jesuit magazine America wrote: "Lennon was simply stating what many a Christian educator would readily admit".[14]

The Beatles left for their US tour on 11 August 1966. According to Lennon's wife, Cynthia, he was nervous and upset that he had made people angry simply by expressing his opinion.[12] The Beatles attended a press conference in Chicago, Illinois; Lennon did not want to apologise but was advised by Epstein and Barrow that he should.[18] Lennon quipped that "if I had said television was more popular than Jesus, I might have got away with it"[19] but stressed that he was simply remarking on how other people viewed and popularised the band. He described his own belief in God by quoting the Bishop of Woolwich, saying, "... not as an old man in the sky. I believe that what people call God is something in all of us."[16] Adamant that he was not comparing himself with Christ, he tried to explain the decline of Christianity in the UK. Pressed for an apology by a reporter, he said "if you want me to apologise, if that will make you happy, then OK, I'm sorry."[20] Journalists gave a sympathetic response, and told Lennon that the Bible Belt were "quite notorious for their Christian attitude."[21]

Epstein was so concerned by the reaction that he considered cancelling the group's upcoming US tour, believing they would be seriously harmed in some way.[16] He then flew to the US and held a press conference in New York City, where he publicly criticised Datebook, saying the magazine had taken Lennon's words out of context, and expressed regret on behalf of the group that "people with certain religious beliefs should have been offended in any way".[16] Epstein's efforts had little effect, as the controversy quickly spread beyond the borders of the US. In Mexico City there were demonstrations against the group, and a number of countries, including South Africa and Spain,[17] made the decision to ban the Beatles' music on national radio stations.[16] The Vatican issued a public denouncement of Lennon's comments.[10]

During the Beatles' performance at Mid-South Coliseum, Memphis, Tennessee, on 19 August 1966, a firecracker was set off onstage.


This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.