World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben

Article Id: WHEBN0002682683
Reproduction Date:

Title: Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Proto-Indo-European language, Proto-Indo-European root, Indo-European studies, LIV, Kʷetwóres rule
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben

Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben
LIV, 2nd edition
Author Helmut Rix, Martin Kümmel et al.
Country Germany
Language German
Subject Proto-Indo-European verb
Publisher Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag
Publication date
1998, 2001
Media type Print (Hardcover)
Pages 754 (1st edition),
823 (2nd edition)
OCLC 47295102
415/.03 21
LC Class P572 .L58 2001

The Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben (LIV, "Lexicon of the Indo-European Verbs") is an etymological dictionary of the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) verb. The first edition appeared in 1998, edited by Helmut Rix. A second edition followed in 2001. The book may be seen as an update to the verb entries of the Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (IEW) by Julius Pokorny. It was the first dictionary fully utilizing the modern three-laryngeal theory with reconstructions of Indo-European verbal roots.


  • The LIV's hypothesis about aspect 1
  • Entries 2
  • Indices 3
  • Reception and criticism 4
  • See also 5
    • Other PIE dictionaries and grammars 5.1
  • References 6
  • External links 7

The LIV's hypothesis about aspect

The authors of the LIV assume a dichotomy between telic verbs (terminated: for example, *leh₂p- 'to light up') and atelic verbs (ongoing: for example, *bʰeh₂- 'to shine') in early stages of Proto-Indo-European. Before the daughter languages split off, aspect emerged as a new grammatical category.

Telic verbs were interpreted as aorist forms, and the missing present was formed with various suffixes (for example, *leh₂p-: *l̥h₂p-sḱé-) and the nasal infix (*l̥h₂--p-), all of which are supposed to come from old grammatical forms of uncertain meaning.

Atelic verbs were interpreted as present forms, and the missing aorist was formed with the suffix -s-, yielding the sigmatic aorist.

This hypothesis is used to explain various phenomena:

  • Some verbs in Indo-European languages form root presents (Latin dūcō 'I pull, I lead', from PIE *deu̯k-, *duk-) and derived sigmatic aorists (perfect forms in Latin: dūxī 'I have pulled, I have led', pronounced dūksī, from *déu̯k-s-).
  • Other verbs form root aorists (Latin vīcī 'I have won', pronounced vīkī, from *wei̯k-, *wik-) and derived present forms (vin 'I win', from *wi-n-k-, with nasal infix).
  • For many PIE verbs, various present forms can be reconstructed without discernible differences in meaning (like *l̥h₂--p- and *l̥h₂p-sḱé- above, both forms have attested reflexes in IE languages: Greek λάμπω 'I shine' and Proto-Celtic *laske- 'to shine, burn' > Scottish Gaelic loisg 'to burn', respectively).

In addition to the present and the aorist, the following aspects are assumed:


The lexical part contains for each verbal root

  • the conjectured meaning,
  • reconstructed stems with their reflexes in the daughter languages,
  • extensive footnotes (with references, remarks on alternative and dubious reconstructions, etc.),
  • the page number of the corresponding IEW entry.


The book includes

  • a regressive root index,
  • an index of reconstructed primary stems, sorted by aspect and formation rule,
  • an index of reflexes in the daughter languages, sorted by language.

Reception and criticism

  • Seebold[1] claims insufficient evidence for roots reconstructed from a single daughter language. Helmut Rix insists in the preface to the second edition that the assessment of the evidence should be left to the reader.[2]
  • Seebold also criticises some of the conjectured meanings. Rix calls this criticism basically legitimate.[3]
  • Meier-Brügger[4] tentatively calls the LIV's aspect hypothesis adequate and capable of consensus ("adäquat und konsensfähig"), without agreeing on all of the details of the analysis.
  • Fortson[5] calls the LIV "[v]ery useful and up-to-date – though in various places controversial", but does not elaborate on the controversial places.
  • Ringe[6] states that the theories in Rix (what he terms the "Cowgill-Rix verb") largely reflect current consensus, but implies that some of his phonological reconstructions may go beyond the consensus (in terms of being insufficiently "conservative").

See also

Other PIE dictionaries and grammars


  1. ^ Seebold, E (1999). IF (104): pp. 287–295.
  2. ^ Rix, H. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben (2 ed.). p. 34. 
  3. ^ Rix, H. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben (2 ed.). p. 35. 
  4. ^  
  5. ^ Fortson, BW (2004). Indo-European Language and Culture. Blackwell. p. 99. 
  6. ^  

External links

  • Pokorny PIE Data (University of Texas)
  • by Gerhard KöblerIndogermanisches Wörterbuch (German) (based on the IEW and including laryngeal-based reconstructions, but only as alternative lemmas with cross references to the pre-laryngeal ones)
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.