World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Chlorophyll fluorescence

Article Id: WHEBN0029946595
Reproduction Date:

Title: Chlorophyll fluorescence  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Plant tissue test, Integrated fluorometer, Chlorophyll, Photosynthetic efficiency, NOAAS Bell M. Shimada (R 227)
Collection: Light Reactions
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Chlorophyll fluorescence

A chlorophyll extract in alcohol shown under white light (above) and UV light inducing fluorescence (below).

Chlorophyll fluorescence is light re-emitted by chlorophyll molecules during return from excited to non-excited states and used as indicator of photosynthetic energy conversion in higher plants, algae and bacteria. Excited chlorophyll dissipates the absorbed light energy by driving photosynthesis (photochemical energy conversion), as heat in non-photochemical quenching or by emission as fluorescence radiation. As these processes are complementary processes analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence is an important tool in plant research with a wide spectra of applications.

Contents

  • The Kautsky effect 1
  • Measuring fluorescence 2
    • Common fluorescence parameters 2.1
    • Calculated parameters 2.2
  • Applications of the Theory 3
    • PSII yield as a measure of photosynthesis 3.1
    • Relating electron transport to carbon fixation 3.2
    • Measuring stress and stress tolerance 3.3
    • Nitrogen Balance Index 3.4
    • Measure Chlorophyll Content 3.5
  • Chlorophyll fluorometers 4
  • Alternative approaches 5
    • LIF sensors 5.1
  • See also 6
  • References 7
  • External links 8

The Kautsky effect

Upon illumination of a dark-adapted leaf, there is a rapid rise in fluorescence from Photosystem II (PSII), followed by a slow decline. First observed by Kautsky et al., 1960, this is called the Kautsky Effect.

The increase in fluorescence is due to PSII reaction centers being in a "closed" state. Reaction centers are "closed" when unable to accept further electrons. This occurs when electron acceptors downstream of PSII have not yet passed their electrons to a subsequent electron carrier, so are unable to accept another electron. Closed reaction centres reduce the overall photochemical efficiency, and so increases the level of fluorescence. Transferring a leaf from dark into light increases the proportion of closed PSII reaction centres, so fluorescence levels increase for 1–2 seconds. Subsequently, fluorescence decreases over a few minutes. This is due to; 1. more "photochemical quenching" in which electrons are transported away from PSII due to enzymes involved in carbon fixation; and 2. more "non-photochemical quenching" in which more energy is converted to heat.

Measuring fluorescence

Fluorometer being used to measure Fv/Fm in the field

Usually the initial measurement is the minimal level of fluorescence, \,F_0. This is the fluorescence in the absence of photosynthetic light.[1]

To use measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence to analyse photosynthesis, researchers must distinguish between photochemical quenching and non-photochemical quenching (heat dissipation). This is achieved by stopping photochemistry, which allows researchers to measure fluorescence in the presence of non-photochemical quenching alone. To reduce photochemical quenching to negligible levels, a high intensity, short flash of light is applied to the leaf. This transiently closes all PSII reaction centres, which prevents energy of PSII being passed to downstream electron carriers. Non-photochemical quenching will not be affected if the flash is short. During the flash, the fluorescence reaches the level reached in the absence of any photochemical quenching, known as maximum fluorescence \,F_m.[1]

The efficiency of photochemical quenching (which is a proxy of the efficiency of PSII) can be estimated by comparing \,F_m to the steady yield of fluorescence in the light \,F_t and the yield of fluorescence in the absence of photosynthetic light \,F_0. The efficiency of non-photochemical quenching is altered by various internal and external factors. Alterations in heat dissipation mean changes in \,F_m. Heat dissipation cannot be totally stopped, so the yield of chlorophyll fluorescence in the absence of non-photochemical quenching cannot be measured. Therefore, researchers use a dark-adapted point (F_m^0) with which to compare estimations of non-photochemical quenching.[1]

Common fluorescence parameters

\,F_0: Minimal fluorescence (arbitrary units). Fluorescence level when all antenna pigment complexes associated with the photosystem are assumed to be open (dark adapted).

\,F_m: Maximal fluorescence (arbitrary units). Fluorescence level when a high intensity flash has been applied. All antenna sites are assumed to be closed.

\,{F_0}': Minimal fluorescence (arbitrary units). Fluorescence level of illuminated sample which is lowered with respect to \,F_0 by non-photochemical quenching.

\,{F_m}': Maximal fluorescence (arbitrary units). Fluorescence level of illuminated sample as induced by saturating pulses which temporarily close all PSII reaction centers.

\,F_{tr}: Terminal fluorescence (arbitrary units). Fluorescence quenching value at the end of the test.

\,T_{1/2}: Half rise time from \,F_0 to \,F_m.

