World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Low-rank approximation

Article Id: WHEBN0034327576
Reproduction Date:

Title: Low-rank approximation  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Biplot, Mathematical optimization, Math, Singular value decomposition, Principal component analysis
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Low-rank approximation

In mathematics, low-rank approximation is a minimization problem, in which the cost function measures the fit between a given matrix (the data) and an approximating matrix (the optimization variable), subject to a constraint that the approximating matrix has reduced rank. The problem is used for mathematical modeling and data compression. The rank constraint is related to a constraint on the complexity of a model that fits the data. In applications, often there are other constraints on the approximating matrix apart from the rank constraint, e.g., non-negativity and Hankel structure.

Low-rank approximation is closely related to:



  • structure specification \mathcal{S} : \mathbb{R}^{n_p} \to \mathbb{R}^{m\times n},
  • vector of structure parameters p\in\mathbb{R}^{n_p}, and
  • desired rank r,
\text{minimize} \quad \text{over } \widehat p \quad \|p - \widehat p\| \quad\text{subject to}\quad \operatorname{rank}\big(\mathcal{S}(\widehat p)\big) \leq r.


Basic low-rank approximation problem

The unstructured problem with fit measured by the Frobenius norm, i.e.,

\text{minimize} \quad \text{over } \widehat D \quad \|D - \widehat D\|_{\text{F}} \quad\text{subject to}\quad \operatorname{rank}\big(\widehat D\big) \leq r

has analytic solution in terms of the singular value decomposition of the data matrix. The result is referred to as the matrix approximation lemma or Eckart–Young–Mirsky theorem.[4] Let

D = U\Sigma V^{\top} \in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}, \quad m \leq n

be the singular value decomposition of D and partition U, \Sigma=:\operatorname{diag}(\sigma_1,\ldots,\sigma_m), and V as follows:

U =: \begin{bmatrix} U_1 & U_2\end{bmatrix}, \quad \Sigma =: \begin{bmatrix} \Sigma_1 & 0 \\ 0 & \Sigma_2 \end{bmatrix}, \quad\text{and}\quad V =: \begin{bmatrix} V_1 & V_2 \end{bmatrix},

where \Sigma_1 is r\times r, U_1 is m\times r, and V_1 is n\times r. Then the rank-r matrix, obtained from the truncated singular value decomposition

\widehat D^* = U_1 \Sigma_1 V_1^{\top},

is such that

\|D-\widehat D^*\|_{\text{F}} = \min_{\operatorname{rank}(\widehat D) \leq r} \|D-\widehat D\|_{\text{F}} = \sqrt{\sigma^2_{r+1} + \cdots + \sigma^2_m}.

The minimizer \widehat D^* is unique if and only if \sigma_{r+1}\neq\sigma_{r}.

Proof of Eckart–Young–Mirsky theorem

A = U_{n}\Sigma_{n} V^{\top}_{n}

where U_n\quad\text{and}\quad V^{\top}_{n} are orthogonal matrix, and \Sigma_n is a diagonal matrix with entries (\sigma_{1} \sigma_{2} \cdots \sigma_{n})

s.t (\sigma_{n} \leq \sigma_{n-1} \leq \cdots \leq \sigma_{1}).

We claim that the best approximation for A be given by

A^k = \Sigma^k_{i=1} u_i \sigma_i v_i

To Prove: A^{k}\quad is indeed the Best approximation i.e. \|A - A^k\|\quad\text{is minimum}

Proof by Contradiction:

Let us suppose \quad\exists\quad B\quad \text{s.t.}\|A - B\|^2_2 < \|A - A^k\|^2_2 \quad =\quad \sigma^2_{k+1}

\operatorname{rank}(B) \leq k \quad \text{(Assuming in Low Rank Approximation, we are approximating via a matrix whose rank}\leq k

\operatorname{dim}(\operatorname{null}(B)) + \operatorname{rank}(B) = n \rightarrow \operatorname{dim(\operatorname{null}(B))} \geq n-k

Let w\in\operatorname{null}(B)

\|(A - B)W\|_2 = \|Aw\|_2 < \sigma_{k+1}

We know that \exists(k+1)\quad dimension space (v_1,v_2, \cdots, v_n)\quad
s.t. V \in \operatorname{span}(v_1,v_2, \cdots, v_n)\quad\text{and} \|AV\|_2 \geq \sigma_{k+1}

Since n-k+k+1 > n\quad Hence a contradiction. So we get that A^k is the best approximation.

Weighted low-rank approximation problems

The Frobenius norm weights uniformly all elements of the approximation error D - \widehat D. Prior knowledge about distribution of the errors can be taken into account by considering the weighted low-rank approximation problem

\text{minimize} \quad \text{over } \widehat D \quad \operatorname{vec}^{\top}(D - \widehat D) W \operatorname{vec}(D - \widehat D) \quad\text{subject to}\quad \operatorname{rank}(\widehat D) \leq r,

where vec(A) vectorizes the matrix A column wise and W is a given positive (semi)definite weight matrix.

The general weighted low-rank approximation problem does not admit an analytic solution in terms of the singular value decomposition and is solved by local optimization methods.

