World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article


Artist's impression of a Hyperloop capsule: Air compressor on the front, passenger compartment in the middle, battery compartment at the back and air bearing skis at the bottom.
A 3D sketch of the Hyperloop infrastructure. The steel tubes are rendered transparent in this image.

The Hyperloop is a conceptual high-speed transportation system popularized by entrepreneur Elon Musk,[1][2] incorporating reduced-pressure tubes in which pressurized capsules ride on a cushion of air that is driven by a combination of linear induction motors and air compressors.[3]

The conceptual route runs from the Los Angeles region to the San Francisco Bay Area, paralleling the Interstate 5 corridor for most of its length, with an expected journey time of 35 minutes, meaning that passengers would traverse the 354-mile (570 km) route at an average speed of around 598 mph (962 km/h), with a top speed of 760 mph (1,220 km/h).

A preliminary design document was made public in August 2013, which included an estimate of a US$6 billion construction cost for a passenger-only version of the system, while a version allowing for transportation of both passengers and vehicles was estimated at US$7.5 billion. The cost projections have been questioned by transportation engineers and others, who contend that the sum is unrealistically low given the scale of construction required and the level of unproven technology involved. The technological and economic feasibility of the idea is unproven and a subject of significant debate.[4][5][6][7]


  • History 1
  • Theory and operation 2
    • Initial design 2.1
    • Computer simulation 2.2
  • Notional route 3
  • Political and economic considerations 4
  • Related projects 5
  • See also 6
  • References 7
  • External links 8


Musk first mentioned that he was thinking about a concept for a "fifth mode of transport", calling it the Hyperloop, in July 2012 at a PandoDaily event in Santa Monica, California. He described several characteristics of what he wanted in a hypothetical high-speed transportation system: immunity to weather, cars that never experience crashes, an average speed twice that of a typical jet aircraft, low power requirements and the ability to store energy for 24-hour operations.[8]

Musk has likened the Hyperloop to a "cross between a Concorde and a railgun and an air hockey table,"[9] while noting that it has no need for rails.[8][10] He believes it could work either below or above ground.[11]

From late-2012 until August 2013, an informal group of engineers at both Tesla and SpaceX worked on the conceptual foundation and modelling of Hyperloop, allocating some full-time effort to it toward the end.[12] An early design for the system was then published in a whitepaper posted to the Tesla and SpaceX blogs.[2][13] Musk has also said he invites feedback to "see if the people can find ways to improve it"; it will be an open source design, with anyone free to use and modify it.[14] The following day he announced a plan to construct a demonstration of the concept.[12]

Theory and operation

Developments in high-speed rail, and high-speed transport more generally, have historically been impeded by the difficulties in managing friction and air resistance, both of which become substantial when vehicles approach high speeds. The vactrain concept theoretically eliminates these obstacles by employing magnetically levitating trains in evacuated (air-less) or partly evacuated tubes or tunnels, allowing for theoretical speeds of thousands of miles per hour. The high cost of maglev, however, and the difficulty of maintaining a vacuum over large distances, has prevented this type of system from ever being built. The Hyperloop resembles a vactrain system but operates at approximately one millibar of pressure.[15]

Initial design

The Hyperloop concept is proposed to operate by sending specially designed "capsules" or "pods" through a continuous steel tube maintained at a partial vacuum. Each capsule floats on a 0.5-to-1.3-millimetre (0.02 to 0.05 in) layer of air provided under pressure to air-bearing "skis", similar to how pucks are suspended in an air hockey table, thus avoiding the use of maglev while still allowing for speeds which wheels cannot sustain. Linear induction motors located along the tube would accelerate and decelerate the capsule to the appropriate speed for each section of the tube route. With rolling resistance eliminated and air resistance greatly reduced, the capsules are theorized to be able to glide for the bulk of the journey. In the Hyperloop concept, an electrically driven inlet fan and air compressor would be placed at the nose of the capsule in order to "actively transfer high pressure air from the front to the rear of the vessel," resolving the problem of high speed transport in a tube that is not a hard vacuum, wherein pressure builds up in front of the vehicle, slowing it down.[2] A fraction of the air is shunted to the skis for additional air pressure, augmenting that gained passively from lift due to their shape.

The capsules, which are proposed to be 2.23 metres (7 ft 4 in) in diameter for the passenger-only version,[2] are projected to reach a top speed of 760 mph (1,220 km/h) so as to maintain aerodynamic efficiency, and the design proposes that passengers will experience a maximum inertial acceleration of 0.5 g, well less than a commercial airliner on takeoff and landing. At those speeds there would not be a sonic boom; with low-pressure warm air inside the tubes, Musk hypothesizes that the pods could travel at high speeds without crossing the sound barrier.[16]

The initial design envisions using turntables to turn capsules at each end of the tube.