Calculated parameters

\,F_v is variable fluorescence. Calculated as \,F_v = \,F_m - \,F_0.[2]

\tfrac{F_v}{F_m} is the ratio of variable fluorescence to maximal fluorescence. Calculated as \frac{F_m-F_0}{F_m}.[3] This is a measure of the maximum efficiency of PSII (the efficiency if all PSII centres were open). \tfrac{F_v}{F_m} can be used to estimate the potential efficiency of PSII by taking dark-adapted measurements.

\,\Phi_{PSII} measures the efficiency of Photosystem II. Calculated as \, Y_{(II)} = ,\frac{{F_m}'-F}{{F_m}'}.[4] This parameter measures the proportion of light absorbed by PSII that is used in photochemistry. As such, it can give a measure of the rate of linear electron transport and so indicates overall photosynthesis.

\,qP (photochemical quenching). Calculated as \,\frac{{F_m}'-F}{{F_m}'-{F_0}'}.[5] This parameter approximates the proportion of PSII reaction centres that are open.

Whilst \,\Phi_{PSII} gives an estimation of the efficiency, \,qP and \tfrac{F_v}{F_m} tell us which processes which have altered the efficiency. Closure of reaction centers as a result of a high intensity light will alter the value of \,qP. Changes in the efficiency of non-photochemical quenching will alter the ratio \tfrac{F_v}{F_m}.

Applications of the Theory

PSII yield as a measure of photosynthesis

Modulated fluorometer measuring photosynthetic yield Y(II) in the field

Chlorophyll fluorescence appears to measure of photosynthesis, but this is an over-simplification. Fluorescence can measure the efficiency of PSII photochemistry, which can be used to estimate the rate of linear electron transport by multiplying by the light intensity. However, researchers generally mean carbon fixation when they refer to photosynthesis. Electron transport and CO2 fixation can correlate well, but may not correlate in the field due to processes such as photorespiration, nitrogen metabolism and the Mehler reaction.

  • De Martino et al. (2007)[6] examined banana peel degreening after treatment with 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP). Many parameters were measured, including chlorophyll fluorescence since fluorescence is a measure of chloroplast photochemical efficiency. 1-MCP treatment was shown to delay the decrease in chlorophyll fluorescence. Greenness and photochemical efficiency decreased simultaneously after ethylene treatment, suggesting that changes in chlorophyll fluorescence \,F_m were responsible for the patterns of de-greening. After 7 and 8 days, \,F_m values of 1-MCP peel were ca. 3-fold the values of the other treatments, showing that 1-MCP treated fruit maintain their photochemical efficiency when the other treatment regimes do not.

Relating electron transport to carbon fixation

A powerful research technique is to simultaneously measure chlorophyll fluorescence and gas exchange to obtain a full picture of the response of plants to their environment. One technique is to simultaneously measure CO2 fixation and PSII photochemistry at different light intensities, in non-photorespiratory conditions. A plot of CO2 fixation and PSII photochemistry indicates the electron requirement per molecule CO2 fixed. From this estimation, the extent of photorespiration may be estimated. This has been used to explore the significance of photorespiration as a photoprotective mechanism during drought.

Fluorescence analysis can also be applied to understanding the effects of low and high temperatures.

  • Sobrado (2008)[7] investigated gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence responses to high intensity light, of pioneer species and forest species. Midday leaf gas exchange was measured using a photosynthesis system, which measured net photosynthetic rate, gs, and intercellular CO2 concentration (C_i). In the same leaves used for gas exchange measurements, chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters (initial, \,F_0; maximum, \,F_m; and variable, \,F_v) were measured using a fluorometer. The results showed that despite pioneer species and forest species occupying different habitats, both showed similar vulnerability to midday photoinhibition in sun-exposed leaves.

Measuring stress and stress tolerance

Chlorophyll fluorescence can measure most types of plant stress. Chlorophyll fluorescence can be used as a proxy of plant stress because environmental stresses, e.g. extremes of temperature, light and water availability, can reduce the ability of a plant to metabolise normally. This can mean an imbalance between the absorption of light energy by chlorophyll and the use of energy in photosynthesis.[8]

  • Favaretto et al. (2010)[9] investigated adaptation to a strong light environment in pioneer and late successional species, grown under 100% and 10% light. Numerous parameters, including chlorophyll a fluorescence, were measured. A greater decline in \tfrac{F_v}{F_m} under full sun light in the late-successional species than in the pioneer species was observed. Overall, their results show that pioneer species perform better under high-sun light than late- successional species, suggesting that pioneer plants have more potential tolerance to photo-oxidative damage.
  • Neocleous and Vasilakakis (2009)[2] investigated the response of raspberry to boron and salt stress. An chlorophyll fluorometer was used to measure \,F_0, \,F_m and \,F_v. The leaf chlorophyll fluorescence was not significantly affected by NaCl concentration when B concentration was low. When B was increased, leaf chlorophyll fluorescence was reduced under saline conditions. It could be concluded that the combined effect of B and NaCl on raspberries induces a toxic effect in photochemical parameters.

