World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article
 

Students for Free Culture

Students for Free Culture
Mission Promoting free culture among secondary education students and young people.[1]
Website http://freeculture.org/

Students for Free Culture, formerly known as FreeCulture.org, is an international student organization working to promote free culture ideals, such as cultural participation and access to information. It was inspired by the work of former Stanford, now Harvard, Law professor Lawrence Lessig, who wrote the book Free Culture, and it frequently collaborates with other prominent free culture NGOs, including Creative Commons, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Public Knowledge. Students for Free Culture has over 30 chapters on college campuses around the world,[2] and a history of grassroots activism.

Students for Free Culture is sometimes referred to as "FreeCulture", "the Free Culture Movement", and other variations on the "free culture" theme, but none of those are its official name. It is officially Students for Free Culture, as set for in the new bylaws that were ratified by its chapters on October 1, 2007, which changed its name from FreeCulture.org to Students for Free Culture.[3]

Contents

  • Goals 1
  • Purpose 2
  • History 3
    • Initial stirrings at Swarthmore College 3.1
    • The OPG v. Diebold case 3.2
    • FreeCulture.org launches at Swarthmore 3.3
    • Internet campaigns 3.4
    • An increased emphasis on local chapters 3.5
  • Structure 4
  • References 5
  • External links 6

Goals

Students for Free Culture has stated its goals in a "manifesto":

The mission of the Free Culture movement is to build a bottom-up, participatory structure to society and culture, rather than a top-down, closed, proprietary structure. Through the democratizing power of digital technology and the Internet, we can place the tools of creation and distribution, communication and collaboration, teaching and learning into the hands of the common person -- and with a truly active, connected, informed citizenry, injustice and oppression will slowly but surely vanish from the earth.[4]

It has yet to publish a more "official" mission statement, but some of its goals are:

  • decentralization of creativity—getting ordinary people and communities involved with art, science, journalism and other creative industries, especially through new technologies
  • reforming copyright, patent, and trademark law in the public interest, ensuring that new creators are not stifled by old creators
  • making important information available to the public

Purpose

According to its website,[5] Students for Free Culture has four main functions within the free culture movement:

  • Creating and providing resources for its chapters and for the general public
  • Outreach to youth and students
  • Networking with other people, companies and organizations in the free culture movement
  • Issue advocacy on behalf of its members

History

Initial stirrings at Swarthmore College

Students for Free Culture had its origins in the Swarthmore Coalition for the Digital Commons (SCDC, now Free Culture Swarthmore), a student group at Swarthmore College which would eventually become the first Students for Free Culture chapter. The SCDC was founded in 2003 by students Luke Smith and Nelson Pavlosky, and was originally focused on issues related to free software, digital restrictions management, and treacherous computing, inspired largely by the Free Software Foundation.[6] After watching Lawrence Lessig's OSCON 2002 speech entitled "free culture"[7] however, they expanded the club's scope to cover cultural participation in general (rather than just in the world of software and computers), and began tackling issues such as copyright reform.

The OPG v. Diebold case

Within a couple of months of founding the SCDC, Smith and Pavlosky became embroiled in the controversy surrounding Diebold Election Systems (now Premier Election Solutions), a voting machine manufacturer accused of making bug-ridden and insecure electronic voting machines. The SCDC had been concerned about electronic voting machines using proprietary software rather than open source software, and kept an eye on the situation. Their alarm grew when a copy of Diebold's internal e-mail archives leaked onto the internet, revealing questionable practices at Diebold and possible flaws with Diebold's machines, and they were spurred into action when Diebold began sending legal threats to voting activists who posted the e-mails on their websites. Diebold was claiming that the e-mails were their copyrighted material, and that anyone who posted these e-mails online was infringing upon their intellectual property. The SCDC posted the e-mail archive on its website and prepared for the inevitable legal threats.

Sure enough, Diebold sent notices under the DMCA to the SCDC's ISP, Swarthmore College. Swarthmore took down the SCDC website, and the SCDC co-founders sought legal representation.[8] They contacted the Electronic Frontier Foundation for help, and discovered that they had an opportunity to sign on to an existing lawsuit against Diebold, OPG v. Diebold, with co-plaintiffs from a non-profit ISP called the Online Policy Group who had also received legal threats from Diebold. With pro bono legal representation from EFF and the Stanford Cyberlaw Clinic, they sued Diebold for abusing copyright law to suppress freedom of speech online. After a year of legal battles, the judge ruled that posting the e-mails online was a fair use, and that Diebold had violated the DMCA by misrepresenting their copyright claims over the e-mails.

