World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Moving parts

Article Id: WHEBN0002951168
Reproduction Date:

Title: Moving parts  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Mission of Burma, Roger Miller (rock musician), Birdsongs of the Mesozoic, Orient Watch, Martin Swope
Collection: MacHinery, Technology
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Moving parts

A model of an engine's moving parts

The moving parts of a machine are those parts of it that move. Machines include both moving (or movable) and fixed parts. The moving parts have controlled and constrained motions.[1][2]

Moving parts do not include any moving fluids, such as fuel, coolant or hydraulic fluid. Moving parts also do not include any mechanical locks, switches, nuts and bolts, screw caps for bottles etc. A system with no moving parts is described as "solid state".


  • Mechanical efficiency and wear 1
  • Failure 2
  • Kinetic energy of the moving parts of a machine 3
  • Representing moving parts in engineering diagrams 4
  • See also 5
  • References 6
  • Further reading 7

Mechanical efficiency and wear

The amount of moving parts in a machine is a factor in its mechanical efficiency. The greater the number of moving parts, the greater the amount of energy lost to heat by friction between those parts.[3] In a modern automobile engine, for example, roughly 7% of the total power obtained from burning the engine's fuel is lost to friction between the engine's moving parts.[4]

Conversely, the fewer the number of moving parts, the greater the efficiency. Machines with no moving parts at all can be very efficient. An electrical transformer, for example, has no moving parts, and its mechanical efficiency is generally above the 90% mark. (The remaining power losses in a transformer are from other causes, including loss to electrical resistance in the copper windings and hysteresis loss and eddy current loss in the iron core.)[5]

Two means are used for overcoming the efficiency losses caused by friction between moving parts. First, moving parts are lubricated. Second, the moving parts of a machine are designed so that they have a small amount of contact with one another. The latter, in its turn, comprises two approaches. A machine can be reduced in size, thereby quite simply reducing the areas of the moving parts that rub against one another; and the designs of the individual components can be modified, changing their shapes and structures to reduce or avoid contact with one another.[4]

Lubrication also reduces wear, as does the use of suitable materials. As moving parts wear out, this can affect the precision of the machine. Designers thus have to design moving parts with this factor in mind, ensuring that if precision over the lifetime of the machine is paramount, that wear is accounted for and, if possible, minimized. (A simple example of this is the design of a simple single-wheel wheelbarrow. A design where the axle is fixed to the barrow arms and the wheel rotates around it is prone to wear which quickly causes wobble, whereas a rotating axle that is attached to the wheel and that rotates upon bearings in the arms does not start to wobble as the axle wears through the arms.)[6]

The scientific and engineering discipline that deals with the lubrication, friction, and wear of moving parts is tribology, an interdisciplinary field that encompasses materials science, mechanical engineering, chemistry, and mechanics.[7]


As mentioned, wear is a concern for moving parts in a machine.[8] Other concerns that lead to failure include corrosion,[8] erosion,[8] thermal stress and heat generation,[8] vibration,[8] fatigue loading,[8] and cavitation.

Fatigue is related to large inertial forces, and is affected by the type of motion that a moving part has. A moving part that has a uniform rotation motion is subject to less fatigue than a moving part that oscillates back and forth. Vibration leads to failure when the forcing frequency of the machine's operation hits a resonant frequency of one or more moving parts, such as rotating shafts. Designers avoid this by calculating the natural frequencies of the parts at design time, and altering the parts to limit or eliminate such resonance.

Yet further factors that can lead to failure of moving parts include failures in the cooling and lubrication systems of a machine.[8]

One final, particular, factor related to failure of moving parts is kinetic energy. The sudden release of the kinetic energy of the moving parts of a machine causes overstress failures if a moving part is impeded in its motion by a foreign object, such as stone caught on the blades of a fan or propellor, or even the proverbial "spanner/monkey wrench in the works".[8] (See foreign object damage for further discussion of this.)

Kinetic energy of the moving parts of a machine

The kinetic energy of a machine is the sum of the kinetic energies of its individual moving parts. A machine with moving parts can, mathematically, be treated as a connected system of bodies, whose kinetic energies are simply summed. The individual kinetic energies are determined from the kinetic energies of the moving parts' translations and rotations about their axes.[9]

The kinetic energy of rotation of the moving parts can be determined by noting that every such system of moving parts can be reduced to a collection of connected bodies rotating about an instantaneous axis, which form either a ring or a portion of an ideal ring, of radius a rotating at n revolutions per second. This ideal ring is known as the equivalent flywheel, whose radius is the radius of gyration. The integral of the squares of the radii all the portions of the ring with respect to their mass \int a^2 dm, also expressible if the ring is modelled as a collection of discrete particles as the sum of the products of those mass and the squares of their radii \sum_{k=0}^n m_k \times a_k^2 is the ring's moment of inertia, denoted I. The rotational kinetic energy of the whole system of moving parts is \frac{1}{2} I \omega^2, where \omega is the angular velocity of the moving parts about the same axis as the moment of inertia.[9][10]

