 #jsDisabledContent { display:none; } My Account | Register | Help Flag as Inappropriate This article will be permanently flagged as inappropriate and made unaccessible to everyone. Are you certain this article is inappropriate?          Excessive Violence          Sexual Content          Political / Social Email this Article Email Address:

Fourier–Mukai transform

Article Id: WHEBN0008465724
Reproduction Date:

 Title: Fourier–Mukai transform Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia Language: English Subject: Fourier transform Collection: Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia Publication Date:

Fourier–Mukai transform

In algebraic geometry, the Fourier–Mukai transform or Mukai–Fourier transform, introduced by Mukai (1981), is an isomorphism between the derived categories of coherent sheaves on an abelian variety and its dual. It is analogous to the classical Fourier transform that gives an isomorphism between tempered distributions on a finite-dimensional real vector space and its dual.

If the canonical class of a variety is positive or negative, then the derived category of coherent sheaves determines the variety. The Fourier–Mukai transform gives examples of different varieties (with trivial canonical bundle) that have isomorphic derived categories, as in general an abelian variety of dimension greater than 1 is not isomorphic to its dual.

Definition

Let $X$ be an abelian variety and $\hat X$ be its dual variety. We denote by $\mathcal P$ the Poincaré bundle on

$X \times \hat X,$

normalized to be trivial on the fibers at zero. Let $p$ and $\hat p$ be the canonical projections.

The Fourier–Mukai functor is then

$R\mathcal S: \mathcal F \in D\left(X\right) \mapsto R\hat p_\ast \left(p^\ast \mathcal F \otimes \mathcal P\right) \in D\left(\hat X\right)$

The notation here: D means derived category of coherent sheaves, and R is the higher direct image functor, at the derived category level.

There is a similar functor

Properties

Let g denote the dimension of X.

The Fourier–Mukai transformation is nearly involutive :

$R\mathcal S \circ R\widehat\left\{\mathcal S\right\} = \left(-1\right)^\ast \left[-g\right]$

It transforms Pontrjagin product in tensor product and conversely.

$R\mathcal S\left(\mathcal F \ast \mathcal G\right) = R\mathcal S\left(\mathcal F\right) \otimes R\mathcal S\left(\mathcal G\right)$
$R\mathcal S\left(\mathcal F \otimes \mathcal G\right) = R\mathcal S\left(\mathcal F\right) \ast R\mathcal S\left(\mathcal G\right)\left[g\right]$