World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

2005 Base Realignment and Closure Commission

 

2005 Base Realignment and Closure Commission

The Commission questions Gordon R. England, Vern Clark, and Michael Hagee in 2005.

The 2005 Base Realignment and Closure Commission preliminary list was released by the United States Congress. Congress had a maximum of 45 days to reject the proposal by passing a joint resolution of disapproval, or the recommendations automatically enter into effect. Such a resolution (H.J.Res. 65) was introduced to the House of Representatives on September 23, 2005, by Rep. Ray LaHood (R-IL) (no such resolution was introduced in the Senate). The House took up debate of the resolution on October 26, 2005. The resolution failed to pass by a 324-85 margin, thereby enacting the list of recommendations.[1] The Secretary of Defense was required to begin implementing the recommendations by September 15, 2007 and to complete implementation no later than September 15, 2011.

Contents

  • Justifications 1
  • Recommendations 2
  • Results 3
  • See also 4
  • References 5
  • External links 6

Justifications

Pentagon officials calculated that, if adopted in full by the nine-member BRAC Commission, the recommendations would have saved almost $50 billion over 20 years. The BRAC Commission (officially known as the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission) disputed this claim, pointing out what it considered to be significant flaws in the Department's methodology. The Commission recalculated the 20-year savings of the DOD recommendation list at just above $37 billion. Between late May and late August, the Commission reviewed the list and amended many of the Pentagon's recommendations, removing several major installations from the closure list. The Commission calculated the overall 20-year savings to the government in carrying out its amended list of recommendations as close to $15 billion.

Gen. Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said on May 12, 2005 that the two-year effort to produce the list had several objectives:

  • better integrate active and reserve units
  • rearrange forces to be able to act around the globe
  • make the military more flexible and agile
  • improve cooperation between military service branches while training and fighting
  • convert unneeded capacity into warfighting capability

The 2005 BRAC round is the fifth since the process was initiated in 1988, and it is the first since 1995. It differs significantly from its predecessors in several respects:

  • It is the first with a nine-member commission (the 1991, 1993, and 1995 commissions had eight members)
  • It is the only stand-alone round authorized by Congress (the 1988 BRAC round was initiated by the Secretary of Defense, and the 1991–1995 rounds were authorized together in the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990)
  • It is the first BRAC round focused on military force transformation, not infrastructure reduction
  • It is the only round to form part of a worldwide defense infrastructure review that includes similar examination of U.S. installations overseas
  • It is the first BRAC to significantly impact the National Guard, causing several states to file legal proceedings attempting to stay or cause recommendations to be thrown out

Recommendations

Major facilities slated for closure include these:

Major facilities slated for realignment include these:

13 Joint Bases were created by merging adjacent installations belonging to different services.

Results

The 2005 Base Realignment and Closure Commission resulted in a $35 billion increase in military spending, in part due to new facilities being built. The military claims, however, that it also resulted in a reduction of $4 billion in annual spending.[3]

See also

References

  1. ^ Sidoti, Liz (2005-10-28). "House refuses to block base closings". onlineathens.com. Retrieved 16 July 2011. 
  2. ^ William Yardley and Katie Zezima (August 25, 2005). "In New England, Sighs of Relief as Commission Votes to Save Submarine Base".  
  3. ^ "The Pentagon’s Excess Space". New York Times (New York, United States). 7 February 2015. Retrieved 9 February 2015. 

External links

  • 2005 BRAC Commission official website
  • Department of Defense BRAC 2005 official website
  • Detailed DOD BRAC Recommendations (in PDF format)
  • Short summary of closure and realignment impacts by state (in PDF format) - MSNBC
  • "BRAC 2005: Closings, Realignments to Reshape Infrastructure" article
  • "BRAC 2005: Rumsfeld Recommends 5 to 11 Percent Cut in Infrastructure" article
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.