Nitrogen Balance Index

Example of a portable multiparametric fluorometer that uses the ratio between chlorophyll and flavonols to detect the nitrogen deficiency of plants

Because of the link between chlorophyll content and nitrogen content in leaves, chlorophyll fluorometers can be used to detect nitrogen deficiency in plants, by several methods.

Based on several years of research and experimentation, polyphenols can be the indicators of nitrogen status of a plant. For instance, when a plant is under optimal conditions, it favours its primary metabolism and synthesises the proteins (nitrogen molecules) containing chlorophyll, and few flavonols (carbon-based secondary compounds). On the other hand, in case of lack of nitrogen, we will observe an increased production of flavonols by the plant.[10]

The NBI (Nitrogen Balance Index) by Force-A, allows the assessment of nitrogen conditions of a culture by calculating the ratio between Chlorophyll and Flavonols (related to Nitrogen/Carbon allocation) .

Measure Chlorophyll Content

Gitelson (1999) states, "The ratio between chlorophyll fluorescence at 735 nm and the wavelength range 700nm to 710 nm, F735/F700 was found to be linearly proportional to the chlorophyll content (with determination coefficient, r2, more than 0.95) and thus this ratio can be used as a precise indicator of chlorophyll content in plant leaves."[11]


Chlorophyll fluorometers

Fluorescence image (Ft value) of adaxial leaf surface (32 x 24 mm) measured with IMAGING-PAM chlorophyll fluorometer

The development of fluorometers allowed chlorophyll fluorescence analysis to become a common method in plant research. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis has been revolutionized by the invention of the Pulse-Amplitude-Modulation (PAM) technique [12][13]and availability of the first commercial modulated chlorophyll fluorometer PAM-101 (Walz, Germany). By modulating the measuring light beam (microsecond-range pulses) and parallel detection of the excited fluorescence the relative fluorescence yield (Ft) can be determined in the presence of ambient light. Crucially, this means chlorophyll fluorescence can be measured in the field even in full sunlight.[1]

Some modulated fluorometers can determine both ambient light and dark adaptation parameters (Fo, Fm, Fo', Fm', Fv/Fm, Y, Ft, Foq, Fms and OJIP transients) and can calculate photochemical and non-photochemical quenching coefficients (qP, qL, qN, Y(NO), Y(NPQ) and NPQ). Some fluorometers are designed to be portable and operated in one hand.

Consistent further development into imaging fluorometers facilitate the visualization of spatial heterogeneities in photosynthetic activity of samples. These heterogeneities naturally occur in plant leaves for example during growths, various environmental stresses or pathogen infection. Thus knowledge about sample heterogeneities is important for correct interpretation of the photosynthetic performance of the plant sample. High performance imaging fluorometer systems provide options to analyze single cell/single chloroplast as well as sample areas covering whole leaves or plants.

Alternative approaches

LIF sensors

Techniques based on the Kautsky effect do not exhaust the variety of detection and evaluation methods based on the chlorophyll fluorescence. In particular, recent advances in the area of laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) also provide an opportunity of developing sufficiently compact and efficient sensors for photophysiological status and biomass assessments. Instead of measuring the evolution of the total fluorescence flux, such sensors record the spectral density of this flux exited by strong monochromatic laser light pulses of nanoseconds duration. Requiring no 15- 20 min dark adaptation period (as is the case for the Kautsky effect methods[14]) and being capable to excite the sample from considerable distance, the LIF sensors can provide fast and remote evaluation.

  • Application of the LIF technique to the assessment of drought stress in cork oak (Quercus suber) and maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) on the basis of chlorophyll emission ratio I685/I740 is described in Ref.[15] Recently the LIF sensing technique was harnessed to address the role of pPLAIIα protein in the protection of the photosynthetic metabolism during drought stress using genetically modified Arabidopsis plants.[16]
  • In 2011, Vieira et al. applied a compact low-cost LIF sensor[17] (built around a frequency-doubled solid-state Q-switched Nd:YAG laser and a specially modified commercial miniature fiber optic spectrometer Ocean Optics USB4000) to study intertidal microphytobenthos communities. Chlorophyll emission enabled the researchers to adequately assess the surface biomass and track migratory rhythms of epipelic benthic microalgae in muddy sediments.[18]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d
  2. ^ a b
  3. ^
  4. ^
  5. ^
  6. ^
  7. ^
  8. ^
  9. ^
  10. ^
  11. ^
  12. ^
  13. ^
  14. ^
  15. ^
  16. ^ Silvestre et al. Contribution of pPLAIIα to drought tolerance using genetically modified arabidopsis plants: II. Effects on photosynthetic metabolism. Int. Meeting Prog. Plant Symposium of the SEB: Oxidative stress and cell death in plants: mechanisms and implications, Florence, Italy, 26–28 June 2013, p. 5
  17. ^
  18. ^

External links

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.