Computer simulation

In September 2013, Ansys Corporation ran computational fluid dynamics simulations to model the aerodynamics of the capsule and shear stress forces that the capsule would be subjected to. The simulation showed that the capsule design would need to be significantly reshaped to avoid creating supersonic airflow, and that the gap between the tube wall and capsule would need to be larger.[17][18] Sandeep Sovani said the simulation showed that Hyperloop has challenges but that he is convinced it is feasible.[17]

In October 2013, the development team of the OpenMDAO software framework released an unfinished, conceptual open-source model of parts of the Hyperloop's propulsion system. The team asserted that the model demonstrated the concept's feasibility, although the tube would need to be 13 feet (4 m) in diameter,[19] significantly larger than originally projected. However, the team's model is not a true working model of the propulsion system, as it did not account for a wide range of technological factors required to actually construct a hyperloop based on Musk's concept, and in particular had no significant estimations of component weight.[20]

In November 2013, MathWorks published a blog post with analysis of the route in the initial proposal. The analysis focused on acceleration forces that would be experienced by passengers along the journey and the necessary deviations from public roadways in order to keep the accelerations reasonable. The conclusion was that the route was mainly feasible. The analysis did highlight that maintaining a trajectory along I-580 east of San Francisco at the planned speeds was not possible without significant deviation into heavily populated areas.[21]

Notional route

The notional route for the Greater Los Angeles Area to the San Francisco Bay Area system outlined in the design document would begin around Sylmar, just south of the Tejon Pass, approximately follow the I-5 highway to the north, and arrive at a station near Hayward on the east side of San Francisco Bay. Several proposed branches were also shown in the design document, including Sacramento, Anaheim, San Diego, and Las Vegas.[2]

While terminating the Hyperloop route on the fringes of the two major metropolitan areas would result in significant cost savings in construction, it would require that passengers traveling to and from Downtown Los Angeles and San Francisco, and any other community beyond Sylmar and Hayward, transfer to another transportation mode in order to reach their final destination. This would significantly lengthen the total travel time to those destinations.[7]

Political and economic considerations

The proposal assumes that cost savings versus conventional rail will come from a combination of several factors. It is proposed that the Hyperloop's small profile and elevated nature enable it to be constructed primarily in the median of Interstate 5. However, whether this would be truly feasible is a matter of debate. The low profile would reduce tunnel boring requirements and the light weight of the capsules versus a train is claimed to reduce construction costs. It is asserted in the design paper that there would be less right-of-way opposition and environmental impact as well due to its small, sealed, elevated profile versus that of a rail easement;[2] however, other commentators contend that a smaller footprint does not guarantee less opposition.[7] In criticizing this assumption, mass transportation writer[22] Alon Levy said that "In reality, an all-elevated system (which is what Musk proposes with the Hyperloop) is a bug rather than a feature. Central Valley land is cheap; pylons are expensive, as can be readily seen by the costs of elevated highways and trains all over the world."[23] Michael Anderson, a professor of agricultural and resource economics at UC Berkeley, predicted that "You're talking $100 billion to build what they're proposing".[5]

The Hyperloop white paper suggests that US$20 of each one-way passenger ticket between Los Angeles and San Francisco would be sufficient to cover initial capital costs, based on amortizing the cost of Hyperloop over 20 years with ridership projections of 7.4 million per year in each direction and does not include operating costs (although the proposal asserts that electric costs would be covered by solar panels). No total ticket price was suggested in the alpha design.[2] The projected ticket price has been questioned by Dan Sperling, director of the Institute of Transportation Studies at UC Davis, who told Al Jazeera America that "there's no way the economics on that would ever work out."[5]

The early cost estimates of the Hyperloop are a subject of debate. A number of economists and transportation experts have expressed the belief that the US$6 billion price tag dramatically understates the cost of designing, developing, constructing and testing an all-new form of transportation.[4][5][7][23] The Economist said that, at the very least, the estimates are unlikely to "be immune to the hypertrophication of cost that every other grand infrastructure project seems doomed to suffer."[24]

Political impediments to the construction of such a project in California will be very large. There is a great deal of "political and reputational capital" invested in the existing mega-project of California High-Speed Rail.[24] Replacing that with a different design would not be straightforward given the California political economy. An alternative location, with what is claimed to be a more amenable political and economic environment, has been suggested in Texas.[24]

Building a successful Hyperloop sub-scale demonstration project could reduce the political impediments and improve the accuracy of cost estimates. Musk has suggested that he may be personally involved in building a demonstration prototype of the Hyperloop concept, including funding the development effort.[12][24]

