World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Discrimination in the United States

Article Id: WHEBN0031682629
Reproduction Date:

Title: Discrimination in the United States  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Racial wage gap in the United States, Racism in the United States, Economy of the United States, Hawaii, Abortion in the United States
Collection: Discrimination in the United States
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Discrimination in the United States

Discrimination, according to Merriam Webster’s dictionary, is the process by which two stimuli differing in some aspect are responded to differently.[1] This term is used to highlight the difference of treatment between members of different groups when one group is intentionally singled out and treated worse, or not given the same opportunities. As attitudes towards minorities started to change the term discrimination came to be used to talk about the issue. Over the years many forms of discrimination have come to be recognized including racial, gender, and sexual orientation.

Contents

  • History 1
    • Racial discrimination 1.1
    • Fighting back 1.2
  • Today 2
    • Gender discrimination 2.1
    • Discrimination based on sexual orientation 2.2
    • Discrimination against immigrants 2.3
  • See also 3
  • References 4

History

Racial discrimination

Picture showing that most public places were segregated.
In the 1800s the slaves were freed by President Abraham Lincoln. After this starting in about the 1870s Jim Crow laws were introduced. These laws promoted the idea "separate but equal", meaning that the races although having to be in different areas and not allowed to intermingle were equal. The mixing of races was illegal in most places public schools, public transportation and eating establishments.[2] These laws increased discrimination, while the idea was separate but equal the black schools were not as advanced and didn’t have good supplies. Overall the areas where African Americans were designated to do daily activities were always of poorer quality than that of their white counterparts. Discrimination was blatantly done; one example of this is in the case of Rosa Parks. In her area of the country it was customary to move to the back of the bus or give up your seat for a white person. Laws like these existed all over America. The court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka made people realize that there was no such thing as separate but equal. By separating races and saying that it was wrong for them to interact showed that they thought something was wrong with one of the races. The Supreme Court of the United States decided that "separate but equal" was no longer necessary in 1954. Racial discrimination was not only used by adults but children as well thought that races should not interact with one another. An example of this is the experiences Ruby Bridges had when she was one of the first black children to be "integrated" into an all-white school.

Fighting back

During this hard time where race became a problem performing even minor daily tasks several people took it upon themselves to fix the system that was holding them down. Figures such as The Nation of Islam wanted nothing to do with white people. They can be considered examples of reverse discrimination in this case because they discriminated against whites, the same way whites discriminated against blacks. Even though Malcolm X’s actions were radical he is still considered one of the pioneers in fighting back against racial discrimination. Ruby Bridges is an example of a child who dealt with discrimination. She dealt with parents as well as students constantly verbally abusing her. Most parents took their child out of the class because they didn't want their children near her. But rather than switching back to her old school she persevered and stayed. Eventually the parents sent their children back, accepting the fact that she wasn't leaving. Ruby Bridges showed that people will not accept inequality and they will actively fight back against discrimination no matter what age.[5]

Today

Gender discrimination

Gender discrimination is another form of discrimination. Despite the Women’s rights movement women are still held back in the work place. An example of this is the glass ceiling[6] this is where women and often minorities are held down in the work place never advancing past a certain point. Women are often seen as an expense to their employers because they take days off for children, need time off for maternity leave and are stereotyped as "more emotional". The theory that goes hand in hand with this is known as the Glass Escalator[7] while women are being held down in male dominated professions, men often rise quickly to positions of authority in fields with mostly women professionals. Men are pushed forward into management even surpassing women who have been at the job longer and with more experience in the field. Not only in work settings but we see examples of this in our government as well. There has never been a female president, and in the case of Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign for president, many did not vote for her because she seemed too cold, but when she did show emotion people thought she wouldn’t be able to handle the job. Double standards are consistently applied so that women are held down by discrimination.

Men's rights deals with discrimination against men in the areas of family law such as divorce and child custody, labor such as paternity leave, paternity fraud, health, education, conscription, and other areas of the law such as domestic violence and allegations of rape.

Discrimination based on sexual orientation

Another type of discrimination is against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender individuals. For personal reasons such as religious reasons, employers sometimes choose to not hire these people. LGBT people have been attacked and protested against numerous. For example, one topic of controversy related to LGBT people is marriage, while some states say it’s okay others have laws against it. There has been a rise in violence against LGBT people in the United States as well.[8]

Discrimination against immigrants

Immigrants to the United States are affected by a totally separate type of discrimination. Some people feel as though the large amounts of people being allowed into the country are cause for alarm, therefore discriminate against them. Looking for someone to blame for an increase in violence immigrants are constantly targeted as bringing crime to the United States.[9] Arizona recently passed a law that forces people to carry documents with them at all times to prove their citizenship. This is only one controversy over immigrants in the United States, another is the claim that immigrants are stealing "true Americans" jobs. Violent hate crimes have increased[10] drastically. Recent social psychological research suggests that this form of prejudice against migrants may be partly explained by some fairly basic cognitive processes.[11][12]

See also

References

  1. ^ http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discrimination
  2. ^ http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/303897/Jim-Crow-law
  3. ^ http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/par0bio-1
  4. ^ http://www.biography.com/articles/Martin-Luther-King-Jr.-9365086
  5. ^ http://www.rubybridges.com/story.htm
  6. ^ http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/For-Gol/Glass-Ceiling.html
  7. ^ http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/hdh9/e-reserves/Williams_-_The_glass_escalator_PDF-1.pdf
  8. ^ http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?dbName=DocumentViewer&DocumentID=32353
  9. ^ http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1717575,00.html
  10. ^ http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2007/winter/immigration-backlash
  11. ^ For more see https:/s.google.com/markrubinsocialpsychresearch/prejudice-and-discrimination-against-migrants-is-it-because-migrants-are-too-hard-to-think-about
  12. ^ Rubin, M., Paolini, S., & Crisp, R. J. (2010). A processing fluency explanation of bias against migrants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 21-28. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.006
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.