The kinetic energy of translation of the moving parts is \frac{1}{2} m v^2, where m is the total mass and v is the magnitude of the velocity. This gives the formula for the total kinetic energy of the moving parts of a machine as \frac{1}{2} I \omega^2 + \frac{1}{2} m v^2.[9][10]

Representing moving parts in engineering diagrams

This engineering diagram (illustrating the principle in kinematic design that using incorrect types/numbers of mechanical linkages can cause fixed parts to wobble[6]) shows the motion of the wobbling parts with a solid outline of the moving part in one position at one extremity of its motion and a phantom line outline of the part in the position at the other extremity.

In technical drawing, moving parts are, conventionally, designated by drawing the solid outline of the part in its main or initial position, with an added outline of the part in a secondary, moved, position drawn with a phantom line (a line comprising "dot-dot-dash" sequences of two short and one long line segments) outline.[11][12][13] These conventions are enshrined in several standards from the American National Standards Institute and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, including ASME Y14.2M published in 1979.[14]

In recent decades, the use of animation has become more practical and widespread in technical and engineering diagrams for the illustration of the motions of moving parts. Animation represents moving parts more clearly and enables them and their motions to be more readily visualized.[15] Furthermore, computer aided design tools allow the motions of moving parts to be simulated, allowing machine designers to determine, for example, whether the moving parts in a given design would obstruct one another's motion or collide by simple visual inspection of the (animated) computer model rather than by the designer performing a numerical analysis directly.[16][17]

See also


  1. ^ V B Bhandari (2001). Introduction to machine design. Tata McGraw-Hill. p. 1.  
  2. ^ Thomas Minchin Goodeve. The Elements of Mechanism (Read Books 2007 reprint ed.). London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts. p. 1.  
  3. ^ Alden J. Balmer (2008). Doc Fizzix Mousetrap Racers: The Complete Builder's Manual. Fox Chapel Publishing. p. 32.  
  4. ^ a b Steven T. Moeller (2002). Energy efficiency: issues and trends. Nova Publishers. p. 57.  
  5. ^ Trevor Linsley (2008). Advanced Electrical Installation Work (5th ed.). Newnes. p. 216.  
  6. ^ a b Edgar Bright Wilson (1952). An introduction to scientific research. Dover books explaining science (1991 reprint ed.). Courier Dover Publications. pp. 104–105,108.  
  7. ^ R. J. Wakelin (1974). "Tribology: The Friction, Lubrication, and Wear of Moving Parts". In Robert A. Huggins. Annual review of materials science 4. Annual Reviews, inc. p. 221.  
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h M. T. Todinov (2007). Risk-based reliability analysis and generic principles for risk reduction. Elsevier. pp. 208–209.  
  9. ^ a b c Russell C. Hibbeler (2009). Engineering Mechanics: Dynamics (12th ed.). Prentice Hall. pp. 457–458.  
  10. ^ a b James Henry Cotterill (1884). Applied Mechanics. An Elementary General Introduction to the Theory of Structures and Machines. With Diagrams, Illustrations, and Examples (Adegi Graphics LLC reprint ed.). London: Macmillan & Co. pp. 212–215.  
  11. ^ Jack Lo and David Pressman (2007). How to Make Patent Drawings: A Patent It Yourself Companion (5th ed.). Nolo. p. 226.  
  12. ^ David A. Madsen (2001). Engineering drawing and design. Delmar drafting series (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning. p. 48.  
  13. ^ Cecil Howard Jensen and Jay D. Helsel (1985). Fundamentals of engineering drawing (2nd ed.). Gregg Division, McGraw-Hill. p. 28.  
  14. ^ Paul H. Wright (2002). Introduction to engineering. Wiley Desktop Editions Series (3rd ed.). John Wiley and Sons. pp. 155–156,171.  
  15. ^ David L. Goetsch, William Chalk, John A. Nelson (1999). Technical drawing. Delmar technical graphics series (4th ed.). Cengage Learning. pp. 452, 456.  
  16. ^ Peter P. Comninos (1989). "Computer Graphics and Animation for Interior and Industrial Designers". In John Lansdown and Rae A. Earnshaw. Computers in art, design, and animation. Springer. pp. 216–217.  
  17. ^ Philip Steadman (1989). "Computer Assistance to the Design Process". In John Lansdown and Rae A. Earnshaw. Computers in art, design, and animation. Springer. p. 158.  

Further reading

  • "Line conventions and lettering". New York:  
  • "Method of diagramming for moving parts fluid controls".  
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.