Related projects

In 1812 the British mechanical engineer and inventor

  • Tesla Motors: Hyperloop Alpha PDF
  • SpaceX: Hyperloop Alpha PDF

External links

  1. ^ Garber, Megan (July 13, 2012). "The Real iPod: Elon Musk's Wild Idea for a 'Jetson Tunnel' from S.F. to L.A.".  
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Musk, Elon (August 12, 2013). "Hyperloop Alpha". SpaceX. Retrieved August 13, 2013. 
  3. ^ a b "Beyond the hype of Hyperloop: An analysis of Elon Musk's proposed transit system". August 22, 2013. Retrieved August 23, 2013. 
  4. ^ a b Bilton, Nick. "Could the Hyperloop Really Cost $6 Billion? Critics Say No".  
  5. ^ a b c d Brownstein, Joseph (August 14, 2013). "Economists don't believe the Hyperloop".  
  6. ^ Melendez, Eleazar David (August 14, 2013). "Hyperloop Would Have 'Astronomical' Pricing, Unrealistic Construction Costs, Experts Say".  
  7. ^ a b c d Johnson, Matt (August 14, 2013). "Musk's Hyperloop math doesn't add up". Greater Greater Washington. 
  8. ^ a b Pensky, Nathan; Lacy, Sarah; Musk, Elon (July 12, 2012). PandoMonthly Presents: A Fireside Chat with Elon Musk.  
  9. ^ Gannes, Liz (May 30, 2013). "Tesla CEO and SpaceX Founder Elon Musk: The Full D11 Interview (Video)".  
  10. ^ Rose, Kevin (September 7, 2012). "Foundation 20 // Elon Musk". Retrieved September 13, 2012. 
  11. ^ Staff; Musk, Elon (June 18, 2013). Tech Summit 2013: Tesla's Musk gears up for sales battle. Reuters Insider. Event occurs at 38:49-43:12. Retrieved June 21, 2013. 
  12. ^ a b c "Musk announces plans to build Hyperloop demonstrator". August 13, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2013. 
  13. ^ Musk, Elon (August 12, 2013). "Hyperloop". Tesla. Retrieved August 13, 2013. 
  14. ^ Mendoza, Martha (August 12, 2013). "Elon Musk to reveal mysterious 'Hyperloop' high-speed travel designs Monday".  
  15. ^ De Chant, Tim (August 13, 2013). "Promise and Perils of Hyperloop and Other High-Speed Trains".  
  16. ^ Vance, Ashlee (August 13, 2013). "Revealed: Elon Musk Explains the Hyperloop, the Solar-Powered High-Speed Future of Inter-City Transportation". Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved August 13, 2013. 
  17. ^ a b Danigelis, Alyssa (September 20, 2013). "Hyperloop Simulation Shows It Could Work". Discovery News. Retrieved September 21, 2013. 
  18. ^ Statt, Nick (September 19, 2013). "Simulation verdict: Elon Musk's Hyperloop needs tweaking". CNET News. Retrieved September 21, 2013. 
  19. ^ "Hyperloop in OpenMDAO". OpenMDAO. October 9, 2013. Retrieved October 9, 2013. 
  20. ^ "Future Modeling Road Map". OpenMDAO. October 9, 2013. Retrieved January 4, 2014. 
  21. ^ "Hyperloop: Not So Fast". MathWorks. November 22, 2013. Retrieved December 5, 2013. 
  22. ^ Salam, Reihan (August 9, 2011). "Alon Levy on Politicals vs. Technicals". National Review. Retrieved September 29, 2013. 
  23. ^ a b Plumer, Brad (August 13, 2013). "There is no redeeming feature of the Hyperloop".  
  24. ^ a b c d e "The Future of Transport: No loopy idea". The Economist. Print edition. August 17, 2013. Retrieved August 16, 2013. 
  25. ^ Anderson, Chris C. (July 15, 2013). "If Elon Musk's Hyperloop Sounds Like Something Out Of Science Fiction, That's Because It Is".  
  26. ^ Beach, Alfred Ely (March 5, 1870). "The Pneumatic Tunnel Under Broadway, N.Y.". Scientific American 22 (10): 154–156.  
  27. ^ "History". Retrieved August 14, 2013. 
  28. ^ Frey, Thomas (October 30, 2013). "Competing for the World's Largest Infrastructure Project: Over 100 Million Jobs at Stake". Futurist Speaker. 
  29. ^ Svaldi, Aldo (August 9, 2013). "Longmont entrepreneur has tubular vision on future of transportation". The Denver Post. 


See also

The ET3 Global Alliance was founded by Daryl Oster in 1997 with the goal of establishing a global transportation system using passenger capsules in frictionless maglev tubes. Oster and his team met with Elon Musk on September 18, 2013, to discuss the technology,[28] resulting in Musk promising an investment in a 3 mi (4.8 km) prototype of ET3's design.[29]

Swissmetro was a proposal to run a maglev train in a low-pressure environment. Concessions were granted to Swissmetro in the early 2000s to connect the Swiss cities of St. Gallen, Zurich, Basel and Geneva. Studies of commercial feasibility reached differing conclusions and the vactrain was never built.[27]

In the 1910s, vacuum trains were first described by rocket pioneer Robert Goddard.[24] While the Hyperloop has significant innovations over early proposals for reduced pressure or vacuum-tube transportation apparatus, the work of Goddard "appears to have the greatest overlap with the Hyperloop."[3]

In 1869 the Beach Pneumatic Transit was an early one-block-long prototype of an underground tube transport public transit system in New York City. The system worked at near-atmospheric pressure, and the passenger car moved by means of higher-pressure air applied to the back of the car while somewhat lower pressure was maintained on the front of the car.[26]

The Crystal Palace pneumatic railway operated around 1864 and used large fans, some 22 feet (6.7 m) in diameter, that were powered by a steam engine. The tunnels are now lost but the line operated successfully for over a year.


This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.