World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Quantifier elimination

Article Id: WHEBN0002150441
Reproduction Date:

Title: Quantifier elimination  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Model theory, O-minimal theory, Cylindrical algebraic decomposition, Existential theory of the reals, Differentially closed field
Collection: Model Theory
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Quantifier elimination

Quantifier elimination is a concept of simplification used in mathematical logic, model theory, and theoretical computer science. One way of classifying formulas is by the amount of quantification. Formulae with less depth of quantifier alternation are thought of as being simpler, with the quantifier-free formulae as the simplest. A theory has quantifier elimination if for every formula \alpha, there exists another formula \alpha_{QF} without quantifiers that is equivalent to it (modulo the theory).

Contents

  • Examples 1
  • Algorithms and decidability 2
  • Related concepts 3
  • Basic ideas 4
  • History 5
  • See also 6
  • References 7

Examples

Examples of theories that have been shown decidable using quantifier elimination are Presburger arithmetic,[1] algebraically closed fields, real closed fields,[1][2] atomless Boolean algebras, term algebras, dense linear orders,[1] random graphs, Feature trees, as well as many of their combinations such as Boolean Algebra with Presburger arithmetic, and Term Algebras with Queues.

Quantifier eliminator for the theory of the real numbers as an ordered additive group is Fourier–Motzkin elimination; for the theory of the field of real numbers it is the Tarski–Seidenberg theorem.[1]

Quantifier elimination can also be used to show that "combining" decidable theories leads to new decidable theories. Such constructions include the Feferman-Vaught theorem and Term Powers.

Algorithms and decidability

If a theory has quantifier elimination, then a specific question can be addressed: Is there a method of determining \alpha_{QF} for each \alpha? If there is such a method we call it a quantifier elimination algorithm. If there is such an algorithm, then decidability for the theory reduces to deciding the truth of the quantifier-free sentences. Quantifier-free sentences have no variables, so their validity in a given theory can often be computed, which enables the use of quantifier elimination algorithms to decide validity of sentences.

Related concepts

Various model theoretic ideas are related to quantifier elimination, and there are various equivalent conditions.

Every theory with quantifier elimination is model complete.

A first-order theory T has quantifier elimination if and only if for any two models B and C of T and for any common substructure A of B and C, B and C are elementarily equivalent in the language of T augmented with constants from A. In fact, it is sufficient here to show that any sentence with only existential quantifiers have the same truth value in B and C.

Basic ideas

To show constructively that a theory has quantifier elimination, it suffices to show that we can eliminate an existential quantifier applied to a conjunction of literals, that is, show that each formula of the form:

\exists x. \bigwedge_{i=1}^n L_i

where each L_i is a literal, is equivalent to a quantifier-free formula. Indeed, suppose we know how to eliminate quantifiers from conjunctions of formulae, then if F is a quantifier-free formula, we can write it in disjunctive normal form

\bigvee_{j=1}^m \bigwedge_{i=1}^n L_{ij},

and use the fact that

\exists x. \bigvee_{j=1}^m \bigwedge_{i=1}^n L_{ij}

is equivalent to

\bigvee_{j=1}^m \exists x. \bigwedge_{i=1}^n L_{ij}.

Finally, to eliminate a universal quantifier

\forall x. F

where F is quantifier-free, we transform \lnot F into disjunctive normal form, and use the fact that \forall x. F is equivalent to \lnot \exists x. \lnot F.

History

In early model theory, quantifier elimination was used to demonstrate that various theories possess certain model-theoretic properties like decidability and completeness. A common technique was to show first that a theory admits elimination of quantifiers and thereafter prove decidability or completeness by considering only the quantifier-free formulas. This technique is used to show that Presburger arithmetic, i.e. the theory of the additive natural numbers, is decidable.

Theories could be decidable yet not admit quantifier elimination. Strictly speaking, the theory of the additive natural numbers did not admit quantifier elimination, but it was an expansion of the additive natural numbers that was shown to be decidable. Whenever a theory in a countable language is decidable, it is possible to extend its language with countably many relations to ensure that it admits quantifier elimination (for example, one can introduce a relation symbol for each formula).

Example: Nullstellensatz in ACF and DCF.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d Grädel, Erich; Kolaitis, Phokion G.; Libkin, Leonid; Maarten, Marx;  
  2. ^ Fried, Michael D.; Jarden, Moshe (2008). Field arithmetic. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge 11 (3rd revised ed.).  
  • Wilfrid Hodges. "Model Theory". Cambridge University Press. 1993.
  • Viktor Kuncak and Martin Rinard. "Structural Subtyping of Non-Recursive Types is Decidable". In Eighteenth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 2003.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.