World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Ibn Maḍāʾ

Article Id: WHEBN0015961376
Reproduction Date:

Title: Ibn Maḍāʾ  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Almohad reforms, Abu Yaqub Yusuf, Ibn Dihya al-Kalby, Mathematics in medieval Islam, Córdoba, Andalusia
Collection: 1120 Births, 1196 Deaths, Islamic Studies Scholars, Medieval Spanish Mathematicians
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Ibn Maḍāʾ

Ibn Maḍāʾ
Born 1116AD[1]
Córdoba, Spain
Died 1195AD[2]
Seville, Spain
Era Medieval era
Region Andalusian scholar
School Zahiri[3]

Abu al-Abbas Ahmad bin Abd al-Rahman bin Muhammad bin Sa'id bin Harith bin Asim al-Lakhmi al-Qurtubi, better known as Ibn Maḍāʾ (1116–1196) was a Muslim polymath from Córdoba in Islamic Spain.[4] Ibn Mada was notable for having challenged the traditional formation of Arabic grammar and of the common understanding of linguistic governance among Arab grammarians, performing an overhaul first suggested by Al-Jahiz two-hundred years prior.[5] He is considered the first linguist in history to address the subject of dependency in the grammatical sense in which it is understood today, and was instrumental during the Almohad reforms as chief judge of the Almohad Caliphate.


  • Biography 1
    • Education 1.1
    • Career 1.2
  • Views 2
  • Legacy 3
    • Influence 3.1
    • Works 3.2
  • References 4



Ibn Mada's exact date of birth is a matter of dispute, having been listed as both 1116[3] and 1119[4][6][7] according to the Gregorian calendar. His family was famous within their local community.[6][8] Ibn Mada was not known to have traveled outside of Cordoba prior to his academic study. He grew up in a family of noble origin, and as a youth he seemed to concern himself only with pursuing his education.[7] In addition to religion, he was also well-versed in geometry and medicine.[4]

He moved from Cordoba to Seville where he studied Arabic grammar and syntax from the works of Sibawayh.[1][8] Later, he left the Iberian Peninsula for Ceuta in North Africa in order to study historiography and prophetic tradition with Muslim academic Qadi Ayyad.[1][8] Ibn Mada was most affeccted by his linguistic study, excelling so far as to develop his own independent opinions in regard to disputes among grammarians.[9][8]


Ibn Mada initially served as a judge in Fes in present-day Morocco and later at Béjaïa in present-day Algeria. It was during his initial judgship that he was a teacher of fellow Andalusian theologian and litterateur, Ibn Dihya al-Kalby.[10] Later on, Almohad Caliph Abu Yaqub Yusuf chose him to serve as the chief judge for the caliphate.[6][8] He served in Fes, Marrakesh and Seville, outliving Abu Yaqub to serve under the caliph's son Abu Yusuf Yaqub al-Mansur and remaining as the empire's chief judge for the remainder of his life.[8][11] During the Almohad reforms, he assisted the Almohad authorities in banning any and all religious books written by non-Zahirites during the reign of Abu Yaqub Yusuf,[4] and oversaw the outright burning of such books under Yusuf's son Abu Yusuf Yaqub al-Mansur.[12] Ibn Maḍāʾs adherence to Zahirism has been described by Dutch arabist Kees Versteegh as "fanatical."[4] He died in Seville the Islamic calendar month of Jumada al-awwal during the Hijri year of 592,[11] corresponding to 1196 in the Gregorian calendar,[13] just as he was approaching eighty years of age.


Ibn Mada rose to fame as one of the first to launch attack on Arabic grammar theory and called for its reformation. Although he was concerned with attacking all major schools of Arabic grammar, he was focused on the grammar of the linguists of Basra, as it was the most popular school around him.[14] His attack on eastern Arabic grammar was violent yet reasoned and eloquent, defending his view that grammar as it was understood in that region was complicated, causistic, obscure and artificial; Ibn Mada instead called for building simple and clear grammar based on true facts of the language.[8] Among his ideas which were considered revolutionary both during his life and with renewed interest in his work during the 1950s was the abolition of governance and linguistic analogy.[13][15] Ibn Mada felt that scholarly work on the Arabic language was intentionally convoluted and inaccessible to both non-native speakers and laymen Arabs, and that an overall simplification of language and grammar would enhance overall comprehension of Arabic. Ibn Mada held great respect for the language as the native speakers understood it, and while he emphasized a simplification of grammar he did not advocate a complete overhaul of the entire language.[16]

His Zahirite views in Muslim jurisprudence influenced his views in linguistics. He explicitly denied the ability of human beings to willfully choose what they say and how they say it, since speech – like all other things – is predetermined by God.[2] Because Arabic grammarians during Ibn Mada's time often linked the spoken language to grammatical causes, they earned both his linguistic and theological ire. In his view, the Zahirite denial of legal causality in regard to Islamic law carried over into a denial of linguistic causality in regard to Arabic grammar.[17]

Ibn Mada's reaction toward Arabic grammar and grammarians wasn't without provocation. Both earlier Zahirite jurists such as Ibn Hazm and al-Ballūṭī and some Shafi'ites sparred with Hanafite jurists who sought to justify practices such as Istihsan, anathema to the more orthodox schools, on the basis of grammatical and linguistic arguments.[17] Thus suspicion and antagonism toward grammarians in the east, where the Hanafite rite predominated, had already been started before Ibn Mada began his whole-scale vehemence.



