World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

British Columbia Treaty Process

The British Columbia Treaty Process (BCTP) is a land claims negotiation process started in 1993 to resolve outstanding issues - including claims to un-extinguished aboriginal rights - with British Columbia's First Nations.

Two treaties have been implemented under the BCTP. The Nisga'a Treaty is considered separate from the Treaty Process because those negotiations began before the BC treaty process was started, and it has been called a blueprint for the current process. To represent the interests of First Nations involved with the process, the First Nations Summit was created. There are officially 60 First Nations in the process, but only 20 are said to be making progress. About 40% of First Nations are not involved in the treaty process.


  • History 1
    • Previous negotiations 1.1
    • The Treaty Commission and Process 1.2
  • Process 2
  • Criticisms 3
  • See also 4
  • Footnotes 5
  • External links 6


Previous negotiations

Because the Royal Proclamation of 1763 stated that the Crown must negotiate and sign treaties with the indigenous people before land could be ceded to a colony, the Numbered Treaties were negotiated in most parts of the Prairie Provinces. The Government of the Colony of British Columbia, however, failed to negotiate many treaties and as a result, most of the province's land is not covered by treaties. The few exceptions are the 14 Douglas Treaties on Vancouver Island, Treaty 8 (1899) in the Northeast of B.C., and the 2000 Nisga'a Final Agreement.

Relations between Indigenous peoples and the B.C. government worsened over time, as the aboriginal title were buoyed by various court decisions in B.C., including Calder v. British Columbia (Attorney General) and R. v. Sparrow.

In 1990, the governments of Canada, B.C. and First Nations established the B.C. Claims Task Force to investigate how treaty negotiations might begin and what they should cover. The following year, the provincial government accepted the concept of aboriginal rights (including the inherent right to self-government) as official policy. The Claims Task Force made 19 recommendations and suggested a six-stage process for negotiating new treaties.

The Treaty Commission and Process

The British Columbia Treaty Commission is the independent body which oversees the treaty process. B.C. Treaty Commissioners were first appointed in April 1993, and the treaty process officially began in December 1993. By 1996, 47 First Nations, representing more than 60% of Status Indians in B.C., had decided to participate. After a few years of negotiations, the Treaty Commission released a 1997 Systems Overload Report which argued that the provincial and federal governments needed to increase their financial resources and the capacity level of First Nations for the negotiation of treaties in BC.

The following year, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its decision on Delgamuukw v. British Columbia, recognizing aboriginal title as "a right to the land itself", which derives from First Nations original occupation and possession at the time the Crown asserted sovereignty. The court also stated that the federal and provincial governments may infringe upon Aboriginal title under conditions for justification but that fair compensation would be due at the time of such an infringement.

The first nation to reach stage 5 of the process was Sechelt First Nation, who signed an Agreement-in-Principle (AIP) in 1999. Members of the Sliammon First Nation voted to reject their negotiated AIP in 2001, approved the AiP in June 2003 and negotiations are now nearing completion. Six of 12 member nations of the Nuu-chah-nulth Tribal Council likewise rejected their AIP. The five Maa-nulth First Nations of the Nuu-chah-nulth ratified their treaty in October 2007. The BC Government has ratified the final agreement which is yet to be ratified in the federal parliament. Ditidaht First Nation has subsequently taken legal action against the Maa-nulth in a dispute over land and resource ownership.

In 2002, the BC Liberal Party mailed out ballots for a provincial referendum on principles for treaty negotiations, sparking protests and a boycott.

In May 1993 the Treaty Commission allocated approximately $432 million in negotiation support funding to more than 50 First Nations- $345.6 million in the form of loans and $86.4 million in the form of contributions.[1] Of that money the Treaty Commission's total operating costs from 1993 to March 31, 2009 has spent $34.2 million.[1] One successfully negotiated treaty was rejected, by the Lheidli T’enneh First Nation, in 2007.

In July 2007, the Tsawwassen First Nation members voted 70% in favour of the treaty. The treaty more than doubles the size of the Tsawwassen reserve, provides a one-time capital transfer of $13.9 million, $2 million for relinquishing mineral rights under English bluff, $13.5 million for startup and transition costs, $7.3 million for a number of funds for the purposes of resource management and economic development and $2.6 annually for ongoing programs and services, and reserves a portion of the Fraser River salmon catch to the Tsawwassen. In return, the Tsawwassen will abandon other land claims and will eventually pay taxes

The Temexw Treaty Association, whose members are signatories to the Douglas Treaties, is also attempting to negotiate within the BC Treaty Process.

A November 2007 court ruling for the Xeni Gwet'in First Nation has called future participation in the process into question. The judge's ruling included a non-binding opinion that the Xeni Gwet'in could demonstrate aboriginal title to half of the Nemaiah Valley, and that the province had no power over these lands.[2] Under the BC treaty process, negotiating nations have received as little as 5% of their claimed land recognized. Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, president of the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs, has called the court victory a "nail in the coffin" of the B.C. treaty process.[2]


The treaty process is a 6-stage negotiation between the federal government, the provincial government, and First Nations. A combination of contribution (grant) funding and loans are provided to First Nations on cost-share basis by the federal and provincial governments to support negotiation efforts.

The British Columbia Treaty Commission accepts First Nations into the process, allocates negotiation support funding and monitors the progress of negotiations.

The process:

  • Stage 1: Statement of Intent to Negotiate
  • Stage 2: Readiness To Negotiate
  • Stage 3: Negotiation Of a Framework Agreement
  • Stage 4: Negotiation Of An Agreement In Principle
  • Stage 5: Negotiation to Finalize a Treaty
  • Stage 6: Implementation of the Treaty


The voice of criticisms have come from different angles in indigenous communities across British Columbia and Canada, and from the non-native society as well.[3] About 2/3 of First Nations are not involved with the Treaty Process, some have formed the "Unity Protocol", calling for an overhaul of the entire process.

The Fraser Institute, a Canadian think tank known for its right-wing views and is funded by industry and has charitable status, released a report in 2008 criticizing the B.C. Treaty Process as "incomplete, illiberal and expensive".[1]

See also


  1. ^ a b "FAQ - How much will treaty negotiations cost?". 2009. Retrieved July 29, 2009. 
  2. ^ a b Huge win for Interior natives, The Province, November 22, 2007
  3. ^ Alfred, Taiaiake. Wasáse. Broadview Press, 2005. ISBN 978-1-55111-637-2.

External links

  • First Nations Summit
  • British Columbia Treaty Commission
  • Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.