World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article


Article Id: WHEBN0000040936
Reproduction Date:

Title: Compromise  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Engineering, Grandfather clause, Tip of the day/August 5, Tip of the day/February 5, WikiProject Music theory/mainpage
Collection: Arguments, Game Theory
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia


To compromise is to make a deal between different parties where each party gives up part of their demand. In arguments, compromise is a concept of finding agreement through communication, through a mutual acceptance of terms—often involving variations from an original goal or desire.

Extremism is often considered as antonym to compromise, which, depending on context, may be associated with concepts of balance and tolerance. In the negative connotation, compromise may be referred to as capitulation, referring to a "surrender" of objectives, principles, or material, in the process of negotiating an agreement. In human relationships, "compromise" is frequently said to be an agreement with which no party is happy because the parties involved often feel that they either gave away too much or that they received too little.[1]


  • Political compromise 1
  • Studies in compromise 2
  • Online Compromising Tools 3
  • See also 4
  • References 5

Political compromise

In international politics, the compromises most often discussed are usually regarded as nefarious deals with dictators, such as Neville Chamberlain's appeasement of Adolf Hitler. Margalit calls these "rotten compromises."[2]

In democratic politics, great challenges of contemporary democracy and has become more difficult in the era of the permanent campaign, as Gutmann and Thompson show.[3] The problem of political compromise in general is an important subject in political ethics.

Studies in compromise

Defining and finding the best possible compromise is an important problem in fields like game theory and the voting system.

Research has indicated that suboptimal compromises are often the result of negotiators failing to realize when they have interests that are completely compatible with those of the other party and settle for suboptimal agreements. Mutually better outcomes can often be found by careful investigation of both parties' interests, especially if done early in negotiations. [4]

The compromise solution of a multicriteria decision making or multi-criteria decision analysis problem that is the closest to the ideal could be determined by the VIKOR method, which provides a maximum utility of the majority, and a minimum individual regret of the opponent.[5]

Online Compromising Tools

There are many compromising tools available for free online. Compromises can often result in unfair or confusing outcomes. A lack of transparency and miscommunication in a compromise are the usual causes for this. Many websites have attempted to solve these longstanding issues with basic and effective solutions. An example of this is[6] attempts to solve the issues of transparency and miscommunication with a simple graph creator that allows both parties in a transaction to see an updated visual of the offer and bid prices.

See also


  1. ^ Global Knowledge (2008). "Methods of Dealing with Conflict - Part II". PM Hut. Retrieved 2010-01-11. 
  2. ^ Margalit, Avishai. On Compromises and Rotten Compromises (Princeton University Press, 2009). ISBN 9780691133171
  3. ^ Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. The Spirit of Compromise (Princeton University Press, 2012). ISBN 9780691153919
  4. ^ Thompson, Leigh; Hastie, Reid (October 1990). "Social perception in negotiation". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 47 (1): 98–123.  
  5. ^ Opricovic, Serafim. “A Compromise Solution in Water Resources Planning”. Water Resources Management, Vol. 23, No 8, 2009, pp. 1549-1561.
  6. ^ "Quick Compromise". Retrieved 2014-06-19. 
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.