Ibn Mada's mastery of the Arabic language and its subfields was so great that, at the time, he was said to have been isolated from the general body of scholarship in terms of sheer knowledge.[7] His refutation was written toward the end of his life and demonstrated his clarity of thought and independent judgment, causing his student Ibn Dihya al-Kalby to brand him as the leader of all grammarians.[8] His critical views of Arabic grammar as it was taught in the eastern Muslim world found an audience with other linguistic and religious scholars of the western half, Abu Hayyan Al Gharnati being one example.[6] Gharnati also criticized so-called "eastern grammarians" and, after his treatise on the non-existence of grammatic causality, cited Ibn Mada as his inspiration.[18] Although Ibn Dihya, Abu Hayyan and Ibn Mada shared their Zahirite and Andalusian backgrounds,[19] not all of Ibn Mada's intellectual descendants shared these traits.

Thus, while Ibn Mada opened the discussion regarding the competence of grammarians, suspicion surrounding them and the religious implications of their work continued even after his death. In the mid-20th century, the rediscovery of Ibn Mada's Refutation by Egyptian linguist Shawqi Daif caused minor shockwaves.[20] Convinced that Ibn Mada's abolition of linguistic analogy and governance were the solutions to the failure of Arabic language education, Daif used this foundation for his later advocacy of modernizing language arts education in the Middle East.[13] So strong was Ibn Mada's refutation of grammarians that University of Oxford Laudian Professor of Arabic Geert Jan van Gelder referred to Ibn Mada as the Sextus Empiricus of the Arab world.[21]


  • al-Radd 'ala` al-Nuhat
  • al-Mashriq fi Islah al-Mantiq
  • Tanzih al-Qur'an 'amma la Yuliqu min al-Bayan


  1. ^ a b c
  2. ^ a b Michael G. Carter, "The Andalusian Grammarians: Are they Different?" Taken from In the Shadow of Arabic: The Centrality of Language to Arab Culture, Pg. 38. Ed. Bilal Orfali. Leiden: Brill Publishers, 2011. Print. ISBN 9789004215375
  3. ^ a b "Ibn Maḍāʾ al-Qurṭubī as a Ẓāhirī linguist" by Kees Versteegh, taken from: Camilla Adang, Maribel Fierro, and Sabine Schmidtke. Ibn Ḥazm of Cordoba: The Life and Works of a Controversial Thinker. 1. 103. Brill Publishers, 2012. 934. Print.
  4. ^ a b c d e Kees Versteegh, The Arabic Linguistic Tradition, pg. 142. Part of Landmarks in Linguistic Thought series, vol. 3. New York: Routledge, 1997. ISBN 9780415157575
  5. ^ Shawqi Daif, Introduction to Ibn Mada's Refutation of the Grammarians, pg. 48. Cairo, 1947.
  6. ^ a b c d Granja, F. de la. Ibn Maḍāʾ. Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Brill Online , 2012. Reference. 23 December 2012
  7. ^ a b c Kojiro Nakamura, "Ibn Mada's Criticism of Arab Grammarians." Orient, v. 10, pgs. 89-113. 1974
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h Encyclopedia of Islam, vol. III, H-IRAM, pg. 747 Eds. Bernard Lewis, Charles Pellat and Joseph Schacht. Assist. J. Burton-Page, C. Dumont and V.L. Menage. Leiden: Brill Publishers, 1971. Photomechanical print.
  9. ^ Al-Suyuti, Bughyah al-wu`a fi tabaqat al-lughawiyyin wa al-nuhat, pg. 138. Cairo, 1907.
  10. ^ Encyclopedia of Islam, vol. III, H-IRAM, pg. 747.
  11. ^ a b Katip Çelebi, Kashf az-zunun, vol. 3, pg. 355. Ed. Gustav Leberecht Flügel. London: 1835-1858.
  12. ^ Shawqi Daif, pg. 6.
  13. ^ a b c "The Emergency of Modern Standard Arabic," by Kees Versteegh. Taken from The Arabic Language by permission of the Edinburgh University Press. 1997.
  14. ^ Muhammad Abdukhaliq, Ibn Madāʾ Al-Qurṭubi, An attack on Mshriq schools to ease the burden of Grammar ابن مضاء القرطبي هجوم على مدارس المشرق لتخفيف أثقال النحو, Accessed 2008-02-25
  15. ^ Yasir Suleiman, The Arabic Grammatical Tradition: a Study in taʻlīl, pg. 161. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999. ISBN 9780748606979
  16. ^ Kees Versteegh, Arabic Linguistic Tradition, pg. 151.
  17. ^ a b Michael G. Carter, Andalusian Grammarians, pg. 34.
  18. ^ Michael G. Carter, Andalusian Grammarians, pg. 39.
  19. ^
  20. ^ Encyclopedia of Islam, vol. III, H-IRAM, pg. 856.
  21. ^ Geert Jan van Gelder, "Against the Arabic Grammarians: Some Poems." Taken from In the Shadow of Arabic: The Centrality of Language to Arab Culture, pg. 249. Ed. Bilal Orfali. Leiden: Brill Publishers, 2011. Print. ISBN 9789004215375
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.