The network of contacts that Smith and Pavlosky built during the lawsuit, including dozens of students around the country who had also hosted the Diebold memos on their websites, gave them momentum they needed to found an international student movement based on the same free culture principles as the SCDC. They purchased the domain name Freeculture.org and began building a website, while contacting student activists at other schools who could help them start the organization.

FreeCulture.org launches at Swarthmore

On April 23, 2004, Smith and Pavlosky announced the official launch of FreeCulture.org,[9] in an event at Swarthmore College featuring Lawrence Lessig as the keynote speaker[10][11] (Lessig had released his book Bryn Mawr College and Franklin and Marshall.[12]

Internet campaigns

FreeCulture.org began by launching a number of internet campaigns, in an attempt to raise its profile and bring itself to the attention of college students. These have covered issues ranging from defending artistic freedom (Barbie in a Blender) to fighting the DRM, and internet campaigns remain an important tool in free culture activism.

An increased emphasis on local chapters

Today the organization focuses on providing services to its local campus chapters, including web services such as mailing lists and wikis, pamphlets and materials for tabling, and organizing conferences where chapter members can meet up. Active chapters are located at schools such as New York University (NYU), Harvard, MIT, Fordham Law, Dartmouth, University of Florida, Swarthmore, USC, Emory, Reed, and Yale.

The NYU chapter made headlines when it began protesting outside of record stores against DRM on CDs during the Sony rootkit scandal,[13] resulting in similar protests around New York and Philadelphia.[14]

In 2008, the MIT chapter developed and released YouTomb, a website to track videos removed by DMCA takedown from YouTube.[15]

Other recent activities at local chapters include:

  • art shows featuring Creative Commons-licensed art,[16][17]
  • mix CD-exchanging flash mobs,[18]
  • film-remixing contests,[19][20]
  • Rockbox,[21]
  • Antenna Alliance, a project that provides free recording space to bands, releases their music online under Creative Commons licenses, and distributes the music to college radio stations,[22]
  • a campaign to promote Open Access on university campuses.[23]

Structure

Students for Free Culture began as a loose confederation of student groups on different campuses, but it has been moving towards becoming an official tax-exempt non-profit.

With the passage of official bylaws, Students for Free Culture now has a clear governance structure which makes it accountable to its chapters. The supreme decision-making body is the Board of Directors, which is elected once a year by the chapters, using a

  • Official homepage
  • Blog posts about Students for Free Culture/FreeCulture.org in the media

External links

  1. ^ Students for Free Culture » About. URL:http://freeculture.org/about/ Accessed: 2011-12-04. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffreeculture.org%2Fabout%2F&date=2011-12-04)
  2. ^ FreeCulture.org, Students for Free Culture chapters
  3. ^ FreeCulture.org, Students for Free Culture's new bylaws
  4. ^ FreeCulture.org, Free Culture manifesto
  5. ^ FreeCulture.org, About Students for Free Culture
  6. ^ SwarthMore.edu, "New group to fight RIAA, Microsoft" from the Swarthmore Phoenix,
  7. ^ Lessig.org Lawrence Lessig's OSCON 2002 speech, "Free Culture
  8. ^ File Sharing Pits Copyright Against Free Speech, New York Times
  9. ^ FreeCulture.org, Students for Free Culture blog: Official Launch
  10. ^ Archive.org, "Lessig at Swarthmore" video from the Internet Archive
  11. ^ LegalAffairs.org, Legal Affairs article on the launch
  12. ^ Wired.com, Wired News - "Students Fight Copyright Hoarders"
  13. ^ USA Today - "Firestorm rages over lockdown on digital music"
  14. ^ PhiladelphiaWeekly.com, "Copy Cats"
  15. ^
  16. ^ FreeCultureNYU.org, NYU's CC art show
  17. ^ SharingIsDaring.org, "Sharing is Daring" CC art show at Harvard
  18. ^ FreeCulture.org, Santa Cruz "face to face peer to peer" flashmob
  19. ^ FreeCultureNYU.org, NYU's Film Remix 2006
  20. ^ BoingBoing.net, USC FC NOTLD speed remix contest
  21. ^ Business.NewsForge.com, Newsforge - Liberating iPods in Cambridge
  22. ^ ThePhoenix.com, Boston Phoenix, Antenna Alliance Offers Free Studio Time
  23. ^ FreeCulture.org, FreeCulture Taking Action on Open Access
  24. ^ FreeCulture.org, Spring 2008 Board Election results

References

and a new Core Team was assembled shortly thereafter. There is no coordinator yet. [24]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.