World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Adoption and Safe Families Act

Article Id: WHEBN0005191983
Reproduction Date:

Title: Adoption and Safe Families Act  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Foster Care Independence Act, Foster care, Hillary Clinton, Adoption law, Adoption in the United States
Collection: 105Th United States Congress, 1997 in Law, Adoption Law, Foster Care, United States Federal Child Welfare Legislation
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Adoption and Safe Families Act

Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997
Great Seal of the United States
Enacted by the 105th United States Congress
Effective November 19, 1997
Citations
Public law Pub.L. 105–89
Statutes at Large
Legislative history
  • Introduced in the House by Dave Camp (R-MI) on February 27, 1997
  • Committee consideration by Ways and Means
  • Passed the House on April 30, 1997 (416–5)
  • Passed the Senate on November 8, 1997 (Unanimous consent)
  • Signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 19, 1997

The Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA, Public Law 105-89) was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 19, 1997 after having been approved by the United States Congress earlier in the month.[1]

Contents

  • Background and passage 1
  • Major provisions and tactics 2
  • Impact 3
  • See also 4
  • References 5
  • External links 6

Background and passage

ASFA was enacted in an attempt to correct problems that were inherent in the foster care system that deterred the adoption of children with special needs. Many of these problems had stemmed from an earlier bill, the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980,[1] although they had not been anticipated when that law was passed, as states decided to interpret that law as requiring biological families be kept together no matter what.[1] The biggest change to the law was how ASFA amended Title IV-E of the Social Security Act regarding funding.

Moreover, ASFA marked a fundamental change to child welfare thinking, shifting the emphasis towards children's health and safety concerns and away from a policy of reuniting children with their birth parents without regard to prior abusiveness.[1] As such, ASFA was considered the most sweeping change to the U.S. adoption and foster care system in some two decades.[1] One of ASFA's lead sponsors, Republican Senator John H. Chafee of Rhode Island, said, "We will not continue the current system of always putting the needs and rights of the biological parents first. ... It's time we recognize that some families simply cannot and should not be kept together."[1]

Ideas for the bill originated with both Democrats and Republicans.[2] First Lady of the United States Hillary Rodham Clinton originally voiced interest in the issue of orphaned children in an article she wrote in 1995.[3] She then held public events to give the issue exposure,[2][3] and met with U.S. Department of Health and Human Services officials and private foundation executives over policy questions and recommendations. She cited the Act as the achievement which she initiated and shepherded that provided her with the greatest satisfaction.[3] The bill began in Congress with bipartisan support, then became contentious over issues of terminating birth parents' rights to children and funding levels for programs to keep children out of foster care.[2] Hillary Clinton played a key role in finding a compromise between Republicans and Democrats on the latter issue after negotiations first broke down.[2]

In greeting the final measure, Bill Clinton stated that the bill "makes clear that children's health and safety are the paramount concerns."[1]

Major provisions and tactics

The major provisions of the law include:

  • Requires that States move to terminate parental rights for children who have been in Foster Care for 15 out of the last 22 months
  • Exceptions to the 15/22 rule include:[4]
  • When the child is in a Foster Home with a biological relative (Kinship Care)
  • When the Agency documents a compelling reason why parental termination is not in the Child's best interest
  • When the State has failed to provide services necessary for reunification
  • Requires that Permanency Hearings be held every 12 months
  • Clarifies cases in which States are not required to reunite Families (Aggravated Circumstances)
  • Expands family preservation and support services
  • Extends subsidies for adoptive children
  • Provides incentives for States to improve adoption rates
  • Requires States to document efforts to move children toward adoption
  • Expands health care coverage for adoptive children
  • Provides funding for efforts at encouraging adoption
  • Clarifies that interstate boundaries should not delay adoption.

Impact

The law required individual states to be in compliance with it in order to continue receiving federal funds for child welfare.[4] Thus, each state had to pass legislation compatible with ASFA; in practice, those legislative actions varied widely.[4] As a result, some states have relied upon the three exceptions in the law more as part of stressing reunification, while other states have stressed adoption.[4]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g Seelye, Katherine Q. (November 17, 1997). "Clinton to Approve Sweeping Shift in Adoption".  
  2. ^ a b c d Sengupta, Somini (October 29, 2000). "Campaigns Soft-Pedal On Children and the Poor".  
  3. ^ a b c "First Lady Biography: Hillary Clinton". National First Ladies' Library. Archived from the original on September 2, 2006. Retrieved August 22, 2006. 
  4. ^ a b c d Hort, Katherine A. (2000). "Is Twenty-two Months Beyond the Best Interest of the Child? ASFA's Guidelines for the Termination of Parental Rights".  

External links

  • Full text of Adoption and Safe Families Act
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.