Image and kernel representations of the rank constraints

Using the equivalences

\operatorname{rank}(\widehat D) \leq r \quad\iff\quad \text{there are } P\in\R^{m\times r} \text{ and } L\in\R^{r\times n} \text{ such that } \widehat D = PL


\operatorname{rank}(\widehat D) \leq r \quad\iff\quad \text{there is full row rank } R\in\R^{m - r\times m} \text{ such that } R \widehat D = 0

the weighted low-rank approximation problem becomes equivalent to the parameter optimization problems

\text{minimize} \quad \text{over } \widehat D, P \text{ and } L \quad \operatorname{vec}^{\top}(D - \widehat D) W \operatorname{vec}(D - \widehat D) \quad\text{subject to}\quad \widehat D = PL


\text{minimize} \quad \text{over } \widehat D \text{ and } R \quad \operatorname{vec}^{\top}(D - \widehat D) W \operatorname{vec}(D - \widehat D) \quad\text{subject to}\quad R \widehat D = 0 \quad\text{and}\quad RR^{\top} = I_r,

where I_r is the identity matrix of size r.

Alternating projections algorithm

The image representation of the rank constraint suggests a parameter optimization methods, in which the cost function is minimized alternatively over one of the variables (P or L) with the other one fixed. Although simultaneous minimization over both P and L is a difficult nonconvex optimization problem, minimization over one of the variables alone is a linear least squares problem and can be solved globally and efficiently.

The resulting optimization algorithm (called alternating projections) is globally convergent with a linear convergence rate to a locally optimal solution of the weighted low-rank approximation problem. Starting value for the P (or L) parameter should be given. The iteration is stopped when a user defined convergence condition is satisfied.

Matlab implementation of the alternating projections algorithm for weighted low-rank approximation:

function [dh, f] = wlra_ap(d, w, p, tol, maxiter)
[m, n] = size(d); r = size(p, 2); f = inf;
for i = 2:maxiter
    % minimization over L
    bp = kron(eye(n), p);
    vl = (bp' * w * bp) \ bp' * w * d(:);
    l  = reshape(vl, r, n);
    % minimization over P
    bl = kron(l', eye(m));
    vp = (bl' * w * bl) \ bl' * w * d(:);
    p  = reshape(vp, m, r);
    % check exit condition
    dh = p * l; dd = d - dh;
    f(i) = dd(:)' * w * dd(:);
    if abs(f(i - 1) - f(i)) < tol, break, end

Variable projections algorithm

The alternating projections algorithm exploits the fact that the low rank approximation problem, parameterized in the image form, is bilinear in the variables P or L. The bilinear nature of the problem is effectively used in an alternative approach, called variable projections.[5]

Consider again the weighted low rank approximation problem, parameterized in the image form. Minimization with respect to the L variable (a linear least squares problem) leads to the closed form expression of the approximation error as a function of P

f(P) = \sqrt{\operatorname{vec}^{\top}(D)\Big( W - W (I_n \otimes P) \big( (I_n \otimes P)^{\top} W (I_n \otimes P) \big)^{-1} (I_n \otimes P)^{\top} W \Big) \operatorname{vec}(D)}.

The original problem is therefore equivalent to the nonlinear least squares problem of minimizing f(P) with respect to P. For this purpose standard optimization methods, e.g. the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm can be used.

Matlab implementation of the variable projections algorithm for weighted low-rank approximation:

function [dh, f] = wlra_varpro(d, w, p, tol, maxiter)
prob = optimset(); prob.solver = 'lsqnonlin';
prob.options = optimset('MaxIter', maxiter, 'TolFun', tol); 
prob.x0 = p; prob.objective = @(p) cost_fun(p, d, w);
[p, f ] = lsqnonlin(prob); 
[f, vl] = cost_fun(p, d, w); 
dh = p * reshape(vl, size(p, 2), size(d, 2));

function [f, vl] = cost_fun(p, d, w)
bp = kron(eye(size(d, 2)), p);
vl = (bp' * w * bp) \ bp' * w * d(:);
f = d(:)' * w * (d(:) - bp * vl);

The variable projections approach can be applied also to low rank approximation problems parameterized in the kernel form. The method is effective when the number of eliminated variables is much larger than the number of optimization variables left at the stage of the nonlinear least squares minimization. Such problems occur in system identification, parameterized in the kernel form, where the eliminated variables are the approximating trajectory and the remaining variables are the model parameters. In the context of linear time-invariant systems, the elimination step is equivalent to Kalman smoothing.

See also


  1. ^ I. Markovsky, Structured low-rank approximation and its applications, Automatica, Volume 44, Issue 4, April 2008, Pages 891–909.
  2. ^ I. Markovsky, J. C. Willems, S. Van Huffel, B. De Moor, and R. Pintelon, Application of structured total least squares for system identification and model reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Volume 50, Number 10, 2005, pages 1490–1500.
  3. ^ I. Markovsky, Low-Rank Approximation: Algorithms, Implementation, Applications, Springer, 2012, ISBN 978-1-4471-2226-5
  4. ^ C. Eckart, G. Young, The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, Volume 1, 1936, Pages 211–8. doi:10.1007/BF02288367
  5. ^ G. Golub and V. Pereyra, Separable nonlinear least squares: the variable projection method and its applications, Institute of Physics, Inverse Problems, Volume 19, 2003, Pages 1-26.
  • M. T. Chu, R. E. Funderlic, R. J. Plemmons, Structured low-rank approximation, Linear Algebra and its Applications, Volume 366, 1 June 2003, Pages 157–172,

External links

  • C++ package for structured-low rank approximation
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Project Gutenberg are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.